HealthSWEDE: costs with sublingual immunotherapy-a Swedish questionnaire study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to compare the health-economic consequences for allergic rhinitis (AR) patients treated with sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) in terms of direct and indirect costs with a reference population of patients receiving standard of care pharmacological therapy. METHODS: Primary objective was to analyse the health-economic consequences of SLIT for grass pollen allergy in Sweden vs reference group waiting for subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). A questionnaire was mailed to two groups of AR patients. RESULTS: The questionnaire was distributed to 548 patients, 307 with SLIT and 241 in reference group (waiting for SCIT). Response rate was 53.8%. Mean annual costs were higher for reference patients than SLIT group; € 3907 (SD 4268) vs € 2084 (SD 1623) p < 0.001. Mean annual direct cost was higher for SLIT-patients, € 1191 (SD 465) than for reference, € 751 (SD 589) p < 0.001. Mean annual indirect costs for combined absenteeism and presenteeism were lower for patients treated with SLIT, € 912 (SD 1530), than for reference, € 3346 (SD 4120) p < 0.001, with presenteeism as main driver. CONCLUSIONS: SLIT seems to be a cost-beneficial way to treat seasonal AR. This information might be used to guide future recommendations.

Epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis patients in Sweden - Healthcare utilization, treatment, morbidity, and mortality using national register data.

PURPOSE: This study is designed to estimate the prevalence of epilepsy associated with TSC in Sweden and to describe treatment, morbidity, and mortality of TSC patients with epilepsy. METHODS: Register data for 2004-2014 was obtained from the National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden. Patients with TSC were identified using ICD-10 codes. Epilepsy was identified using ICD-10 codes, interventions aimed to treat epilepsy, or prescriptions for antiepileptic drugs. RESULTS: The prevalence of TSC was 5.38 per 100 000 individuals. We identified 551 unique patients with TSC, of which 386 (70.1%) had epilepsy. The mean study period was 8.82 years. Antiepileptic drugs were dispensed to 97.9% of patients with epilepsy. The most prescribed antiepileptic drug was sodium valproate. Ketogenic diet was used in 6 (1.6%) patients, vagus nerve stimulation in 23 (6.0%) patients, and epilepsy surgery was performed in 25 (6.5%) patients. The mean number of outpatient visits per year was 4.70 (SD 4.17) and the mean number of inpatient days per year was 3.25 (SD 5.61). The mean number of outpatient visits per year with an ICD-10 code for epilepsy was 1.65 (SD 1.95) and the corresponding number of inpatient days was 2.06 (SD 4.50). A total of 30 patients with TSC and epilepsy died during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of epilepsy in this study was in the lower range of previously reported numbers, suggesting that epilepsy may be overestimated in non-population based studies. A substantial part of the healthcare utilization was directly related to epilepsy.

Treatment of Severe Pain and Opioid-induced Constipation: An Observational Study of Quality of Life, Resource Use, and Costs in Sweden.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common and costly side effect of opioid treatment affecting patients' quality of life (QoL). The combination oxycodone/naloxone reduces OIC while providing effective analgesia in patients with moderate to severe pain. The objective of this observational study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource use, and costs in patients with severe pain who were initially treated with oxycodone and laxatives and then subsequently switched to treatment with oxycodone/naloxone. METHODS: Data were collected by means of questionnaires completed by patients with OIC before and after the initiation of oxycodone/naloxone treatment at different clinical centers in Sweden. The questionnaires included questions on healthcare resource use and absence from work and also consisted of the Patient Assessment of Constipation-QoL (PAC-QoL) instrument, the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D), the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) instrument, and the Bowel Function Index (BFI). RESULTS: The analysis included 37 patients. Resource utilization was lower after treatment with oxycodone/naloxone, in terms of both the number of healthcare contacts and the purchases of medicine for the treatment of constipation. According to the BFI score, patients had fewer problems with OIC after the initiation of oxycodone/naloxone. The PAC-QoL score showed a positive change for patients in both the 96-point dissatisfaction index and the 16-point satisfaction index. PAC-SYM scores was lower after the initiation of oxycodone/naloxone treatment, indicating fewer constipation-related problems. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oxycodone/naloxone had an overall positive effect on patients, consisting mainly of decreasing the severity of the constipation problems, increasing HRQoL, and decreasing the use of healthcare resources. FUNDING: Mundipharma AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.

TOTALL: high cost of allergic rhinitis-a national Swedish population-based questionnaire study.

Allergic rhinitis is a global illness with a well-recognised impact on quality of life and work performance. Comparatively little is known about the extent of its economic impact on society. The TOTALL study estimates the total cost of allergic rhinitis using a sample representing the entire Swedish population of working age. A questionnaire focused on allergic rhinitis was mailed out to a random population of Swedish residents, aged 18-65 years. Health-care contacts, medications, absenteeism (absence from work) and presenteeism (reduced working capacity at work) were assessed, and the direct and indirect costs of allergic rhinitis were calculated. Medication use was evaluated in relation to the ARIA guidelines. In all, 3,501 of 8,001 (44%) answered the questionnaire, and 855 (24%) of these reported allergic rhinitis. The mean annual direct and indirect costs because of allergic rhinitis were €210.3 and €750.8, respectively, resulting in a total cost of €961.1 per individual/year. Presenteeism represented 70% of the total cost. Antihistamines appear to be used in excess in relation to topical steroids, and the use of nasal decongestants was alarmingly high. The total cost of allergic rhinitis in Sweden, with a population of 9.5 million, was estimated at €1.3 billion annually. These unexpectedly high costs could be related to the high prevalence of disease, in combination with the previously often underestimated indirect costs. Improved adherence to guidelines might ease the economic burden on society.