RESUMO
Background: Despite growing support for the distinction between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as separate diagnoses within the ICD-11 psychiatric taxonomy, the prevalence and treatment implications of CPTSD among current and ex-serving military members have not been established. Objective: The study aims were to a) establish the prevalence of provisional ICD-11 CPTSD diagnosis relative to PTSD in an Australian sample of treatment-seeking current and ex-serving military members, and b) examine the implications of CPTSD diagnosis for intake profile and treatment response. Methods: The study analysed data collected routinely from Australian-accredited treatment programmes for military-related PTSD. Participants were 480 current and ex-serving military members in this programmes who received a provisional ICD-11 diagnosis of PTSD or CPTSD at intake using proxy measures. Measures of PTSD symptoms, disturbances in self-organisation, psychological distress, mental health and social relationships were considered at treatment intake, discharge, and 3-month follow-up. Results: Among participants with a provisional ICD-11 diagnosis, 78.2% were classified as having CPTSD, while 21.8% were classified as having PTSD. When compared to ICD-11 PTSD, participants with CPTSD reported greater symptom severity and psychological distress at intake, and lower scores on relationship and mental health dimensions of the quality of life measure. These relative differences persisted at each post-treatment assessment. Decreases in PTSD symptoms between intake and discharge were similar across PTSD (d RM = -0.81) and CPTSD (d RM = -0.76) groups, and there were no significant post-treatment differences between groups when controlling for initial scores. Conclusions: CPTSD is common among treatment-seeking current and ex-serving military members, and is associated with initially higher levels of psychiatric severity, which persist over time. Participants with CPTSD were equally responsive to PTSD treatment; however, the tendency for those with CPTSD to remain highly symptomatic post-treatment suggests additional treatment components should be considered.
Antecedentes: A pesar del creciente apoyo para la distinción entre trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) y trastorno de estrés postraumático complejo (TEPTC) como diagnósticos separados dentro de la taxonomía psiquiátrica de la CIE-11, la prevalencia y las implicaciones en el tratamiento del TEPTC dentro de miembros militares activos o en retiro no han sido establecidas.Objetivo: Los objetivos del estudio fueron a) establecer la prevalencia de TEPTC provisional según CIE-11 en relación al TEPT en una muestra australiana de miembros militares activos o en retiro en busca de tratamiento, y b) examinar las implicaciones del diagnóstico de TEPTC para el perfil de ingreso y respuesta a tratamiento.Método: El estudio analizó datos recolectados de forma rutinaria por programas de tratamiento australianos acreditados para TEPT relacionado a militares. Los participantes fueron 480 miembros activos o en retiro ingresados a este programa bajo el diagnóstico provisional de TEPT o TEPTC según CIE-11 a través de indicadores indirectos. Al ingreso, egreso y a los 3 meses de seguimiento, se consideraron mediciones de los síntomas de TEPT, alteraciones en la organización del Yo, estrés psicológico, salud mental y relaciones sociales.Resultados: Dentro de los participantes con un diagnóstico provisional según CIE-11, el 78,2% fue clasificado como portador de TEPTC, mientras que un 21,8% fue clasificado como portador de TEPT. Al ser comparados con TEPT según CIE-11, los participantes con TEPTC reportaron al ingreso una mayor severidad en la sintomatología y en el estrés psicológico, y menores puntajes en las dimensiones de medida de calidad de vida de salud mental y relaciones sociales. Estas diferencias relativas persistieron en cada seguimiento posterior al tratamiento. Las disminuciones en los síntomas de TEPT entre el ingreso y el egreso fueron similares entre los grupos con TEPT (d RM = -0.81) y TEPTC (d RM = -0.76), y no hubo diferencias significativas post-tratamiento entre los grupos al controlarlos según los puntajes iniciales. Conclusiones: El TEPTC es común dentro de miembros militares activos o en retiro en busca de tratamiento, y está asociado a mayores niveles de severidad psiquiátrica inicial, la cual persiste a lo largo del tiempo. Los participantes con TEPTC respondieron igualmente al tratamiento del TEPT; sin embargo, la tendencia de aquéllos con TEPTC de permanecer altamente sintomáticos tras el tratamiento sugiere componentes de tratamiento adicionales que deberían ser considerados.
RESUMO
Five studies tested the common assumption that women prefer nonconformist men as romantic partners, whereas men prefer conformist women. Studies 1 and 2 showed that both men and women preferred nonconformist romantic partners, but women overestimated the extent to which men prefer conformist partners. In Study 3, participants ostensibly in a small-group interaction showed preferences for nonconformist opposite-sex targets, a pattern that was particularly evident when men evaluated women. Dating success was greater the more nonconformist the sample was (Study 4), and perceptions of nonconformity in an ex-partner were associated with greater love and attraction toward that partner (Study 5). On the minority of occasions in which effects were moderated by gender, it was in the reverse direction to the traditional wisdom: Conformity was more associated with dating success among men. The studies contradict the notion that men disproportionately prefer conformist women.
