Uptake of Risk-Reducing Measures, Cascade Testing, and Related Challenges Among Carriers of Breast Cancer-Associated Germline Pathogenic Variants in Mexico.

PURPOSE: Genetic cancer risk assessment (GCRA) provides pathogenic variant (PV) carriers with the invaluable opportunity to undertake timely cancer risk-reducing (RR) measures and initiate cascade testing (CT). This study describes the uptake of these strategies and the related barriers among breast cancer-associated germline PV carriers in Mexico. METHODS: Carriers who were at least 6 months after disclosure of genetic test results at two GCRA referral centers were invited to answer a survey assessing sociodemographic characteristics, awareness of their carrier status and its implications, uptake of RR measures according to international guidelines by PV, CT initiation, and associated challenges. RESULTS: Of the eligible carriers, 246/384 (64%) answered the survey (median age: 44 years). Most were female (88%), married/in domestic partnership (66%), and had personal breast/ovarian cancer history (61%). PVs included BRCA1/2 (75%), CHEK2 (10%), PALB2 (5%), ATM (5%), NF1 (2%), RAD51C (2%), PTEN (1%), and TP53 (1%). Most (87%) participants were aware of their carrier status. When recommended, 37% underwent RR bilateral mastectomy, 48% RR oophorectomy, 70% annual mammogram, and 20% breast magnetic resonance imaging. Challenges hindering the uptake of RR measures included financial limitations (67%), lack of recommendation by their physician (35%), and fear (24%). Nearly all (98%) claimed sharing their results with their relatives. CT was initiated in 63% of families and was associated with carriers being married/in domestic partnership (P = .04) and believing GCRA was useful (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Despite the resource-constrained setting, relevant rates of RR measures and CT were observed. Targeted interventions to reduce out-of-pocket expenses and improve patient-physician communication and patients' understanding on carrier status are warranted to enhance the overall benefit of GCRA and ultimately improve the provision of patient-centered care to both carriers and their at-risk relatives.

Hereditary cancer testing in a diverse sample across three breast imaging centers.

PURPOSE: Up to 10% of all breast cancers (BC) are attributed to inherited pathogenic variants (PV) in BC susceptibility genes; however, most carriers of PVs remain unidentified. Here, we sought to determine the yield of hereditary cancer gene PVs among diverse women attending breast imaging centers, who could benefit from enhanced surveillance and/or risk reduction interventions. METHODS: This cross-sectional retrospective cohort study included consecutive women, unselected for personal or family cancer history, who were offered genetic testing for hereditary cancer genes at the time of breast imaging at three centers (November 2020-March 2022). RESULTS: Among 1943 patients (median age: 66 years), self-reported race/ethnicity was White (34.5%), Hispanic (27.7%), African American (17.9%), Asian (4.5%), Ashkenazi Jewish (0.6%), Other (3.5%), and missing (13.0%). Thirty-nine patients (2%) were identified as carriers of a PV in an autosomal dominant clinically actionable hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC)-related or Lynch syndrome gene, most frequently, BRCA2 (6/39; 15.4%), PALB2 (8/39; 20.5%), CHEK2 (10/39; 25.6%), and PMS2 (5/39; 12.8%). Of the 34 PVs with known race/ethnicity, 47% were detected among non-White patients. Overall, 354/1,943 (18.2%) of patients met NCCN guidelines for HBOC gene testing and only 15/39 (38.5%) patients with an autosomal dominant clinically actionable PV met guidelines. CONCLUSION: This population health approach extended the reach of genetic cancer risk assessment in a diverse population and highlighted the limits of a guideline-based approach. This may help address inequity in access to risk-appropriate screening and cancer prevention.

Profiling the Somatic Mutational Landscape of Breast Tumors from Hispanic/Latina Women Reveals Conserved and Unique Characteristics.

Somatic mutational profiling is increasingly being used to identify potential targets for breast cancer. However, limited tumor-sequencing data from Hispanic/Latinas (H/L) are available to guide treatment. To address this gap, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing on 146 tumors and WES of matched germline DNA from 140 H/L women in California. Tumor intrinsic subtype, somatic mutations, copy-number alterations, and expression profiles of the tumors were characterized and compared with data from tumors of non-Hispanic White (White) women in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Eight genes were significantly mutated in the H/L tumors including PIK3CA, TP53, GATA3, MAP3K1, CDH1, CBFB, PTEN, and RUNX1; the prevalence of mutations in these genes was similar to that observed in White women in TCGA. Four previously reported Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) mutation signatures (1, 2, 3, 13) were found in the H/L dataset, along with signature 16 that has not been previously reported in other breast cancer datasets. Recurrent amplifications were observed in breast cancer drivers including MYC, FGFR1, CCND1, and ERBB2, as well as a recurrent amplification in 17q11.2 associated with high KIAA0100 gene expression that has been implicated in breast cancer aggressiveness. In conclusion, this study identified a higher prevalence of COSMIC signature 16 and a recurrent copy-number amplification affecting expression of KIAA0100 in breast tumors from H/L compared with White women. These results highlight the necessity of studying underrepresented populations. SIGNIFICANCE: Comprehensive characterization of genomic and transcriptomic alterations in breast tumors from Hispanic/Latina patients reveals distinct genetic alterations and signatures, demonstrating the importance of inclusive studies to ensure equitable care for patients. See related commentary by Schmit et al., p. 2443.

Functional and Clinical Characterization of Variants of Uncertain Significance Identifies a Hotspot for Inactivating Missense Variants in RAD51C.

Pathogenic protein-truncating variants of RAD51C, which plays an integral role in promoting DNA damage repair, increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. A large number of RAD51C missense variants of uncertain significance (VUS) have been identified, but the effects of the majority of these variants on RAD51C function and cancer predisposition have not been established. Here, analysis of 173 missense variants by a homology-directed repair (HDR) assay in reconstituted RAD51C-/- cells identified 30 nonfunctional (deleterious) variants, including 18 in a hotspot within the ATP-binding region. The deleterious variants conferred sensitivity to cisplatin and olaparib and disrupted formation of RAD51C/XRCC3 and RAD51B/RAD51C/RAD51D/XRCC2 complexes. Computational analysis indicated the deleterious variant effects were consistent with structural effects on ATP-binding to RAD51C. A subset of the variants displayed similar effects on RAD51C activity in reconstituted human RAD51C-depleted cancer cells. Case-control association studies of deleterious variants in women with breast and ovarian cancer and noncancer controls showed associations with moderate breast cancer risk [OR, 3.92; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.18-7.59] and high ovarian cancer risk (OR, 14.8; 95% CI, 7.71-30.36), similar to protein-truncating variants. This functional data supports the clinical classification of inactivating RAD51C missense variants as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, which may improve the clinical management of variant carriers. SIGNIFICANCE: Functional analysis of the impact of a large number of missense variants on RAD51C function provides insight into RAD51C activity and information for classification of the cancer relevance of RAD51C variants.

Ovarian cancer pathology characteristics as predictors of variant pathogenicity in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

BACKGROUND: The distribution of ovarian tumour characteristics differs between germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers. In this study, we assessed the utility of ovarian tumour characteristics as predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity, for application using the American College of Medical Genetics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant classification system. METHODS: Data for 10,373 ovarian cancer cases, including carriers and non-carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants, were collected from unpublished international cohorts and consortia and published studies. Likelihood ratios (LR) were calculated for the association of ovarian cancer histology and other characteristics, with BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Estimates were aligned to ACMG/AMP code strengths (supporting, moderate, strong). RESULTS: No histological subtype provided informative ACMG/AMP evidence in favour of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity. Evidence against variant pathogenicity was estimated for the mucinous and clear cell histologies (supporting) and borderline cases (moderate). Refined associations are provided according to tumour grade, invasion and age at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We provide detailed estimates for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity based on ovarian tumour characteristics. This evidence can be combined with other variant information under the ACMG/AMP classification system, to improve classification and carrier clinical management.

Maternal Malignancy After Atypical Findings on Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of cell-free DNA results suspicious for maternal malignancy on prenatal cell-free DNA screening with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based technology. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included data from SNP-based, noninvasive prenatal screening samples from a commercial laboratory from January 2015 to October 2021. Maternal plasma was screened for trisomy 21, 18, and 13; monosomy X; and triploidy. Cases were considered suspicious for maternal malignancy if retrospective bioinformatics and visual inspection of the SNP plot were suggestive of multiple maternal copy number variants across at least two of the tested chromosomes. Clinical follow-up on patients was obtained by contacting individual referring clinician offices by telephone, facsimile, or email. RESULTS: A total of 2,004,428 noninvasive prenatal screening samples during the study period met criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Of these, 38 samples (0.002% or 1 in 52,748, 95% CI 1:74,539-1:38,430) had SNP-plot results that were suspicious for maternal malignancy. Maternal health outcomes were obtained in 30 of these patients (78.9%); eight were lost to follow-up. Maternal malignancy or suspected malignancy was identified in 66.7% (20/30) of the 30 patients with clinical follow-up provided by the clinic. The most common maternal malignancies were lymphoma (n=10), breast cancer (n=5), and colon cancer (n=3). CONCLUSION: Results suspicious for maternal malignancy are rare with SNP-based noninvasive prenatal screening (1:53,000), but two thirds of patients who had a noninvasive prenatal screening result concerning for malignancy in this study had a cancer diagnosis. Investigation for malignancy should be recommended for all pregnant patients with this type of result. FUNDING SOURCE: This study was funded by Natera, Inc.

Whole exome sequencing and replication for breast cancer among Hispanic/Latino women identifies FANCM as a susceptibility gene for estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer.

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers globally. Genetic testing can facilitate screening and risk-reducing recommendations, and inform use of targeted treatments. However, genes included in testing panels are from studies of European-ancestry participants. We sequenced Hispanic/Latina (H/L) women to identify BC susceptibility genes. Methods: We conducted a pooled BC case-control analysis in H/L women from the San Francisco Bay area, Los Angeles County, and Mexico (4,178 cases and 4,344 controls). Whole exome sequencing was conducted on 1,043 cases and 1,188 controls and a targeted 857-gene panel on the remaining samples. Using ancestry-adjusted SKAT-O analyses, we tested the association of loss of function (LoF) variants with overall, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, and ER-negative BC risk. We calculated odds ratios (OR) for BC using ancestry-adjusted logistic regression models. We also tested the association of single variants with BC risk. Results: We saw a strong association of LoF variants in FANCM with ER-negative BC (p=4.1×10-7, OR [CI]: 6.7 [2.9-15.6]) and a nominal association with overall BC risk. Among known susceptibility genes, BRCA1 (p=2.3×10-10, OR [CI]: 24.9 [6.1-102.5]), BRCA2 (p=8.4×10-10, OR [CI]: 7.0 [3.5-14.0]), and PALB2 (p=1.8×10-8, OR [CI]: 6.5 [3.2-13.1]) were strongly associated with BC. There were nominally significant associations with CHEK2, RAD51D, and TP53. Conclusion: In H/L women, LoF variants in FANCM were strongly associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk. It previously was proposed as a possible susceptibility gene for ER-negative BC, but is not routinely tested in clinical practice. Our results demonstrate that FANCM should be added to BC gene panels.

Integration of a Cross-Ancestry Polygenic Model With Clinical Risk Factors Improves Breast Cancer Risk Stratification.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a cross-ancestry integrated risk score (caIRS) that combines a cross-ancestry polygenic risk score (caPRS) with a clinical estimator for breast cancer (BC) risk. We hypothesized that the caIRS is a better predictor of BC risk than clinical risk factors across diverse ancestry groups. METHODS: We used diverse retrospective cohort data with longitudinal follow-up to develop a caPRS and integrate it with the Tyrer-Cuzick (T-C) clinical model. We tested the association between the caIRS and BC risk in two validation cohorts including > 130,000 women. We compared model discrimination for 5-year and remaining lifetime BC risk between the caIRS and T-C and assessed how the caIRS would affect screening in the clinic. RESULTS: The caIRS outperformed T-C alone for all populations tested in both validation cohorts and contributed significantly to risk prediction beyond T-C. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve improved from 0.57 to 0.65, and the odds ratio per standard deviation increased from 1.35 (95% CI, 1.27 to 1.43) to 1.79 (95% CI, 1.70 to 1.88) in validation cohort 1 with similar improvements observed in validation cohort 2. We observed the largest gain in positive predictive value using the caIRS in Black/African American women across both validation cohorts, with an approximately two-fold increase and an equivalent negative predictive value as the T-C. In a multivariate, age-adjusted logistic regression model including both caIRS and T-C, caIRS remained significant, indicating that caIRS provides information over T-C alone. CONCLUSION: Adding a caPRS to the T-C model improves BC risk stratification for women of multiple ancestries, which could have implications for screening recommendations and prevention.

Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk Among Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2.

PURPOSE: To estimate the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among women with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. METHODS: The study population included 15,104 prospectively followed women within the CARRIERS study treated with ipsilateral surgery for invasive breast cancer. The risk of CBC was estimated for PV carriers in each gene compared with women without PVs in a multivariate proportional hazard regression analysis accounting for the competing risk of death and adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. The primary analyses focused on the overall cohort and on women from the general population. Secondary analyses examined associations by race/ethnicity, age at primary breast cancer diagnosis, menopausal status, and tumor estrogen receptor (ER) status. RESULTS: Germline BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2 PV carriers with breast cancer were at significantly elevated risk (hazard ratio > 1.9) of CBC, whereas only the PALB2 PV carriers with ER-negative breast cancer had elevated risks (hazard ratio, 2.9). By contrast, ATM PV carriers did not have significantly increased CBC risks. African American PV carriers had similarly elevated risks of CBC as non-Hispanic White PV carriers. Among premenopausal women, the 10-year cumulative incidence of CBC was estimated to be 33% for BRCA1, 27% for BRCA2, and 13% for CHEK2 PV carriers with breast cancer and 35% for PALB2 PV carriers with ER-negative breast cancer. The 10-year cumulative incidence of CBC among postmenopausal PV carriers was 12% for BRCA1, 9% for BRCA2, and 4% for CHEK2. CONCLUSION: Women diagnosed with breast cancer and known to carry germline PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, or PALB2 are at substantially increased risk of CBC and may benefit from enhanced surveillance and risk reduction strategies.

Variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs) as modifiers of breast cancer risk in carriers of BRCA1 185delAG.

Despite substantial efforts in identifying both rare and common variants affecting disease risk, in the majority of diseases, a large proportion of unexplained genetic risk remains. We propose that variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs) may explain a proportion of the missing genetic risk. Herein, in a pilot study with a retrospective cohort design, we tested whether VNTRs are causal modifiers of breast cancer risk in 347 female carriers of the BRCA1 185delAG pathogenic variant, an important group given their high risk of developing breast cancer. We performed targeted-capture to sequence VNTRs, called genotypes with adVNTR, tested the association of VNTRs and breast cancer risk using Cox regression models, and estimated the effect size using a retrospective likelihood approach. Of 303 VNTRs that passed quality control checks, 4 VNTRs were significantly associated with risk to develop breast cancer at false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05 and an additional 4 VNTRs had FDR < 0.25. After determining the specific risk alleles, there was a significantly earlier age at diagnosis of breast cancer in carriers of the risk alleles compared to those without the risk alleles for seven of eight VNTRs. One example is a VNTR in exon 2 of LINC01973 with a per-allele hazard ratio of 1.58 (1.07-2.33) and 5.28 (2.79-9.99) for the homozygous risk-allele genotype. Results from this first systematic study of VNTRs demonstrate that VNTRs may explain a proportion of the unexplained genetic risk for breast cancer.

Development and Validation of a Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score on the Basis of Genetic Ancestry Composition.

PURPOSE: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer (BC) risk stratification have been developed primarily in women of European ancestry. Their application to women of non-European ancestry has lagged because of the lack of a formal approach to incorporate genetic ancestry and ancestry-dependent variant frequencies and effect sizes. Here, we propose a multiple-ancestry PRS (MA-PRS) that addresses these issues and may be useful in the development of equitable PRSs across other cancers and common diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women referred for hereditary cancer testing were divided into consecutive cohorts for development (n = 189,230) and for independent validation (n = 89,126). Individual genetic composition as fractions of three reference ancestries (African, East Asian, and European) was determined from ancestry-informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The MA-PRS is a combination of three ancestry-specific PRSs on the basis of genetic ancestral composition. Stratification of risk was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression models controlling for family cancer history. Goodness-of-fit analysis compared expected with observed relative risks by quantiles of the MA-PRS distribution. RESULTS: In independent validation, the MA-PRS was significantly associated with BC risk in the full cohort (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.40 to 1.46; P = 8.6 × 10-308) and within each major ancestry. The top decile of the MA-PRS consistently identified patients with two-fold increased risk of developing BC. Goodness-of-fit tests showed that the MA-PRS was well calibrated and predicted BC risk accurately in the tails of the distribution for both European and non-European women. CONCLUSION: The MA-PRS uses genetic ancestral composition to expand the utility of polygenic risk prediction to non-European women. Inclusion of genetic ancestry in polygenic risk prediction presents an opportunity for more personalized treatment decisions for women of varying and mixed ancestries.

Clonal Hematopoiesis and Mosaicism Revealed by a Multi-Tissue Analysis of Constitutional TP53 Status.

BACKGROUND: Though germline TP53 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV) are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, many detected by multigene panels represent aberrant clonal expansion (ACE), most due to clonal hematopoiesis (CH). Discerning ACE/CH from germline variants and postzygotic mosaicism (PZM) is critically needed for risk assessment and management. METHODS: Participants in the Li-Fraumeni & TP53 Understanding & Progress (LiFT UP) study with a TP53 PV were eligible. Demographics, personal/family cancer history, and clinical laboratory test reports were obtained. DNA from multiple tissues was analyzed using a custom QIAseq assay (ACE panel) that included TP53 and other CH-associated genes; the ACE panel and eyebrow follicles were assessed in a workflow to discern TP53 PV clinical categories. RESULTS: Among 134 participants there was a significant difference for the age at diagnosis (P < 0.001), component cancers (P = 0.007), and clinical testing criteria (P < 0.001), comparing germline with PZM or ACE. ACE panel analysis of DNA from 55 sets of eyebrow follicles (mean 1.4 ug) and 36 formalin-fixed, paraffin imbedded tissues demonstrated low variance (SE, 3%; P = 0.993) for TP53 variant allele fraction, with no significant difference (P = 0.965) between tissue types, and detected CH gene PVs. Of 55 multi-tissue cases, germline status was confirmed for 20, PZM in seven, ACE for 25, and three were indeterminate. Additional CH variants were detected in six ACE and two germline cases. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated an effective approach and tools for discerning germline TP53 status. IMPACT: Discernment of PZM and TP53-driven CH increases diagnostic accuracy and enables risk-appropriate care.

Cross-sectional clinical cancer genomics community of practice survey analysis of provider attitudes and beliefs regarding the use of deceased family member tissue to guide living family member genetic cancer risk assessment.

Next-generation tumor tissue sequencing techniques may result in the detection of putative germline pathogenic variants (PVs), raising the possibility that germline cancer predisposition could be identified from archival medical tissue samples of deceased relatives. The approach, termed traceback, is designed to inform risk management recommendations for living family members. Provider perspectives regarding traceback testing have not yet been explored, so we conducted a cross-sectional survey of Clinical Cancer Genomics Community of Practice providers regarding their attitudes and beliefs toward traceback testing. Self-reported demographics, provider characteristics, attitudes and perceived barriers were collected. We evaluated responses in the context of whether providers had previous experience with traceback testing. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher's exact testing. Among 207 respondents (of 816 eligible), most were women (89.4%), white (85.5%), and not Hispanic or Latino (89.7%). US-based providers represented the majority of respondents (87.4%). Relatively, few providers 32 of 207 (15.5%) had previous experience with traceback. Among the individuals without experience in traceback, 84.0% thought there would be barriers to implementation; however, only 68.8% of individuals with previous traceback experience agreed (p = .04). Respondents in both groups thought that traceback would be valuable in their practice (82.6%, p = .22) and that they would feel comfortable discussing the concept (83.6%, p = .83), interpreting the results (72.2%, p = .24), and discussing the results with their patients (80.7%, p = .38). Patient interest and cost were seen as less of a barrier by those with experience with traceback testing. Recurrent themes obtained in open-ended responses are also presented. Overall, providers believe that traceback would be a valuable tool in their practice. Individuals with previous experience identified less barriers with implementation of this testing, highlighting an area for future research and education.

Germline pathogenic variants in Mexican patients with hereditary triple-negative breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Describe the prevalence of breast cancer (BC)- associated germline pathogenic variants (PVs) among Mexican patients with triple-negative BC (TNBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The spectrum of PVs identified among patients with TNBC who were enrolled in a prospective registry and underwent genetic testing was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 387 patients with invasive TNBC and a median age at diagnosis of 39 years (range 21-72), 113 (29%) were carriers of PVs in BC-susceptibility genes: BRCA1 (79%), BRCA2 (15%), and other (6%: ATM, BRIP1, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, and TP53). PV carriers were younger at BC diagnosis (37 vs. 40 years, p=0.004) than non-carriers. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of TNBC in Mexican patients is associated with germline PVs, the vast majority in BRCA. The incremental yield of PVs in other BC-susceptibility genes was modest, and a stepwise approach starting with BRCA testing may be justified if it is more cost-effective than multigene panel testing.

Germline pathogenic variants in Mexican patients with hereditary triple-negative breast cancer / Variantes patóge nas de línea germinal en mexicanas con cáncer de mama triple negativo hereditario

Abstract: Objective: Describe the prevalence of breast cancer (BC)-associated germline pathogenic variants (PVs) among Mexican patients with triple-negative BC (TNBC). Materials and methods: The spectrum of PVs identified among patients with TNBC who were enrolled in a prospective registry and underwent genetic testing was analyzed. Results: Of 387 patients with invasive TNBC and a median age at diagnosis of 39 years (range 21-72), 113 (29%) were carriers of PVs in BC-susceptibility genes: BRCA1 (79%), BRCA2 (15%), and other (6%: ATM, BRIP1, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, and TP53). PV carriers were younger at BC diagnosis (37 vs. 40 years, p=0.004) than non-carriers. Conclusion: A large proportion of TNBC in Mexican patients is associated with germline PVs, the vast majority in BRCA. The incremental yield of PVs in other BC-susceptibility genes was modest, and a stepwise approach starting with BRCA testing may be justified if it is more cost-effective than multigene panel testing.

Resumen: Objetivo: Describir la prevalencia de variantes patógenas (VPs) germinales en genes asociados con cáncer de mama (CM) en pacientes mexicanos con CM triple negativo (CMTN). Material y métodos: Se analizó el espectro de VPs identificadas en pacientes con CMTN que fueron incluidos prospectivamente en un registro y se realizó un estudio genético. Resultados: Se analizó un total de 387 pacientes con una mediana de edad al diagnóstico de 39 años; 113 (29%) eran portadores de VPs en genes de susceptibilidad a CM: BRCA1 (79%), BRCA2(15%), y otros (6%: ATM, BRIP1, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C y TP53). Los portadores de VPs eran más jóvenes al diagnóstico de CM (37 vs. 40 años, p=0.004). Conclusiones: Existe una alta prevalencia de VPs en pacientes mexicanos con CMTN y la mayoría se encuentra en genes BRCA. La realización de pruebas genéticas se puede optimizar mediante la adopción de un proceso escalonado para la detección de VPs.

Suspected clonal hematopoiesis as a natural functional assay of TP53 germline variant pathogenicity.

PURPOSE: Some variants identified by multigene panel testing of DNA from blood present with low variant allele fraction (VAF), often a manifestation of clonal hematopoiesis. Research has shown that the proportion of variants with low VAF is especially high in TP53, the Li-Fraumeni syndrome gene. Based on the hypothesis that variants with low VAF are positively selected as drivers of clonal hematopoiesis, we investigated the use of VAF as a predictor of TP53 germline variant pathogenicity. METHODS: We used data from 260,681 TP53 variants identified at 2 laboratories to compare the distribution of pathogenic and benign variants at different VAF intervals. RESULTS: Likelihood ratios toward pathogenicity associated with a VAF < 26% equated to the American College of Medical Genetics/Association of Molecular Pathology strong strength level and were applicable for 1 in 5 variants of unknown significance. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, detection of variants with low VAF in blood can be considered an in vivo functional assay to aid assessment of TP53 variant pathogenicity.

Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes Among Women With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.

PURPOSE: To determine the contribution of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in hereditary cancer testing panel genes to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 2,999 women with ILC from a population-based cohort and 3,796 women with ILC undergoing clinical multigene panel testing (clinical cohort). Frequencies of germline PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were compared between women with ILC and unaffected female controls and between women with ILC and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). RESULTS: The frequency of PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes among women with ILC was 6.5% in the clinical cohort and 5.2% in the population-based cohort. In case-control analysis, CDH1 and BRCA2 PVs were associated with high risks of ILC (odds ratio [OR] > 4) and CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2 PVs were associated with moderate (OR = 2-4) risks. BRCA1 PVs and CHEK2 p.Ile157Thr were not associated with clinically relevant risks (OR < 2) of ILC. Compared with IDC, CDH1 PVs were > 10-fold enriched, whereas PVs in BRCA1 were substantially reduced in ILC. CONCLUSION: The study establishes that PVs in ATM, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, and PALB2 are associated with an increased risk of ILC, whereas BRCA1 PVs are not. The similar overall PV frequencies for ILC and IDC suggest that cancer histology should not influence the decision to proceed with genetic testing. Similar to IDC, multigene panel testing may be appropriate for women with ILC, but CDH1 should be specifically discussed because of low prevalence and gastric cancer risk.

Analysis of the Li-Fraumeni Spectrum Based on an International Germline TP53 Variant Data Set: An International Agency for Research on Cancer TP53 Database Analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a cancer predisposition syndrome that is associated with a high, lifelong risk of a broad spectrum of cancers that is caused by pathogenic TP53 germline variants. A definition that reflects the broad phenotypic spectrum that has evolved since the gene discovery is lacking, and mechanisms leading to phenotypic differences remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To define the phenotypic spectrum of Li-Fraumeni syndrome and conduct phenotype-genotype associations across the phenotypic spectrum. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed and classified the germline variant data set of the International Agency for Research on Cancer TP53 database that contains data on a cohort of 3034 persons from 1282 families reported in the scientific literature since 1990. We defined the term Li-Fraumeni spectrum to encompass (1) phenotypic Li-Fraumeni syndrome, defined by the absence of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic TP53 variant in persons/families meeting clinical Li-Fraumeni syndrome criteria; (2) Li-Fraumeni syndrome, defined by the presence of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic TP53 variant in persons/families meeting Li-Fraumeni syndrome testing criteria; (3) attenuated Li-Fraumeni syndrome, defined by the presence of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic TP53 variant in a person/family with cancer who does not meet Li-Fraumeni syndrome testing criteria; and (4) incidental Li-Fraumeni syndrome, defined by the presence of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic TP53 variant in a person/family without a history of cancer. Data analysis occurred from November 2020 to March 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Differences in variant distribution and cancer characteristics in patients with a germline TP53 variant who met vs did not meet Li-Fraumeni syndrome testing criteria. RESULTS: Tumor spectra showed significant differences, with more early adrenal (n = 166, 6.5% vs n = 0), brain (n = 360, 14.17% vs n = 57, 7.46%), connective tissue (n = 303, 11.92% vs n = 56, 7.33%), and bone tumors (n = 279, 10.98% vs n = 3, 0.39%) in patients who met Li-Fraumeni syndrome genetic testing criteria (n = 2139). Carriers who did not meet Li-Fraumeni syndrome genetic testing criteria (n = 678) had more breast (n = 292, 38.22% vs n = 700, 27.55%) and other cancers, 45% of them occurring after age 45 years. Hotspot variants were present in both groups. Several variants were exclusively found in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, while others where exclusively found in patients with attenuated Li-Fraumeni syndrome. In patients who met Li-Fraumeni syndrome genetic testing criteria, most TP53 variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic (1757 of 2139, 82.2%), whereas 40.4% (404 of 678) of TP53 variants identified in patients who did not meet the Li-Fraumeni syndrome genetic testing criteria were classified as variants of uncertain significance, conflicting results, likely benign, benign, or unknown. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this cohort study suggest that this new classification, Li-Fraumeni spectrum, is a step toward understanding the factors that lead to phenotypic differences and may serve as a model for other cancer predisposition syndromes.

Genetic epidemiology of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated cancer across Latin America.

The prevalence and contribution of BRCA1/2 (BRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs) to the cancer burden in Latin America are not well understood. This study aims to address this disparity. BRCA analyses were performed on prospectively enrolled Latin American Clinical Cancer Genomics Community Research Network participants via a combination of methods: a Hispanic Mutation Panel (HISPANEL) on MassARRAY; semiconductor sequencing; and copy number variant (CNV) detection. BRCA PV probability was calculated using BRCAPRO. Among 1,627 participants (95.2% with cancer), we detected 236 (14.5%) BRCA PVs; 160 BRCA1 (31% CNVs); 76 BRCA2 PV frequency varied by country: 26% Brazil, 9% Colombia, 13% Peru, and 17% Mexico. Recurrent PVs (seen ≥3 times), some region-specific, represented 42.8% (101/236) of PVs. There was no ClinVar entry for 14% (17/125) of unique PVs, and 57% (111/196) of unique VUS. The area under the ROC curve for BRCAPRO was 0.76. In summary, we implemented a low-cost BRCA testing strategy and documented a significant burden of non-ClinVar reported BRCA PVs among Latin Americans. There are recurrent, population-specific PVs and CNVs, and we note that the BRCAPRO mutation probability model performs adequately. This study helps address the gap in our understanding of BRCA-associated cancer in Latin America.

Weight Gain and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain and other anthropometric measures on the risk of ovarian cancer for women with BRCA mutations are not known. We conducted a prospective analysis of weight change since age 18, height, body mass index (BMI) at age 18, and current BMI and the risk of developing ovarian cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, height, weight, and weight at age 18 were collected at study enrollment. Weight was updated biennially. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ovarian cancer. RESULTS: This study followed 4,340 women prospectively. There were 121 incident cases of ovarian cancer. Weight gain of more than 20 kg since age 18 was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of ovarian cancer, compared with women who maintained a stable weight (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.13-3.54; P = 0.02). Current BMI of 26.5 kg/m2 or greater was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers, compared with those with a BMI less than 20.8 kg/m2 (Q4 vs. Q1 HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.04-4.36; P = 0.04). There were no significant associations between height or BMI at age 18 and risk of ovarian cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Adult weight gain is a risk factor for ovarian cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. IMPACT: These findings emphasize the importance of maintaining a healthy body weight throughout adulthood in women at high risk for ovarian cancer.