[Research of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system for primary hepatocellular carcinoma].

Objective: To apply artificial intelligence technology in clinical real-world data of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma, explore the precise treatment of disease and build up artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system. Methods: A total of 5 642 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma admitted to West China Hospital from July 2004 to June 2016 with complete follow-up records were included in the study. A merged model composed of multiple sub-classifiers was adopted to calculate therapy recommendation coefficient, and receiver operator characteristic curve was analyzed. Survival risk and recurrence risk were predicted by DeepSurv algorithm, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were further compared among low, middle and high risk groups. Siamese-Net was applied to find similar patients. Results: The Top-1 and Top-2 accuracy of therapy recommendation coefficient reached 82.36% and 94.13% respectively. In internal verification of West China Hospital, the above-mentioned value reached 95.10% in accordance with multi-disciplinary team results. The C-index derived from survival risk model was 0.735 (95%CI:0.70-0.77), and the difference of Kaplan-Meier in pairwise comparison was of statistical significance under log-rank test (P<0.001). Meanwhile, the C-index derived from recurrence risk model was 0.705 (95%CI:0.68-0.73), and the difference of Kaplan-Meier in pairwise comparison was of statistical significance under log-rank test (P<0.001). Conclusions: The artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support system for primary hepatocellular carcinoma has can accurately make therapy recommendation and prognosis prediction for primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Pediatric Donor to Adult Recipients in Donation After Cardiac Death Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The impact of using liver allografts from donors who are younger than 14 years at the time of donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation in terms of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and graft survival is undefined. To determine if adults undergoing DCD liver transplantation who receive a graft from a donor age younger than or equal to 13 years have similar outcomes to recipients of organs from older than 18-year-old donors. METHODS: Records from adult patients undergoing DCD liver transplantation between March 2012 and December 2015 who received whole grafts from donors after cardiac death were reviewed. Patients with donors younger than or equal to 13 years (group 1) and older than 18 years (group 2) were compared for EAD rates, hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), and graft survival. RESULTS: Records of 60 DCD liver transplantation patients were analyzed. The 90-day and 1-year graft survival rate of both groups was 90% versus 96% (P = .427) and 80% versus 84% (P = .668), respectively. The EAD rates of groups 1 and 2 were 30% versus 34% (P = .806). The incidence of HAT was 20% in group 1 compared with 12% in group 2 (P = .610). Also, 0.7% < graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.8% was also usable for pediatric donor to adult recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Whole liver grafts from donors younger than or equal to 13 years can potentially be used in selected size-matched (GRWR >0.7%) DCD adult recipients.

Response to transarterial chemoembolization as a selection criterion for resection of hepatocellular carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Liver resection for intermediate (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This study attempted to demonstrate the effectiveness of preresection transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a selection criterion for BCLC-B HCC. METHODS: The study included patients with BCLC-B HCC who underwent liver resection after TACE. The tumour response to TACE was evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST). Patients with a complete or partial response comprised the responder group, whereas those with stable or progressive disease were classified as non-responders. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included. After between one and eight sessions of TACE, 141 patients were included in the responder group: 37 patients (15·3 per cent) who achieved a complete response and 104 who had a partial response. The cumulative 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 97·2, 88·7 and 75·2 per cent respectively in the responder group, compared with 90·1, 67·3 and 53·5 per cent among 101 non-responders (P < 0·001). Tumour-free survival rates were also better among responders than non-responders (P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of overall and tumour-free survival were response to TACE and microvascular invasion (all P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: mRECIST may represent selection criterion for intermediate HCC for surgical treatment.

Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection for small unifocal hepatocellular carcinomas.

We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) less than 5 cm in diameter. A total of 289 patients were diagnosed with a small HCC (a single tumor no larger than 5 cm). Among these patients, 133 underwent hepatic resection, and 156 received RFA. Demographic data, intraoperative data, post-operative recovery data, and the baseline characteristics of the 2 groups of patients were compared. The incidence of post-operative complications; 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates; and tumor recurrence were determined. No statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics were noted between the 2 groups. By contrast, operation time (P = 0.003), intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.000), and the length of post-operative hospital stay (P = 0.000) were significantly lower in the RFA group compared with the surgical resection group. The 2 groups displayed similar post-operative complication rates (12% or 16/133 in the liver resection group vs. 8.3% or 13/156 in the RFA group, P = 0.395). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the patients in the liver resection group were 88.7%, 78.2%, and 66.2%, respectively, whereas the rates in the RFA group were 90.4%, 76.3%, and 66.0%, respectively (P = 0.722). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year tumor-free survival rates of patients in the resection group were 87.2%, 69.9%, and 58.6%, respectively, whereas the rates in the RFA group were 85.9%, 66.0%, and 54.5%, respectively (P = 0.327). In addition, among HCC patients receiving RFA, patients with tumors no greater than 3 cm in diameter exhibited no significant differences regarding overall survival and tumor-free survival rates compared with patients with tumors 3 to 5 cm in diameter (all P > 0.05). RFA is an effective and safe treatment option for small HCCs and may be a preferred choice for HCC patients with small lesions.

Immediate radical therapy or conservative treatments when meeting the Milan criteria for advanced HCC patients after successful TACE.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases can be successfully downstaged into the Milan criteria; however, immediate radical therapy cannot be applied to all such patients for various reasons. Of the patients who are not eligible for immediate radical therapy, some accept repeated downstaging therapies and some undergo persistent observation. The aim of the present study was to compare long-term survival between these two groups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 2003 and October 2008, 156 HCC patients successfully received downstaging therapy resulting in compliance with the Milan criteria. Of those, 98 cases accepted radical therapies, including liver transplantation (LT), resection, or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (group 1), and 58 cases underwent repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or persistent observation (group 2). The baseline characteristics, demographic data, downstaging protocol, and information on long-term outcomes were collected and compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the patient demographic data, downstaging protocols, or tumor characteristics between the two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.9, 82.7, and 78.6 %, respectively, in group 1, whereas these rates were 82.8, 65.5, and 48.3 %, respectively, in group 2 (P = 0.046). Among the 58 patients in group 2, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 92.3, 65.4, and 46.2 %, respectively, in the repeated TACE group, and 81.3, 65.6, and 50 %, respectively, in the persistent observation group (P = 0.783). CONCLUSION: Immediate radical therapy should be the first choice for advanced HCC patients who undergo successful TACE, and repeated TACE is unnecessary.

New prognostic model for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients.

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT) is an effective therapeutic modality to treat patients with end-stage liver disease. The aims of this study were to identify recipient characteristics of A-A LDLT seeking to determine variables that affected patient survival. We retrospectively examined a cohort of 154 consecutive A-A LDLT recipients with end-stage liver disease in our center over 4 years. All donors volunteered to give their partial livers with written consent. There were no organs from prisoners and no prisoner subjects. The overall survivals at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 93.5%, 90.9%, 88.9%, 86.3%, 80%, 65.6%, 63.8%, and 63.8%, respectively. About 31 pre- and intraoperative factors were analyzed to identify correlations with posttransplant survival using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Recipient age, serum creatinine concentration, intraoperative blood loss, and graft-to-recipient weight ratio were significant predictors of survival after transplantation. The prognostic index model, which was calculated by combining these four prognostic values with their regression coefficients, showed a c-statistic of 0.706 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.621-0.792) compared with the Model for End-stage Liver Disease value of 0.546 (95% CI = 0.350-0.558). There was a significant difference between the predictions achieved with the two models (P = .012). In conclusion, selecting younger recipients, better pretransplant renal condition, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and graft-to-recipient size match appeared to be advantageous to achieve better survivals among patients undergoing A-A LDLT.

Dual grafts live donor liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure.

OBJECTIVE: This study reports the preliminary experience of dual grafts living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (AoCLF) caused by hepatitis B. METHODS: Two patients who demonstrated acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure and portal hypertension with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores of 42 and 37, respectively, underwent dual LDLT grafts including one right lobe without a middle hepatic vein and one left lobe because the graft-to-recipient body weight ratio of the right lobe grafts were 0.53% and 0.66%. The donors and the recipients have been followed for over 1 year. RESULTS: Mortality and operative complications were not observed in the donors or recipients. At present, the donors and recipients have returned to their daily routine. No prisoners or organs from prisoners were used to obtain these data. CONCLUSION: Dual LDLT grafts including one right lobe without the middle hepatic vein and one left lobe may be a possible therapeutic option for subjects with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B-induced liver failure.

A significant expansion of CD8+ CD28- T-suppressor cells in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The appearance of human regulatory CD8(+) CD28(-) T-suppressor (Ts) cells has been associated with a reduced need for maintenance immunosuppression in cadaveric heart- kidney transplant recipients and pediatric liver-intestine transplant recipients. However, few data are available in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To study the population of CD8(+) CD28(-) Ts cells in A-A LDLT, we performed flow cytometry on whole blood specimens obtained from 20 transplant recipients, 18 end-stage liver disease patients, and 20 normal controls. Meanwhile, we measured the trough levels of immunosuppressants and monitored graft function in transplant recipients. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of the 20 recipients. RESULTS: A significant expansion of CD8(+) CD28(-) Ts cells was observed among recipients of A-A LDLT as compared with a disease control group (P = .000) or healthy individuals (P = .000). All recipients were free of acute cellular rejection episodes. During the follow-up period, no grafts were lost due to acute or chronic rejection. CONCLUSION: Expansion of CD8(+) CD28(-) Ts cells in A-A LDLT seemed to be associated with a decreased occurrence of acute or chronic rejection and sustained good graft function. Based on our low dosages of immunosuppressants for recipients of A-A LDLT, we suggest that this strategy may promote expansion of CD8(+) CD28(-) Ts cells, which can conversely maintain the low immunosuppressant dosages.

Body mass index evaluating donor hepatic steatosis in living donor liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of graft hepatic steatosis is important for the safety of the donor and the recipient in living donor liver transplantation. It is necessary to establish a noninvasive evaluation method to avoid performing a liver biopsy for donor safety. The aim of this study was to identify independent factors that correlated with hepatic steatosis to create a noninvasive method to evaluate hepatic steatosis. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 105 living donors. No prisoners were used to obtain the grafts, all of which underwent postoperative histological evaluation for hepatic steatosis. Preoperative clinical and biochemical variables were examined with univariate analyses, and filtered variables further examined with ordinal regression analysis. RESULTS: Eighty (76.2%) donors showed no hepatic steatosis, 15 (14.3%), mild steatosis, and 10 (9.5%), moderate steatosis. In ordinal stepwise regression analysis, body mass index (BMI; P = .000) was the only independent factor that correlated with the grade of hepatic steatosis. Preoperative biochemical parameters were not significantly correlated with hepatic steatosis. A regression model based on BMI was created to evaluate hepatic steatosis grade. Furthermore, individuals with a BMI > 27.5 were most likely to show moderate steatosis, and those with BMI < 23 likely to display no or mild steatosis. CONCLUSION: BMI can help to identify the grade of hepatic steatosis among living donors. BMI is also useful to select living donors for a preoperative liver biopsy before liver transplantation.

Initial clinical effect of intraportal insulin administration on liver graft regeneration in adult patients underwent living donor right lobe liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Insulin is one factor responsible for hepatotrophic regeneration in animal models. This study assessed the clinical effects of intraportal administration of insulin on liver graft regeneration in adult patients undergoing right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: Between July 2005 and September 2007, 19 right lobe LDLT adult recipients voluntarily received posttransplant intraportal insulin administration. The present study describes 15 patients without postoperative vascular and bile duct complications, with more than 1 month survival and with complete clinical data who were enrolled to receive intraportal insulin therapy (group I; n = 15). Another consecutive 15 right lobe LDLT adult recipients without any stimulation regeneration who met the same criteria were enrolled in as noninsulin therapy control group (group NI; n = 15). Group I recipients were treated postoperatively with intraportal insulin infusion, as follows. An 18-gauge catheter was inserted into right gastro-omental vein during surgery, to administer regular insulin just after the operation at the rate of 2 U/h for 1 week. Graft volume (GV) was measured by computed tomography on postoperative days (POD) 7 and 30. Liver functions and serum insulin levels were also measured at POD 7 and POD 30. The liver graft regeneration rate was defined as ratio of posttransplant GV/harvested GV and posttransplant graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR)/operative GRWR. RESULTS: The rate defined as ratio of POD 7 GV/harvested GV among group I was significantly greater than that of group NI (186.07 +/- 35.40% vs 160.61 +/- 22.11%; P < .05). The rate defined as ratio of POD 7 GRWR/operation GRWR was also significantly higher in group I than group NI (178.95 +/- 35.84% vs 156.56 +/- 18.53%; P < .05), whereas there was no significant difference in terms of regeneration rates at 1 month post-LDLT. Intraportal insulin administration may significantly downregulate POD 7 total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase levels (P < .05). These results suggested that intraportal insulin administration augmented liver regeneration during the first postoperative week by improving hepatic function in LDLT recipients.

Risk factors of biliary complications following liver transplantation: retrospective analysis of a single centre.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements that have been achieved in surgical techniques and organ preservation, biliary complications remain one of the most serious morbidities following liver transplantation. However, factors related to biliary complications after liver transplantation are not completely understood. The objective of this study was to identify retrospectively possible risk factors of biliary complications following liver transplantation. METHODS: Data on 279 patients who underwent liver transplantation between January 1999 and November 2005 were collected retrospectively. Selected variables from preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data were first analysed using univariate logistic regression. Filtered factors with p<0.1 in the first step were further investigated to identify factors independently associated with biliary complications following liver transplantation. RESULTS: The overall incidence of biliary complications was 22.6%. Multivariate regression revealed that biliary cirrhosis (p = 0.038), anhepatic phase time (p = 0.04), and incidence of hepatic artery abnormality (p = 0.001) after transplantation were factors that were significantly related to biliary complications. Use of a T tube for biliary reconstruction and living grafts were not associated with biliary complications following liver transplantation. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that further technical refinement-namely, shortening the anhepatic phase duration, shielding the hepatic artery, and refining biliary duct reconstruction-can reduce the incidence of biliary complications following liver transplantation.

Preliminary experience with indications for liver transplantation for hepatolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the indications for liver transplantation among patients with hepatolithiasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 1,431 consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment from January 2000 to December 2006 were retrospectively collected for analysis. Surgical procedures included T-tube insertion combined with intraoperative cholangioscopic removal of intrahepatic stones, hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and liver transplantation. RESULTS: Nine hundred sixty-one patients who had a stone located in the left or right intrahepatic duct underwent hepatectomy or T-tube insertion combined with intraoperative cholangioscopic removal of intrahepatic stones. The rate of residual stones was 7.5%. Four hundred seventy patients who had a stone located in the bilateral intrahepatic ducts underwent surgical procedures other than liver transplantation; the rate of residual stones was 21.7%. Only 15 patients with hepatolithiasis underwent liver transplantation; they all survived. According to the degree of biliary cirrhosis, recipients were divided into 2 groups: a group with biliary decompensated cirrhosis (n = 7), or group with compensated cirrhosis or no cirrhosis (n = 8). There were significant differences in operative times, transfusion volumes, and blood losses between the 2 groups (P < .05). In the first group, 6 of 7 patients experienced surgical complications, and in the second, 8 recipients recovered smoothly with no complications. Health status, disability, and psychological wellness of all recipients (n = 15) were significantly improved at 1 year after transplantation compared with pretransplantation (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation is a possible method to address hepatolithiasis and secondary decompensated biliary cirrhosis or difficult to remove, diffusely distributed intrahepatic duct stones unavailable by hepatectomy, cholangiojejunostomy, and choledochoscopy.

Estimation of standard liver volume for liver transplantation in the Chinese population.

INTRODUCTION: The accurate assessment of standard liver volume (SLV) is necessary for the safety of both the donor and the recipient in living donor liver transplantation. However, the accuracy of SLV formulas relates to cohorts or races. This study examined the accuracy of a simple linear formula versus previous formulas of SLV for Chinese adults. METHODS: Among 112 patients with normal liver, we created a new formula for SLV with stepwise regression analysis using the following variables: age, gender, body weight, body height, body mass index, and body surface area. The agreement between the actual liver volume (LV) and calculated LV using various formulas was prospectively evaluated among 63 living donors by paired-sample student's t-test and Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A new formula was developed SLV (mL) = 949.7 x BSA (m(2)) - 48.3 x age - 247.4 where age was counted as 1 for those <40, 2 if 41-60, and 3 if >60 years old. The calculated LV using our formula showed no significant difference from the actual LV using the paired-samples student's t-test (P = .653). Lin's concordance correlation coefficient showed substantial agreement between estimated LV using our formula and actual LV. Furthermore, this study also observed an almost perfect agreement between our formula and the Yoshizumi et al formula. CONCLUSION: Our formula, which accurately estimated LV among Chinese adults, may be applicable to adults of other ethnicitis.

University of California at San Francisco criteria can be applied to living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: single-center preliminary results in 27 patients.

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can provide life-saving therapy for many patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who otherwise would succumb due to tumor progression. However, donor risk must be balanced against potential recipient benefit. METHODS: From January 2002 to December 2006, a total of 27 LDLT were performed for HCC patients in our center, including 25 right lobe grafts, and 2 dual grafts. Twenty-four (88.89%) met the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) criteria, whereas 3 (11.11%) did not. RESULTS: Of our 29 donors, the overall complication rate was 17.24%. Two (6.90%) experienced major complications including intra-abdominal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in 1, respectively; 3 (10.34%) experienced minor complications: wound steatosis, pleural effusion, and transient chyle leakage in 1, respectively. We did not observe any donor mortality; all donors fully recovered and returned to their previous occupations. No recipient developed small-for-size syndrome. The overall HCC patient survival rates at 1- and 3-years were 84.01% and 71.40%, respectively, similar to those of patients undergoing LDLT for various nonmalignant diseases during the same period (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although further study is needed to fully assess the risks and benefits of LDLT for both HCC patients and donors, our preliminary results suggested that LDLT offered an acceptable chance and duration of survival for HCC patients. It was not only a relatively safe procedure provided that every effort was taken to minimize donor morbidities, but also beneficial for HCC recipients.

Arterial complications after living-related liver transplantation: single-center experience from West China.

Vascular complications after liver transplantation remain a major source of morbidity and mortality for recipients. In particular, patients receiving living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) experience a higher rate of vascular complications owing to the complex vascular reconstruction. Between July 2001 and December 2005, LRLTs were performed in our center on 33 patients with end-stage liver diseases. The 23 men and 10 women had a mean age of 32.6 +/- 11.3 years (range = 5 to 58 years). Of the 33 patients, the percentage of vascular complications was 9.09% (3 cases), including hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT), hepatic arterial stenosis (HAS), or hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm (HAP) in one patient, respectively. No portal vein or hepatic vein complication occurred in our patients. Thrombectomy was performed in the patient with thrombosis. The patient with stenosis was treated with balloon angioplasty and endoluminal stent placement. The pseudoaneurysm was also successfully embolized to restore the blood flow toward the donor liver. Mean follow-up for all patients after LRLT was 18.0 +/- 5.4 months. The overall postoperative 30-day mortality rate was 6.06% (2/33). The 1-year survival rate was 86.36% in 22 patients with benign diseases and 72.73% in 11 patients with malignant diseases. However, no death was associated with vascular complications. Careful preoperative evaluation and intraoperative microsurgical technique for hepatic artery reconstructions are the keys to prevent vascular complications following LRLT. Immediate surgical intervention is required for acute vascular complications, whereas late complications may be treated by balloon angioplasty and endoluminal stent placement. Embolization may be a safe and effective approach in the treatment of a pseudoaneurysm of the hepatic artery.

Surgical procedures for management of right portal venous branching in right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to describe the surgical management of right portal venous (PV) branches encountered among 104 cases of right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: From January 2002 to September 2007, we performed 104 cases of right-lobe LDLT including 11-donors who had anomalous right portal venous branches (APVB). One recipient had PV sponginess hemangioma. The donor right PV branches were type I in 93 cases, type II (trifurcation) in nine cases, and type III in two cases. Except one narrow bridge of tissue excision, the PV branches were transected on the principal of donor priority: PV branches were excised approximately 2 to 3 mm from the confluence while leaving the donor's main portal vein and confluence intact. In type II APVB, donor PV branches were obtained with two separate openings in six cases; with two separate openings joined as a common orifice at the back table in two cases, with one common opening with a narrow bridge of tissue in one case. In type III APVB, the donor right anterior and posterior PV branches were obtained with separate openings. The donor right PV branches with one common opening in 92 cases of type I PV branches and a joined common orifice in three cases of type II APVB were anastomosed to the recipient's main portal vein or to right branching. As the unavailable recipient PV for sponginess hemangioma, one case of type I right PV branches was end-to-end anastomosed to one of the variceal lateral veins of about 1 cm diameter in a pediatric patient. The PV were reconstructed as double anastomoses in six type II APVB and in one type III APVB obtained with two separate PV openings. In the another type III APVB reconstruction, we successfully utilized a novel U-shaped vein graft interposition. RESULTS: The type II APVB donor receiving a narrow bridge of portal vein tissue excision developed portal vein thrombosis on the third postoperative day and underwent reexploration for thrombectomy. There were no vascular complications, such as portal vein thrombosis or stricture among other donors or all recipients. The velocity of blood flow in the U-graft was normal. The anastomosis between the type I donor right portal vein and recipient variceal lateral vein was unobstructed. CONCLUSION: Right PV branches should be excised on the principal of donor priority while leaving the donor's main portal vein and confluence intact. Single anastomoses was the fundamental procedure of right branch reconstruction. Double anastomoses could be used as the main management for type II and type III APVB reconstruction. U-graft interposition may be a potential procedure for type III APVB reconstruction. Single anastomoses between the donor right portal vein and the recipient variceal lateral vein may be performed when recipient portal vein is unavailable. These innovations for excision and reconstruction of right PV branches were feasible, safe, and had good outcomes.

Safety of donor in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft.

BACKGROUND: The growing gap between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and available organs has continued to be the primary issue facing the transplant community. To overcome the waiting list mortality, living donor liver transplantation has become an option, in which the greatest concern is the safety of the donor, especially in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT) using a right lobe liver graft. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of donors after right lobe liver donation for A-A LDLT performed in our center. METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2006, 26 patients underwent A-A LDLT using right lobe liver grafts in our center. Seven donors were men and 19 were women (range, 19-65 years; median age, 38 years). The right lobe liver grafts were obtained by transecting the liver on the right side of the middle hepatic vein without interrupting the vascular blood flow. The mean follow-up time for these donors was 9 months. RESULTS: These donor residual liver volumes ranged from 30.5% to 60.3%. We did not experience any donor mortality. Two cases (7.69%) experienced major complications: intra-abdominal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in one each and three (11.54%), minor ones: wound steatosis in two, and transient chyle leak in one. All donors were fully recovered and returned to their previous occupations. CONCLUSIONS: A-A LDLT using a right lobe liver graft has become a standard option. The donation of right lobe liver for A-A LDLT was a relatively safe procedure in our center.

Postoperative severe pneumonia in adult liver transplant recipients.

Severe pneumonia in adult liver transplantation (OLT) recipients is a dangerous condition with significant morbidity and mortality. To analyze the risk factors for postoperative severe pneumonia in OLT patients, we collected data from 132 consecutive adult patients who underwent OLT between February 1999 and April 2004. According to the American Thoracic Society consensus statement, episodes of severe pneumonia were observed in 24 patients (18.2%). We retrospectively reviewed the etiology diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of the 24 recipients. Bacteria were responsible for 95.8% of these episodes (23 of 24), fungi for 16.7% (4 of 24) and viruses for 4.4% (1 of 24). Twenty-six percent of the bacterial pneumonias were due to Streptococcus alpha hemolyticus. The mortality rate was 37.5% (9 of 24) for patients with severe pneumonia versus 7.4% (8 of 108, P = .004) for patients without pneumonia. Two cases with hepatorenal syndrome died, and three patients with coinfection by bacteria and fungi died. Acute rejection episodes occurred in 15 patients, four of whom died. Mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy were required in 13 cases (54%). Six who experienced prolonged intubation died. Sputum and pleural fluid cultures helped to establish a diagnosis in 91.7% (22 of 24) of cases. Twenty cases (83%) underwent reduction in the immunosuppressive regimen. Patient age, intraoperative transfusion requirements, extubation time, and hospital stay were fatal predictors of prognoses. We concluded that early detection of the responsible pathogen; timely and specific diagnosis; reduction in the immunosuppressive regimen; appropriate treatment with reliable, effective techniques; and implementation of sensitive culture-based antibiotics was an effective strategy to treat severe adult pneumonia in liver transplantation recipients.

Orthotopic liver transplantation for incurable alveolar echinococcosis: report of five cases from west China.

Alveolar echinococcosis of the liver, caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus multilocularis, has the characteristics of a slow-growing liver cancer. The aim of the present work was to report a series of patients who received orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for life-threatening disease. Our article summarizes the medical history, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of five patients who received OLT between 2001 and 2002. Most patients had a long history of symptomatic disease (iterative cholangitis, obstructive jaundice) and repeated abdominal surgery. One patient died during the hospitalization mostly related to bacterial infection and multiple organ failure. Another accidental death happened 3 months later from heart failure. Three patients are alive in good condition verifying that OLT is a feasible option for these end-stage cases. In general, combination therapy-chemotherapy, interventional therapy, radical surgery or/and OLT at an early stage-is proposed in advanced cases of which OLT has clearly played a vital role. Despite major technical difficulties, OLT for incurable disease is feasible. Specific management is needed to improve the results: earlier decision for OLT in symptomatic disease, routine pre- and post-transplant therapy, reduced immunosuppression, and regular follow-up.