Area Deprivation and Disease Severity in Adult Patients With Discoid Lupus Erythematosus.

Importance: The association of area deprivation with outcomes in discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) remains poorly understood. Objective: To determine the association between US Census block measures of deprivation and disease severity in adult patients with DLE. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 154 patients with DLE seen between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2024, at a single-center referral-based specialty rheumatologic-dermatology clinic in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Patients were aged 18 to 73 years and were enrolled in the University of Pennsylvania's Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Database study. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2024, and May 8, 2024. Exposures: Residence in a highly disadvantaged area as geocoded by a state area deprivation index (ADI). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was DLE disease severity as codified by the validated Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) damage and activity scores. Results: A total of 154 adult patients with DLE (128 women [83%] and 26 men [17%]; mean [SD] age, 43 [13] years; 6 [4%] Asian individuals, 98 [64%] Black individuals, 2 [1%] Hispanic individuals, 46 [30%] White individuals, and 2 individuals [1%] with other race or ethnicity; 78 [51%] with an ADI >5; 43 who currently smoked [28%];and 56 [36%] with concurrent systemic lupus erythematosus) were included in the analysis. By multivariable logistic regression, residence within communities with an ADI greater than 5 was associated with nearly 4-fold greater odds of moderate to severe damage (odds ratio [OR], 3.90; 95% CI, 1.27-12.69] and activity (OR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.27-9.44). Concurrent cigarette smoking was similarly associated with greater odds of moderate to severe damage (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.09-10.29). After controlling for ADI and other confounders, race was not significantly associated with DLE disease severity. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that geospatial disadvantage is associated with DLE disease severity independent of race. This invites a paradigm shift that considers the social context within which racial disparities are observed, highlighting the potential for geographically targeted interventions and policy changes to improve patient outcomes in DLE.

Plain Language Summary of the PAISLEY study: deucravacitinib as a treatment for people with systemic lupus erythematosus.

What is this summary about?This plain language summary describes the results of the phase 2 study called PAISLEY which tested deucravacitinib, a new medicine under investigation before approval, in people living with lupus. In this trial, researchers wanted to find out if deucravacitinib would be safe and reduce the symptoms and disease activity in people living with lupus. PAISLEY looked at the type of lupus known as systemic lupus erythematosus, shortened to SLE.What happened in the study?The study included 363 people from 17 countries who had SLE and were between 18 and 75 years of age. The participants were divided into 4 groups at random. One group was given placebo (a fake or dummy pill that contains no medicine) and the other 3 groups took deucravacitinib, a pill taken by mouth. Each of the groups taking deucravacitinib took a different dose, either 3 milligrams (mg) twice daily, 6 mg twice daily, or 12 mg once daily. After 32 and 48 weeks, researchers measured the number of people in each group who had improvements in their SLE symptoms and disease activity, as measured by different tests. They also looked at any side effects people experienced, which may or may not have been caused by the medicine.What do the results mean?After 32 weeks of treatment, SLE symptoms and disease activity improved in more people in each of the deucravacitinib dose groups compared with the people taking placebo (the dummy pill). After 48 weeks of treatment, SLE symptoms and disease activity were still improved in more people taking deucravacitinib compared with people taking placebo, and this was measured in several different ways. The best results were seen in people taking deucravacitinib 3 mg twice daily. The number of serious side effects was similar for people taking deucravacitinib and those taking placebo. The most common side effects that were seen in people taking deucravacitinib were infections such as sore throat, cough, or bronchitis (upper respiratory tract), infltion in the nose (nasopharyngitis), headaches, and urinary tract infections. More people taking deucravacitinib than placebo had acne, rash, and cold sores (oral herpes). These were not serious and did not have any long-term effects on patient health or lead to patients stopping treatment.How to say (double click sound icon to play sound)… Systemic lupus erythematosus: SIS-teh-MIC LOO-puhs Eh-RE-the-ma-TOE-susDeucravacitinib: doo-KRAV-a-sih-ti-nibEnzyme: EN-zimeInterferon: in-tur-FER-onPlacebo: pluh-SEE-bohTyrosine kinase: TY-ruh-seen KY-naysTYK2: TIK-tu.

Study Design of a Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Dupilumab in Adults with Bullous Pemphigoid: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT.

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare, autoimmune, blistering skin disease associated with high disease burden, profoundly decreased quality of life and increased morbidity. Emerging evidence supports an important role for type 2 inflammation in disease pathogenesis. Current management relies on topical and/or systemic corticosteroids, non-selective immunosuppressants and antibiotics with anti-inflammatory properties, which are all limited by side effects and toxicities. Therefore, targeted, efficacious and safe therapies are needed. Dupilumab blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation. Several reports of patients successfully treated with dupilumab have been published; however, dupilumab has not been formally assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. OBJECTIVES: We report the design of LIBERTY-BP ADEPT, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults with BP. METHODS: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT comprises a 35-day screening, 52-week treatment and 12-week follow-up period. Approximately 98 adults aged 18-90 years with moderate-to-severe BP are being enrolled at 51 sites on 4 continents and randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo every 2 weeks. All participants will receive concomitant oral corticosteroids (OCS). PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving complete remission off steroid therapy at week 36. Key secondary endpoints include total cumulative OCS dose to week 36, percent change and proportion of patients with ≥ 4-point reduction in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline to week 36 and percent change in Bullous Pemphigoid Area Index score from baseline to week 36. CONCLUSION: The trial results will provide evidence on whether the efficacy and safety of dupilumab support its use as a potential novel treatment approach for BP and will provide new insights into the role of type 2 inflammation in BP pathogenesis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04206553.

Performance of the 2017 EULAR/ACR Classification Criteria for adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and their major subgroups: a scoping review.

The 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for adult/juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) were established using a data-driven approach by an international group of myositis experts to allow classification of IIM and its major subtypes. Since their publication, the performance of the criteria has been tested in multiple cohorts worldwide and significant limitations have been identified. Moreover, the understanding and classification of IIM have evolved since 2017. This scoping review was undertaken as part of a large international project to revise the EULAR/ACR criteria and aims to i) summarise the evidence from the current literature on the performance characteristics of the 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria in various cohorts and IIM subtypes, and ii) delineate the factors that need to be considered in the revision of the classification criteria. A systematic search of Medline (via PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and conference abstract archives was conducted independently by three investigators for studies on the EULAR/ACR criteria published between October 2017 and January 2023. This scoping review of 19 articles and 13 abstracts revealed overall good performance characteristics of the EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM, yet deficiencies in lack of inclusion of certain IIM subtypes, such as immune mediated necrotising myopathy, amyopathic dermatomyositis, antisynthetase syndrome and overlap myositis. Published modifications that may improve the performance characteristics of the criteria for classification of IIM subtypes were also summarised. The results of this review suggest that a revision of the EULAR/ACR criteria is warranted.

Efficacy and Safety of Rilzabrutinib in Pemphigus: PEGASUS Phase 3 Randomized Study.

TRIAL DESIGN: Pemphigus is a rare but life-threatening autoimmune disease requiring long-term treatment that minimizes corticosteroid (CS) exposure while providing consistent disease control. The phase 2 pemphigus study of oral, reversible, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor rilzabrutinib demonstrated rapid and sustained efficacy with well-tolerated safety. METHODS: Adults (aged 18-80 years) were randomized 1:1 to 400 mg rilzabrutinib (n = 65) or placebo (n = 66) twice daily (with CS ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/d) for 37 weeks in the phase 3 PEGASUS study in moderate-to-severe pemphigus vulgaris/pemphigus foliaceus. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of complete remission from week 29 to week 37 with the amended endpoint CS dose ≤10 mg/d was not significant for 13 of 54 (24%) rilzabrutinib versus 10 of 55 (18%) placebo patients with PV (P = .45). Secondary endpoints showed numerical but nonsignificant improvements with rilzabrutinib (vs placebo) in reduced CS use, prolonged complete remission duration, and faster time to first complete remission. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, rilzabrutinib was well-tolerated, with similar adverse events reported in both groups. Using minimal CS dose ≤10 mg/d and excluding remote observations, the primary efficacy endpoint was not met. However, results from a prespecified sensitivity analysis using CS dose ≤5 mg/d, considering all observations, and including all patients support Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition as a viable therapeutic approach for pemphigus.

International exchange on the clinical practice and research of rheumatic skin diseases: A report of the 5th International Conference of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus.

The 5th International Conference of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus was held in Tokyo, Japan on May 9 and 10, 2023. The latest topics on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and scleroderma (systemic sclerosis, morphea) were presented by experts in each field and new developments discussed. In these rheumatic skin diseases, many clinical trials of novel therapies targeting cytokines, signaling molecules, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, B cells, and other molecules are currently underway, and standardization of outcome assessment was discussed. In addition, the selection of the therapeutic agents available for the diversity of each case is becoming more important, together with the ongoing pathophysiological analysis of the diseases. The achievements of this conference will further promote the development of clinical practice and research in rheumatic skin diseases through international exchange among researchers. We hope that by reporting a summary of the conference in this manuscript, we can share its contents with readers.

An update on clinical trials for cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) comprises dermatologic manifestations that may occur independently or with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite advancements in refining CLE classification, establishing precise subtype criteria remains challenging due to overlapping presentations and difficulty in distinguishing morphology. Current treatments encompass preventive measures, topical therapies, and systemic approaches. Hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids are the sole US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for CLE, with numerous off-label treatments available. However, these treatments are often not covered by insurance, imposing a significant financial burden on patients. The exclusion of most CLE patients, particularly those without concurrent SLE, from trials designed for SLE has resulted in a lack of targeted treatments for CLE. To develop effective CLE treatments, validated outcome measures for tracking patient responsiveness are essential. The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index is widely utilized for its reliability, validity, and ability to differentiate between skin activity and damage. In contrast, the FDA mandates the use of the Investigator's Global Assessment, a five-point Likert scale related to lesion characteristics, for skin-related therapeutic trials. It requires the disease to resolve or almost completely resolve to demonstrate improvement, which can be difficult when there is residual erythema or incomplete clearance that is meaningfully improved from a patient perspective. Various classes of skin lupus medications target diverse pathways, allowing tailored treatment based on the patient's lupus inflammatory profile, resulting in improved outcomes. Promising targeted therapeutic drugs include anifrolumab (anti-type 1 interferon), deucravacitinib (allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor), litifilimab (plasmacytoid dendritic cell-directed therapy), iberdomide (cereblon-targeting ligand), and belimumab (B-cell directed therapy). Despite the significant impact of CLE on quality of life, therapeutic options remain inadequate. While promising treatments for cutaneous lupus are emerging, it is crucial to underscore the urgency for skin-focused treatment outcomes and the implementation of validated measures to assess therapeutic effectiveness in clinical trials.

Collaborative research in myositis-related disorders: MIHRA, a global shared community model.

Myositis International Health and Research Collaborative Alliance (MIHRA) is a newly formed purpose-built non-profit charitable research organization dedicated to accelerating international clinical trial readiness, global professional and lay education, career development and rare disease advocacy in IIM-related disorders. In its long form, the name expresses the community's scope of engagement and intent. In its abbreviation, MIHRA, conveys linguistic roots across many languages, that reflects the IIM community's spirit with meanings such as kindness, community, goodness, and peace. MIHRA unites the global multi-disciplinary community of adult and pediatric healthcare professionals, researchers, patient advisors and networks focused on conducting research in and providing care for pediatric and adult IIM-related disorders to ultimately find a cure. MIHRA serves as a resourced platform for collaborative efforts in investigator-initiated projects, consensus guidelines for IIM assessment and treatment, and IIM-specific career development through connecting research networks.MIHRA's infrastructure, mission, programming and operations are designed to address challenges unique to rare disease communities and aspires to contribute toward transformative models of rare disease research such as global expansion and inclusivity, utilization of community resources, streamlining ethics and data-sharing policies to facilitate collaborative research. Herein, summarises MIHRA operational cores, missions, vision, programming and provision of community resources to sustain, accelerate and grow global collaborative research in myositis-related disorders.

Clinical characteristics and symptom progression of dermatomyositis subtypes: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database.

BACKGROUND: Disease characteristics of classic dermatomyositis (DM) and clinically amyopathic DM (CADM) are well established, but there exists limited knowledge on the disease progression of these subtypes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to longitudinally track and characterize classic DM and CADM patients who experience changes in disease presentation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 269 DM patients from a longitudinal database. RESULTS: A total of 51% of the patients had classic DM and 49% had CADM. Forty percent of the classic DM patients became postmyopathic (PmDM). Median Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity (CDASI-A) score was lower in PmDM patients than in classic DM patients (13.0 vs 16.0), but 45% of the PmDM patients had CDASI-A scores > 14. Five percent of the CADM patients developed muscle involvement. Compared with CADM patients, those who developed muscle symptoms had milder skin disease before subtype conversion (median CDASI-A 12.0 vs 16.0) and at subtype conversion (median CDASI-A 9.0 vs 16.0). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single tertiary-care dermatology clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of the classic DM patients became PmDM. The majority continue with muscle disease, and many continue to have moderate/severe skin disease. CADM has a low risk of progressing to muscle disease, with the extent of skin disease as a potential predictive factor.

The impact of hormones in autoimmune cutaneous diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Dermatomyositis, systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus have a significantly higher prevalence in women than men, emphasizing the relevance of exploring the relationship between sex hormones and autoimmune skin diseases. This review analyzes the interplay between sex hormones and these two skin diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search using the PubMed database from July to August 2023. Search terms included 'contraceptives', 'pregnancy', 'hormone replacement', 'tamoxifen', and 'aromatase inhibitors'. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: This comprehensive literature review shows that there remains considerable debate regarding the use of hormonal contraceptives and hormonal replacement therapy in individuals with autoimmune skin conditions. Nonetheless, it is well established that their use is contraindicated in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome or when antiphospholipid antibodies are positive. Individuals experiencing disease flares and uncontrolled symptoms should also avoid these interventions. Pregnancy planning should be timed to coincide with well-managed disease states to minimize obstetric and neonatal complications. Hormonal breast cancer treatment requires close skin monitoring. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy, menopause, contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, and breast cancer treatment drugs result in substantial shifts in hormone levels. Additionally, hormone levels are altered by aromatase inhibitors and anti-estrogen medications. These fluctuations can modulate mechanisms influencing autoimmune skin abnormalities.

Evaluation of RNase therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised phase 2a clinical trial of RSLV-132.

BACKGROUND: Circulating, extracellular RNA is the primary trigger of type I interferon in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and interferon is known to play a central pathogenic role in the disease. RSLV-132 is a catalytically active human RNase molecule fused to human IgG1 Fc designed to digest RNA and thereby decrease the chronic inflammation associated with SLE. The drug was evaluated in a cohort of patients with SLE with moderate-severe cutaneous disease activity and the presence of RNA immune complexes. The primary objective of the study was the assessment of the impact of 13 doses of 10 mg/kg RSLV-132 over 6 months on the mean Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) score. METHODS: Sixty-five patients meeting the entry criteria of a baseline CLASI score of 10 or greater and positivity of at least one of five autoantibodies to RNA-binding proteins (SM/RNP, SSA/Ro, SSB/La, Sm, RNP) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive 13 doses of RSLV-132 10 mg/kg or placebo, respectively. Participants received study drug for 24 weeks on days 1, 8, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, 85, 99, 113, 127, 141 and 155 with an end-of-treatment visit on day 169 and a follow-up visit at the end of the study on day 215. The primary objective was assessed on days 85 and 169. Secondary objectives included assessment of systemic disease activity using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 Index and the Physician's Global Assessment. Data from these instruments were used to calculate the SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) and the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) scores. RESULTS: The mean CLASI score change from baseline at day 169 was -5.7 (±7.0) in the placebo group and -6.2 (±8.5) in the RSLV-132 group. A subgroup of participants with moderate-severe systemic disease activity and high baseline SLEDAI scores (≥9) were analysed with respect to BICLA and SRI-4 responses. The RSLV-132 treated participants in the high SLEDAI subgroup had a greater percentage of BICLA responses (62% vs 44%) and SRI-4 responses (23% vs 11%) as compared with placebo. A second subgroup of participants with high baseline CLASI scores (≥21) were analysed with respect to BICLA and SRI-4 responses. The RSLV-132 treated participants in the high CLASI subgroup had a greater percentage of BICLA responses (28% vs 8%) and SRI-4 responses (39% vs 8%) as compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of RSLV-132 therapy consisting of a weekly loading dose of RSLV-132 for 1 month, followed by 5 months of biweekly administrations did not significantly improve the mean CLASI score relative to placebo in this cohort of patients with SLE. The study entry criteria selected patients with moderate-severe cutaneous disease activity and no minimum SLEDAI score, which resulted in a wide range of systemic disease activity from inactive to severe as measured by SLEDAI. When the participants with higher SLEDAI and CLASI scores were analysed, a trend towards clinical improvement favouring RSLV-132 was observed. The results warrant further evaluation of RSLV-132 in SLE and suggest that patients with more active systemic disease are most likely to benefit from RNase therapy.

Extracellular Vesicles in the Pathogenesis, Clinical Characterization, and Management of Dermatomyositis: A Narrative Review.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-bilayer particles secreted from cells that primarily assist in cell-to-cell communication through the content of their cargo, such as proteins and RNA. EVs have been implicated in the pathogenesis of various autoimmune diseases, including dermatomyositis (DM), an inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by distinct cutaneous manifestations, myopathy, and lung disease. We sought to review the role of EVs in DM and understand how they contribute to the pathogenesis and clinical characterization of the disease. We summarized the research progress on EVs in dermatomyositis based on recent publications. EV cargoes, such as double-stranded DNA, microRNA, and proteins, contribute to DM pathogenesis and mediate the proinflammatory response and cytokine release through signaling pathways such as the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway. These nucleic acids and proteins have been proposed as disease-specific, stable biomarkers to monitor disease activity and responses to therapy. They also correlate with clinical parameters, inflammatory markers, and disease severity scores. Furthermore, some markers show an association with morbidities of DM, such as muscle weakness and interstitial lung disease. The continued study of EVs will help us to further elucidate our understanding of dermatomyositis.

Current myositis clinical trials and tribulations.

With improved understanding of disease pathogenesis and availability of outcome measures, there has been a remarkable increase in the number of therapeutic clinical trials in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (myositis) over the last three years reaching as many as five trials per site. These trials share similar design and inclusion/exclusion criteria resulting in a competitive clinical trial landscape in myositis. While these are exciting times for the myositis field, we have a number of concerns about the design and conduct of the myositis trials. These include competitive landscape, lengthy placebo arms, underrepresentation of minority groups among participants, use of patient reported outcome measures with limited/no data on validity in myositis, antiquated disease classification criteria, and unclear performance of the ACR/EULAR Myositis Response Criteria in skin-predominant patients despite inclusion of these patients in trials. In this viewpoint, we further discuss these concerns and offer potential solutions such as including patient perspectives in the trial design and adoption of innovative frameworks.