Chronic Doxepin Toxicity Masquerading as Epilepsy in a 10-Year-Old Boy.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic tricyclic antidepressant toxicity is rarely described in children. Symptoms include confusion, ataxia, and seizures. Toxicity may result from dosing error, CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 genetic variability, and drug-drug interactions. Chronic doxepin toxicity has not been previously reported in children. Doxepin is prescribed for insomnia and depression, with a maximum off-label dose of 3 mg/kg in children. We present a case of chronic doxepin toxicity mimicking epilepsy in a child attributable to three potential factors: supratherapeutic dosing, pharmacogenomic variability, and drug-drug interactions. CASE REPORT: A 10-year-old boy with insomnia, diagnosed with epilepsy 6 months prior, presented to an emergency department with confusion, ataxia, and increasing seizure frequency. He was prescribed doxepin for insomnia and four antiepileptics for seizures. After admission, he had two seizures and remained confused. EKGs showed QRS prolongation, suggesting doxepin toxicity. Doxepin-nordoxepin combined serum concentration was 1419 ng/mL (therapeutic 100-300 ng/mL), confirming doxepin toxicity. Outpatient records showed onset of confusion and seizures as doxepin dose was gradually uptitrated to 300 mg nightly (4.41 mg/kg). Symptoms worsened following addition of clobazam (CYP2D6 inhibitor) and topiramate (CYP2C19 inhibitor). Following doxepin discontinuation, all symptoms resolved. CYP2D6 testing showed intermediate metabolizer phenotype (CYP2D6*1/*4; activity score = 1.0; copy number = 2.0). No seizures have occurred in more than one year since doxepin discontinuation. DISCUSSION: Caution must be exercised when prescribing doxepin. Pharmacogenomics, dose, drug-drug interactions, and age should be considered. Chronic toxicity should be contemplated in patients taking doxepin without acute overdose who present with persistent neurologic abnormalities including seizure.

Clinical and electrocardiographic factors associated with adverse cardiovascular events in bupropion exposures.

INTRODUCTION: Bupropion toxicity can cause cardiogenic shock, ventricular dysrhythmias, and death. Clinical and electrocardiographic factors associated with adverse cardiovascular events in bupropion toxicity have not been well-studied. This study aimed to identify factors associated with adverse cardiovascular events in adult patients with isolated bupropion exposures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study queried the National Poison Data System from 2019 through 2020. We included patients 20 years or older with acute or acute-on-chronic single-agent bupropion exposures evaluated in a healthcare facility. Exclusion criteria were confirmed non-exposure, withdrawal as a reason for exposure, lack of follow-up, documentation that exposure was probably not responsible for the effects, and missing data. The primary outcome was adverse cardiovascular events, defined as the presence of any of the following: vasopressor use, ventricular dysrhythmia, myocardial injury, or cardiac arrest. Independent variables were age, the intentionality of exposure, seizures, tachycardia, QRS widening, and QTc prolongation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to test for independent associations between independent variables and adverse cardiovascular events. RESULTS: Of 4,640 patients included in the final analysis (56.7% female, 56.5% suspected suicidal intent), 68 (1.47%) experienced an adverse cardiovascular event. Age (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence intervals 1.02-1.05), single seizure (odds ratio 9.18; 95% confidence intervals 4.24-19.9) and complicated seizures (odds ratio 38.9; 95% confidence intervals 19.3-78.1), QRS widening (odds ratio 3.01; 95% confidence intervals 1.62-5.59), and QTc prolongation (odds ratio 1.76; 95% confidence intervals 1.00-3.10) were independently associated with adverse cardiovascular events. No patients with unintentional exposure experienced adverse cardiovascular events, prohibiting intentionality from inclusion in the regression model. In the post hoc subgroup analysis of intentional exposures, age, single and complicated seizures, and QRS widening remained independently associated with adverse cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age, seizures, QRS widening, and QTc prolongation were associated with adverse cardiovascular events in bupropion exposures. Adverse cardiovascular events did not occur in unintentional exposures. Further research is needed to develop screening tools and treatments for bupropion cardiotoxicity.

Intensive Care Interventions Among Children With Toxicologic Exposures to Cardiovascular Medications.

OBJECTIVES: Interventions requiring a PICU are rare in toxicologic exposures, but cardiovascular medications are high-risk exposures due to their hemodynamic effects. This study aimed to describe prevalence of and risk factors for PICU interventions among children exposed to cardiovascular medications. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of Toxicology Investigators Consortium Core Registry from January 2010 to March 2022. SETTING: International multicenter research network of 40 sites. PATIENTS: Patients 18 years old or younger with acute or acute-on-chronic toxicologic exposure to cardiovascular medications. Patients were excluded if exposed to noncardiovascular medications or if symptoms were documented as unlikely related to exposure. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 1,091 patients in the final analysis, 195 (17.9%) received PICU intervention. One hundred fifty-seven (14.4%) received intensive hemodynamic interventions and 602 (55.2%) received intervention in general. Children less than 2 years old were less likely to receive PICU intervention (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.86). Exposures to alpha-2 agonists (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.11-3.72) and antiarrhythmics (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.41-12.90) were associated with PICU intervention. In the sensitivity analysis removing atropine from the composite outcome PICU intervention, only exposures to calcium channel antagonists (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.09-4.11) and antiarrhythmics (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.57-14.81) were independently associated with PICU intervention. No independent association was identified between PICU intervention and gender, polypharmacy, intentionality or acuity of exposure, or the other medication classes studied. CONCLUSIONS: PICU interventions were uncommon but were associated with exposure to antiarrhythmic medications, calcium channel antagonists, and alpha-2 agonists. As demonstrated via sensitivity analysis, exact associations may depend on institutional definitions of PICU intervention. Children less than 2 years old are less likely to require PICU interventions. In equivocal cases, age and exposure to certain cardiovascular medication classes may be useful to guide appropriate disposition.

Shortages of agents used to treat antimuscarinic delirium.

INTRODUCTION: Antimuscarinic delirium (AD), a potentially life-threatening condition frequently encountered by emergency physicians, results from poisoning with antimuscarinic agents. Treatment with physostigmine and benzodiazepines is the mainstay of pharmacotherapy, and use of dexmedetomidine and non-physostigmine centrally-acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (cAChEi) such as rivastigmine has also been described. Unfortunately, these medications are subject to drug shortages which negatively impact the ability to provide appropriate pharmacologic treatment of patients with AD. METHODS: Drug shortage data were retrieved from the University of Utah Drug Information Service (UUDIS) database from January 2001 through December 2021. Shortages of first-line agents used to treat AD (physostigmine and parenteral benzodiazepines) and second-line agents (dexmedetomidine and non-physostigmine cAChEi) were examined. Drug class, formulation, route of administration, reason for shortage, shortage duration, generic status, and whether the drug was a single-source product (made by only one manufacturer) were extracted. Shortage overlap and median shortage durations were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-six shortages impacting drugs used to treat AD were reported to UUDIS from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2021. Median shortage duration for all medication classes was 6.0 months. Four shortages were unresolved at the end of the study period. The single medication most often on shortage was dexmedetomidine, however benzodiazepines were the most common medication class on shortage. Twenty-five shortages involved parenteral formulations, and one shortage involved the transdermal patch formulation of rivastigmine. The majority (88.5%) of shortages involved generic medications, and 50% of products on shortage were single-source. The most common reported reason for shortage was a manufacturing issue (27%). Shortages were often prolonged and, in 92% of cases, overlapped temporally with other shortages. Shortage frequency and duration increased during the second half of the study period. CONCLUSION: Shortages of agents used in the treatment of AD were common during the study period and affected all agent classes. Shortages were often prolonged and multiple shortages were ongoing at study period end. Multiple concurrent shortages involving different agents occurred, which could hamper substitution as a means of mitigating shortage. Healthcare stakeholders must develop innovative patient- and institution-specific solutions in times of shortage and work to build resilience into the medical product supply chain to minimize future shortages of drugs used for treatment of AD.

Diphenhydramine-Induced Antimuscarinic Delirium Treated with Physostigmine and Transdermal Rivastigmine.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent physostigmine shortages present a challenge to healthcare providers treating antimuscarinic delirium. Other centrally acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as rivastigmine may represent a therapeutic alternative or adjunct during physostigmine shortage; however, previous reports of use have not documented serum antimuscarinic toxin concentrations, limiting evaluation of effectiveness. Combination therapy with physostigmine and rivastigmine has not been described. In this report, the authors present a case of diphenhydramine-induced antimuscarinic delirium with elevated diphenhydramine serum concentrations treated with physostigmine and transdermal rivastigmine without observed adverse effect. CASE REPORT: A 48-year-old female presented to an emergency department after ingesting 3.75 g (41.2 mg/kg) of diphenhydramine. She had antimuscarinic delirium with a presenting serum diphenhydramine concentration of 1500 ng/mL (therapeutic range, 25-112 ng/mL) and required two doses of physostigmine to avert intubation prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. At hospital hour 22, in the ICU, antimuscarinic delirium persisted but no further physostigmine was available due to hospital shortage. Therefore, a 9.5-mg transdermal rivastigmine patch was applied. By hospital hour 24, her delirium had resolved. A serum diphenhydramine concentration at hospital hour 25 was elevated at 760 ng/mL. Transdermal rivastigmine was discontinued at hospital hour 48 without recurrent delirium. Despite persistent normal mental status after rivastigmine discontinuation, the patient had a dry mouth, difficulty urinating, and mydriasis until hospital day 5. She never developed muscarinic toxicity. DISCUSSION: Transdermal rivastigmine may be a useful treatment alternative or adjunct during physostigmine shortage for antimuscarinic delirium and has a long duration of action without aspiration risk. Muscarinic toxicity was not observed.

Warfarin Overdose in an Adolescent Not Dependent on Anticoagulation: Reversal Strategy and Kinetics.

INTRODUCTION: Warfarin induces coagulopathy. Guidelines protocolize reversal of supratherapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) in patients dependent on anticoagulation, but practices vary for reversing warfarin-induced coagulopathy after overdose in non-warfarin-dependent patients. CASE REPORT: This is the report of a 15-year-old female who ingested her father's warfarin (100-200 mg) in a self-harm attempt. At hour 24 post-ingestion, her INR was 2.00 and she was admitted for monitoring. Reversal of coagulopathy was initially deferred pending the INR trend. The INR was 5.10 at hour 60 and 2.5 mg oral vitamin K1 (VK1) was given. At hour 85, the INR peaked at 6.67 and she received a second oral dose of 2.5 mg VK1. On day 8, she was medically cleared with an INR of 1.31. On day 11, she developed lower abdominal pain and diarrhea. Imaging revealed a duodenal hematoma, and symptoms improved spontaneously. She was again medically cleared 13 days post-ingestion. Her serum warfarin concentration peaked at 19 mcg/mL at hour 46. Serial warfarin concentrations were obtained, demonstrating first-order elimination kinetics and a 30-hour half-life. CONCLUSION: A restrictive approach to coagulopathy reversal in non-warfarin-dependent patients with intentional warfarin overdose may result in worsening coagulopathy, bleeding, and lengthy hospital stay. Given the risk for significant, prolonged coagulopathy, these patients should be treated early with VK1, with subsequent serial INR monitoring and probable additional VK1 dosing. Delayed peak warfarin concentrations support consideration of gastrointestinal decontamination in late presenters.

Pharmaceutical Compounding: a History, Regulatory Overview, and Systematic Review of Compounding Errors.

INTRODUCTION: Medications are compounded when a formulation of a medication is needed but not commercially available. Regulatory oversight of compounding is piecemeal and compounding errors have resulted in patient harm. We review compounding in the United States (US), including a history of compounding, a critique of current regulatory oversight, and a systematic review of compounding errors recorded in the literature. METHODS: We gathered reports of compounding errors occurring in the US from 1990 to 2020 from PubMed, Embase, several relevant conference abstracts, and the US Food and Drug Administration "Drug Alerts and Statements" repository. We categorized reports into errors of "contamination," suprapotency," and "subpotency." Errors were also subdivided by whether they resulted in morbidity and mortality. We reported demographic, medication, and outcome data where available. RESULTS: We screened 2155 reports and identified 63 errors. Twenty-one of 63 were errors of concentration, harming 36 patients. Twenty-seven of 63 were contamination errors, harming 1119 patients. Fifteen errors did not result in any identified harm. DISCUSSION: Compounding errors are attributed to contamination or concentration. Concentration errors predominantly result from compounding a prescription for a single patient, and disproportionately affect children. Contamination errors largely occur during bulk distribution of compounded medications for parenteral use, and affect more patients. The burden falls on the government, pharmacy industry, and medical providers to reduce the risk of patient harm caused by compounding errors. CONCLUSION: In the US, drug compounding is important in ensuring access to vital medications, but has the potential to cause patient harm without adequate safeguards.