Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure for the Prediction of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Primary Percutaneous Intervention (the ELEVATE Study).

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We investigated whether left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) in patients who underwent PCI might be additive to current risk stratification of CIN. Data from consecutive patients who underwent primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction between 2013 and 2018 at Western Health in Victoria, Australia were analyzed. CIN was defined as a 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline or 44 µmol/L increase in absolute value within 48 hours of contrast administration. Compared with patients without CIN (n = 455, 93%), those who developed CIN (n = 35, 7%) were older (64 vs 58 years, p = 0.006), and had higher peak creatine kinase (2,862 [1,258 to 3,952] vs 1,341 U/L [641 to 2,613], p = 0.02). The CIN group had higher median LVEDP (30 [21-33] vs 25 mm Hg [20-30], p = 0.013) and higher median Mehran risk score (MRS) (5 [2-8] vs 2 [1-5], p <0.001). Patients with CIN had more in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (composite end point of death, new or recurrent myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization or stroke) (23% vs 8.6%, p = 0.01), but similar 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (20% vs 15%, p = 0.46). An LVEDP >30 mm Hg independently predicted CIN (odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.46 to 8.03, p = 0.005). The addition of LVEDP ≥30 mm Hg to MRS marginally improved risk prediction for CIN compared with MRS alone (area-under-curve, c-statistic = 0.71 vs c-statistic = 0.63, p = 0.08). In conclusion, elevated LVEDP ≥30 mm Hg during primary PCI was an independent predictor of CIN in patients treated for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The addition of LVEDP to the MRS may improve risk prediction for CIN.

Associations between symptoms and functional capacity in patients after COVID-19 infection and community controls.

BACKGROUND: Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC or 'long COVID') reflect ongoing symptoms, but these are non-specific and common in the wider community. Few reports of PASC have been compared with a control group. AIMS: To compare symptoms and objective impairment of functional capacity in patients with previous COVID-19 infection with uninfected community controls. METHODS: In this community-based, cross-sectional study of functional capacity, 562 patients from Western Melbourne who had recovered from COVID-19 infections in 2021 and 2022 were compared with controls from the same community and tested for functional capacity pre-COVID-19. Functional impairment (<85% of the predicted response) was assessed using the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) test. A subgroup underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after exercise training. RESULTS: Of 562 respondents (age 54 ± 12 years, 69% women), 389 were symptomatic. Functional impairment (<85% predicted metabolic equivalent of tasks) was documented by DASI in 149 participants (27%), and abnormal 6MWD (<85% predicted) was observed in 14% of the symptomatic participants. Despite fewer risk factors and younger age, patients with COVID-19 had lower functional capacity by 6MWD (P < 0.001) and more depression (P < 0.001) than controls. In a pilot group of seven participants (age 58 ± 12 years, two women, VO2 18.9 ± 5.7 mL/kg/min), repeat testing after exercise training showed a 20% increase in peak workload. CONCLUSIONS: Although most participants (69%) had symptoms consistent with long COVID, significant subjective functional impairment was documented in 27% and objective functional impairment in 14%. An exercise training programme might be beneficial for appropriately selected patients.

Sex differences among patients presenting to hospital with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and shockable rhythm.

OBJECTIVE: Sex differences in patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and shockable rhythm might be associated with disparities in clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study and compared characteristics and short-term outcomes between male and female adult patients who presented with OHCA and shockable rhythm at two large metropolitan health services in Melbourne, Australia between the period of 2014-2018. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of sex on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 212 patients, 166 (78%) were males and 46 (22%) were females. Both males and females presented with similar rates of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (44% vs 36%, P = 0.29), although males were more likely to have a history of coronary artery disease (32% vs 13%) and a final diagnosis of a cardiac cause for their OHCA (89% vs 72%), both P = 0.01. Rates of coronary angiography (81% vs 71%, P = 0.23) and percutaneous coronary intervention (51% vs 42%, P = 0.37) were comparable among males and females. No differences in rates of in-hospital mortality (38% vs 37%, P = 0.90) and 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and nonfatal stroke) (39% vs 41%, P = 0.79) were observed between males and females, respectively. Female sex was not associated with worse in-hospital mortality when adjusted for other variables (odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.60, P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Among patients presenting with OHCA and a shockable rhythm, baseline sex and sex differences were not associated with disparities in short-term outcomes in contemporary systems of care.

Adverse Impact of Peri-Procedural Stroke in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Peri-procedural stroke (PPS) is an important complication in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The extent to which PPS impacts mortality and outcomes remains to be defined. Consecutive patients who underwent PCI enrolled in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (2014 to 2018) were categorized into PPS and no PPS groups. The primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and unplanned revascularization). Of 50,300 patients, PPS occurred in 0.26% patients (n = 133) (71% ischemic, and 29% hemorrhagic etiology). Patients who developed PPS were older (69 vs 66 years) compared with patients with no PPS, and more likely to have pre-existing heart failure (59% vs 29%), chronic kidney disease (33% vs 20%), and previous cerebrovascular disease (13% vs 3.6%), p <0.01. Among those with PPS, there was a higher frequency of presentation with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (49% vs 18%) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (14% vs 2.2%), PCI by way of femoral access (59% vs 46%), and adjunctive thrombus aspiration (12% vs 3.6%), all p = <0.001. PPS was associated with incident 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR] 2.97, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.86 to 4.74, p <0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Utilizing inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, PPS remained predictive of 30-day MACE (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.80, p = 0.001) driven by higher 30-day mortality (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.96, p = 0.001). In conclusion, in this large, multi-center registry, the incidence of PPS was low; however, its clinical sequelae were significant, with a twofold increased risk of 30-day MACE and all-cause death.

Randomized Informational Intervention and Adult Park Use and Park-Based Physical Activity in Low-Income, Racially Diverse Urban Neighborhoods.

BACKGROUND: Neighborhood parks are important locations to encourage and stimulate physical activity (PA) among the urban population. This study aims to evaluate the impact of an informational intervention on adult park use and PA behaviors in 3 low-income, racially diverse urban neighborhoods in Minneapolis, MN. METHOD: The study employed a household-level randomized controlled trial and collected baseline and follow-up data from 171 participants. Within each neighborhood, participants were randomized to an informational intervention or to a no-intervention comparison. Intervention households received monthly, neighborhood-specific newsletters about park-based PA opportunities, park program brochures, trail maps, and activity guides. RESULTS: The average treatment effect of the newsletter intervention was positive yet moderated by respondent age. For a 20-year-old resident, treatment was associated with 0.97 (P < .05) additional park visits and 31.24 (P < .05) additional minutes of park-based PA over a 3-day recall period. For 40-year-old respondents, these positive effects are smaller at 0.36 (P < .05) additional visits and 4.66 (P < .05) additional minutes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An intervention to increase awareness about park-based PA opportunities and benefits increased self-reported park visits and in-park PA among adults who lived in low-income, racially diverse neighborhoods.