The Impact of Social Vulnerability on Alcohol Consumption and Mortality: A 20-year Age, Sex-stratified Analysis from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study of Aging.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) to encapsulate the complex and multidimensional nature of social determinants and their influence on alcohol intake and mortality in middle-aged and older individuals. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA), with 3945 study participants aged 50 years and older. METHODS: The TLSA questionnaire defined SVI (51 items including living conditions, social support, socially oriented activities of daily living, social engagement and leisure, empowerment of life, satisfaction about life, and socioeconomic status) and alcohol intake (behavior as well as type and frequency of alcohol intake). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between alcohol intake and mortality, stratified by sex and SVI groups. RESULTS: Men with high social vulnerability and high alcohol intake exhibit an elevated mortality risk [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.51; 95% CI, 1.01-2.24], whereas notably, women in similar social circumstances but with moderate alcohol intake face a quintupled mortality risk (>35 g/wk; aHR, 5.67; 95% CI, 2.37-13.61). The impact of alcohol and social vulnerability on mortality was more pronounced in men younger than 65. Among them, those with high social vulnerability and moderate (35-140 g/wk; aHR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.50-5.36) to high (>140 g/wk; aHR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.15-4.35) alcohol intake was associated with an increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Various factors throughout the life course of both men and women significantly impact the risk of all-cause mortality due to alcohol intake, underscoring the importance of social vulnerability as a determinant of both alcohol intake behavior and mortality risk.

ChatGPT failed Taiwan's Family Medicine Board Exam.

BACKGROUND: Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), OpenAI Limited Partnership, San Francisco, CA, USA is an artificial intelligence language model gaining popularity because of its large database and ability to interpret and respond to various queries. Although it has been tested by researchers in different fields, its performance varies depending on the domain. We aimed to further test its ability in the medical field. METHODS: We used questions from Taiwan's 2022 Family Medicine Board Exam, which combined both Chinese and English and covered various question types, including reverse questions and multiple-choice questions, and mainly focused on general medical knowledge. We pasted each question into ChatGPT and recorded its response, comparing it to the correct answer provided by the exam board. We used SAS 9.4 (Cary, North Carolina, USA) and Excel to calculate the accuracy rates for each question type. RESULTS: ChatGPT answered 52 questions out of 125 correctly, with an accuracy rate of 41.6%. The questions' length did not affect the accuracy rates. These were 45.5%, 33.3%, 58.3%, 50.0%, and 43.5% for negative-phrase questions, multiple-choice questions, mutually exclusive options, case scenario questions, and Taiwan's local policy-related questions, with no statistical difference observed. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT's accuracy rate was not good enough for Taiwan's Family Medicine Board Exam. Possible reasons include the difficulty level of the specialist exam and the relatively weak database of traditional Chinese language resources. However, ChatGPT performed acceptably in negative-phrase questions, mutually exclusive questions, and case scenario questions, and it can be a helpful tool for learning and exam preparation. Future research can explore ways to improve ChatGPT's accuracy rate for specialized exams and other domains.

Choices of Specialties and Training Sites among Taiwanese Physicians Graduating from Polish Medical Schools.

Taiwanese students who graduated from Polish medical schools (P-IMGs) accounted for the second-largest group of international medical graduates in Taiwan. In 2009, domestic medical students in Taiwan staged mass demonstrations against P-IMG's exemption from the qualifying test before the licensing exam. Although medical circles in Taiwan might still hold prejudices against P-IMGs, little is known about their career development. This study will analyze P-IMGs' choices of specialties and training sites from 2000 to 2020 using data from the membership section of the Taiwan Medical Journal, the monthly official publication of the Taiwan Medical Association. Of 372 P-IMGs, 34.2% chose internal medicine and 17.1% surgery. Although academic medical centers offered 76% of all available trainee positions in a year, only 49.3% of P-IMGs received training there. By contrast, 20.9% of P-IMGs were trained at nonmetropolitan hospitals that altogether accounted for only 5.8% of trainee positions. In conclusion, P-IMGs had their residency training at less favorable specialties and sites. Their long-term career development deserves further study.

The element of family medicine in the mega journal of the family medicine specialty: A bibliometric analysis of the journal, Chinese General Practice.

BACKGROUND: With the evolving specialization of modern medicine, family medicine (FM), also known as general practice, is relatively late in being recognized as a formal specialty in most countries of the world. Because many non-FM specialists were recruited into the new specialty in the early stages of FM specialization, the contents of FM specialty journals might, to an extent, reflect the development of the FM specialization. METHODS: In this study, the voluminous journal, Chinese General Practice, which is regarded as the most representative specialty journal, was chosen and analyzed to illustrate the current situation of FM in China. A total of 878 articles, relating to the journal, Chinese General Practice in 2018, were retrieved from the publisher's web site and the original articles were categorized into FM- and non-FM- related articles by 3 board-certified FM doctors. Furthermore, the first authors, as well as the institutions and regions where the first authors worked, and their related specialties, were also analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 634 original articles, 252 (39.7%) articles were FM related. Only 41 FM-related articles were written by authors working at FM departments: 3 at community health service centers, 29 at hospitals, and 9 at universities. Of the 382 non-FM related articles, 159 articles dealt with the topic of internal medicine, followed by traditional Chinese medicine (36), obstetrics and gynecology (28), neurology (27), pediatrics (27), and surgery (21). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, FM publications in China in the study year, as exemplified by Chinese General Practice, were mostly contributed by non-FM authors dealing with non-FM topics. A transition to more FM-oriented development might be anticipated in the near future.