[How did the survival of acute myeloid leukemia change over the last ten years in our unit?] / Hogyan változott az akut myeloid leukaemiás betegek túlélése a terápiás lehetoségek bovülésével az elmúlt 10 évben klinikánkon?

INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a hematological malignancy with high mortality rate. The treatment is especially challenging in patients older than 65 years, which is the large majority of those. For patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy regimens, only palliative cytoreduction and basic supportive care used to be the options in our unit. However, from 2018, the azacitidine-venetoclax combination has been a new therapeutic alternative. This treatment resulted in marked survival benefit in clinical trials, however, its impact on the daily clinical practice and the entire patient population is unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate how the application of azacitidine-venetoclax changed the treatment and survival of AML patients in our practice. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the available clinical data of all AML patients treated consecutively between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2021 at the 3rd Department of Internal Medicine (from 2020 onward called Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology), examining their treatment depending on the time period of therapy (2011-2017 and 2018-2021). Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. RESULTS: 423 patients were diagnosed during this period. The number of cases showed a marked increase: in the first 7 years of our study, 184 patients were diagnosed, while this rose to 239 during the subsequent 4 years. The median age of patients was 67.6 years, with more than 60% of patients aged over 65. An improving trend can be observed in the overall survival: between 2011 and 2017, the median overall survival was 4.8 ± 0.9 months, while between 2018 and 2021, it was 8.3 ± 1.4 months (p = 0.051). Moreover, in the case of patients over 65 there was a significant overall survival improvement: 3.1 ± 0.5 vs. 4.9 ± 0.6 months (p = 0,01). The main factor behind this improvement could be that a large proportion of over 65 patients previously only fit for supportive care could now be treated with azacitidine-venetoclax: the percentage of actively treated patients grew from 57.1% to 75.3% in the second period. CONCLUSION: The survival of patients unfit for curative therapy and older than 65 showed a steady increase which can be attributed to the introduction of new therapeutic alternatives. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(45): 1787-1794.

[Venetoclax-based salvage in multiple myeloma with (11;14) translocation after suboptimal response to first-line therapy]. / Venetoclaxalapú mentokezelés (11;14)-transzlokációs myeloma multiplexben az elso vonalbeli kezelésre adott nem megfelelo válasz esetén.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma is one of the most common hematologic malignancies, with approximately 400 patients diagnosed in Hungary annually. Novel therapies emerging in the last decade have made a great impact on most patients' survival, however, those responding poorly to standard first-line therapy and failing to proceed to stem cell transplantation face a dire prognosis. Venetoclax, a selective Bcl-2 inhibitor has been shown very effective in the treatment of relapsed/refractory t(11;14) patients, but there are only a few studies about its safety and efficacy when used as salvage in the second line. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to analyze the data of t(11;14) patients treated with venetoclax salvage at our clinic and to evaluate its efficacy. METHOD: Between 2017 and 2021, 13 patients received venetoclax therapy at our clinic after suboptimal response to frontline treatment, whose data we analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Adverse prognostic markers were very prevalent in our group, 4 of our patients had del(17p), 5 had amp(1q21) and 6 had stage 3. Nevertheless, all 13 patients responded well to venetoclax therapy, with 6 reaching very good partial response and 7 complete response. All eligible patients (10) could proceed to transplantation. After median 38 months follow up, neither median progression-free, nor median overall survival was reached, since only 3 patients progressed and 1 died. CONCLUSION: We have shown that when salvage is needed for t(11;14) patients who respond suboptimally to standard frontline therapy, venetoclax is a remarkably good option. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(23): 894-899.

Soluble B-cell maturation antigen as a monitoring marker for multiple myeloma.

Objective: Response to treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) is routinely measured by serum and urine M-protein and free light chain (FLC), as described by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) consensus statement. A non-negligible subgroup of patients however present without measurable biomarkers, others become oligo or non-secretory during recurrent relapses. The aim of our research was to evaluate soluble B-cell maturation antigen (sBCMA) as a monitoring marker measured concurrent with the standard monitoring in MM patients at diagnosis, at relapse and during follow up, in order to establish its potential usefulness in oligo and non-secretory disease. Method: sBCMA levels were measured in 149 patients treated for plasma cell dyscrasia (3 monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance, 5 smoldering myeloma, 7 plasmacytoma, 8 AL amyloidosis and 126 MM) and 16 control subjects using a commercial ELISA kit. In 43 newly diagnosed patients sBCMA levels were measured at multiple timepoints during treatment, and compared to conventional IMWG response and progression free survival (PFS). Results: sBCMA levels among control subjects were significantly lower than among newly diagnosed or relapsed MM patients [20.8 (14.7-38.7) ng/mL vs. 676 (89.5-1,650) and 264 (20.7-1,603) ng/mL, respectively]. Significant correlations were found between sBCMA and the degree of bone marrow plasma cell infiltration. Out of the 37 newly diagnosed patients who have reached partial response or better per IMWG criteria, 33 (89%) have had at least a 50% drop in sBCMA level by therapy week 4. Cohorts made similarly to IMWG response criteria-achieving a 50% or 90% drop in sBCMA levels compared to level at diagnosis-had statistically significant differences in PFS. Conclusion: Our results confirmed that sBCMA levels are prognostic at important decision points in myeloma, and the percentage of BCMA change is predictive for PFS. This highlights the great potential use of sBCMA in oligo- and non-secretory myeloma.