Inflammatory bowel disease and risk of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors in the small bowel.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty prevails about the magnitude of excess risk of small bowel cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: To quantify the risk of small bowel adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), we undertook a population-based cohort study of all patients with IBD diagnosed in Norway and Sweden from 1987 to 2016. Patients were followed through linkage to national registers. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of small bowel adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine tumors for patients with CD and UC. We excluded the first year of follow-up to reduce reverse causality. RESULTS: Among 142 008 patients with a median follow-up of 10.0 years, we identified 66 adenocarcinomas and 57 neuroendocrine tumors in the small bowel. The SIR of small bowel adenocarcinoma was 8.3 (95% CI 5.9-11.3) in CD and 2.0 (95% CI 1.2-3.1) in UC. The incidence rates of adenocarcinomas were highest in CD with stricturing disease and extent limited to the small bowel, at 14.7 (95% CI 8.2-24.2) and 15.8 (95% CI 8.4-27.0) per 100 000 person-years, respectively. The SIR of neuroendocrine tumors was 2.5 (95% CI 1.5-3.9) in CD and 2.0 (95% CI 1.4-2.8) in UC. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CD experienced an eightfold increased risk of small bowel adenocarcinomas, patients with both UC and CD experienced an about twofold increased risk of neuroendocrine tumors, and patients with UC experienced a twofold increased risk of small bowel adenocarcinoma. The small absolute excess cancer risk suggests that active surveillance to diagnose small intestinal cancer early is unlikely to be cost-effective.

Effectiveness of digital feedback on patient experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy: a randomized health services study.

Background and study aims European guidelines (ESGE) recommend measuring patient experience and 30-day complication rate after colonoscopy. We compared digital and paper-based feedback on patients' experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy. Patients and methods Screenees attending for primary screening colonoscopies in two centers from September 2015 to December 2016 were randomized (1:1) to an intervention arm (choice of feedback method) or control arm (routine paper-based feedback). Participants in the intervention arm could choose preferred feedback method (paper-based, automated telephone or online survey) and were contacted by automated telephone 30 days after colonoscopy to assess complications. Control group participants self-reported complications. Primary and secondary endpoints were response rates to feedback and complications questionnaire, respectively. Results There were 1,281 and 1,260 participants in the intervention and control arms, respectively. There was no significant difference in response rate between study groups (64.8 % vs 61.5 %; P  = 0.08). Free choice of feedback improved response for participants identified as poor responders: younger than 60 years (60.8 % vs 54.7 %; P  = 0.031), male (64.0 % vs 58.6 %; P  = 0.045) and in small non-public center (56.2 % vs 42.5 %; P  = 0.043). In the intervention arm, 1,168 participants (91.2 %) answered the phone call concerning complications. A total of 79 participants (6.2 %) reported complications, of which two (0.2 %) were verified by telephone as clinically relevant. No complications were self-reported in the control group. Conclusion The overall response rate was not significantly improved with digital feedback, yet the technology yielded significant improvement in participants defined as poor responders. Our study demonstrated feasibility and efficacy of digital patient feedback about complications after colonoscopy.

Diminished presentation of complement regulatory protein CD55 on red blood cells from patients with hereditary haemolytic anaemias.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary haemolytic anaemias (HHA) encompass a heterogeneous group of anaemias characterized by decreased red blood cell survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the status of red blood cell (RBC) surface molecules known or previously proposed to participate in preventing premature RBC clearance, analysing erythrocytes from patients with two types of HHA: hereditary spherocytosis (HS) and microcytosis. MATERIAL/METHODS: Relative binding of five monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), anti-CD55, anti-CD59, anti-CD44, anti-CD47 and anti-CD58, was evaluated in erythrocytes of patients with HS and hereditary microcytosis, using flow cytometry. The amount of CD55 protein was assessed by semi-quantitative Western blots densitometry analysis. RESULTS: The majority of both HS and microcytic patients demonstrated significant reduction of anti-CD55 binding by erythrocytes (average 23% and 19%, respectively, P < .001), with no concomitant anti-CD59-binding deficiency. Anti-CD44, anti-CD47 and anti-CD58 binding was within the healthy control range or was slightly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence supporting the presence of erythrocytes deficient in CD55 presentation in HS and hereditary microcytosis. Moreover, deficiency of CD55 antigen presentation on RBC does not correlate with the amount of CD55 in RBC membrane. Further studies using molecular techniques will clarify the exact participation of CD55 deficiency in premature RBC clearance in HHA.

Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer.

GOALS: The aim of this paper was to discuss association between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and interval colorectal cancer risk. BACKGROUND: Adenoma detection rate is being used as a benchmark quality measure for colonoscopy. There are three studies showing inverse association between ADR and interval colorectal cancer risk. One recent study reports significant impact of increased ADR on decreasing interval colorectal cancer risk. STUDY: We discussed evidence for using ADR as a quality measures in colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. We revised three studies (Kaminski et al., N Engl J Med 2010; Corley et al., N Engl J Med 2014 and Rogal et al., Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013) analyzing association between ADR and interval colorectal cancer. We collated strengths and weaknesses of these studies with the perspective of clinical impact of their results. RESULTS: Kaminski et al. and Corley et al. reported inverse association between ADR at colonoscopy and interval colorectal cancer. Kaminski et al. showed that patients examined by endoscopists with ADR of less than 20% had over 10 times greater risk of interval colorectal cancer during the follow-up time than those examined by endoscopists with ADR ≥20%. Additionally, Corley et al. showed that ADR ≥28% resulted in a significantly lower risk of colorectal cancer death than ADR of less than 19%. In parallel, Rogal et al. reported similar association for flexible sigmoidoscopy, with 2.4 higher odds of interval colorectal cancer diagnosis during follow-up time in patients examined by endoscopists with distal ADR <7.2% than those with distal ADR ≥7.2%. Apart from inevitable clinical importance of the studies, they are not without disadvantages. In Kaminski et al. study cohort and study endpoint are well defined, but there is lack of statistical power to provide more robust results. In Rogal et al. study cohort is well defined, but approximation of the study endpoint was used. Finally, Corley et al. study has both poorly defined study cohort and study endpoint, but has the highest statistical power of all three to detect the differences for both interval colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer death. CONCLUSION: Both, inverse relationship between ADR and ADR improvement and colorectal cancer risk and death reaffirm ADR as a crucial quality control parameter.