UFT/leucovorin vs 5-FU/leucovorin in colon cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to alter the natural history of resected colon cancer. Two regimens (fluorouracil [5-FU] plus leucovorin and 5-FU plus levamisole) have been found to prolong disease-free survival and overall survival in affected patients. Previous comparisons of these two regimens indicate that 5-FU plus leucovorin may offer a small disease-free survival and overall survival advantage. Evidence that UFT (uracil and tegafur) plus oral leucovorin is associated with significant antitumor activity and has an acceptable toxicity profile makes this a logical formulation for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06 is a randomized comparison of the relative efficacies of 5-FU plus leucovorin vs UFT plus leucovorin. Preliminary analysis of the toxicity findings among 1,530 evaluable patients indicates that both regimens are well tolerated and have similar toxicity profiles.

Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02.

BACKGROUND: The conviction that postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy represent an acceptable standard of care for patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the rectum evolved in the absence of data from clinical trials designed to determine whether the addition of radiotherapy results in improved disease-free survival and overall survival. This study was carried out to address this issue. An additional aim was to determine whether leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is superior to the combination of 5-FU, semustine, and vincristine (MOF) in men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 694) with Dukes' B or C carcinoma of the rectum were enrolled in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol R-02 from September 1987 through December 1992 and were followed. They were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alone (n = 348) or chemotherapy with postoperative radiotherapy (n = 346). All female patients (n = 287) received 5-FU plus LV chemotherapy; male patients received either MOF (n = 207) or 5-FU plus LV (n = 200). Primary analyses were carried out by use of a stratified log-rank statistic; P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The average time on study for surviving patients is 93 months as of September 30, 1998. Postoperative radiotherapy resulted in no beneficial effect on disease-free survival (P =.90) or overall survival (P =.89), regardless of which chemotherapy was utilized, although it reduced the cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse from 13% to 8% at 5-year follow-up (P =.02). Male patients who received 5-FU plus LV demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival at 5 years compared with those who received MOF (55% versus 47%; P =.009) but not in 5-year overall survival (65% versus 62%; P =.17). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of postoperative radiation therapy to chemotherapy in Dukes' B and C rectal cancer did not alter the subsequent incidence of distant disease, although there was a reduction in locoregional relapse when compared with chemotherapy alone.

Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence.

BACKGROUND: In 1989, Gail and colleagues developed a model for estimating the risk of breast cancer in women participating in a program of annual mammographic screening (designated herein as model 1). A modification of this model to project the absolute risk of developing only invasive breast cancer is referred to herein as model 2. We assessed the validity of both models by employing data from women enrolled in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. METHODS: We used data from 5969 white women who were at least 35 years of age and without a history of breast cancer. These women were in the placebo arm of the trial and were screened annually. The average follow-up period was 48.4 months. We compared the observed number of breast cancers with the predicted numbers from the models. RESULTS: In terms of absolute risk, the ratios of total expected to observed numbers of cancers (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were 0.84 (0. 73-0.97) for model 1 and 1.03 (0.88-1.21) for model 2, respectively. Within the age groups of 49 years or less, 50-59 years, and 60 years or more, the ratios of expected to observed numbers of breast cancers (95% CIs) for model 1 were 0.91 (0.73-1.14), 0.96 (0.73-1. 28), and 0.66 (0.52-0.86), respectively. Thus, model 1 underestimated breast cancer risk in women more than 59 years of age. For model 2, the risk ratios (95% CIs) were 0.93 (0.72-1.22), 1.13 (0.83-1.55), and 1.05 (0.80-1.41), respectively. Both models exhibited a tendency to overestimate risk for women classified in the higher quintiles of predicted 5-year risk and to underestimate risk for those in the lower quintiles of the same. CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations, these methods provide useful information on breast cancer risk for women who plan to participate in an annual mammographic screening program.

UFT plus calcium folinate vs 5-FU plus calcium folinate in colon cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to alter the natural history of resected colon cancer. Two regimens (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] plus calcium folinate and 5-FU plus levamisole [Ergamisol]) have been found to prolong disease-free survival and overall survival in affected patients. Previous comparisons of these two regimens indicate that 5-FU plus calcium folinate may offer a small disease-free survival and overall survival advantage. The demonstration that UFT (uracil and tegafur) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) offers significant antitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile makes this a logical formulation for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06 is a randomized comparison of the relative efficacies of 5-FU/calcium folinate vs UFT plus oral calcium folinate. Preliminary analysis of toxicity findings among 473 evaluable patients indicates that both regimens are well tolerated and have similar toxicity profiles. If, in the final survival analysis, UFT plus oral calcium folinate treatment yields the same or better disease-free survival and/or overall survival as the 5-FU/calcium folinate treatment and the toxicity profiles remain similar, it is likely that UFT plus oral calcium folinate will be accepted as a new standard for adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer.

PURPOSE: This study had two major goals: (1) to assess the effectiveness of a regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole plus leucovorin as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk colon cancer, and (2) to evaluate 6 months versus 12 months of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with poor-prognosis stage II or III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either intensive-course 5-FU and leucovorin combined with levamisole, or a standard regimen of 5-FU plus levamisole. Patients were also randomly assigned to receive either 12 months or 6 months of chemotherapy, which resulted in four treatment groups. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-one of 915 patients entered (97.4%) were eligible. The median follow-up duration is 5.1 years for patients still alive. There was a difference among the four treatment groups with respect to patient survival, and a significant duration-by-regimen interaction was observed. Specifically, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was inferior to 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole when treatment was given for 6 months (5-year survival rate, 60% v 70%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: There was no significant improvement in patient survival when chemotherapy was given for 12 months compared with 6 months. When chemotherapy was given for 6 months, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with inferior patient survival compared with intensive-course 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole. These data suggest that 5-FU plus levamisole for 6 months should not be used in clinical practice, whereas 6 months of treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole is effective.

Early stopping of a clinical trial when there is evidence of no treatment benefit: protocol B-14 of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project.

Although several randomized clinical trials in the 1980s indicated a benefit from the use of tamoxifen in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, questions have remained regarding the optimal duration of drug administration. In 1982, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) initiated a randomized trial to compare 5 years of tamoxifen to placebo among breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors and no evidence of axillary node involvement. By 1987, evidence of a substantial benefit for tamoxifen led the NSABP to extend this trial to determine whether longer duration tamoxifen therapy would be additionally beneficial. This study randomized patients who had completed 5 years of tamoxifen free of breast cancer recurrence or other events to either tamoxifen or placebo for an additional 5 years. By 1994, 1172 women had entered the study and accrual was closed. In late 1995, the trial was terminated on the basis of interim findings indicating that a benefit for continuing tamoxifen would not be realized. The closure has prompted controversy among cancer researchers, because there are currently at least three tamoxifen duration trials in progress, whereas results from two other studies evaluating 5-year duration therapy versus longer therapy were recently published. Here, we provide details of the statistical rationale contributing to our decision to recommend early closure of the study. We then consider other possible approaches to assessing the appropriateness of early termination in the face of evidence against a benefit, including Bayesian methods, which can be used to incorporate a range of prior beliefs regarding the efficacy of a treatment with accruing information from the trial. We also briefly discuss results of the other published studies.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe chemotherapy-induced afebrile neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials of colony-stimulating factors in febrile patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy have not consistently shown clinical benefit. Nevertheless, the use of colony-stimulating factors to treat patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is widespread. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in afebrile outpatients with severe chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. We measured the number of days of neutropenia, rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, number of days the patient received parenteral antibiotics, and number of culture-positive infections. RESULTS: We randomly assigned 138 patients to receive G-CSF (n=71) or placebo (n=67). The median time to an absolute neutrophil count of at least 500 per cubic millimeter was significantly shorter for patients who received G-CSF (two days, vs. four days for the patients given placebo). However, there was no effect on the rate of hospitalization, number of days in the hospital, duration of treatment with parenteral antibiotics, or number of culture-positive infections. CONCLUSIONS: Routine therapeutic application of G-CSF in afebrile patients with severe neutropenia can reduce the duration of neutropenia, but this does not appear to provide practical clinical benefit.

A clinical trial to evaluate the worth of preoperative multimodality therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the rectum: a progress report of National Surgical Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03.

PURPOSE: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03 was designed to determine the worth of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of operable rectal cancer. METHODS: Thus far, 116 patients of an eventual 900 with primary operable rectal cancer have been randomized to receive multimodality therapy to begin preoperatively (59 patients) or identical therapy beginning after curative surgery (57). All patients received seven cycles of 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy. Cycles 1 and 4 through 7 used a high-dose weekly FU regimen. In Cycles 2 and 3, FU and low-dose LV chemotherapy was given during the first and fifth week of radiation therapy (5,040 cGy). The preoperative arm (Group 1) received the first three cycles of chemotherapy and all radiation therapy before surgery. The postoperative arm (Group 2) received all radiation and chemotherapy after surgery. Primary study end points included disease-free survival and survival. Secondary end points included local recurrence, primary tumor response to combination therapy, tumor downstaging, and sphincter preservation. RESULTS: Overall treatment-related toxicity was similar in both groups. Although seven preoperative patients had events after randomization that precluded surgery, eight events occurred during an equivalent follow-up period in the postoperative group. No patient was deemed inoperable because of progressive local disease. Sphincter-saving surgery was intended in 31 percent of Group 1 patients and 33 percent of Group 2 patients at the time of randomization. Such surgery was actually performed in 50 percent of the preoperatively treated patients and 33 percent of the postoperatively treated patients. The use of protective colostomy in patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery and the development of perioperative complications in all surgical patients were similar in both groups. There was evidence of tumor downstaging in evaluable patients undergoing preoperative therapy, with 8 percent of Group 1 patients having had a pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: These data do suggest that the preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimen used are, at least, as safe and tolerable as standard postoperative treatment. There is presently a trend to tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation in the preoperative arm. Whether this arm will have greater or lesser survival and long-term toxicity awaits the completion of this relevant study.

Controlled trial of fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months as postoperative adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of intensive-course fluorouracil (5FU) plus low-dose leucovorin given for 6 months following potentially curative resection of colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventeen patients with high-risk stage II or stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned 3 to 4 weeks following surgery to receive either (1) chemotherapy with six cycles of 5FU (425 mg/m2) plus leucovorin (20 mg/m2) by rapid intravenous injection daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 to 5 weeks, or (2) observation. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration is 72 months for patients still alive. Patients who received postoperative 5FU plus leucovorin experienced significant improvement in time to relapse (P < .01) and survival (P = .02) compared with control patients treated with surgery alone. Stomatitis, diarrhea, and leukopenia were the predominant chemotherapy toxicities. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin is effective in preventing tumor relapse and improving survival in patients with high-risk colon cancer. These benefits were seen with only six cycles of treatment, using low-dose leucovorin in combination with 5FU on a schedule convenient for outpatient administration.

Future directions in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to alter the natural history of patients with resected colon cancer. Two regimens (fluorouracil [5-FU] plus levamisole (Ergamisol) and 5-FU plus leucovorin) have been found most successful in prolonging disease-free and overall survival. When these two regimens were directly compared in randomized clinical trials, it appeared that a small disease-free survival and overall survival advantage had emerged in favor of 5-FU plus leucovorin. This advantage, in conjunction with an increased understanding of the mechanism of leucovorin's biochemical modulation of 5-FU, makes this regimen a logical choice for studies designed to further optimize and augment the clinical efficacy of chemotherapy for colon cancer. The introduction of oral tegafur and uracil (UFT) and the demonstration of significant antitumor activity with the combination of oral UFT and oral leucovorin, provide an excellent opportunity to optimize treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project has recently implemented a new clinical trial (Protocol C-06) comparing oral UFT plus leucovorin with 5-FU plus leucovorin in the treatment of patients with resected stage II and III colon cancer. The rationale for the design of the trial, inclusion and exclusion criteria, treatment regimens, and statistical considerations are reviewed.

Flow-cytometric analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid content in advanced ovarian carcinoma: its importance in long-term survival.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the importance of deoxyribonucleic acid content to long-term survival from advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical and pathologic prognostic factors, including deoxyribonucleic acid content measured by means of flow cytometry, were analyzed for 282 patients. RESULTS: In 80% of the patients, the deoxyribonucleic acid patterns were nondiploid. In univariate analysis stage (p < 0.0001), residual disease (p < 0.0001), deoxyribonucleic acid index (p = 0.01), and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy (p = 0.02) significantly predicted progression-free survival. In multivariate analysis stage (p < 0.001), residual tumor (p = 0.001), deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy (p = 0.02), and deoxyribonucleic acid index (p = 0.02) retained independent prognostic value. Residual disease and deoxyribonucleic acid content retained independent prognostic value for stage III tumors but not for stage IV tumors. CONCLUSION: Deoxyribonucleic acid analysis with flow cytometry provides prognostic information about long-term progression-free survival from advanced ovarian carcinoma and should be considered in the stratification processes of patients in future clinical trials. This prognostic information appears to be inversely related to tumor burden.

DNA index by flow cytometric analysis: an additional prognostic factor in advanced ovarian carcinoma without residual disease after primary operation.

Patients with no macroscopic residual disease after primary cytoreductive operation are considered to have the most favorable prognosis among subjects with advanced ovarian carcinoma. Nevertheless, approximately half of these patients eventually die of recurrent disease. The identification of more cogent prognostic factors within this subcategory of patients might allow for improved design of postoperative adjuvant treatment. The prognostic significance of several clinical and pathologic factors, including DNA content, was evaluated in 27 patients afforded complete cytoreduction at primary operation who were participants in prospective clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma. After a median follow-up of 120 months, 14 patients were alive without evidence of disease and 13 had died of progressive disease. DNA index provided statistically significant prognostic information on the outcome (P = 0.02). Eleven of the 16 patients with a DNA index more than 1.3 died of tumor (8-year survival, 35%), whereas only 2 of the 11 with a DNA index less than 1.3 died (8-year survival, 79%). In addition, menopausal status was of borderline significance for predicting survival (P = 0.04). The prognostic impact of the DNA index became progressively more evident with longer follow-up. Confirmation of this observation in larger sample populations may provide useful information for designing future clinical trials for this prognostically favorable subset of patients who have optimal reduction with advanced ovarian epithelial carcinoma.

A quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy for resectable rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy after surgery, compared with postsurgical radiation therapy alone, has been shown to improve disease-free survival and overall survival significantly among patients with poor-prognosis (i.e., advanced stage disease or metastasis to regional lymph nodes) resectable rectal cancer. However, the combined therapy is associated with more toxic effects, raising the question of whether the benefits of the treatment justify its quality-of-life costs for the individual patient. PURPOSE: To assess the trade-offs between improved survival and increased treatment toxicity, we reanalyzed data from a randomized clinical trial that compared the efficacy of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy with adjuvant radiation therapy alone in the treatment of patients with poor-prognosis resectable rectal cancer. METHODS: The data were from a North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial in which 204 patients with poor-prognosis rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative radiation therapy alone or radiation therapy plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. A quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis was used to account for freedom from symptomatic disease and from early and late side effects of treatment. All reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: As reported previously, the combined therapy reduced the risk of relapse by 34% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12%-50%; P = .0016) and reduced the overall death rate by 29% (95% CI = 7%-45%; P = .025) in comparison with adjuvant radiation therapy alone. In the 5 years following assignment to treatment, patients who received the combined therapy had more time with toxicity (3.1 months; 95% CI = 2.0-4.1 months), shorter survival after relapse (3.6 months less; 95% CI = 0.9-6.3 months less), and more TWiST (6.1 months; 95% CI = 0.2-12.0 months) than patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy alone. Despite an increase in the amount of time that individuals spent with early and late toxic effects, the Q-TWiST analysis indicated that the combined therapy conferred significantly greater benefit for a wide range of patient preferences about living with the toxicity of treatment or the symptoms of overt disease. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Use of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy as an adjuvant to surgery for patients with poor-prognosis resectable rectal cancer is justified, since the improved outcome in terms of delayed recurrence and increased survival balances the time spent with early and late toxic effects. The Q-TWiST method is an excellent way to compare treatment outcomes that include quality-of-life considerations.

Comparison of estrogen receptor determinations by a biochemical ligand-binding assay and immunohistochemical staining with monoclonal antibody ER1D5 in females with lymph node positive breast carcinoma entered on two prospective clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The measurement of estrogen receptors (ER) in breast cancer specimens has traditionally been assessed with a dextran-coated charcoal assay (DCCA). More recently the immunohistochemical staining (IHC) method has gained increasing popularity because of its ability to use fixed tissue, assess needle biopsies, and reduce cost. Controversy exists over the accuracy of IHC compared with that of DCCA in determining ER. We compared these two techniques using tumor tissue obtained from a large group of females with lymph node positive breast carcinoma with long term follow-up. METHODS: Breast carcinoma tissue was obtained from a large group of females with node positive breast carcinoma participating in two adjuvant chemotherapy trials. ER was determined by the traditional DCCA method and by IHC using the ER1D5 antibody. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by each of these methods. RESULTS: ER status was determined by DCCA and IHC in tumor tissue obtained from 316 females. A concordance of 79% was observed for the determination of ER-positive tumors. Of the discordant results, the majority of DCCA-negative, IHC-positive tumors could be explained by a low level of DCCA positivity (< 10 fmol) or IHC staining of nonmalignant cells. A much higher rate of discordant results was observed in premenopausal females. Of the DCCA-negative, IHC-positive patients 97% were premenopausal and of the DCCA-positive, IHC-negative patients 79% were premenopausal. ER by DCC appears to perform better than ER by IHC as a prognostic factor in terms of DFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with DCCA, IHC with monoclonal antibody ER1D5 appears to be a reasonable substitute for the determination of ER. Although DCCA appeared to perform better as a determinant of prognosis, ER detection is used primarily for deciding on hormonal therapy. Review of discordant cases indicates IHC may more accurately reflect the ER status of malignant cells in some patients. Attention must be paid to quality control considerations in performance of IHC staining.

Prognostic factors in elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: an analysis of patients entered on four prospective clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding prognostic factors and survival in elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen is limited. METHODS: The data from 4 prospective clinical trials were analyzed, including information on 396 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who received tamoxifen as initial therapy for metastatic disease. Emphasis was placed on 184 elderly patients (age greater than 65 years) to characterize the response to therapy, time to progression TTP), overall survival (OS), prognostic factors, and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Among 363 patients with measurable or evaluable disease, the objective response rates were higher in the elderly patients (46% versus 33%, P = 0.06); but age did not achieve significance in a logistic regression analysis (P= 0. 1). The median TTP (10.5 months versus 6.2 months, log rank P = 0.002) and OS (35.7 months versus 28.8 months, log rank P = 0.02) were superior in the elderly cohort. In multivariate analysis, age at diagnosis approached statistical significance (P = 0.055) for TTP but was not significant for OS (P = 0.17). Among elderly patients, disease free interval (DFI) (greater than 5 years), dominant disease site (soft tissue), prior adjuvant chemotherapy, positive estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PgR) and performance status (PS) were independent prognostic factors. Hot flashes were common in both younger and older cohorts (25% versus 33%, P = 0.14), while anorexia (14% versus 22%, P = 0.04) and mood changes (2% versus 6%, P = 0.03) were more common in the elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was no indication that elderly women with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen have a poorer outcome with regard to response rate, TTP or OS; in fact, they appeared to have a slightly better prognosis although this was not significant after adjustment for other prognostic factors. In elderly patients, DFI, PS, positive ER or PGR, and dominant disease site are independent prognostic factors.

Wound recurrence following conventional treatment of colorectal cancer. A rare but perhaps underestimated problem.

UNLABELLED: Reports of trocar and extraction site tumor recurrences following laparoscopic colectomy raise concern that such recurrences may be occurring more frequently with laparoscopic compared with open colectomy. Contemporary data on the incidence of incisional recurrence following open colectomy, in the age of adjuvant therapies, are not available. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to examine the incidence and clinical features of wound recurrence in current prospective trials including 1,711 patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum treated for cure. METHODS: Files of all patients with recurrence (n = 623) were reviewed. Each site of recurrence was recorded separately. All patients have been followed prospectively, and 3-year and 4-year data are mature on 100 and 70 percent, respectively. Stage at diagnosis was B2 in 344 patients and C in 1,367 patients (> 4 nodes positive in 346 patients). RESULTS: Recurrence was identified in 623 patients (36.4 percent) and occurred at a mean of 1.5 years following primary treatment. Eleven patients (0.6 percent) had documented incisional recurrences (9 abdominal wound, 1 perineal wound, and 1 stoma wound). Only four were diagnosed clinically, and the remaining seven were diagnosed incidentally at reoperation. Of 11 patients with incisional wound recurrences, 2 had primary Stage B2 and 9 had primary Stage C disease. Nine of 11 patients were found to have multiple sites of recurrence at time of recurrence. At a mean follow-up of 1.8 years after recurrence, 3 of 11 patients are alive with disease, although 8 have died because of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Incisional recurrence is uncommon, although likely underestimated, following conventional treatment of colorectal carcinoma. Its occurrence is usually a harbinger of diffuse intra-abdominal disease. These data may provide useful information for investigations of laparoscopic approaches to colon cancer.

Evaluation of ifosfamide plus mesna as first-line chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Ifosfamide is an oxazaphosphorine analogue of cyclophosphamide with proven activity in breast cancer but substantial urotoxicity. The introduction of mesna as a uroprotective agent provided a stimulus for reexamination of ifosfamide for therapy of women with metastatic breast cancer. Twenty women with measurable (18 patients) or evaluable (2 patients) disease were entered into a phase II clinical trial of ifosfamide plus mesna as first-line chemotherapy. Ifosfamide was administered i.v. at a dose of 1,800 mg/m2 in 1 L D5W over 2 h on five consecutive days. Mesna was administered i.v. at a dose of 400 mg/m2 over 15 min immediately before and 1 h after ifosfamide, and then every 4 h for three more doses. The last three doses could be given either i.v. or orally. The planned cycle length was 28 days. Three patients (15%), all with measurable disease, achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval: 3 to 38%). Median time to progression was 137 days and median survival was 407 days. Toxicities included cumulative myelosuppression and substantial nausea and emesis. Four patients were removed from treatment because of toxicity alone and a fifth refused further therapy. We conclude that ifosfamide, plus mesna, as given in this protocol has definite but limited antitumor activity and poor tolerability.

Controlled clinical trial of interferon-gamma as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

PURPOSE: The primary goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) to prevent tumor relapse following potentially curative surgery in patients with high-risk colon cancer. A secondary goal was to determine the effect of IFN-gamma on immune function and to correlate alterations in immune parameters with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three to 4 weeks after undergoing resection of all known malignant disease, 99 patients with stage II, III, or IV colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive IFN-gamma 0.2 mg total dose by subcutaneous injection daily for 6 months or observation. Serial assessment of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR expression and Fc receptors on peripheral-blood monocytes was conducted in 24 patients who received IFN-gamma and 27 control patients. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 59 months in patients still alive, there was evidence of a detrimental effect on time to relapse (P = .03) among patients who received IFN-gamma. There was no significant difference in patient survival (P = .12). This study has sufficient power to rule out a 25% reduction in death rate for patients who received IFN-gamma (P < .05). Significant enhancement of immune function was observed in patients treated with IFN-gamma as measured by HLA-DR expression (P < .01) and Fc receptors (P < .001) on peripheral-blood monocytes. CONCLUSION: This study effectively rules out any clinically meaningful benefit for IFN-gamma as surgical adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk colon cancer. Although significant enhancement of nonspecific immune function was seen with this dosage administration schedule of IFN-gamma, this was not associated with any demonstrable antitumor effect.

A phase III evaluation of a somatostatin analogue (octreotide) in the treatment of patients with asymptomatic advanced colon carcinoma. North Central Cancer Treatment Group and the Mayo Clinic.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine by randomized, controlled, double-blind evaluation whether therapy with the somatostatin analogue, octreotide, would delay tumor progression and improve survival of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinomas who were ambulatory with no significant symptoms. METHODS: Two hundred sixty patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and without symptoms related to colon cancer were randomized to receive 150 micrograms of octreotide subcutaneously three times daily or, initially, no treatment. After 91 patients were entered in the double-blind study, saline placebo injections were used for patients in the control arm. RESULTS: The randomization culminated in balanced assignment of patients with respect to disease site(s), presence or absence of measurable or evaluable disease, and interval from diagnosis of metastasis to protocol entry. Steatorrhea and diarrhea, usually mildly severe, resulted more often from treatment than from the placebo. The major end points were time to progression and survival. Curves for both parameters overlapped in the blind and open trial segments. CONCLUSION: Octreotide at a dose of 150 micrograms given three times daily is not effective therapy for patients with advanced asymptomatic colon carcinoma.

Perioperative blood transfusions do not affect disease recurrence of patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal carcinoma: a Mayo/North Central Cancer Treatment Group study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of perioperative blood transfusions on colorectal cancer recurrence and patient survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,051 patients treated with curative surgery for stage II or III colorectal adenocarcinoma were retrospectively studied for the effect of perioperative blood transfusions on disease recurrence and patient survival. Forty-two percent of patients received perioperative blood components. RESULTS: Perioperative transfusions had no effect on disease progression in univariate or multivariate analysis. Tumor stage (P = .0001), locally advanced tumor characteristics (adherence, involvement of adjacent structure, or perforation; P = .0001), location (rectal v colon; P = .0002), grade (P < .001), and cell kinetic profile (nondiploid or high percent synthetic phase [%S]+ percent gap 2 mitosis phase [%G2M]; P = .0003) were the most powerful independent predictors of tumor recurrence. Use of transfusions was associated with an adverse effect on overall survival (P < .004) using multivariate analysis, as well as tumor stage (P = .0001), location (P = .004), grade (P = .001), patient age (P = .0001), sex (P < .04), and cell kinetic profile (P = .0001). In further evaluation of the prognostic effects of transfusions, there was no increased risk of disease recurrence after whole-blood transfusion (P = .14) as compared with packed RBC or no transfusions, although the disease-specific survival for patients who received whole blood was lower than for nontransfused patients (P < .0005) patients who received other blood components (P < .03). CONCLUSION: With transfusion practices that use blood components, most commonly RBCs, medically indicated transfusions to patients with colorectal carcinoma seem to have no impact on disease recurrence. The adverse impact of transfusions on cancer patient survival is more likely due to other unevaluated tumor variables or underlying illness rather than tumor recurrence enhancement by immunosuppression induced by transfusion of blood components.