The Clinical Utility of Genetic Testing in the Diagnosis and Management of Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Accurate diagnosis of a patient's underlying cause of CKD can influence management and ultimately overall health. The single-arm, interventional, prospective Renasight Clinical Application, Review, and Evaluation study assessed the utility of genetic testing with a 385 gene kidney disease panel on the diagnosis and management of 1623 patients with CKD. Among 20.8% of patients who had positive genetic findings, half resulted in a new or reclassified diagnosis. In addition, a change in management because of genetic testing was reported for 90.7% of patients with positive findings, including treatment changes in 32.9%. These findings demonstrate that genetic testing has a significant effect on both CKD diagnosis and management. BACKGROUND: Genetic testing in CKD has recently been shown to have diagnostic utility with many predicted implications for clinical management, but its effect on management has not been prospectively evaluated. METHODS: Renasight Clinical Application, Review, and Evaluation RenaCARE (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05846113 ) is a single-arm, interventional, prospective, multicenter study that evaluated the utility of genetic testing with a broad, 385 gene panel (the Renasight TM test) on the diagnosis and management of adult patients with CKD recruited from 31 US-based community and academic medical centers. Patient medical history and clinical CKD diagnosis were collected at enrollment. Physician responses to questionnaires regarding patient disease categorization and management were collected before genetic testing and 1 month after the return of test results. Changes in CKD diagnosis and management after genetic testing were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1623 patients with CKD in 13 predefined clinical disease categories (ages, 18-96; median, 55 years), 20.8% ( n =338) had positive genetic findings spanning 54 genes. Positive genetic findings provided a new diagnosis or reclassified a prior diagnosis in 48.8% of those patients. Physicians reported that genetic results altered the management of 90.7% of patients with a positive genetic finding, including changes in treatment plan, which were reported in 32.9% of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing with a CKD-focused 385 gene panel substantially refined clinical diagnoses and had widespread implications for clinical management, including appropriate treatment strategies. These data support the utility of broader integration of panels of genetic tests into the clinical care paradigm for patients with CKD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05846113 .

Genetic Counseling in Kidney Disease: A Perspective.

As genetic testing is increasingly integrated into nephrology practice there is a growing need for partnership with genetic experts. Genetic counselors are ideally suited to fill this role. The value of genetic counseling is born out of the clinical value of genetic test results against the backdrop of the complexity of genetic testing. Genetic counselors who specialize in nephrology are trained to understand and explain the potential effects of genes on kidney disease, which can enable patients to make informed decisions about proceeding with genetic testing, navigating variants of uncertain significance, educating on extrarenal features of hereditary kidney disease, facilitating cascade testing, providing post-test education about testing results, and assisting with family planning. Genetic counselors can partner with the nephrologist and provide the knowledge needed to maximize the use of genetic testing for patients for nephrology consultation. Genetic counseling is more than an element or extension of genetic testing; it is a dynamic, shared conversation between the patient and the genetic counselor where concerns, sentiments, information, and education are exchanged, and value-based decision making is facilitated.

Genetic Etiologies for Chronic Kidney Disease Revealed through Next-Generation Renal Gene Panel.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major public health issue in the USA. Identification of monogenic causes of CKD, which are present in ∼10% of adult cases, can impact prognosis and patient management. Broad gene panels can provide unbiased testing approaches, which are advantageous in phenotypically heterogeneous diseases. However, the use and yield of broad genetic panels by nephrologists in clinical practice is not yet well characterized. METHODS: Renal genetic testing, ordered exclusively for clinical purposes, predominantly by general and transplant nephrologists within the USA, was performed on 1,007 consecutive unique patient samples. Testing was performed using a commercially available next-generation sequencing-based 382 gene kidney disease panel. Pathogenic (P) and likely pathogenic (LP) variants were reported. Positive findings included a monoallelic P/LP variant in an autosomal dominant or X-linked gene and biallelic P/LP variants in autosomal recessive genes. RESULTS: Positive genetic findings were identified in 21.1% (212/1,007) of cases. A total of 220 positive results were identified across 48 genes. Positive results occurred most frequently in the PKD1 (34.1%), COL4A5 (10.9%), PKD2 (10.0%), COL4A4 (6.4%), COL4A3 (5.9%), and TTR (4.1%) genes. Variants identified in the remaining 42 genes comprised 28.6% of the total positive findings, including single positive results in 26 genes. Positive results in >1 gene were identified in 7.5% (16/212) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Use of broad panel genetic testing by clinical nephrologists had a high success rate, similar to results obtained by academic centers specializing in genetics.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Kidney Disease-Related Genes: A Laboratory's Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Recent literature highlights the clinical utility of genetic testing for patients with kidney disease. Genetic testing provides significant benefits for reproductive risk counseling, including the option of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M). PGT-M allows for a significant reduction in risk for a pregnancy affected with the familial disease. We aim to summarize our experience with PGT-M for genes with kidney involvement as either a primary or secondary feature of the disease. METHODS: All PGT-M tests performed by the reference laboratory between September 2010 and July 2020 were reviewed for clinical indication and cases for which the disease tested included a renal component. Each patient referred for PGT-M had an existing molecular genetic diagnosis themselves or in their family. Frequency of each condition, gene, inheritance pattern, and year over year increase in referral cases was analyzed. RESULTS: In the study cohort, the most common disease targeted was autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, caused by pathogenic variants in the PKD1 or PKD2 genes, which accounted for 16.5% (64/389) of cases. The 5 most common referral indications accounted for 51.9% (202/389) of the cases. Autosomal recessive inheritance accounted for 52.0% (26/50) of conditions for which PGT-M was performed. The number of PGT-M tests performed for conditions that included either primary or secondary kidney disease increased from 5 cases in 2010 to 47 cases in the 2020 study period. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the pursuit of PGT-M by couples at risk for passing on conditions with a kidney component is common and has significantly increased since 2010. With this rising trend of patients undergoing PGT-M and the prerequisite of molecular genetic confirmation in the PGT-M process, this study underscores the importance of the reproductive component to a molecular genetic diagnosis for patients with kidney disease, especially as the accessibility of genetic testing and utilization by nephrologists grows.

Correction: Clinical experience with carrier screening in a general population: support for a comprehensive pan-ethnic approach.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Estimating the relative frequency of leukodystrophies and recommendations for carrier screening in the era of next-generation sequencing.

Leukodystrophies are a heterogeneous group of heritable disorders characterized by abnormal brain white matter signal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and primary involvement of the cellular components of myelin. Previous estimates suggest the incidence of leukodystrophies as a whole to be 1 in 7,000 individuals, however the frequency of specific diagnoses relative to others has not been described. Next generation sequencing approaches offer the opportunity to redefine our understanding of the relative frequency of different leukodystrophies. We assessed the relative frequency of all 30 leukodystrophies (associated with 55 genes) in more than 49,000 exomes. We identified a relatively high frequency of disorders previously thought of as very rare, including Aicardi Goutières Syndrome, TUBB4A-related leukodystrophy, Peroxisomal biogenesis disorders, POLR3-related Leukodystrophy, Vanishing White Matter, and Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease. Despite the relative frequency of these conditions, carrier-screening laboratories regularly test only 20 of the 55 leukodystrophy-related genes, and do not test at all, or test only one or a few, genes for some of the higher frequency disorders. Relative frequency of leukodystrophies previously considered very rare suggests these disorders may benefit from expanded carrier screening.

Clinical experience with carrier screening in a general population: support for a comprehensive pan-ethnic approach.

PURPOSE: To present results from a large cohort of individuals receiving expanded carrier screening (CS) in the United States. METHODS: Single-gene disorder carrier status for 381,014 individuals was determined using next-generation sequencing (NGS) based CS for up to 274 genes. Detection rates were compared with literature-reported values derived from disease prevalence and carrier frequencies. Combined theoretical affected pregnancy rates for the 274 screened disorders were calculated. RESULTS: For Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) diseases, 81.6% (4434/5435) of carriers identified did not report AJ ancestry. For cystic fibrosis, 44.0% (6260/14,229) of carriers identified had a variant not on the standard genotyping panel. Individuals at risk of being a silent spinal muscular atrophy carrier, not detectable by standard screening, comprised 1/39 (8763/344,407) individuals. For fragile X syndrome, compared with standard premutation screening, AGG interruption analysis modified risk in 83.2% (1128/1356) premutation carriers. Assuming random pairing across the study population, approximately 1/175 pregnancies would be affected by a disorder in the 274-gene screening panel. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard screening, NGS-based CS provides additional information that may impact reproductive choices. Pan-ethnic CS leads to substantially increased identification of at-risk couples. These data support offering NGS-based CS to all reproductive-aged women.