Comparison of Eastern and Western patients undergoing bariatric surgery at two US and Korean institutions: a retrospective analysis of differing bariatric patient populations.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are differences in both demographics and indications for bariatric surgery between Eastern and Western countries. We compared postoperative outcomes between Korean and American bariatric programs in order to assess how bariatric surgery differently affects these populations. METHODS: We enrolled 540 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and 85 patients who underwent surgery at Kosin University Gospel Hospital (KUGH) between January 2019 and December 2020. We compared demographics, complications, weight loss, and metabolic parameters between these groups. RESULTS: There was a difference in age between the UCLA and KUGH patient groups (44.3 years vs 37.6 years, P < 0.01). Frequencies of T2DM and OSA were also different (4.2% vs 50.6%, 34.1% vs 85.9% P < 0.01. Length of hospital stay varied (1.55 days vs 6.68 days, P < 0.01), but there was no difference in operating time and complications. There was no difference in percent of excess weight loss between the two groups at 6 months (29.7 vs 33.8, P = 0.13). Hepatic steatosis index (HSI) was higher in the UCLA group both before (54.2 vs 51.5, P < 0.01) and after (44.4 vs 40.0, P = 0.02) surgery. LSG was the most frequently performed operation, and robotic surgery and revisions were performed only in the UCLA program. CONCLUSION: There were differences in age, BMI, length of stay, and choice of operation between Korean and American bariatric patients. Also, there were differences in the degree of fatty liver disease using HSI and liver enzymes before and after surgery. There was no significant differences in operation time and complications. These findings suggest differences in bariatric practices and reactions to bariatric surgery in Eastern and Western settings.

Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a major threat to public health and traditional bariatric surgery continues to have low utilization. Endoscopic treatments for obesity have emerged that offer less risk, but questions remain regarding efficacy, durability, and safety. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic bariatric procedures as compared to other existing treatments. METHODS: A literature search of Embase, Cochrane Central, and Pubmed was conducted from January 1, 2014 to December 7, 2021, including endoscopic bariatric therapies that were FDA or CE approved at the time of search to non-endoscopic treatments. Thirty-seven studies involving 15,639 patients were included. Primary outcomes included % total body weight loss (%TBWL), % excess body weight loss (%EBWL), and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included quality of life data and differences in hemoglobin A1C levels. Strength of clinical trial and observational data were graded according to the Cochrane methods. RESULTS: Intragastric balloons achieved greater %TBWL with a range of 7.6-14.1% compared to 3.3-6.7% with lifestyle modification at 6 months, and 7.5-14.0% compared to 3.1-7.9%, respectively, at 12 months. When endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) was compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), ESG had less %TBWL at 4.7-14.4% compared to 18.8-26.5% after LSG at 6 months, and 4.5-18.6% as compared to 28.4-29.3%, respectively, at 12 months. For the AspireAssist, there was greater %TBWL with aspiration therapy compared to lifestyle modification at 12 months, 12.1-18.3% TBWL versus 3.5-5.9% TBWL, respectively. All endoscopic interventions had higher adverse events rates compared to lifestyle modification. CONCLUSION: This review is the first to evaluate various endoscopic bariatric therapies using only RCTs and observational studies for evaluation of weight loss compared with conservative management, lifestyle modification, and bariatric surgery. Endoscopic therapies result in greater weight loss compared to lifestyle modification, but not as much as bariatric surgery. Endoscopic therapies may be beneficial as an alternative to bariatric surgery.

Correlation of Computed Tomography, Pathological Findings, and Clinical Outcomes for Appendicoliths in Appendicitis.

Objectives: To correlate preoperative imaging of fecaliths with what is seen in surgical specimens. Background: Early studies considered radiological findings of appendicoliths as a contraindication for nonoperative treatment of appendicitis. There is no standard definition for what is labeled as an appendicolith radiologically and little is known about the pathological correlates of these lesions. Methods: A single center, retrospective study of a consecutive series of adult patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from March 2021 to February 2022 was performed. The primary outcome was concordance between preoperative cross-sectional imaging description of appendicolith with postoperative gross pathology description. Images were retrospectively reviewed by an independent radiologist, and the presence and characteristics of appendicoliths and appendices were examined. Results: Of 88 cases of appendicitis, 86 were diagnosed preoperatively by computed tomography (CT) imaging. Appendicoliths were seen either on CT or pathology in 45 (51%) patients. Of these 45 patients, a total of 38 (84%) were identified radiographically, and 28 (62%) were identified on pathology. Of the 38 appendicoliths diagnosed on preoperative imaging, only 21 (55%) were confirmed pathologically. Additionally, of the 28 appendicoliths observed on pathology, only 21 (75%) were identified preoperatively on imaging. There was no appendiceal obstruction in 10 of the 40 cases (25%) in which retrospective radiological review identified appendicoliths. Conclusions: Discrepancies were observed between CT and pathology findings of appendicoliths. Not all appendicoliths seem to cause appendicitis. Because the presence of appendicolith influences the treatment decisions, there is a need to standardize their radiological diagnosis and better understand their pathophysiology.

The Role of Releasing Incisions in Emergency Inguinal Hernia Repair.

The majority of inguinal hernia repairs worldwide are performed on an outpatient basis. However, incarceration and concern for strangulation of abdominal contents necessitates emergent repair in order to address visceral ischemia. In the setting of salvageable ischemia, this necessitates release of strangulation of blood supply by the hernia defect and reduction of visceral contents into the abdominal cavity. In certain cases, this cannot be achieved with simple manual reduction, and requires enlargement of the aperture of the hernia defect with releasing incisions in order to allow reduction. We aim to describe strategies for releasing incisions via open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches in emergency inguinal hernia repair.

Short-term perioperative outcomes among patients with concurrent asymptomatic and mild SARS-CoV-2 infection: A retrospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies report high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality among patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). With routine preoperative screening, we are identifying an increasing number of patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19. Based on these prior studies, we hypothesized that patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infections have low perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with operations performed on patients diagnosed with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study of patients with asymptomatic/mild SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection diagnosed within 8 days of surgery from March 2020 to February 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included pulmonary complications and perioperative morbidity. The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention criteria of COVID severity was used for categorization. RESULTS: The initial cohort included 53 patients. COVID-19 infection was detected preoperatively in 86.8%. At admission, 90.5% of patients were asymptomatic, 7.5% had mild COVID-19 symptoms, and 1.9% were unknown due to obtundation and later determined to be asymptomatic. Of the 53 cases, 35.8% were general surgical and 18.9% orthopedic; the remaining 54.7% were other surgical subspecialties. Overall mortality was 0%. New COVID-19 symptoms developed in 13.2% of patients postoperatively, with only 11.3% developing postoperative pulmonary complications. CONCLUSION: Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were low among patients with asymptomatic and mild COVID-19. The risks of nonoperative management should be weighed against these operative risks in such patients with surgical indications.

Incidence and risk factors for early gastrojejunostomy anastomotic stricture requiring endoscopic intervention following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a MBSAQIP analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture is one of the most commonly recognized complications following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The risks involving the formation of early GJ stomal stenosis are largely unknown. The aims of this study are to evaluate the rate and risk factors associated with GJ stricture in patients requiring esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within 30 days after LRYGB. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent EGD for GJ stricture following LRYGB. Data were retrieved from MBSAQIP database from 2015 to 2018. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Those who had reoperation, readmission, and intervention for other indications rather than GJ stricture were excluded from the risk factor analysis. RESULTS: 760,076 patients underwent bariatric surgery. Of these, 184,660 (24.3%) underwent LRYGB and 875 had GJ stricture within 30 days postoperatively. The overall incidence of early GJ stricture after LRYGB was 4.7 per 1000 person-years. The incidence decreased from 6.2 to 3.4 per 1000 person-years during the 4-year period. 85% of patients with GJ stricture required therapeutic intervention. Median (IQR) day to the first endoscopic intervention was 25 (21-28) days. The overall 30-day readmission rate was 40%. 30-day reoperation rate due to GJ stricture was 5.6%. No 30-day mortality occurred. Factors independently associated with an increased risk for early GJ stricture include concurrent hiatal hernia repair (Adjusted Odds Ratio-AOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.2), revision case (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.6), African American (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.7), gastroesophageal reflux disease-GERD (AOR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.5), drain placement (AOR 1.3, 95% CI1.1-1.4), and routine postoperative swallow study (AOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.50). CONCLUSION: The incidence of early GJ stricture following LRYGB decreased at MBSAQIP-accredited centers over the review period. Patients having additional manipulation at or around GJ were at risk of developing early GJ stricture after LRYGB.