Safety and use of late-turndown liver allografts to increase rate of transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The demand for liver transplants (LT) in the United States far surpasses the availability of allografts. New allocation schemes have resulted in occasional difficulties with allograft placement and increased intraoperative turndowns. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes related to use of late-turndown liver allografts. METHODS: A review of prospectively collected data of LTs at a single center from July 2019 to July 2023 was performed. Late-turndown placement was defined as an open offer 6 h prior to donation, intraoperative turndown by primary center, or post-cross-clamp turndown. RESULTS: Of 565 LTs, 25.1% (n = 142) received a late-turndown liver allograft. There were no significant differences in recipient age, gender, BMI, or race (all p > 0.05), but MELD was lower for the late-turndown LT recipient group (median 15 vs 21, p < 0.001). No difference in 30-day, 6-month, or 1-year survival was noted on logistic regression, and no difference in patient or graft survival was noted on Cox proportional hazard regression. Late-turndown utilization increased during the study from 17.2% to 25.8%, and median waitlist time decreased from 77 days in 2019 to 18 days in 2023 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Use of late-turndown livers has increased and can increase transplant rates without compromising post-transplant outcomes with appropriate selection.

Need for Blood Transfusion Volume Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients suffering from isolated severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) receive blood transfusion on hospital arrival due to hypotension. We hypothesized that increasing blood transfusions in isolated sTBI patients would be associated with an increase in mortality. METHODS: We performed a trauma quality improvement program (TQIP) (2017-2019) and single-center (2013-2021) database review filtering for patients with isolated sTBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale head ≥3 and all other areas ≤2). Age, initial Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), initial systolic blood pressure (SBP), mechanism (blunt/penetrating), packed red blood cells (pRBCs) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion volume (units) within the first 4 h, FFP/pRBC ratio (4h), and in-hospital mortality were obtained from the TQIP Public User Files. RESULTS: In the TQIP database, 9257 patients had isolated sTBI and received pRBC transfusion within the first 4 h. The mortality rate within this group was 47.3%. The increase in mortality associated with the first unit of pRBCs was 20%, then increasing approximately 4% per unit transfused to a maximum mortality of 74% for 11 or more units. When adjusted for age, initial GCS, ISS, initial SBP, and mechanism, pRBC volume (1.09 [1.08-1.10], FFP volume (1.08 [1.07-1.09]), and FFP/pRBC ratio (1.18 [1.08-1.28]) were associated with in-hospital mortality. Our single-center study yielded 138 patients with isolated sTBI who received pRBC transfusion. These patients experienced a 60.1% in-hospital mortality rate. Logistic regression corrected for age, initial GCS, ISS, initial SBP, and mechanism demonstrated no significant association between pRBC transfusion volume (1.14 [0.81-1.61]), FFP transfusion volume (1.29 [0.91-1.82]), or FFP/pRBC ratio (6.42 [0.25-164.89]) and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients suffering from isolated sTBI have a higher rate of mortality with increasing amount of pRBC or FFP transfusion within the first 4 h of arrival.

Re-Evaluating the Use of High Sensitivity Troponin to Diagnose Blunt Cardiac Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Blunt cardiac injury (BCI) can be challenging diagnostically, and if misdiagnosed, can lead to life-threatening complications. Our institution previously evaluated BCI screening with troponin and electrocardiogram (EKG) during a transition from troponin I to high sensitivity troponin (hsTnI), a more sensitive troponin I assay. The previous study found an hsTnI of 76 ng/L had the highest capability of accurately diagnosing a clinically significant BCI. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the newly implemented protocol. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with a sternal fracture from March 2022 to April 2023 at our urban level-1 trauma center were retrospectively reviewed for EKG findings, hsTnI trend, echocardiogram changes, and clinical outcomes. The BCI cohort and non-BCI cohort ordinal measures were compared using Wilcoxon's two-tailed rank sum test and categorical measures were compared with Fisher's exact test. Youden indices were used to evaluate hsTnI sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Sternal fractures were identified in 206 patients, of which 183 underwent BCI screening. Of those screened, 103 underwent echocardiogram, 28 were diagnosed with clinically significant BCIs, and 15 received intervention. The peak hsTnI threshold of 76 ng/L was found to have a Youden index of 0.31. Rather, the Youden index was highest at 0.50 at 40 ng/L (sensitivity 0.79 and specificity 0.71) for clinically significant BCI. CONCLUSIONS: Screening patients with sternal fractures for BCI using hsTnI and EKG remains effective. To optimize the hsTnI threshold, this study determined the hsTnI threshold should be lowered to 40 ng/L. Further improvements to the institutional protocol may be derived from multicenter analysis.

Expanding MELD exceptions for colorectal liver metastasis: data and policy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While liver transplant for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has been demonstrated to be a promising treatment in selected patients, the typically low MELD score of these patients and lack of exception points may lead to challenges in receiving a deceased donor liver for transplant. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies have shown improved outcomes in select patients with CRLM who undergo liver transplant, and several trials are ongoing and will conclude in the next several years. MELD exception points have recently been proposed in qualifying patients with CRLM to help this group obtain more timely quality allografts. Under the current proposal, patients with CRLM would receive a score of the median MELD at transplant (MMaT) for their center minus 20 with a minimum score of 15 in cases where MMaT minus 20 would be less than 15. This would allow them to receive transplants faster without competing unnecessarily with those with greater medical need. SUMMARY: Giving MELD exception points to patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases in need of transplant may decrease time on the waitlist and improve outcomes for these patients.

Nationwide Analysis of Locoregional Management for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Males: An NCDB Analysis of the Surgical Approach to DCIS in Males.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding the optimal locoregional approach for males with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). This study examined trends in management and survival for males with DCIS. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for males with a diagnosis of DCIS from 2006 to 2017. Patients were categorized by locoregional management. Continuous variables were evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis and categorical variables by chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate for predictors of patients receiving partial mastectomy (PM) with radiation. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2017, 711 males with DCIS were identified. Most received mastectomy alone (57.1%). No change was observed in management approach from 2006 to 2017. Patients who underwent mastectomy alone were mostly hormone-positive (95.9% were estrogen-positive, 90.9% were progesterone-positive), although this cohort was least likely to receive hormone therapy (17.2%). Among those who underwent PM with radiation, only 61% of those who were hormone-positive received hormone therapy. Univariable analysis demonstrated that those of black race had lower odds of receiving PM with radiation (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.84), which persisted in the multivariable analysis with control for age and tumor size (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15-0.67). Overall survival did not differ significantly between the four treatment methods (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The management approach to male DCIS did not change from 2006 to 2017. Survival did not differ between treatment methods. Demographic and clinicopathologic features, including race, may influence locoregional treatments received, and further studies are needed to further understand this.

Defining the operative time threshold for safety in patients undergoing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is a safe and efficacious procedure in appropriately selected patients, though frequently with increased operative times compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). METHODS: From 2014 to 2019, patients who underwent elective, low-risk, RPDs and OPDs in the NSQIP database were isolated. The operative time threshold (OTT) for safety in RPD patients was estimated by identifying the operative time at which complication rates for RPD patients exceeded the complication rate of the benchmark OPD control. RESULTS: Of 6270 patients identified, 939 (15%) underwent RPD and 5331 (85%) underwent OPD. The incidence of major morbidity or mortality for the OPD cohort was 35.1%. The OTT was identified as 7.7 h. Patients whose RPDs were above the OTT experienced a higher incidence of major morbidity (42.5% vs. 35.0%, p < 0.01) and 30-day mortality (2.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.03) than the OPD cohort. Preoperative obstructive jaundice (OR: 1.47, [95% CI: 1.08-2.01]) and pancreatic duct size <3 mm (OR: 2.44, [95% CI: 1.47-4.06]) and 3-6 mm (OR: 2.15, [95% CI: 1.31-3.52]) were risk factors for prolonged RPDs on multivariable regression. CONCLUSION: The operative time threshold for safety, identified at 7.7 h, should be used to improve patient selection for RPDs and as a competency-based quality benchmark.

Axillary management in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the modern era: A national cancer database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Axillary management for node-positive breast cancer continues to evolve. Data further supporting targeted axillary dissection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was published in 2016 and may have induced changes in practice. METHODS: Patients included in the National Cancer Database from 2014 to 2017 with clinical T1 to T4 and node-positive disease who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgical axillary management were evaluated. Patients were divided into the following 3 groups: selective axillary dissection, minimal axillary dissection, and maximal axillary dissection, according to surgical axillary management and pathological node status. RESULTS: Patients who underwent selective axillary dissection were younger (52.4 years ± 12.4, P < .0001) compared to maximal axillary dissection (55.1 ± 12.7) and minimal axillary dissection (54.6 ± 12.7). Patients with higher clinical stage more frequently underwent maximal axillary dissection, and those with lower tumor grade more frequently underwent minimal axillary dissection (P < .0001). Community cancer programs were more likely to perform maximal axillary dissection compared to all other types of programs and had the slowest rate of adoption of selective axillary dissection. Integrated Network Cancer Programs had the lowest proportion of maximal axillary dissection performed and the highest proportion of selective axillary dissection. Uninsured patients were more likely to receive maximal axillary dissection, and those with private insurance were more likely to undergo selective axillary dissection (P < .0001). Selective axillary dissection rates increased from 29.8% of procedures in 2016 to 41.5% in 2017, and MaxAD rates decreased from 62.4% in 2016 to 47.9% in 2017. CONCLUSION: Utilization of selective axillary dissection has increased since 2016; however, discrepancies in surgical axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy still exist.

Liver Transplantation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: Is It Appropriate?

Colorectal cancer with liver metastases is a condition with significant morbidity and mortality that affects many people around the world. Many treatments exist to target liver metastases, including surgical resection, chemotherapy, nonsurgical liver-directed therapies, and liver transplantation. The field of transplant oncology is emerging as a promising alternative to palliative chemotherapy alone in appropriately selected patients. Though few clinical trials have been completed to evaluate safety of liver transplant for colorectal cancer metastases, there are several ongoing trials to hopefully make transplant a viable option for more patients with limited options.

Long-term follow-up of temporary abdominal closure in complex abdomens during liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Temporary abdominal closure is commonly employed in liver transplantation when patient factors make primary fascial closure challenging. However, there is minimal data evaluating long-term survival and patient outcomes after temporary abdominal closure. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review of patients undergoing liver transplantation from January 2013 through December 2017 was performed with a 5-year follow-up. Patients were characterized as either requiring temporary abdominal closure or immediate primary fascial closure at the time of liver transplantation. RESULTS: Of 422 patients who underwent 436 liver transplantations, 17.2% (n = 75) required temporary abdominal closure, whereas 82.8% (n = 361) underwent primary fascial closure. Patients requiring temporary abdominal closure had higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores preoperatively (27 [22-36] vs 23 [20-28], P = .0002), had higher rates of dialysis preoperatively (28.0% vs 12.5%, P = .0007), and were more likely to be hospitalized within 90 days of liver transplantation (64.0% vs 47.5%, P = .0093). On univariable analysis, survival at 1 year was different between the groups (90.9% surviving at 1 year for primary fascial closure versus 82.7% for temporary abdominal closure, P = .0356); however, there was no significant difference in survival at 5 years (83.7% vs 76.0%, P = .11). On multivariable analysis, there was no difference in survival after adjusting for multiple factors. Patients requiring temporary abdominal closure were more likely to have longer hospital stays (median 16 days [9.75-29.5] vs 8 days [6-14], P < .0001), more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (45.3% vs 32.2%, P = .03), and less likely to be discharged home (36.5% vs 74.2%, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary abdominal closure after liver transplantation appears safe and has similar outcomes to primary fascial closure, though it is used more commonly in complex patients.

Transplant for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Colorectal cancer with unresectable liver metastases has significant mortality when treated with chemotherapy alone. In appropriately selected patients, liver transplant is emerging as a treatment alternative for this population. Some key clinical trials, including SECA-I and SECA-II, have shown promising survival results: more trials are being conducted to evaluate safety of this practice.

Importance of the profunda femoris upon patency following aortoiliac procedures.

OBJECTIVE: The importance of the profunda femoris for aortoiliac inflow procedure patency is well-recognized. We aim to quantify the characteristics of the profunda femoris and its relation to patency following aortoiliac inflow procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing aortoiliac inflow procedures between 2009 and 2019 were identified. These were classified into aorto-bifemoral bypass (ABF), extra-anatomic bypass (EAB), femoral endarterectomy (FEA), and iliac stenting. Preoperative imaging characteristics of the profunda femoris were reviewed as well as outcomes. RESULTS: We performed 269 procedures in 202 patients. Of these, 162 were men (59.8%), with a mean age of 61 years (standard deviation, 11.45 years). A total of 123 patients (45.3%) presented with claudication, 69 (25.9%) with critical limb ischemia, and 30 (11.2%) with acute limb ischemia. Fifty patients (18.6%) underwent ABF, 44 (16.4%) underwent EAB, 57 (21.2%) underwent FEA, and 158 (58.7%) underwent iliac stenting. Fourteen patients (5.2%) underwent FEA plus iliac stenting. Fifty-two patients (19.2%) had an occluded superficial femoral artery. Twenty-four patients (8.9%) had additional outflow procedures performed during the index operation, including infrainguinal endovascular intervention in 10 patients (3.7%), infrainguinal bypass in 10 patients (3.7%), and femoropopliteal thrombectomy in 5 patients (1.9%). The mean follow-up was 17.5 months with overall 2-year primary patency (PP) of 79%. Two-year PP was 94.7% for FEA, 85.6% for ABF, 79.8% for iliac stents, and 62.5% for EAB. Unadjusted analysis revealed that loss of primary assisted patency was associated with active smoking (67.6% vs 48.6%; P = .035), lower creatinine (mean, 0.84 vs 1.06 mg/dL; P = .003), critical limb ischemia vs claudication (37.8% vs 21.4%; P = .037), and profunda femoris with fewer than five branches >2 mm in size (88.2% vs 68.5%; P = .011). Multivariate analysis confirmed that a profunda with five or more branches >2 mm in diameter was significantly associated with a lower risk of thrombosis (odds ratio, 0.30; P = .034). Size of the profunda greater than 6 mm approached statistical significance on univariate analysis (35% of the non-thrombosed vs 21% in the thrombosed; P = .073), but did not significantly affect risk of thrombosis on the multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.58; P = .25). The 2-year PP when all operations were considered was 76% compared with 72% for profunda with fewer than five branches > 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic characteristics of the profunda are associated with patency of inflow procedures. Care should be taken to assess the main profunda and branch diameters on preoperative imaging. A concomitant infrainguinal procedure should be considered in cases of profunda with inadequate large branches, to ensure long-term patency of the inflow operation.