Silver Indium Telluride Semiconductors and Their Solid Solutions with Cadmium Indium Telluride: Structure and Physical Properties.

Ag0.8In2.4Te4 (= AgIn3Te5) and Ag0.5In2.5Te4 (= AgIn5Te8) form solid solutions with CdIn2Te4, which are interesting as materials for photovoltaics or with respect to their thermoelectric properties. The corresponding crystal structures are related to the chalcopyrite type. Rietveld refinements of high-resolution synchrotron powder diffraction data measured at K-absorption edges of Cd, Ag, In, and Te and electron diffraction reveal the symmetry as well as the element and vacancy distribution in Ag0.8In2.4Te4 (= AgIn3Te5)/Ag0.5In2.5Te4 (= AgIn5Te8) mixed crystals such as Ag0.25Cd0.5In2.25Te4 and Ag0.2Cd0.75In2.1Te4. All compounds of the solid solution series (CdIn2Te4)x(Ag0.5In2.5Te4)1-x exhibit the HgCu2I4 structure type (space group I4̅2m) with completely ordered vacancies but disordered cations. The uniform cation distribution and thus the local charge balance are comparable to that of CdIn2Te4. In contrast, Ag0.8In2.4Te4 (= AgIn3Te5) crystallizes in the space group P4̅2c with disordered cations and partially ordered vacancies. This is corroborated by bond-valence sum calculations and the fact that there is a Vegard-like behavior for compounds with 0.5 < x in the pseudobinary system (CdIn2Te4)x(Ag0.8In2.4Te4)1-x. Owing to the different structures, there is no complete solid solution series between CdIn2Te4 and AgIn3Te5. All compounds in this work are n-type semiconductors with a low electrical conductivity (∼1 S/m) and rather high absolute Seebeck coefficients (up to -750 µV/mK; 225 °C). Electrical band gaps (Eg) determined from the Seebeck coefficients as well as (more reliably) from the electrical conductivity range between 0.19 and 1.13 eV.

Layered germanium tin antimony tellurides: element distribution, nanostructures and thermoelectric properties.

In the system Ge-Sn-Sb-Te, there is a complete solid solution series between GeSb2Te4 and SnSb2Te4. As Sn2Sb2Te5 does not exist, Sn can only partially replace Ge in Ge2Sb2Te5; samples with 75% or more Sn are not homogeneous. The joint refinement of high-resolution synchrotron data measured at the K-absorption edges of Sn, Sb and Te combined with data measured at off-edge wavelengths unambiguously yields the element distribution in 21R-Ge(0.6)Sn(0.4)Sb2Te4 and 9P-Ge(1.3)Sn(0.7)Sb2Te5. In both cases, Sb predominantly concentrates on the position near the van der Waals gaps between distorted rocksalt-type slabs whereas Ge prefers the position in the middle of the slabs. No significant antisite disorder is present. Comparable trends can be found in related compounds; they are due to the single-side coordination of the Te atoms at the van der Waals gap, which can be compensated more effectively by Sb(3+) due to its higher charge in comparison to Ge(2+). The structure model of 21R-Ge(0.6)Sn(0.4)Sb2Te4 was confirmed by high-resolution electron microscopy and electron diffraction. In contrast, electron diffraction patterns of 9P-Ge(1.3)Sn(0.7)Sb2Te5 reveal a significant extent of stacking disorder as evidenced by diffuse streaks along the stacking direction. The Seebeck coefficient is unaffected by the Sn substitution but the thermal conductivity drops by a factor of 2 which results in a thermoelectric figure of merit ZT = ~0.25 at 450 °C for both Ge(0.6)Sn(0.4)Sb2Te4 and Ge(1.3)Sn(0.7)Sb2Te5, which is higher than ~0.20 for unsubstituted stable layered Ge-Sb-Te compounds.