RESUMO
Objective This study aimed to analyze the knowledge, attitude, behavior, and practice of pneumococcal vaccination in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Methods From January to March 2018, 3000 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomly selected from patients with type 2 diabetes registered and managed in community health service centers to participate in a questionnaire survey, using multi-stage cluster random sampling. The questionnaire included basic information, pneumococcal vaccine awareness, and pneumococcal vaccination status and inoculation intention, 2896 valid questionnaires were collected. The chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the knowledge, attitude, behavior, and practice and influencing factors of pneumococcal vaccination. Results Of all the patients, 1267 (43.75％) patients with type 2 diabetes were willing to receive pneumococcal vaccination, and 23 (0.79％) patients with type 2 diabetes were vaccinated against pneumococcal, 1295(44.72％) patients with type 2 diabetes believed that patients with chronic diseases were susceptible to pneumococcal. Eight hundred seventy-seven (30.38％) patients believed that pneumococcal vaccination for chronic disease patients could reduce the risk of outpatient, hospitalization and death. Seven hundred ninety-nine (27.59％) patients believed that diabetic patients were the primary recipients of the pneumococcal vaccine. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that retired patients; those who thought that patients with chronic diseases were susceptible to pneumonia; those who thought that pneumococcal vaccination could reduce the risk of needing outpatient care, hospitalization, and death;and those who thought that diabetes was the priority of pneumococcal vaccination were more willing to receive pneumococcal vaccination (OR=1.442, 0.764, 1.494, 1.713, P all<0.05). Conclusion Patients with type 2 diabetes in Shenzhen have lower pneumococcal vaccine awareness, inoculation intention, and vaccination rates. Health education on the prevention of diabetes complications and pneumococcal vaccination should be promoted.
RESUMO
Objective@#To evaluate the effect of lifestyle intervention among high risk group of chronic diseases in Shenzhen Futian district.@*Methods@#12 out of 115 communities were randomly selected in Futian district of Shenzhen city from October to November, 2013, and 1 923 cases were screened by multiple ways as high risk groups of chronic diseases. High risk groups of chronic diseases were divided into intervention group (1 338 cases, from five residential communities and three villages within city) and control group (585 cases, from four residential communities). The intervention group received group based health education activities as well as lifestyle intervention. The intervention group was provided with health management which was mainly lifestyle intervention. No intervention was implemented in the control group. All participants were followed up over two years. 1 563 participants (1 002 in intervention group and 561 in control group) were followed up from October to November, 2015. The changes of lifestyle related outcome indicators were analyzed to examine the effect of intervention.@*Results@#In the intervention group, 21.8% (219 persons) in high risk groups of chronic diseases became healthy individuals and 15.2% (152 persons) became patients with chronic diseases. In the control group, 9.6% (54 persons) in high risk groups of chronic diseases became healthy individuals and 20.5% (115 persons) became patients with chronic diseases. The outcome of the intervention group was better than that of the control group and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=-5.67, P<0.001). The proportion of people who knew how to correctly use of oil control pot in the intervention group increased from 61.00% (61/100) to 80.00% (280/350). The proportion of people who took oil control measures in the intervention group increased from 36.43% (365/1 002) to 56.99%(571/1 002). The changes in the intervention group were statistically different (P<0.001), but there was no statistical difference in the control group over the years (P>0.05). The proportion of people who knew how to correctly use of the salt restriction spoon increased from 81.95% (109/133) to 97.99% (342/349). The proportion of people who took salt control measures increased from 45.61% (457/1 002) to 62.67% (628/1 002) in the intervention group. The changes in the intervention group were statistically different (P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the control group over the years (P>0.05).@*Conclusion@#The proportion of people who adopted healthy lifestyles has increased after 2 years intervention and the lifestyle intervention demonstrated good effect.
RESUMO
Objective@#To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of intervention and management of the patients with dyslipidemia in some districts in Shenzhen and provide health economic basis for prevention and control of dyslipidemia.@*Methods@#We conducted a comprehensive community intervention among patients for dyslipidemia management, enrolling 204 cases of dyslipidemia in the intervention group and 200 cases in the control group through multi-stage cluster random sampling. We collected baseline and intervention data, such as the cost of institutional intervention (labor costs, office expenses, material expenses, loss of low-value consumables, service costs, and depreciation of fixed assets), patient costs (direct and indirect medical costs), effect indicators (lipid control rate, lipid improvement rate, and lipid exacerbation rate) to analyze cost-effectiveness.@*Results@#After 12 months of the comprehensive community intervention, the total cost for the intervention group was 1 321.62 yuan per capita; the cost per patient was 973.33 yuan; and per capita institutional cost was 348.29 yuan. Total cholesterol, triglyceide, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol of intervention group decreased by 0.43 mmol/L, 0.16 mmol/L, and 0.42 mmol/L, respectively, after the intervention, and there was a significant difference before and after the intervention (P<0.05). After intervention, the intervention group lipid control rate was 17.6%, the lipid improvement rate was 48.0%, and the lipid exacerbation rate was 7.4%, whereas those of the control group were 10.5%, 22.5%, and 16.0%, respectively. The lipid control rate and improvement rate in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, and the lipid exacerbation rate was lower than that of the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (χ2=43.774, P<0.001). Patients in the control group had a unit cost of 81.17 yuan for 1% of blood lipid control rate and 37.88 yuan for one unit of blood lipid improvement rate. The corresponding per capita cost of the intervention group was 74.87 yuan and 27.51 yuan, respectively. The intervention group's cost-effect ratio was lower than that of the control group and had good cost-effectiveness.@*Conclusions@#The comprehensive community intervention and management of patients with dyslipidemia was effective in terms of health economics and it is worth the long-term implementation and promotion in the community health service center.
