Trajectory of Healthcare Contact Days for Veterans With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancy.

How and where patients with advanced cancer facing limited survival spend their time is critical. Healthcare contact days (days with healthcare contact outside the home) offer a patient-centered and practical measure of how much of a person's life is consumed by healthcare. We retrospectively analyzed contact days among decedent veterans with stage IV gastrointestinal cancer at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Healthcare System from 2010 to 2021. Among 468 decedents, the median overall survival was 4 months. Patients spent 1 in 3 days with healthcare contact. Over the course of illness, the percentage of contact days followed a "U-shaped" pattern, with an initial post-diagnosis peak, a lower middle trough, and an eventual rise as patients neared the end-of-life. Contact days varied by clinical factors and by sociodemographics. These data have important implications for improving care delivery, such as through care coordination and communicating expected burdens to and supporting patients and care partners.

Health Care Contact Days Experienced by Decedents With Advanced GI Cancer.

PURPOSE: Frequent visits to health care facilities can be time intensive and all-consuming for people with cancer. We measured health care contact days (days with healthcare contact outside the home) among decedents with advanced GI cancer and examined sources of contact days, their associations with demographic and clinical factors, and their temporal patterns over the course of illness. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a tumor registry and electronic medical record data for decedents with stage IV GI cancer between 2011 and 2019 in a large health care network in MN. We determined contact days from diagnosis to death using chart review. Using multivariable beta regression adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics offset by survival, we calculated adjusted estimates of contact days and determined patient-level factors associated with percentage of contact days. RESULTS: We identified 809 patients eligible for analysis (median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 65 [56-73] years). The median (IQR) overall survival was 175 (56-459) days. Patients spent a median (IQR) of 25.8% (17.4%-39.1%) of these as contact days. Of these days, 83.6% were spent on outpatient visits. In the multivariable analysis, older age, Black race, and never receiving systemic cancer-directed treatment were associated with a higher percentage of contact days. The percentage of contact days was highest in the first month after diagnosis (39.6%) and before death (32.2%), with a more moderate middle phase (U-shaped curve). CONCLUSION: Decedents with advanced GI cancer spend 1 in 4 days alive with health care contact, despite a median survival of under 6 months. This is even higher immediately postdiagnosis and near death. These findings highlight the need to understand sources of variation, benchmark appropriate care, and deliver more efficient care for this vulnerable population with limited time.

Breast Cancer and Women Veterans: What Is the Impact of Mental Health on Screening Rates?

Background: The proportion of women Veterans are increasing and, as such, access to high-quality breast cancer care is important. Prior studies have shown that rural location, age, and a mental health diagnosis negatively impact breast cancer screening rates. Methods: We aimed to retrospectively assess the impact of these risk factors on breast cancer screening adherence rates among Veterans at our institution. Women who were eligible for breast cancer screening per the United States Preventative Services Taskforce guidelines were included. Results: Of 2321 women, overall adherence was 78.2%. There were no significant differences in screening rates between races, various age groups, geographical distribution, and having anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, Veterans with a diagnosis of depression were more likely to adhere to screening guidelines. Having multiple mental health diagnoses was also not a negative risk factor. Conclusions: Our Veteran population's adherence rates are higher than the national average and rural location, race, age, and certain mental health disorders did not negatively affect adherence to screening mammography. Though more research is needed, screening reminders from our women's health coordinator may have improved adherence rates and lowered disparities.

Decreased warfarin sensitivity among patients treated with elbasvir and grazoprevir for hepatitis C infection.

PURPOSE: We previously reported an interaction with warfarin anticoagulation when initiating treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents for hepatitis C infection. A decreased warfarin sensitivity led to subtherapeutic anticoagulation. To study this interaction further, we expanded our research to include patients treated with the combination of elbasvir and grazoprevir concurrent with warfarin anticoagulation and investigated changes in warfarin sensitivity during and after treatment. METHODS: Using electronic health records of the Veterans Health Administration, patients starting treatment with elbasvir-grazoprevir for hepatitis C infection concurrent with warfarin anticoagulation were identified. Inclusion required stable warfarin anticoagulation prior to 12 weeks of treatment with elbasvir-grazoprevir. A warfarin sensitivity index (WSI) was calculated at the start of treatment, after 12 weeks after treatment, and at the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was the difference in WSI from pre- to end-treatment. The secondary endpoint was the WSI difference from before treatment to Changes in International Normalized Ratio, warfarin doses, and time in therapeutic range were measured. RESULTS: In the final sample of 43 patients, the mean WSI decreased during treatment from 0.53 to 0.40, or 25.2%. After treatment, the mean WSI rose to 0.51. Although the mean weekly warfarin dose increased from 40.3 to 44.6 mg during treatment, the mean International Normalized Ratio decreased from 2.40 to 1.96, recovering to 2.59 after treatment. The time spent in therapeutic range decreased from 74.1% before treatment to 39.8% during treatment and back to 64.9% 12 weeks posttreatment. CONCLUSION: When elbasvir-grazoprevir was added to stable warfarin anticoagulation, warfarin sensitivity decreased significantly during treatment and returned to baseline after treatment.

Quality of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Related Health Care in Rural and Urban Veterans Affairs Clinics.

Only minor disparities were found between patients at rural and urban clinics in this examination of the differences in the quality of health care for patients with COPD.

Evaluation of a Potential Interaction Between New Regimens to Treat Hepatitis C and Warfarin.

OBJECTIVE: New regimens to treat hepatitis C virus infection have expanded the eligible patient population to include more patients receiving concurrent warfarin. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether a drug interaction occurs when these regimens are added to warfarin therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort design using a nationwide database of the Veterans Affairs Health System. Patients on warfarin therapy treated with sofosbuvir or ombitasvir, paritaprevir-ritonavir, and dasabuvir (OBV-PTV/r-DSV) from March 2014 through October 2015 were identified. The warfarin dose response was calculated using a warfarin sensitivity index (WSI) defined as the steady-state INR divided by the mean daily warfarin dose. The primary outcome was the change in WSI from hepatitis C treatment initiation to completion. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 271 patients. The WSI decreased 23% from a mean baseline value of 0.53 to 0.39 (decrease of 0.14; 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.16; P < 0.001). OBV-PTV/r-DSV produced a significantly greater decrease than any sofosbuvir regimen. Concurrent ribavirin accounted for an additional decrease in warfarin sensitivity of -0.09 (95% CI = -0.06 to -0.12; P < 0.001). The percentage of subtherapeutic INR results increased from 26% prior to hepatitis C treatment to 58% during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate a clinically significant reduction in warfarin dose-response when hepatitis C treatment regimens were added to warfarin. They were most profound with OBV-PTV/r-DSV. Ribavirin was associated with an additive effect. Clinicians should be aware of this potential drug interaction to closely monitor and minimize subtherapeutic levels of anticoagulation.

Duloxetine: a balanced and selective norepinephrine- and serotonin-reuptake inhibitor.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, drug interactions, dosage and administration, cost, and place in therapy of duloxetine for major depression, pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and stress urinary incontinence are reviewed. SUMMARY: Duloxetine is a balanced selective serotonin and norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitor available in the United States for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). Duloxetine has also been used for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Absorption of duloxetine begins two hours after oral administration, reaching a maximum plasma concentration in six hours. Half-life and volume of distribution are 12 hours and 1640 L, respectively. The recommended dosage of duloxetine is 40-80 mg daily, depending on the indication, preferably split into two doses per day. For the treatment of major depression, duloxetine has achieved remission rates similar to that of existing selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). For SUI and pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, duloxetine has not demonstrated equivalence or superiority to existing therapies. The adverse effects of duloxetine are similar to those of traditional SSRIs. Nausea is common and has been cited as the primary reason for discontinuation of duloxetine in trials. Increases in blood pressure have been mild, but caution should be used in patients with hypertension. Patients with a creatinine clearance of <30 mL/min and patients with hepatic impairment should avoid duloxetine. Duloxetine should not be recommended as first-line therapy for SUI or DPNP. For MDD, duloxetine may be a useful alternative for patients who do not benefit from or are unable to tolerate other antidepressant therapy. CONCLUSION: Duloxetine has been approved for the treatment of MDD and pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in adults.