Sociodemographic factors and Child Opportunity Index disparities associated with missed care opportunities in pediatric patients with lymphoma and leukemia referred for FDG-PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: Little data exists on the association of missed care opportunities (MCOs) in children referred for nuclear medicine/nuclear oncology imaging examinations and socioeconomic disparities. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of MCOs in children with lymphoma/leukemia scheduled for fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and the impact of sociodemographic factors and Child Opportunity Index (COI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of MCOs in children with lymphoma/leukemia scheduled for FDG-PET/CT (2012 to 2022) was performed. In univariate analysis, patient, neighborhood, and appointment data were assessed across MCOs and completed appointments. Logistic regression evaluated independent effects of patient-, neighborhood-, and appointment-level factors with MCOs. Two-sided P-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In 643 FDG-PET/CT appointments (n = 293 patients; median age 15 years (IQR 11.0-17.0 years); 37.9% female), there were 20 MCOs (3.1%) involving 16 patients. Only 8.2% appointments involved Black/African American non-Hispanic/Latino patients, yet they made up a quarter of total MCOs. Patients living in neighborhoods with very low or low COI experienced significantly higher MCOs versus zip codes with very high COI (6.9% vs. 0.8%; P = 0.02). Logistic regression revealed significantly increased likelihood of MCOs for patients aged 18 to 21 [odds ratio (OR) 4.50; 95% CI 1.53-13.27; P = 0.007], Black/African American non-Hispanic/Latino (OR 3.20; 95% CI 1.08-9.49; P = 0.04), zip codes with very low or low COI (OR 9.60; 95% CI 1.24-74.30; P = 0.03), and unknown insurance status. CONCLUSION: Children with lymphoma/leukemia, living in zip codes with very low or low COI, and who identified as Black/African American non-Hispanic/Latino experienced more MCOs. Our study supports the need to address intersecting sociodemographic, neighborhood, and health system factors that will improve equitable access to necessary healthcare imaging for children.

Establishing a Pediatric Health Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Research Review Process.

Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) research is increasing, and there is a need for a more standardized approach for methodological and ethical review of this research. A supplemental review process for EDI-related human subject research protocols was developed and implemented at a pediatric academic medical center (AMC). The goal was to ensure that current EDI research principles are consistently used and that the research aligns with the AMC's declaration on EDI. The EDI Research Review Committee, established in January 2022, reviewed EDI protocols and provided recommendations and requirements for addressing EDI-related components of research studies. To evaluate this review process, the number and type of research protocols were reviewed, and the types of recommendations given to research teams were examined. In total, 78 research protocols were referred for EDI review during the 20-month implementation period from departments and divisions across the AMC. Of these, 67 were given requirements or recommendations to improve the EDI-related aspects of the project, and 11 had already considered a health equity framework and implemented EDI principles. Requirements or recommendations made applied to 1 or more stages of the research process, including design, execution, analysis, and dissemination. An EDI review of human subject research protocols can provide an opportunity to constructively examine and provide feedback on EDI research to ensure that a standardized approach is used based on current literature and practice.