Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Radiol ; 62(8): 1045-1051, 2021 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32847366

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Making the preoperative diagnosis of soft-tissue lymphoma is important because the treatments for lymphoma and sarcoma are different. PURPOSE: To determine the reliability and accuracy of single-slice and whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis when differentiating soft-tissue lymphoma from undifferentiated sarcoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with confirmed soft-tissue lymphoma or undifferentiated sarcoma who underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion-weighted imaging, were included. Single-slice and whole-tumor ADC histogram analyses were performed using software. Mean, standard deviation (SD), 5th and 95th percentiles, skewness, and kurtosis were compared between groups, and a receiver operating characteristic curve with area under the curve (AUC) was obtained. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with soft-tissue lymphoma and 12 patients with undifferentiated sarcoma were included. ADC histogram analysis of single-slice and whole-tumor, mean, SD, and 5th and 95th percentiles was significantly lower in lymphoma than in undifferentiated sarcoma. Whole-tumor analysis kurtosis was significantly higher in lymphoma than in undifferentiated sarcoma. All AUCs were high in single-slice and whole-tumor analysis: 0.987 vs. 1.000 in mean; 0.821 vs. 0.782 in SD; 0.949 vs. 0.949 in 5th percentile; and 1.000 vs. 1.000 in 95th percentile without significant difference. AUC of kurtosis in whole-tumor ADC histogram analysis was 0.750. CONCLUSION: Single-slice and whole-tumor ADC histogram analysis seems to be reliable and accurate for differentiating soft-tissue lymphoma from undifferentiated sarcoma.


Assuntos
Linfoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico
2.
Eur Radiol ; 30(8): 4150-4163, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32166493

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted in order to compare the diagnostic performance of noncontrast and abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in initially diagnosed HCC patients. METHODS: We identified 140 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed HCC (173 HCCs) within the Milan criteria, who underwent liver MRI using gadoxetic acid between 2015 and 2016. One hundred twenty-three consecutive patients without HCC who underwent liver MRI in the same period for HCC surveillance were enrolled for the control group. Two radiologists independently reviewed two MRI sets: a noncontrast set and an abbreviated set. The noncontrast set consists of T2 FSE/ssFSE, T1 in- and out-of-phase image, DWI, and the ADC map. The abbreviated set consists of T2 FSE/ssFSE, hepatobiliary phase image 20 min after gadoxetic acid injection, DWI, and the ADC map. RESULTS: In a per-patient analysis, sensitivity of reviewer 1 for noncontrast and abbreviated sets was 85.7 and 90.0%, respectively. The specificity for both noncontrast and abbreviated sets was 92.7%. For reviewer 2, sensitivity of noncontrast and abbreviated sets was 86.4 and 89.3%, respectively. Per-patient specificity of reviewer 2 was 92.7% for both noncontrast and abbreviated sets. The sensitivity and specificity of two image sets were not significantly different for both reviewers. The per-tumor sensitivity of noncontrast and abbreviated sets was 81.5 and 84.4% for reviewer 1, respectively, and 79.8 and 84.4% for reviewer 2, respectively. There was no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Noncontrast and abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid showed comparable diagnostic performance for detecting patients with HCCs in the early stage. KEY POINTS: • Diagnostic performance of noncontrast MRI and abbreviated MRI using gadoxetic acid for detecting HCCs is comparable in patients with HCCs in the early stage. • Noncontrast MRI and abbreviated MRI showed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting HCCs in the early stage. • Outcomes of surveillance for HCC in high-risk patients can be improved by adopting these simplified and focused MRI protocols.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Meios de Contraste , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Gadolínio DTPA , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...