Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Health Commun ; 26(4): 215-224, 2021 04 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33908834

RESUMO

Delaying childhood vaccinations has become a public health threat. Numerous studies have shown that the proliferation of conflicting information about the health effects of childhood vaccinations leads parents to believe misinformation about the outcomes of these vaccinations. To build upon the limited understanding of how conflicting information affects decision-making of health protective behaviors, this study extends and applies the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in the context of childhood vaccinations. This study integrates perceived uncertainty as an antecedent of the TPB model, and incudes the negative emotions resulting from the uncertainty as a parallel predictor for the model to examine parents' acceptance of and engagement in childhood vaccinations. Drawing from a survey of with parents in the United States (N = 405), we found that both perceived uncertainty and subjective norms are strong predictors of parents' attitudes and perceived control regarding childhood vaccinations. Additionally, our study also proved that affective factors and the other three cognitive components in TPB are equally important on the formation of parents' intentions of childhood vaccinations. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in this study.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Emoções , Pais/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Incerteza , Vacinação/psicologia , Adulto , Criança , Conflito Psicológico , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Intenção , Masculino , Teoria Psicológica , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Health Commun ; 36(8): 992-1000, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32089000

RESUMO

Improving awareness and mitigating stigma related to depression have been a concern to both health communicators and practitioners. This study conducted a 2 (narrative vs. non-narrative) × 2 (high controllability vs. low controllability) experiment (N = 242) to test the interaction effects of narrative persuasion and cause controllability of depression. The results show that narrative messages attributing depression to an uncontrollable cause increase identification, feeling of pity, and intention to help. However, the study finds that the positive effects of narrative messages are conditional, and they may be less effective than non-narrative messages when the cause of depression is controllable. Also, the findings suggest identification as the underlying mechanism of such interaction effects on emotional and behavioral responses. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed further.


Assuntos
Comunicação Persuasiva , Opinião Pública , Depressão/etiologia , Humanos , Intenção , Narração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...