De novo sirolimus and reduced-dose tacrolimus versus standard-dose tacrolimus after liver transplantation: the 2000-2003 phase II prospective randomized trial.

We studied whether the use of sirolimus with reduced-dose tacrolimus, as compared to standard-dose tacrolimus, after liver transplantation is safe, tolerated and efficacious. In an international multicenter, open-label, active-controlled randomized trial (2000-2003), adult primary liver transplant recipients (n=222) were randomly assigned immediately after transplantation to conventional-dose tacrolimus (trough: 7-15 ng/mL) or sirolimus (loading dose: 15 mg, initial dose: 5 mg titrated to a trough of 4-11 ng/mL) and reduced-dose tacrolimus (trough: 3-7 ng/mL). The study was terminated after 21 months due to imbalance in adverse events. The 24-month cumulative incidence of graft loss (26.4% vs. 12.5%, p=0.009) and patient death (20% vs. 8%, p=0.010) was higher in subjects receiving sirolimus. A numerically higher rate of hepatic artery thrombosis/portal vein thrombosis was observed in the sirolimus arm (8% vs. 3%, p=0.065). The incidence of sepsis was higher in the sirolimus arm (20.4% vs. 7.2%, p=0.006). Rates of acute cellular rejection were similar between the two groups. Early use of sirolimus using a loading dose followed by maintenance doses and reduced-dose tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients is associated with higher rates of graft loss, death and sepsis when compared to the use of conventional-dose tacrolimus alone.

Combined liver transplantation and gastric sleeve resection for patients with medically complicated obesity and end-stage liver disease.

Obesity is increasingly common before and after liver transplantation (LT), yet optimal management remains unclear. Our aim was to analyze the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary protocol for obese patients requiring LT, including a noninvasive pretransplant weight loss program, and a combined LT plus sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for obese patients who failed to lose weight prior to LT. Since 2006, all patients referred LT with a BMI > 35 were enrolled. There were 37 patients who achieved weight loss and underwent LT alone, and 7 who underwent LT combined with SG. In those who received LT alone, weight gain to BMI > 35 was seen in 21/34, post-LT diabetes (DM) in 12/34, steatosis in 7/34, with 3 deaths plus 3 grafts losses. In patients undergoing the combined procedure, there were no deaths or graft losses. One patient developed a leak from the gastric staple line, and one had excess weight loss. No patients developed post-LT DM or steatosis, and all had substantial weight loss (mean BMI = 29). Noninvasive pretransplant weight loss was achieved by a majority, though weight gain post-LT was common. Combined LT plus SG resulted in effective weight loss and was associated with fewer post-LT metabolic complications. Long-term follow-up is needed.

Anti-tumour necrosis factor treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease can sometimes relapse and be refractory to standard treatment following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) despite post-transplantation immunosuppressive therapy. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents for the management of IBD following OLT. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients with a diagnosis of IBD who underwent OLT at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1985 and 2009. Patients were included if they had received anti-TNF therapy post-OLT. Clinical response was defined as a physician's assessment of improvement after 12 weeks of anti-TNF usage, and mucosal healing was defined as the absence of ulcerations on follow-up endoscopy. RESULTS: The median age of the eight study patients was 42.0 years and 37.5% were female patients. All had been diagnosed with IBD prior to OLT (UC in three and Crohn's disease in five). Indication for OLT was cirrhotic stage primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and three concomitantly had cholangiocarcinoma. Clinical response was demonstrated in seven of eight patients (87.5%) and mucosal healing was demonstrated in three of seven (42.9%). Four infections (oral candidiasis, Clostridium difficile colitis, bacterial pneumonia and cryptosporidiosis) in three patients were reported. One patient developed an Epstein-Barr virus-positive post-transplant lympho-proliferative disorder. One death occurred due to complications from recurrent PSC. CONCLUSIONS: Starting Anti-TNF therapy following orthotopic liver transplantation appears to be a potential option for inflammatory bowel disease management. Additional studies are needed, however, to confirm these findings and to further assess risks associated with this treatment strategy.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis after liver transplantation.

Recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an important clinical outcome after liver transplantation (LT) in selected patients. Prevalence rates for recurrent PBC (rPBC) reported by individual LT programs range between 9% and 35%. The diagnostic hallmark of rPBC is histologic identification of granulomatous changes. Clinical and biochemical features are frequently absent with rPBC and cannot be used alone for diagnostic purposes. Some of the risk factors of rPBC may include recipient factors such as age, gender, HLA status and immunosuppression, as well as donor factors such as age, gender and ischemic time, although controversy exists. Most patients have early stage disease at the time of diagnosis, and there may be a role for therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid. While short- and medium-term outcomes remain favorable, especially if compared to patients transplanted for other indications, continued follow-up may identify reduced long-term graft and patient survival.

Insulin resistance, serum adipokines and risk of fibrosis progression in patients transplanted for hepatitis C.

In the nontransplant setting diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for disease progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The impact of early insulin resistance on the development of advanced fibrosis, even in the absence of clinically apparent diabetes mellitus, is not known. Our aim was to determine whether the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) can be used to identify insulin-resistant patients at risk for rapid fibrosis progression. Cohort study including patients transplanted for chronic HCV between January 1, 1995 and January 1, 2005. One hundred sixty patients were included; 25 patients (16%) were treated for diabetes mellitus and 36 patients (23%) were prediabetic, defined as HOMA-IR >2.5. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that insulin resistance (hazard ratio (HR) 2.07; confidence interval (CI) 1.10-3.91, p = 0.024), donor age (HR 1.33;CI 1.08-1.63, p = 0.007) and aspartate aminotransferase (HR 1.03;CI 1.01-1.05, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with a higher probability of developing advanced fibrosis, i.e. Knodell fibrosis stage 3 or 4, whereas steatosis (HR 0.94;CI 0.46-1.92, p = 0.87) and acute cellular rejection (HR 1.72;CI 0.88-3.36, p = 0.111) were not. In conclusion, posttransplant insulin resistance is strongly associated with more severe recurrence of HCV infection. HOMA-IR is an important tool for the identification of insulin resistance among patients at risk for rapid fibrosis progression after liver transplantation for HCV.

Survival in portopulmonary hypertension: Mayo Clinic experience categorized by treatment subgroups.

To determine the natural history of portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), a retrospective screening-right heart catheterization-survival analysis of patients was performed. We categorized patients by three treatment subgroups: (1) no therapy for pulmonary hypertension (PH) or liver transplantation (LT), (2) therapy for PH alone and (3) therapy for PH followed by LT. Seventy-four patients were identified between 1994 and 2007. Nineteen patients received no therapy for PH and no LT representing the natural history of POPH. Five-year survival was 14%, and 54% had died within 1 year of diagnosis. Five-year survival in 43 patients receiving therapy for PH but no LT was 45%, and 12% had died within 1 year of diagnosis. Twelve patients underwent LT and 5-year survival for the nine receiving therapy for PH was 67% versus 25% in the three who were not pretreated with prostacyclin therapy. The survival of untreated patients with POPH was poor. Subgroups of patients selected to medical treatment with or without LT had better long-term survival. Mortality did not correlate with baseline hemodynamic variables, type of liver disease or severity of hepatic dysfunction. Medical therapy for POPH should be considered in all patients with POPH, but the treatment effects and impact on those considered for LT still requires well-designed, prospective study before practice guidelines can be suggested.

Impact of pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment on graft survival in liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C infection.

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation for HCV-related end stage liver disease. Although previous studies have shown a short-term effect of interferon-based treatment on fibrosis progression, it is unclear whether this translates to improved graft survival. We evaluated whether treatment of recurrent HCV leads to an improved graft survival. Cohort study included consecutive HCV patients who underwent liver transplantation between 1 January 1995 and 1 January 2005 in the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Two hundred and fifteen patients were included in the study. During a median follow-up of 4.4 years (interquartile range 2.2-6.6), 165 patients (77%) had biopsy-proven recurrent HCV infection confirmed by serum HCV RNA testing. Seventy-eight patients were treated. There were no differences in MELD-score, fibrosis stage or time towards HCV recurrence between treated and untreated patients at time of recurrence. There was a trend for greater frequency of acute cellular rejection among untreated patients. The incidence of graft failure was lower for patients treated within 6 months of recurrence compared to patients not treated within this time-period (log rank p = 0.002). Time-dependent multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that treatment of recurrent HCV infection was statistically significantly associated with a decreased risk of overall graft failure (hazard ratio 0.34; CI 0.15-0.77, p = 0.009) and a decreased risk of graft failure due to recurrent HCV (hazard ratio 0.24; CI 0.08-0.69, p = 0.008). In conclusion, although a cause and effect relationship cannot be established, treatment of recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation is associated with a reduced risk of graft failure.

Mycophenolate mofetil use is associated with decreased risk of late acute rejection in adult liver transplant recipients.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) used in a triple-drug regimen has been shown to decrease acute rejection rates, compared to a double-drug regimen. The impact of MMF on late acute rejection (LAR) episodes has not been well described. To investigate the risk of LAR (rejection > or = 6 months post-transplantation) data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) were used. We studied adult primary liver transplant recipients transplanted between June 1, 1995, and April 30, 2004, with hepatitis C virus (HCV) (n = 3356), hepatitis B virus (HBV) (n = 550) or a nonviral (n = 5740) primary cause of liver disease who were recorded as receiving continuous 3-(MMF + Tacro + steroids) versus 2-drug (Tacro + steroids) therapy for at least 6 months immediately post transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly lower LAR rates 4 years post-transplant in 3- versus 2-drug HCV, HBV and nonviral disease patients. Multivariate regression confirmed 3- versus 2-drug therapy to be associated with a decreased risk of LAR. Late graft survival was significantly lower at 4 years post-transplant for patients with LAR 6-12 months post-transplantation versus patients with early rejection (78.0% vs. 87.0%, p < 0.001) and no rejection (88.1%, p < 0.001). Three-drug versus 2-drug therapy for a minimum of 6 months may offer a better treatment strategy to avoid the consequences and expense of LAR episodes.

Factor XII deficiency acquired by orthotopic liver transplantation: case report and review of the literature.

Transmission of congenital clotting factor deficiencies after orthotopic liver transplantation is rare. There are published reports of liver donor-to-recipient transmission of protein C deficiency with dysfibrinogenemia, protein S, factor VII and factor XI deficiencies. We report a case of transmission of factor XII deficiency with liver transplantation in a patient with Budd-Chiari syndrome. There was a persistent elevation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), but no evidence of bleeding while the patient was maintained on warfarin. The presence of a persistently abnormal aPTT may raise suspicion for the presence of a clotting factor deficiency; however, deficiencies of other clotting factors may not be readily apparent on routine blood tests performed in a donor. Being aware of the possibilities of transmission of these inherited deficiencies of coagulation factors will aid in their early detection and management in the transplant donor and recipient.

Reduced priority MELD score for hepatocellular carcinoma does not adversely impact candidate survival awaiting liver transplantation.

The liver organ allocation policy of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) is based on the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). The policy provides additional priority for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are awaiting deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). However, this priority was reduced on February 27, 2003 to a MELD of 20 for stage T1 and of 24 for stage T2 HCC. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of reduced priority on HCC candidate survival while on the waiting list. The UNOS database was reviewed for all HCC candidates listed after February 27, 2002, The HCC candidates were grouped into two time periods: MELD 1 (listed between February 27, 2002, and February 26, 2003) and MELD 2 (listed between February 27, 2003 and February 26, 2004). For the two time periods, the national DDLT incidence rates for HCC patients were 1.44 versus 1.53 DDLT per person-year (p = NS) and the waiting times were similar for the two periods (138.0 +/- 196.8 vs. 129.0 +/- 133.8 days; p = NS). Furthermore, the 3-, 6- and 12-month candidate, patient survival and dropout rates were also similar nationally. Regional differences in rates of DDLT for HCC were observed during both MELD periods. Consequently, the reduced MELD score for stage T1 and T2 HCC candidates awaiting DDLT has not had an impact nationally either on their survival on the waiting list or on their ability to obtain a liver transplant within a reasonable time frame. However, regional variations point to the need for reform in how organs are allocated for HCC at the regional level.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders following liver transplantation: incidence, risk factors and survival.

This study investigates retrospectively the incidence, risk factors and mortality of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in adult orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Among 1206 OLT recipients at a single institution, 37 developed a PTLD. The incidence of PTLD was highest during the first 18 months and relatively constant thereafter with cumulative incidence of 1.1% at 18 months and 4.7% at 15 years. The risk of PTLD was approximately 10% to 15% of the risk of death without PTLD. During the first 4 years following OLT, PTLD were predominantly related to EBV, while afterward most PTLD were EBV negative. Significant risk factors for PTLD in OLT recipients were transplantation for acute fulminant hepatitis during the first 18 months following OLT (HR=2.6, p=0.007), and rejection therapy with high-dose steroids (HR=4.5, p=0.049) and OKT3 (HR=3.9, p=0.016) during the previous year. Therapy with high-dose steroids or OKT3 (HR=3.6, p=0.0071) were also significant risk factors for PTLD-associated mortality. OLT recipients remain at risk for PTLD years after transplantation. The strong association of PTLD with rejection therapy and the worse post-PTLD prognosis among recipients of rejection therapy indicate the need to balance the risk of immunosuppression against the risk of PTLD following rejection treatment.

Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM).

Access to timely, risk-adjusted measures of transplant center outcomes is crucial for program quality improvement. The cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) has been proposed as a sensitive tool to detect persistent, clinically relevant changes in transplant center performance over time. Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data for adult kidney and liver transplants (1/97 to 12/01) were examined using logistic regression models to predict risk of graft failure (kidney) and death (liver) at 1 year. Risk-adjusted CUSUM charts were constructed for each center and compared with results from the semi-annual method of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). Transplant centers (N = 258) performed 59 650 kidney transplants, with a 9.2% 1-year graft failure rate. The CUSUM method identified centers with a period of significantly improving (N = 92) or declining (N = 52) performance. Transplant centers (N = 114) performed 18 277 liver transplants, with a 13.9% 1-year mortality rate. The CUSUM method demonstrated improving performance at 48 centers and declining performance at 24 centers. The CUSUM technique also identified the majority of centers flagged by the current OPTN method (20/22 kidney and 8/11 liver). CUSUM monitoring may be a useful technique for quality improvement, allowing center directors to identify clinically important, risk-adjusted changes in transplant center outcome.

Addition of MMF to dual immunosuppression does not increase the risk of malignant short-term death after liver transplantation.

Immunosuppression is often incriminated for the increased risk of post-transplant malignancies. To examine whether triple- (MMF+Tacro+CS) versus dual-drug therapy (Tacro+CS) is associated with an increased incidence of malignancy, or death due to malignancy, data from a large registry of liver transplant recipients were analyzed. Data from adult primary liver recipients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between June 1, 1995, and April 30, 2004, and recorded at transplant on triple-drug (n = 9180) or dual-drug (n = 10 099) therapy were included. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant differences in death due to malignancy 4 years post-transplantation between the treatment groups. Multivariable analysis using Cox proportional hazard models confirmed no differences in risk of death due to malignancy between the groups (HR: 0.83, p = 0.107). Incidence of any post-transplant malignancy was also not significantly different. Older recipient age and cause of liver disease were significantly associated with an increased risk of malignancy-related death. These data utilizing relatively short follow-up suggest the addition of MMF to Tacro+CS at transplant is not associated with death due to malignancy, at least in the short term. Individual recipient factors appear to be important risk factors for malignancy-related death; elucidating these risk factors can assist in identifying who should be monitored most aggressively for post-transplant malignancies.

[Why does blood have a pH-value of 7.4? The theory of acid-base management]. / Warum liegt der pH-Wert des Blutes bei 7.40? Zur Theorie des Säure-Basen-Haushalts.

Aim of the present paper is to discuss the physiologic principles of the acid-base status, in particular those of the pH value. The alpha-stat theory of acid-base management interprets the normal value of arterial pH, usually thought of as being 7.40, as a value derived from the intracellular pH, which is close to neutrality. This appears to have offered an evolutionary advantage, since most of the intermediates in biosynthetic pathways are ionized at neutrality resulting in a decreased rate of penetration across biological membranes of these compounds thus producing a benefit for the economy of a cell. Finally, we present the clinical implications of both the alpha-stat and the pH-stat strategy of acid-base management.

Late hepatic allograft dysfunction.

1. Lifelong monitoring of graft function, immunosuppressive levels, and screening for drug toxicity is required in all liver recipients. 2. Late hepatic allograft dysfunction is common and is caused by a variety of etiologies including rejection, infection, biliary/vascular abnormalities, recurrence of disease, and drug hepatotoxicity. 3. In all patients with late hepatic allograft dysfunction, liver biopsy should be performed to assess for the presence of rejection, and to thus avoid excessive use of bolus corticosteroid therapy and guide appropriate immunosuppressive management. 4. Recurrence of disease is the most common cause of late hepatic allograft dysfunction. 5. Hepatitis C universally reinfects the hepatic allograft, and is associated with decreased patient and graft survival and leads to the recurrence of cirrhosis in 28% of patients within 5 years of transplantation. 6. Major advances have been made in preventing recurrence of hepatitis B by the use of hepatitis B immune globulin in combination with lamivudine therapy. 7. Autoimmune liver diseases such as primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and autoimmune hepatitis have a recurrence rate of approximately 20% to 30%. 8. In patients developing recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis, steroid withdrawal is the most common cause. 9. Recurrent hepatocellular cancer can be markedly reduced if strict guidelines are adhered to in selecting patients. 10. Drug hepatotoxicity must always be considered in the differential diagnosis of late hepatic allograft dysfunction.

Liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: timing, outcome, impact of inflammatory bowel disease and recurrence of disease.

Over the past decade, the outcome of liver transplantation in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients with end-stage liver disease has improved significantly with many centres reporting 1-year patient and graft survival of 90-97% and 85-88%, respectively. Based on these results, liver transplantation has emerged as the treatment of choice for PSC patients. Specific complications related to PSC remain problematical. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) occurs in 70% of patients, and there is a distinctly increased risk of colorectal neoplasia both pre- and post-transplantation. Furthermore, symptoms related to IBD post-transplantation can become severe and lead to the need for proctocolectomy. Cholangiocarcinoma remains a major risk facing the PSC patient and develops in 15-30% of patients. Markers to detect the early neoplastic changes of cholangiocarcinoma are not available. To date, outcome following liver transplantation in PSC patients who have associated cholangiocarcinoma has been dismal. However, those patients who are found to have an incidental cholangiocarcinoma have an acceptable low incidence of recurrence of disease. To assess optimal timing of liver transplantation, natural history risk scores have been developed and utilized. Utilizing such risk scores, estimated survival for the individual PSC patient can be obtained. Finally, there is an increased incidence of both acute and chronic rejection, hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary stricturing in PSC patients undergoing liver transplantation. A late rise in serum alkaline phosphatase level is almost always indicative of biliary stricturing and recurrence of disease. Approximately 20% of patients followed for 5 years or more will have recurrence of PSC documented both on cholangiography and histology.

Frequency of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis as a cause of advanced liver disease.

Although nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has generally been considered a benign condition, the increasing prevalence and severity of obesity has heightened concerns about the frequency with which NASH progresses to end-stage liver disease. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency, clinical features, and posttransplantation history of decompensated liver disease secondary to NASH. The frequency of NASH as a cause of end-stage liver disease was prospectively determined in patients evaluated for liver transplantation. NASH was considered to be the primary cause of liver disease in patients who had histological evidence of steatohepatitis and in whom chronic liver diseases other than NASH were excluded. Posttransplantation histological characteristics were also determined in patients with NASH and compared with those of patients with pretransplantation diagnoses of cholestatic liver diseases, alcoholic disease, and hepatitis C. Of 1,207 patients evaluated for liver transplantation during the study period, 31 patients (2.6%) had NASH as the primary cause of liver disease. In the same period, 546 liver transplantations were performed, 16 of which (2.9%) were for end-stage disease secondary to NASH. Posttransplantation steatosis was seen in 60% of transplant recipients with NASH versus 5% of those with cholestatic disease, 15% of those with alcoholic disease, and 15% of those with hepatitis C. Steatohepatitis recurred in 33% of transplant recipients with NASH, with progression to cirrhosis in 12.5%. NASH can progress to end-stage liver disease in a minority of affected patients and was the primary cause of liver disease in 2.9% of patients evaluated for liver transplantation at our center. Recurrence of steatosis and NASH is frequent and can be severe after liver transplantation.

Safety and efficacy of hepatitis A vaccination in liver transplantation recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Vaccination against hepatitis A (HAV) has been shown to be safe and effective in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). The safety and efficacy of HAV vaccines in liver transplant (OLT) recipients have not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in OLT recipients. METHODS: Thirty-seven HAV seronegative OLT recipients were enrolled. Patients received two doses of vaccine 6 months apart. Postvaccination IgG anti-HAV were determined at 1, 6, and 7 months after the first vaccine dose. Side effects were monitored for 3 days after each vaccination shot. An unvaccinated control group (45 patients) was followed for evidence of seroconversion. Seroconversion rate was also compared with those reported in healthy patients and in patients with chronic liver disease. RESULTS: Testing was available for all the cases at 1 month, and for 26 and 23 patients at 6 and 7 months, respectively. Only 3 of 37 patients (8%) had seroconversion at 1 month. At 6- and 7-month time points, 5 of 26 (19%) and 6 of the 23 (26%) patients had seroconversion, respectively. Vaccine responders had higher total white blood cell count and lymphocyte count and were further out from transplant compared with nonresponders. None of the unvaccinated patients had seroconversion over the follow-up time. Seroconversion rates in OLT recipients were significantly lower than that reported in healthy individuals (P=0.001) or in pre-OLT patients with CLD (P=0.001). All patients tolerated the vaccine well. CONCLUSIONS: HAV vaccination is safe in OLT recipient. Efficacy of HAV vaccination in OLT recipients, as measured by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay, is low and alternative strategies should be developed to improve response rate.

Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation.

To determine the frequency, risk factors, and consequences of recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation, 41 patients with type 1 disease were monitored after surgery in accordance with a surveillance protocol. Tacrolimus or cyclosporine plus prednisone were administered to each patient, and liver biopsy examinations were performed at least annually according to protocol. Corticosteroid therapy was ultimately discontinued in only 2 patients. Recurrent disease was defined as the presence of lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates in liver tissue in the absence of other causes of allograft dysfunction. Autoimmune hepatitis recurred in 7 patients (17%), and the mean time to recurrence was 4.6 +/- 1 years. Recurrence was asymptomatic in 4 of 7 patients and detected only by surveillance liver biopsy assessment in 2 patients. Histological changes were mild, and there was no progression to cirrhosis during 4.9 +/- 0.9 years of observation. Five-year patient (86% v. 82%; P =.9) and graft (86% v. 67%; P =.5) survival rates were not statistically different between patients with and without recurrent disease. HLA-DR3 or HLA-DR4 occurred more commonly in patients with than without recurrence (100% v. 40%; P =.008) and healthy subjects (100% v. 49%; P =.01). Recurrent disease was unrelated to donor HLA status. In conclusion, recurrence after transplantation for type 1 autoimmune hepatitis is common. Its mild manifestations and favorable prognosis may reflect early detection by a surveillance protocol and/or continuous corticosteroid treatment. HLA-DR3- or HLA-DR4-positive recipients are at risk for recurrence regardless of donor HLA status.