Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 129
Filtrar
1.
Br J Cancer ; 103(7): 1103-8, 2010 Sep 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20877337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding cancer risks for relatives of women with very early-onset breast cancer. METHODS: We studied 2208 parents and siblings of 504 unselected population-based Caucasian women with breast cancer diagnosed before age 35 years (103 from USA, 124 from Canada and 277 from Australia), 41 known to carry a mutation (24 in BRCA1, 16 in BRCA2 and one in both genes). Cancer-specific standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were estimated by comparing the number of affected relatives (50% verified overall) with that expected based on incidences specific for country, sex, age and year of birth. RESULTS: For relatives of carriers, the female breast cancer SIRs were 13.13 (95% CI 6.57-26.26) and 12.52 (5.21-30.07) for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. The ovarian cancer SIR was 12.38 (3.1-49.51) for BRCA1 and the prostate cancer SIR was 18.55 (4.64-74.17) for BRCA2. For relatives of non-carriers, the SIRs for female breast, prostate, lung, brain and urinary cancers were 4.03 (2.91-5.93), 5.25 (2.50-11.01), 7.73 (4.74-12.62), 5.19 (2.33-11.54) and 4.35 (1.81-10.46), respectively. For non-carriers, the SIRs remained elevated and were statistically significant for breast and prostate cancer when based on verified cancers. CONCLUSION: First-degree relatives of women with very early-onset breast cancer are at increased risk of cancers not explained by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.


Assuntos
Idade de Início , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Família , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Mutação , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Saúde da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Mães , Risco , Irmãos
3.
Hugo J ; 3(1-4): 63-76, 2009 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20535403

RESUMO

Breast cancers related to BRCA mutations are associated with particular biological features. Here we report the clinical and pathological characteristics of breast cancer in Chinese women with and without BRCA mutations and of carriers of BRCA1 mutations compared to BRCA2 mutations. Two hundred and 26 high-risk Hong Kong Chinese women were tested for BRCA mutations, medical information was obtained from medical records, and risk and demographic information was obtained from personal interviews. In this cohort, 28 (12.4%) women were BRCA mutation carriers and among these carriers, 39.3% were BRCA1 and 60.7% were BRCA2 mutations. Mutation carriers were more likely to have a familial history of breast and ovarian cancer, high-grade cancers, and triple negative (TN) cancers. Prevalence of TN was 48.3% in BRCA carriers and 25.6% in non-carriers and was 67.7% in BRCA1 and 35.3% in BRCA2 carriers. Estrogen receptor (ER) negative cancer was significantly associated with BRCA1 mutations, especially in those under 40 years of age. BRCA-related breast cancer in this Chinese population is associated with family history and adverse pathological/prognostic features, with BRCA2 mutations being more prevalent but BRCA1 carriers having more aggressive and TN cancers. Compared to Caucasian populations, prevalence of BRCA2 mutations and TN cancer in BRCA2 mutation carriers in Chinese population are elevated.

4.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 58(12): 1241-51, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16291468

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate minimally important differences (MIDs) on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using anchor- and distribution-based methods. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Preliminary MIDs were generated for FACT-C scores based on published results for two samples (n = 60 and n = 63) from the FACT-C validation study. Preliminary MIDs were confirmed using data from a Phase II randomized controlled clinical trial (n = 104) and a population-based observational study (n = 568). MIDs were estimated for the colorectal cancer subscale (CCS); the FACT-C Trial Outcome Index (TOI-C), which is the sum of the CCS, physical well-being, and functional well-being subscales; and the FACT-C total score. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses were used. RESULTS: MIDs were stable across the different patient samples. The recommended MIDs ranged from 2 to 3 points for the CCS, 4 to 6 points for the TOI-C, and 5 to 8 points for the FACT-C total score. CONCLUSIONS: MIDs can enhance the interpretability of FACT-C scores, and they can be used to provide a basis for sample size estimation and to determine clinical benefit in combination with other measures of efficacy. General guidelines for estimating MIDs for other FACT instruments are suggested.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Bevacizumab , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estatística como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Am J Epidemiol ; 160(7): 613-8, 2004 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15383404

RESUMO

In the general population, ovarian cancer risk is inversely associated with oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, and childbearing. Among carriers of BRCA1 gene mutations, the data are conflicting. The authors identified women diagnosed with incident invasive epithelial ovarian cancer in the San Francisco Bay Area of California from March 1997 through July 2001. They compared the contraceptive and reproductive histories of 36 carrier cases and 381 noncarrier cases with those of 568 controls identified by random digit dialing who were frequency matched to cases on age and race/ethnicity. In both carriers and noncarriers, reduced risk was associated with ever use of oral contraceptives (odds ratio = 0.54 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.26, 1.13) for carriers and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.73) for noncarriers), duration of oral contraceptive use (risk reduction per year = 13% (p = 0.01) for carriers and 6% (p < 0.001) for noncarriers), history of tubal ligation (odds ratio = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.25, 1.90) for carriers and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45, 0.95) for noncarriers), and increasing parity (risk reduction per childbirth = 16% (p = 0.26) for carriers and 24% (p < 0.001) for noncarriers). These data suggest that BRCA1 mutation carriers and noncarriers have similar risk reductions associated with oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, and parity.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Orais/efeitos adversos , Genes BRCA1 , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Neoplasias Ovarianas/etiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Paridade , Esterilização Tubária/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco
6.
Cancer Causes Control ; 13(8): 735-40, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12420952

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe factors associated with vitamin supplement use in a large cohort of adult women. METHODS: California teachers and administrators (n = 133,479) completed a questionnaire on lifestyle factors and medical history. Specific supplement users regularly used at least one specific vitamin supplement in the past year; multivitamin users regularly used a multivitamin; and multivitamin and specific supplement users took a multivitamin and one or more specific supplements. Associations between supplement use and other variables were quantified using means, cross-tabulations, and age-adjusted prevalence odds ratios. RESULTS: Multivitamin and specific supplement users tended to be older and Caucasian. Compared to non-users, they were also leaner (odds ratio [OR] for BMI > or = 30 kg/m2 = 0.6 for specific supplement users with or without multivitamins, and OR = 0.7 for multivitamin only users), and were less likely to be current smokers (OR for current smoking = 0.8 for multivitamin plus specific supplement users, OR = 0.9 for specific supplement only users, and OR = 0.7 for multivitamin only users). Specific supplement users (with or without multivitamins) were more likely to use cancer screening tests, eat fruits and vegetables, and exercise than were multivitamin only users or non-users. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of demographic, dietary, and health-related factors were associated with different categories of supplement use.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Estilo de Vida , Vitaminas/administração & dosagem , Peso Corporal , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Br J Cancer ; 87(1): 54-60, 2002 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12085256

RESUMO

In 1983-87, we conducted a population-based case-control study of breast cancer in Asian women living in California and Hawaii, in which migration history (a composite of the subject's place of birth, usual residence in Asia (urban/rural), length of time living in the West, and grandparents' place of birth) was associated with a six-fold risk gradient that paralleled the historical differences in incidence rates between the US and Asian countries. This provided the opportunity to determine whether endogenous hormones vary with migration history in Asian-American women. Plasma obtained from 316 premenopausal and 177 naturally premenopausal study controls was measured for levels of estrone (E1), estradiol (E2), estrone sulphate (E1S), androstenedione (A), testosterone (T), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), progesterone (PROG) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Levels of the oestrogens and sex hormone-binding globulin did not differ significantly between Asian- and Western-born women, although among premenopausal women, those least westernised had the lowest levels of E1, E2, and E1S. Androgen levels, particularly DHEA, were lower in women born in the West. Among premenopausal women, age-adjusted geometric mean levels of DHEA were 16.5 and 13.8 nmol l(-1) in Asian- and Western-born women respectively; in postmenopausal women these values were 11.8 and 9.2 nmol l(-1), (P<0.001) respectively. Among postmenopausal women, androgens tended to be highest among the least westernised women and declined as the degree of westernisation increased. Our findings suggest that aspects of hormone metabolism play a role in population differences in breast cancer incidence.


Assuntos
Asiático , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Emigração e Imigração , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/análise , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/genética , Adulto , Ásia/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Geografia , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linhagem , Pós-Menopausa , Pré-Menopausa , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 10(9): 979-85, 2001 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11535551

RESUMO

Research on the relationship between iodine exposure and thyroid cancer risk is limited, and the findings are inconclusive. In most studies, fish/shellfish consumption has been used as a proxy measure of iodine exposure. The present study extends this research by quantifying dietary iodine exposure as well as incorporating a biomarker of long-term (1 year) exposure, i.e., from toenail clippings. This study is conducted in a multiethnic population with a wide variation in thyroid cancer incidence rates and substantial diversity in exposure. Women, ages 20-74, residing in the San Francisco Bay Area and diagnosed with thyroid cancer between 1995 and 1998 (1992-1998 for Asian women) were compared with women selected from the general population via random digit dialing. Interviews were conducted in six languages with 608 cases and 558 controls. The established risk factors for thyroid cancer were found to increase risk in this population: radiation to the head/neck [odds ratio (OR), 2.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-5.5]; history of goiter/nodules (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.5-5.6); and a family history of proliferative thyroid disease (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.6-3.8). Contrary to our hypothesis, increased dietary iodine, most likely related to the use of multivitamin pills, was associated with a reduced risk of papillary thyroid cancer. This risk reduction was observed in "low-risk" women (i.e., women without any of the three established risk factors noted above; OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.85) but not in "high-risk" women, among whom a slight elevation in risk was seen (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.56-3.4). However, no association with risk was observed in either group when the biomarker of exposure was evaluated. In addition, no ethnic differences in risk were observed. The authors conclude that iodine exposure appears to have, at most, a weak effect on the risk of papillary thyroid cancer.


Assuntos
Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Iodo/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/etiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Animais , California/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Dieta , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Iodo/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Unhas/química , Fatores de Risco , São Francisco/epidemiologia , Frutos do Mar , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/etnologia , Saúde da Mulher
9.
Am J Hum Genet ; 69(1): 148-58, 2001 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11404817

RESUMO

We conducted a genomewide screen for prostate cancer-susceptibility genes on the basis of data from 98 families from the United States and Canada that had three or more verified diagnoses of prostate cancer among first- and second-degree relatives. We found a statistically significant excess of markers for which affected relatives exhibited modest amounts of excess allele-sharing; however, no single chromosomal region contained markers with excess allele-sharing of sufficient magnitude to indicate unequivocal evidence of linkage. Positive linkage signals of nominal statistical significance were found in two regions (5p-q and 12p) that have been identified as weakly positive in other data sets and in region 19p, which has not been identified previously. All these signals were considerably stronger for analyses restricted to families with mean age at onset below the median than for analyses of families with mean age at onset above the median. The data provided little support for any of the putative prostate cancer-susceptibility genes identified in other linkage studies.


Assuntos
Heterogeneidade Genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Idade de Início , Idoso , Alelos , Canadá , Cromossomos Humanos Par 12/genética , Cromossomos Humanos Par 5/genética , Ligação Genética/genética , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Genótipo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Grupos Raciais/genética , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Estados Unidos
10.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 10(5): 533-8, 2001 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11352865

RESUMO

Men with higher endogenous 5alpha-reductase activity may have higher prostate cancer risk. This hypothesis raises two questions: (a) Could racial differences in 5alpha-reductase activity explain the observed racial differences in prostate cancer risk? and (b) Could a man reduce his activity level by modifying his lifestyle? To address these questions, we measured two hormonal indices of 5alpha-reductase activity [serum levels of androstane-3alpha-17beta-diol glucuronide (3alpha-diol G) and androsterone glucuronide (AG)] in healthy, older African-American, white, and Asian-American men, who are at high, intermediate, and low prostate cancer risk, respectively. We also examined associations between these metabolite levels and such lifestyle characteristics as body size and physical activity as well as select aspects of medical history and family history of prostate cancer. Men included in this cross-sectional analysis (n = 1054) had served as control subjects in a population-based case-control study of prostate cancer we conducted in California, Hawaii, and Vancouver, Canada and provided information on certain personal attributes and donated blood between March 1990 and March 1992. In this study, concentrations of 3alpha-diol G declined significantly with age and increased significantly with body mass index. Mean levels of 3alpha-diol G, adjusted for age and body mass index, were 6.1 ng/ml in African-Americans, 6.9 ng/ml in whites and 4.8 ng/ml in Asian-Americans. These differences were statistically significant (African-Americans versus whites: P < 0.01; whites versus Asian-Americans: P < 0.001). Concentrations of AG decreased significantly with age, but only in whites, and were unrelated to any of the reported personal attributes. Mean levels of AG, adjusted for age, were 44.1 ng/ml in African-Americans, 44.9 ng/ml in whites, and 37.5 ng/ml in Asian-Americans (Asian-Americans versus whites, P < 0.001). In conclusion, older African-American and white men have similar levels of these two indices of 5alpha-reductase activity, and these levels are higher than those of older Asian-American men. This difference may be related to the lower prostate cancer risk in Asian-Americans.


Assuntos
Androstano-3,17-diol/metabolismo , Androsterona/análogos & derivados , Androsterona/metabolismo , Povo Asiático , População Negra , Estilo de Vida , Oxirredutases/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/enzimologia , População Branca , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento/metabolismo , Análise de Variância , Androstano-3,17-diol/análogos & derivados , Biomarcadores/análise , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colestenona 5 alfa-Redutase , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxirredutases/análise , Vigilância da População , Valores de Referência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
11.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 9(8): 795-804, 2000 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10952096

RESUMO

The evidence for a protective effect of vegetables, fruits, and legumes against prostate cancer is weak and inconsistent. We examined the relationship of these food groups and their constituent foods to prostate cancer risk in a multicenter case-control study of African-American, white, Japanese, and Chinese men. Cases (n = 1619) with histologically confirmed prostate cancer were identified through the population-based tumor registries of Hawaii, San Francisco, and Los Angeles in the United States and British Columbia and Ontario in Canada. Controls (n = 1618) were frequency-matched to cases on ethnicity, age, and region of residence of the case, in a ratio of approximately 1:1. Dietary and other information was collected by in-person home interview; a blood sample was obtained from control subjects for prostate-specific antigen determination. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for age, geographic location, education, calories, and when indicated, ethnicity. Intake of legumes (whether total legumes, soyfoods specifically, or other legumes) was inversely related to prostate cancer (OR for highest relative to lowest quintile for total legumes = 0.62; P for trend = 0.0002); results were similar when restricted to prostate-specific antigen-normal controls or to advanced cases. Intakes of yellow-orange and cruciferous vegetables were also inversely related to prostate cancer, especially for advanced cases, among whom the highest quintile OR for yellow-orange vegetables = 0.67 (P for trend = 0.01) and the highest quintile OR for cruciferous vegetables = 0.61 (P for trend = 0.006). Intake of tomatoes and of fruits was not related to risk. Findings were generally consistent across ethnic groups. These results suggest that legumes (not limited to soy products) and certain categories of vegetables may protect against prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Anticarcinógenos/uso terapêutico , Comportamento Alimentar/etnologia , Fitoterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , Verduras/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Povo Asiático , População Negra , Colúmbia Britânica/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Inquéritos sobre Dietas , Fabaceae/uso terapêutico , Frutas/uso terapêutico , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Ontário/epidemiologia , Plantas Medicinais , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , População Branca
12.
Am J Epidemiol ; 150(6): 561-7, 1999 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10489994

RESUMO

Breast cancer incidence has historically been 4-7 times higher in the United States than in Asia. A previous study by the authors in Asian-American women demonstrated a substantial increase in breast cancer risk in women who migrated from Asia to the United States, with the risk almost doubling during the first decade after migration. Increased use of oral contraceptives soon after migration to the United States could possibly explain this rapid rise in risk. In a population-based case-control study of Chinese, Filipino, and Japanese-American women, aged 20-55 years, who lived in San Francisco-Oakland, California; Los Angeles, California; and Oahu, Hawaii during 1983-1987, 597 cases (70% of those eligible) and 966 controls (75%) were interviewed. Controls were matched to cases on age, ethnicity, and area of residence. Oral contraceptive (OC) use increased with time since migration; 15.0% of Asian-born women who had been in the West <8 years, 33.4% of Asian-born women who had been in the West > or =8 years, and 49.6% of Asian women born in the West had ever used OCs. However, duration of OC use (adjusted for age, ethnicity, study area, years since migration, education, family history of breast cancer and age at first full-term birth) was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Moreover, neither OC use before age 25 years nor before first full-term birth was associated with increased risk. Results were unchanged when restricted to women under age 45 years or under age 40 years. After adjustment for duration of OC use, women who had been in the United States > or =8 years were still at almost twice the risk of breast cancer compared with women who had been in the United States 2-7 years. This study suggests that OC use cannot explain the elevated risk observed in Asian women who migrated to the United States > or =7 years ago.


PIP: The relationship between oral contraceptive (OC) use and breast cancer was investigated among Asian-American women. A population-based case-control study of Chinese, Japanese, and Filipino women, ages 20-25 years were interviewed. Results showed that women who had been in the West for 2-7 years had the lowest prevalence of use. About 15.0% were OC users, and 1.4% had been OC users for more than 5 years. Asian-Americans born in the West had the highest prevalence of OC use. However, there were only slight differences of OC use among women living in rural or urban areas while in the East. An inverse association is shown between the duration of OC use and breast cancer among migrants more than 8 years ago. There were no increased risks associated with the use of OC and the duration of OC use. Women who started using OC at an early age were not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and with a decreased risk at the very onset of use (age 21 years). Recent OC use (last OC use during last 5 years) was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Consequently, women who had been in the US more than 8 years were at almost twice the risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.67] as women who had been in the country 2-7 years (OR = 0.34). This study suggests that OC use cannot explain the elevated risk observed in Asian-American women who migrated more than 7 years ago.


Assuntos
Asiático , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Anticoncepcionais Orais , Adulto , California/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , China/etnologia , Emigração e Imigração , Feminino , Havaí/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Japão/etnologia , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Filipinas/etnologia , Fatores de Risco
13.
Am J Epidemiol ; 149(11): 1063-71, 1999 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10355383

RESUMO

The accuracy of ethnic classification can substantially affect ethnic-specific cancer statistics. In the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, which is part of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and of the statewide California Cancer Registry, Hispanic ethnicity is determined by medical record review and by matching to surname lists. This study compared these classification methods with self-report. Ethnic self-identification was obtained by surveying 1,154 area residents aged 20-89 years who were diagnosed with cancer in 1990 and were reported to the registry as being Hispanic or White non-Hispanic. Predictive value positive, sensitivity, and relative bias were used to assess the accuracy of Hispanic classification by medical record and surname. Among those persons classified as Hispanic by either or both of these sources, only two-thirds agreed (predictive value positive = 66%), and many self-identified Hispanics were classified incorrectly (sensitivity = 68%). Classification based on either medical record or surname alone had a lower sensitivity (59% and 61%, respectively) but a higher predictive value positive (77% and 70%, respectively). Ethnic classification by medical record alone resulted in an underestimate of Hispanic cancer cases and incidence rates. Bias was reduced when medical records and surnames were used together to classify cancer cases as Hispanic.


Assuntos
Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/etnologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , São Francisco/epidemiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
14.
Cancer Causes Control ; 10(2): 107-13, 1999 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10231158

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper was to investigate the relationship between food and beverage consumption and the development of breast cancer in men. METHODS: Possible relationships of dietary factors to risk of breast cancer in men were assessed in a case-control study conducted between 1983 and 1986. Cases (N = 220) were ascertained from ten population-based cancer registries. Controls (N = 291) were selected by random-digit dialing (< age 65) and from Health Care Financing Administration Medicare beneficiary lists (> or = age 65). RESULTS: No trends in risk were observed with increasing intakes of specific foods, except for an increase in risk with citrus fruits. No increase in risk with increasing amounts of specific fats, vitamins, or minerals or with amounts of protein, fiber, carbohydrate, starches, nitrites, or alcohol consumed was observed, except for an increase in risk with dietary vitamin C consumption. A decreasing trend in risk with dietary niacin and with coffee and an increasing trend in risk with tea consumption were observed. No associations were found with use of any dietary supplements, including vitamin C. CONCLUSIONS: The observed associations are not consistent with findings from studies of breast cancer in women and probably do not represent causal relationships. Dietary factors are unlikely to be strong determinants of breast cancer in men.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama Masculina/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama Masculina/etiologia , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Frutas , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Valores de Referência , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
15.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 68(6 Suppl): 1437S-1443S, 1998 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9848513

RESUMO

Evidence from case-control studies suggests, although not entirely consistently, that soy intake may protect against breast cancer. The designs and findings of studies conducted in Asian women living in Japan, Singapore, China, and the United States are reviewed. Because of the considerably higher intake of soy by native Asians than by Asian Americans living in California and Hawaii, these studies investigated different segments of the dose-response relation between soy intake and breast cancer risk. Data are not sufficient to determine the amount or frequency of soy intake effective in protecting against breast cancer. Of concern is that soy intake may be homogeneously high in Asia, making it difficult to identify differences in breast cancer risk between high and moderate daily consumers. In studies conducted in Asian Americans, it is difficult to be certain that soy intake is not a marker of other factors related to Western lifestyle that are causally associated with risk of breast cancer. Additional studies assessing the role of soy and breast cancer are needed. These studies should assess intake of all food sources of soy, considering portion size as well as other dietary and nondietary factors that may confound the soy-breast cancer association. A better understanding of the mechanisms whereby soy intake may influence the risk of breast cancer is also needed. Dietary intervention studies with soy will provide information on the acute effects of soy on endogenous hormone concentrations. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies are necessary to investigate the longer-term relations between hormone concentrations and soy intake in women.


Assuntos
Asiático , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Dieta , Proteínas de Soja/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/etnologia , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ásia Oriental/epidemiologia , Ásia Oriental/etnologia , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Proteínas de Soja/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Ethn Dis ; 8(2): 218-27, 1998.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9681287

RESUMO

Racial classification of Asian subgroups is increasingly important for health statistics, given the growing Asian-American populations. This study reports the reliability of racial classification of Vietnamese in population-based cancer registry data from northern California. From the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, we selected 2240 persons diagnosed with cancer in 1989-1992 and whom the registry considered Vietnamese by birthplace and/or registry race and/or surname, or who were Southeast Asian or Chinese by race. One thousand ninety persons (49%) were interviewed. Sensitivity and predictive value positive, and cancer incidence rates, were calculated using different combinations of the classification factors (birthplace, registry race, and name). By registry-reported race alone, 74% of those the registry classified as Vietnamese agreed with this classification on interview, while 90% of those identifying themselves as Vietnamese were so classified. With classification based on 2 of 3 factors, 78% of those classified as Vietnamese agreed, and 91% of self-reported Vietnamese were correctly classified. Misclassification was associated with age, sex, year of immigration, education, and language use. Registry-based annual age-adjusted all-site cancer incidence rates per 100,000 for Vietnamese were 287.7 for males and 221.3 for females. Rates adjusted for self-reported ethnicity were 242.8 (male) and 213.7 (female). Registry classification of Vietnamese is currently problematic. Approximately 20% of cancer cases classified as Vietnamese are probably not Vietnamese. The higher incidence rates for Vietnamese in the United States than in Vietnam partly may reflect such classification error.


Assuntos
Povo Asiático/classificação , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sudeste Asiático/etnologia , California/epidemiologia , China/etnologia , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vietnã/etnologia
17.
Biometrics ; 54(2): 774-81, 1998 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9629656

RESUMO

Although ethnic population counts measured by the United States Census are based on self-identification, the same is not necessarily true of cases reported to cancer registries. The use of different ethnic classification methods for numerators and denominators may therefore lead to biased estimates of cancer incidence rates. The extent of such misclassification may be assessed by conducting an ethnicity survey of cancer patients and estimating the proportion misclassified using double sampling models that account for sample stratification. For two ethnic categories, logistic regression may be used to model self-identified ethnicity as a function of demographic variables and the fallible classification method. Incidence rates then may be adjusted for misclassification using regression results to estimate the number of cancer cases of a given age, sex, and site in each self-identified ethnic group. An example is given using this method to estimate ethnic misclassification of San Francisco Bay area Hispanic cancer patients diagnosed in 1990. Results suggest that the number of cancer cases reported as Hispanic is an underestimate of the number of cases self-identified as Hispanic, resulting in an underestimate of Hispanic cancer rates.


Assuntos
Etnicidade/classificação , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Modelos Estatísticos , Neoplasias/etnologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , São Francisco/epidemiologia
18.
Cancer Causes Control ; 9(5): 511-7, 1998 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9934716

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We used readily accessible, existing data to assess whether or not geographic variation in breast cancer incidence rates in the San Francisco Bay Area was related to the unequal distribution of known breast cancer risk factors. METHODS: Cancer registry and 1990 census block-group data were used to look at the associations between breast cancer incidence and known risk factors (including parity, urban/rural status, and socioeconomic indicators) in 25 California counties. Average annual age-adjusted invasive breast cancer incidence rates were calculated for the period 1988-1992, and adjusted morbidity ratios were computed. RESULTS: While breast cancer incidence in Marin County was 9 percent higher than that of the other 24 counties combined (relative risk = 1.09, 95 percent confidence interval = 1.01-1.18), this increase appeared to be due to the unequal distribution of known risk factors. Block-groups that had a high level of any risk factor had higher incidence rates, regardless of geographic location. After multivariate adjustment, breast cancer incidence no longer differed between Marin and the other counties (adjusted morbidity ratio = 1.02). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the unequal distribution of known risk factors was responsible for Marin County's high breast cancer incidence rate.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Topografia Médica , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Intervalos de Confiança , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Paridade , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , São Francisco/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...