Recurrent Unilateral E. coli Breast Infection in a Non-Lactating Women: A Rare Case Report.

Breast abscess is a common infection of the breast in humans, particularly affecting females who are lactating. Lactation mastitis is present in 2%-3% of women and approximately 5%-11% of patients may develop abscess. However, breast abscess in non-lactating women is extremely rare and there has only been limited literature published on this. Escherichia coli (E. coli) is usually found in the gastrointestinal and urogenital system, with no previous documentation of an E. coli infection in the breast. This case report summarizes the rare case of a fit and healthy adult female healthcare worker who presented with a recurrence of a unilateral E. coli breast abscess within three years. On review, there have not been any similar documented cases.

Incidental Intraoperatively Detected Choledocholithiasis: A General Surgeon's Approach to Management.

Background Up to 15% of patients with cholelithiasis have choledocholithiasis, with almost 10% not detected pre-operatively. Our study aims to quantify the prevalence of incidental choledocholithiasis during routine intra-operative cholangiogram (IOC), identify the best management pathway, and identify reliable pre-operative factors to predict choledocholithiasis. Methods We conducted a single-centre, retrospective cohort study at St John of God Midland Hospital in Western Australia, Perth, on 880 consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomies performed by 15 surgeons between January 2, 2020, and December 30, 2021.  Results The overall choledocholithiasis rates were 10.6% (93), with 4.0% (35) diagnosed pre-operatively and 6.6% (58) diagnosed during IOC. In all, 50% of incidental choledocholithiasis during IOC were managed with hyoscine butylbromide, with a 55.2% success rate; 22.4% of patients received octreotide, with a 61.5% success rate; and 8.6% of patients underwent trans-cystic bile duct exploration (TCBE) and 8.6% underwent postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), both with 100% success rates. Choledocholithiasis most commonly presents with gallstone pancreatitis, with a median aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level 7.2 times and alanine transaminase (ALT) level 7.8 times higher than those of patients without choledocholithiasis. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was the most sensitive in identifying choledocholithiasis with a 66.7% pickup rate. The median common bile duct (CBD) diameter on ultrasound was 8 mm, computerised tomography scans were 11 mm, and MRCP was 9 mm. Conclusion One in 10 cholecystectomies will be complicated with choledocholithiasis, and over half will be incidentally diagnosed during routine IOC. We propose IOC in all cases and hyoscine butylbromide, octreotide, and saline flushes as first-line treatment; if unsuccessful, TCBE is performed. Gallstone pancreatitis, markedly elevated AST/ALT, and imaging showing CBD ≥8 mm may serve as early predictors of choledocholithiasis.

Massive stone or is it glass: a curious case of porcelain gallbladder.

Usage of computed tomography (CT) scans has increased exponentially over the past decade. This is associated with the rise in incidental findings and having to manage clinical scenarios previously never encountered in the pre-CT scan era. Once such finding is a porcelain gallbladder, specifically gallbladder wall calcification. We report one such case of a porcelain gallbladder mimic and propose some suggestions on the decision-making process when managing an incidentally discovered calcified gallbladder.

Predictors for success of non-operative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Majority of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) cases can be managed non-operatively. However, a proportion of patients failed non-operative management. AIM: To evaluate the predictors of successful non-operative management in adhesive SBO. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed for all consecutive cases of adhesive SBO from November 2015 to May 2018. Data collated included basic demographics, clinical presentation, biochemistry and imaging results and management outcomes. The imaging studies were independently analyzed by a radiologist who was blinded to the clinical outcomes. The patients were divided into group A operative (including those that failed initial non-operative management) and group B non-operative for analysis. RESULTS: Of 252 patients were included in the final analysis; group A (n = 90) (35.7%) and group B (n = 162) (64.3%). There were no differences in the clinical features between both groups. Laboratory tests of inflammatory markers and lactate levels were similar in both groups. From the imaging findings, the presence of a definitive transition point [odds ratio (OR) = 2.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-7.32, P = 0.048], presence of free fluid (OR = 2.11, 95%CI: 1.15-3.89, P = 0.015) and absence of small bowel faecal signs (OR = 1.70, 95%CI: 1.01-2.88, P = 0.047) were predictive of the need of surgical intervention. In patients that received water soluble contrast medium, the evidence of contrast in colon was 3.83 times predictive of successful non-operative management (95%CI: 1.79-8.21, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The computed tomography findings can assist clinicians in deciding early surgical intervention in adhesive SBO cases that are unlikely to be successful with non-operative management to prevent associated morbidity and mortality.

Relationship of computed tomography quantified visceral adiposity with the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review.

Whilst obesity and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of severe AP, the established predictive scoring systems have not yet encompassed the impact of obesity or visceral adiposity. In the acute setting, computed tomography (CT) is often performed to assess AP severity and associated complications. With the added benefit of quantifying body fat distribution, it can be opportunistically used to quantify visceral adiposity and assess its relationship with the course of AP. This systematic review identified fifteen studies evaluating the relationship between visceral adiposity measured on CT and the severity of presentations of acute pancreatitis from January 2000 to November 2022. The primary outcome was to assess the relationship between CT quantified VAT and AP severity. The secondary outcomes were to assess the impact of VAT on patients developing local and systemic complications associated with AP. Whilst ten studies showed there was a significant correlation between an increased VAT and AP severity, five studies found otherwise. The majority of current literature demonstrate a positive correlation between increased VAT and AP severity. CT quantification VAT is a promising prognostic indicator with the potential to guide initial management, prompt more aggressive treatment measures or earlier re-evaluation and to aid disease prognostication in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Readmission Within the First Day of Discharge Is Painful: Experience From an Australian General Surgical Service.

Background Unplanned readmission to the hospital after discharge is a costly issue for healthcare systems and patients. It is a delicate balance between the resolution of the surgical problem and the length of hospital stay. Most studies have focused on readmissions within 28 or 30 days after discharge, despite data showing that many occur early in this period. This study examined the reasons for unplanned readmission within the first day after discharge.  Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of readmissions between 1st May 2016 and 1st May 2021 was undertaken by chart review. Readmissions on the "day of" and the "day after" discharge and their respective index admissions were identified via the hospital's patient administration database, webPAS (DXC Technology, USA). Results There were 126 readmissions (0.5%) across 25,119 admissions. Common reasons for readmission were pain (28%, n=35), readmission for the same diagnosis (21%, n=26), surgical site infection (SSI) (11%, n=14), bleeding (11%, n=14) and ileus (6%, n=7). Analysis of index admissions showed that 18/35 readmissions for pain had inadequate pain management based on pain scores, analgesic use and discharge medications and 7/14 readmissions for SSI did not have appropriate treatment of a recognised SSI or did not have antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines adhered to. Fourteen of 26 readmissions for the same diagnosis received just continuation of treatment initiated at index admission.  Conclusion Pain is the most common reason for readmission within the first day after discharge in surgical patients. Better pain management, following antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines, and involving patients in discharge planning could prevent many readmissions.

Duplicated gallbladder with double cystic duct: hidden in plain sight.

Duplicated gallbladder with double cystic duct is a rare anomaly, with 62 cases reported including this case. We present a 76-year-old man who underwent interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy after previous conservative management of acute cholecystitis. Retrograde dissection of gallbladder was performed due to difficult access. Gallbladder was opened at Hartman's pouch which revealed two bile-flowing structures. Cholangiogram was only successful via one of the ducts with no evidence of leak. Subtotal cholecystectomy was performed after consultation with a Hepatobiliary surgeon. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) were reviewed which revealed duplicated gallbladder. CT cholangiogram was performed post-operatively, confirming two separate cystic ducts. Our case emphasizes that anatomical anomalies can still be unappreciated despite having high-resolution CT and MRCP preoperatively, which poses increased risk of biliary tree injury. Routine intraoperative cholangiogram will help avoid bile duct injuries. Literature advises that both gallbladders should be removed to avoid relapse of gallbladder disease.

Endoscopic foreign body retrieval from the caecum - A case report and push for intervention guidelines.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Endoscopic foreign body retrieval in the upper gastrointestinal tract is well established, however indications for endoscopy for retained foreign bodies in the lower gastrointestinal tract and specifically the right colon is still being navigated [3]. A PubMed and Google Scholar search discovered a variety of case reports detailing various methods and indications for endoscopic retrieval of right sided colonic foreign bodies. This case report endeavors to supplement the literature so that guidelines can one day be established for colonoscopic retrieval of right-sided foreign bodies. CASE PRESENTATION: 36-year-old male prisoner swallowed 6.5 cm nail clippers with a long-standing history of intentional foreign body ingestion (FBI) including multiple laparotomies for foreign body retrievals. Computerized tomography (CT) was used initially to confirm the position of the nail clippers. After almost two weeks of failure of the foreign body (FB) to move beyond the caecum as demonstrated on plain abdominal X-rays, the patient had a colonoscopy with successful retrieval of the FB. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case report hopes to encourage the consideration of colonoscopy for retrieval of right sided colonic foreign bodies that have failed to pass on their own and where an operation may come with increased risk (multiple laparotomies, multiple comorbidities, and higher anaesthetic risk for a general anaesthetic). Colonoscopy/endoscopy still has inherent risk and this patient did have an episode of temporary laryngospasm that required intubation and monitoring in the intensive care unit post operatively. Despite this the patient recovered and was discharged day one post procedure without further complication. The case report has been reported in line with the SCARE 2020 criteria (Agha et al., 2020 [2]). CONCLUSION: Indications for consideration of endoscopic retrieval of foreign bodies in the right colon have not been entirely detailed as endoscopy is for upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies. This case report documents the indications for endoscopy in the clinical context of a recurrent FBI and a history of multiple laparotomies with failure of the FB to move beyond the caecum.

Idiopathic acute chylous peritonitis during pregnancy, mimicking perforated acute appendicitis: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Chylous ascites (CA) is an extremely rare presentation in pregnancy and poses a diagnostic challenge in clinical practice. There have only been a few case reports of CA in pregnancy with the majority of cases found incidentally at the time of caesarean section or in the context of pancreatitis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 36-year-old female who was 13 weeks pregnant had clinically presented right iliac fossa pain with peritonitis and had signs of sepsis. Once other potential sources of sepsis were excluded, had proceeded to diagnostic laparoscopy performed by the treating consultant given there were no appropriate out-of-hours imaging modalities available. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case report hopes to advocate for the effective intervention of a diagnostic laparoscopy in this setting and other important considerations for management during first trimester pregnancy. Upon diagnosis the patient was put onto a medium chain fatty acid diet with excellent outcomes post operatively and at the outpatient follow up. The case report has been reported in line with the SCARE 2020 criteria [11]. CONCLUSION: Chylous ascites is a rare finding and additionally is even more rare to cause peritonism. What we found most interesting in this case is that in the absence of any other potential sources of infection, how chylous ascites not only presented with peritonism but prompted a septic response. Another pertinent issue is that in pregnancy we are limited with investigative options and therefore diagnosis will depend on the clinical presentation and decision for prompt diagnostic/therapeutic laparoscopy should be strongly considered.

Case report - Bouveret's syndrome with pancreatitis: A rare combination.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Bouveret's syndrome is characterised by gastric outlet obstruction due to impaction of gallstone in the duodenum through a cholecystoduodenal fistula, having concurrent pancreatitis makes it an even rarer presentation. CASE PRESENTATION: We present an 82-year-old woman who presented with acute pancreatitis which she described 2 days of right upper quadrant pain with nausea and vomiting. Biliary obstruction signs were not present. She was known to have cholelithiasis but was for non-operative management due to significant cardiac history and multiple comorbilities. CLINICAL FINDINGS AND INVESTIGATIONS: On initial examination, abdomen was soft with mild right upper quadrant tenderness. Murphy sign was negative. Lipase level was raised at 64,261U/L with cholestasis appearance on liver function test. Bouveret's syndrome was later diagnosed on CT after symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction surfaced during her admission. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOME: An on-table endoscopic stone retrieval was done as first-line treatment. After multiple attempts of stone retrieval via endoscopy, surgical extraction of the impacted gallstone was required. Patient's post-operative care was further challenged by effects from pancreatitis. Patient eventually recovered well and was discharged from hospital. RELEVANCE AND IMPACT: When managing patients with gallstone pancreatitis, presence of persistent vomiting should raise suspicion of Bouveret's syndrome. Bouveret's syndrome can be diagnosed in these patients with aid of CT imaging or endoscopy. Stone extraction is required to treat Bouveret's syndrome, endoscopic retrieval is first-line therapy as surgery has mortality risk of 12-30%. Prolonged recovery period can be expected due to concurrent inflammatory effects from acute pancreatitis.

Non-operative management of small bowel obstruction in virgin abdomen: a systematic review.

The aim of this study was to systematically review the feasibility and safety of non-operative management of small bowel obstruction (SBO) in virgin abdomen. A systematic review was performed through December 2019. The primary outcome was the resolution of non-operative management of SBO in virgin abdomen. Secondary outcomes were the etiology of SBO and findings of exploratory laparotomy. Six studies were included in the analysis. Of the 442 patients, 2 with metastatic cancer received palliative care, and the management in 26 was not reported, so these patients were excluded. A total of 414 patients were ultimately analyzed, including 203 patients (49%) who were managed non-operatively and 211 (51%) who underwent surgical management. Of the 203 managed non-operatively, the condition of 194 (96%) was resolved without further intervention. The remaining 9 (5%) patients failed non-operative management and ultimately required surgery. Of the 211 patients who underwent surgical exploration, only 137 had their intraoperative findings reported. Adhesions (n = 67; 49%) were the main cause, followed by malignancy (n = 14; 10%) and others (n = 33; 24%). No cause was found in 23 patients (17%). In highly select cases of SBO with virgin abdomen, non-operative management can be attempted if patients are clinically stable and computed tomography does not demonstrate concerning features or obvious pathology. Further well-designed prospective studies will be required prior to the introduction of this concept in clinical practice, as current evidence remains heterogeneous.

The role of quantitative radiological measures of visceral adiposity in diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Diverticular disease has been linked to obesity. Recent studies have assessed the role of visceral adiposity with diverticulitis and its complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of quantitative radiological measures of visceral adiposity in patients with diverticulitis with vital signs, biochemistry results, uncomplicated versus complicated diverticulitis and its interventions. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients with diverticulitis admitted from November 2015 to April 2018 at a single institution was performed. Data collected included demographics, vital signs, biochemistry results, CT scan findings and management outcomes. The patients were divided into uncomplicated (U) and complicated diverticulitis (C) groups. Visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and VFA/SFA ratio (V/S) were measured at L4/L5 level by the radiologist. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the association of VFA, SFA, V/S with the parameters in both U and C groups. RESULTS: 352 patients were included in this study (U:C = 265:87). There was no significant difference in vital signs and biochemistry results in both groups. There was no significant difference in VFA, SFA, V/S ratios in both groups. In patients with V/S ratio > 0.4, they were 5.06 times more likely to undergo emergency intervention (95% CI 1.10-23.45) (p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, a heart rate > 100 (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2-6.7), CRP > 50 (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.9-6.0), WCC < 4 or > 12 (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6) and V/S ratio > 0.4 (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5-5.4) were predictive of complicated diverticulitis. CONCLUSION: The quantitative radiological measurement of visceral adiposity is useful in prognostication in patients presenting with diverticulitis.

Post-colonoscopy appendicitis: Systematic review of current evidence.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Appendicitis after colonoscopy is an exceedingly rare complication. It remains to be explored if this entity is truly a complication of colonoscopy or a coincidental occurrence of appendicitis post-colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to systematically review all the available evidence since it was first described in 1988. METHODS: The literature on post-colonoscopy appendicitis was searched using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Additional manual search was performed and cross-checked for additional references. The search was performed up to November 2019. Data collected included demographics, reason for colonoscopy, time to diagnosis, imaging performed, management, and outcome. RESULTS: Fifty-three cases were found in the systematic review with a median age of 55 years (24-84 years). The time to diagnosis post-colonoscopy was mostly within 24-48 h. Clinical features mimicked those of common acute appendicitis. In the past decade, computed tomography scan has been the imaging choice to investigate abdominal pain after colonoscopy, mainly to rule out perforation. The mainstay of management was appendectomy (open or laparoscopy). Four of the 12 cases (33.3%) were treated successfully with antibiotics alone. There has been a twofold increase in cases reported in the past decade (2009-2019, n = 31 vs 1999-2008, n = 15). CONCLUSION: There is a considerable variation in the definition of post-colonoscopy appendicitis in the current literature. Regardless of whether post-colonoscopy appendicitis is a true entity, it should be considered as a differential diagnosis in any patient presenting with acute abdomen following colonoscopy.

Opportunistic use of radiological measures of visceral adiposity for assessment of risk of colorectal adenoma.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggested that radiological measures of visceral adiposity are a better tool for risk assessment of colorectal adenomas. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of visceral adiposity with the development of colorectal adenomas. METHODS: A retrospective review of all cases of computed tomography-confirmed acute diverticulitis from November 2015 to April 2018 was performed. Data collated included basic demographics, computed tomography scan results (uncomplicated versus complicated diverticulitis), treatment modality (conservative versus intervention), outcomes and follow-up colonoscopy results within 12 months of presentation. The patients were divided into no adenoma (A) and adenoma (B) groups. Visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and VFA/SFA ratio (V/S) were measured at L4/L5 level. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluation the association of VFA, SFA, V/S and different thresholds with the risk of adenoma formation. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients were included in this study (A:B = 123:46). The mean ± standard deviation for VFA was higher in group B (201 ± 87 cm2 versus 176 ± 79 cm2 ) with a trend towards statistical significance (P = 0.08). There was no difference in SFA and V/S in both groups. When the VFA >200 cm2 was analysed, it was associated with a threefold risk of adenoma formation (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.35-5.50, P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis of gender with VFA, SFA and V/S found that males have a significantly higher VFA in group B (220.0 ± 95.2 cm2 versus 187.3 ± 69.2 cm2 ; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The radiological measurement of visceral adiposity is a useful tool for opportunistic assessment of risk of colorectal adenoma.

Carcinoid tumours of the appendix: an analysis of emergency appendicectomies over a 24-year period and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoid tumours of the appendix are the most common primary malignant lesion of the appendix. However, the overall incidence remains low; found in as few as 0.3-0.9% appendicectomy specimens. Almost all appendiceal carcinoids are found incidentally during surgery for suspected appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective review of all appendiceal carcinoids was performed in six hospitals from January 1990 until December 2013. Demographic data, operative technique, histopathological characteristics, clinic reviews and need for further treatment were recorded and compared with literature. RESULTS: Appendiceal carcinoids were identified in 175 specimens. The mean age is 32 years (range 8-87 years), with 69 (39.4%) males and 106 (60.6%) females (P < 0.0001). Of these, 106 underwent open surgery with standard McBurney incision, nine underwent full laparotomy and 60 underwent laparoscopic surgery. Six of the laparoscopic surgeries were converted to open procedures. We recorded 159 (90.75%) classical carcinoids and 16 (9.25%) goblet cell carcinoids. Overall, 131 (75.7%) had concurrent appendicitis; classical carcinoid 72.6% versus goblet cell carcinoid 93.8%. The median size of the goblet cell carcinoids was significantly larger than classical carcinoids. Classical carcinoids were mostly distal to the base, while goblet cell carcinoids had equal distribution. It appears that the involvement of resection margins was not influenced by the surgical technique. Thirty patients required further right hemicolectomy as treatment for high-risk features; open 19 (15.9%) versus laparoscopic 11 (20.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic appendicectomy did not seem to adversely influence the margin clearance in appendiceal carcinoid, though we recommend that all appendicectomies should include the mesoappendix.

Routine Colonoscopy After Acute Diverticulitis: is it Warranted?

PURPOSE: Recent evidence suggests routine colonoscopy after acute diverticulitis is not necessary but remains debatable. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of follow-up colonoscopic finding of adenoma, advanced neoplastic lesion, and adenocarcinoma after diverticulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all cases of acute diverticulitis admitted from November 2015 to April 2018 was performed. Data collected included demographics, computed tomography (CT) findings, and findings of the follow-up colonoscopy within 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 368 patients were admitted for acute diverticulitis. A total of 366 patients underwent CT scan for diagnosis. Of whom, 185 patients (50.5%) had a follow-up colonoscopy; 115 (31.4%) did not have a follow-up colonoscopy, and the remaining have had a recent colonoscopy. The overall incidence of adenomas was 25.9% (n=48) and advanced colonic neoplasia 1.62% (n=3) in patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of advanced colonic neoplasia in follow-up colonoscopy after an acute episode of CT-proven diverticulitis is equivalent to, or less than, that of the population colorectal cancer screening program. Routine colonoscopy is not necessary unless there are other concerning symptoms/CT findings.

Jejunal Diverticulitis: A Single-Center Experience and Proposed Management Algorithm.

Background: Jejunal diverticulitis is rare and usually an incidental diagnosis found on imaging. Its symptoms are non-specific. Hence, the diagnosis often is delayed, and a high mortality rate has been reported. The aim of this study was to review our experience in the management of jejunal diverticulitis and to propose a management algorithm. Methods: A retrospective review of all cases of jejunal diverticulitis seen from November 2015 to November 2018 was performed. Data collected included demographics, history of diverticulitis, risk factors, clinical presentation, biochemistry and imaging results, and management outcome. Results: Eight patients were identified during the study period, five females and three males with a median age of 71 years (range 61-85 years). One patient was on steroid treatment, and one patient had a history of jejunal diverticulitis. Abdominal pain was present in all patients, but other symptoms were variable. Two patients were initially believed to have constipation and were discharged home. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan for the diagnosis, showing that three had uncomplicated jejunal diverticulitis and five had localized perforation. Five patients were managed conservatively initially; two failed this treatment because of small bowel obstruction and persistent abdominal pain with rising inflammatory markers. Three underwent emergency laparotomy (two because of sepsis; one was thought to have a foreign body). There were no deaths. A proposed management algorithm is discussed. Conclusions: A CT scan is the mainstay for the accurate diagnosis of jejunal diverticulitis. The proposed algorithm can aid in selection of patients suitable for conservative management.

Dilemma of the giant abdominal cyst.

Giant abdominal cyst can lead to various non-specific symptoms such as abdominal bloating, nausea/vomiting, constipation due to its mass effect. In rarer circumstances, it can lead to bowel obstruction, hydronephrosis and even abdominal compartment syndrome. Hereby, we present a case of giant abdominal cyst in a young woman where its origin was a diagnostic dilemma despite exhausting all imaging techniques. A laparotomy was performed and the giant cyst was found to be originating from the left ovary. The final histopathology confirmed it as an ovarian benign serous cystadenoma. The patient made a fully recovery without any complications.

Haemorrhagic cholecystitis: a rare entity not to be forgotten.

Haemorrhagic cholecystitis is a rare entity of acute cholecystitis that carries a high morbidity and mortality rate if management is delayed. Its clinical course can mirror that of acute cholecystitis. Characteristic findings on ultrasound or CT scan are useful clues to early diagnosis. Urgent cholecystectomy is required prior to progressing to perforation of gallbladder. Most of the literature are case reports with causes associated with anticoagulation. Herein, we described a morbidly obese patient with poorly controlled diabetes presenting with non-specific right upper quadrant pain and was subsequently diagnosed with haemorrhagic cholecystitis. A review of the literature was also performed to summarise the potential clinical presentations, distinctive imaging findings and management options available for this rare condition.