Genetic associations of fatigue and other symptoms following breast cancer treatment: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related fatigue, mood disturbances, pain and cognitive disturbance are common after adjuvant cancer therapy, but vary considerably between individuals despite common disease features and treatment exposures. A genetic basis for this variability was explored in a prospective cohort. METHODS: Physical and psychological health of women were assessed prospectively following therapy for early stage breast cancer with self-report questionnaires. Participation in a genetic association sub-study was offered. Indices for the key symptom domains of fatigue, pain, depression, anxiety, and neurocognitive difficulties were empirically derived by principal components analysis from end-treatment questionnaires, and then applied longitudinally. Genetic associations were sought with functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine genes - tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α (-308 â€‹GG), interferon (IFN)-É£ (+874 â€‹TA), interleukin (IL)-10 (1082 â€‹GA and -592 CA), IL-6 (-174 â€‹GC), IL-1ß (-511 â€‹GA). RESULTS: Questionnaire data was available for 210 participants, of whom 111 participated in the genetic sub-study. As expected, symptom domain scores generally improved over several months following treatment completion. Tumour and adjuvant treatment related factors were unassociated with either severity or duration of the individual symptom domains, but severity of symptoms at end-treatment was strongly associated with duration for each domain (all p â€‹< â€‹0.05). In multivariable analyses, risk genotypes were independently associated with: fatigue with IL-6 -174 â€‹GG/GC and IL-10 -1082 GG; depression and anxiety with IL-10 -1082 AA; neurocognitive disturbance: TNF-α -308 GG; depression IL-1ß (all p â€‹< â€‹0.05). The identified SNPs also had cumulative effects in prolonging the time to recovery from the associated symptom domain. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic factors contribute to the severity and duration of common symptom domains after cancer therapy.

More than just the median: Calculating survival times for patients with HER2 positive, metastatic breast cancer using data from recent randomised trials.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate worst-case, typical and best-case scenarios for survival as a communication aid for managing patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) starting HER2-targeted therapies. METHODS: We sought randomised trials of HER2-targeted therapies and recorded the following percentiles (representative scenarios) from each OS curve: 90th (worst-case), 75th (lower-typical), 50th (median), 25th (upper-typical) and 10th (best-case). We then tested whether we could estimate these percentiles for each OS curve by multiplying its median by four simple multiples: 0.25 (to derive the 90th percentile), 0.5 (75th), 2 (25th) and 3 (10th). Estimates were deemed accurate if within 0.75-1.33 times the actual value. RESULTS: We identified 15 trials with 4798 patients. For first-line, single-agent HER2-targeted therapy (15 treatment groups), the median (interquartile range [IQR]) for median OS was 33.3 months (29.1-38.4), and for each percentile was: 90th 9.5 months (7.7-11.0); 75th 19.2 months (16.4-20.8); and 25th 50.6 months (47.1-63.3). The 10th percentile was unavailable for all treatment groups. For first-line dual HER2-targeted therapy (1 treatment group), the median OS was 56.5 months. Simple multiples of the median OS accurately estimated the: 90th percentile in 79%; 75th percentile in 100%; and 25th percentile in 89% of OS curves. CONCLUSIONS: Surprisingly little is known of survival beyond the median for HER2-positive MBC. Longer trial follow-up is required to help clinicians estimate and explain the best-case scenario. Simple multiples of the median OS provide a reasonable framework for estimating then explaining survival times to patients.

Hope, optimism and survival in a randomised trial of chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Psychological responses to cancer are widely believed to affect survival. We investigated associations between hope, optimism, anxiety, depression, health utility and survival in patients starting first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Four hundred twenty-nine subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer in a randomised controlled trial of chemotherapy completed baseline questionnaires assessing the following: hopefulness, optimism, anxiety and depression and health utility. Hazard ratios (HRs) and P values were calculated with Cox models for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 31 months. Univariable analyses showed that OS was associated negatively with depression (HR 2.04, P < 0.001) and positively with health utility (HR 0.56, P < 0.001) and hopefulness (HR 0.75, P = 0.013). In multivariable analysis, OS was also associated negatively with depression (HR 1.72, P < 0.001) and positively with health utility (HR 0.73, P = 0.014), but not with optimism, anxiety or hopefulness. PFS was not associated with hope, optimism, anxiety or depression in any analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Depression and health utility, but not optimism, hope or anxiety, were associated with survival after controlling for known prognostic factors in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Further research is required to understand the nature of the relationship between depression and survival. If a causal mechanism is identified, this may lead to interventional possibilities.

Retrospective imaging audit and cost analysis of medical oncology inpatients admitted to Westmead Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often require complex and expensive admissions necessitating multiple investigations. We conducted an audit of cost of imaging performed on medical oncology inpatients in a teaching hospital in New South Wales. AIMS: Our overall aim was to assess cost and appropriateness of imaging studies in inpatients. METHODS: Data were collected on 219 consecutive evaluable inpatients admitted to Westmead Hospital (August-October 2012). A panel of oncology doctors assessed cost and appropriateness of imaging. RESULTS: The total expenditure for the cohort was $106,488.15 over 624 investigations (range: 0-26, median: two per admission). Of this sum, $8881.91 (8%) was deemed inappropriate. The most frequently ordered test was chest X-ray (251). Imaging cost per admission was $0-2478 (range), $324.95 (median), $486.99 (mean). Cost trended to increase with age of patient ($186.40 (18-40), $477.22 (41-65), $489.50 (66-75), $575.33 (>75) ). Mean cost was higher for patients treated with palliative ($493.98) vs curative ($307.59) intent. Mean cost was higher for patients consulted by palliative care and other subspecialties. There was variation of average cost by discharge destination - other hospital ($262.23), palliative care unit ($334.08), home ($480.84) and death ($769.93). Although imaging ordered was deemed overwhelmingly clinically appropriate, approximately $35,000/year is spent on inappropriate tests, mostly due to duplication or scans that could have been performed as an outpatient. CONCLUSION: Our audit supports that the current spending patterns on imaging within our department is predominantly appropriate and necessary. Duplication and expenditure may be reduced by improving electronic access from the ward to outpatient scan results.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with sequential anthracycline-docetaxel with gemcitabine for large operable or locally advanced breast cancer: ANZ 0502 (NeoGem).

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a sound rationale for use in women with large operable breast cancer, and achievement of pathological complete response (pCR) is prognostic. Epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel is a standard chemotherapy regimen for early breast cancer. In metastatic breast cancer the combination of gemcitabine and a taxane has shown promising results. This phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of incorporating gemcitabine into neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Female patients with operable breast cancer that was clinically T2 (≥3 cm) or T3-4, N0-1, M0 were enrolled to receive 24 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and gemcitabine, plus trastuzumab if HER2-positive. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in the breast in separate HER2-negative and HER2-positive cohorts. Secondary endpoints included pCR in both the breast and axillary lymph nodes, clinical and radiological response rates, disease free survival and safety. RESULTS: 81 patients were enrolled: 63 HER2-negative and 18 HER2-positive. 67 (84%) completed all cycles of chemotherapy, and 78 (96%) proceeded to surgery. pCR was achieved by 12 (20%) patients with HER2-negative, and 9 (53%) with HER2-positive disease. At the first interim analysis, addition of prophylactic G-CSF was recommended due to excess neutropenia. The HER2-negative cohort was closed to accrual because it did not meet the pre-specified target for pCR, and the HER2-positive cohort was closed due to slow accrual. At a median follow-up of 24 months, 12 of 81 (15%) patients had experienced a relapse of their breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant gemcitabine, when added to docetaxel, after epirubicin and cyclophosphamide, did not reach the pre-specified expectations for pCR rate in HER2-negative tumours. Excess neutropenia was observed, requiring growth factor support. Addition of gemcitabine to docetaxel in this schedule cannot be recommended. Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www.anzctr.org.au) registration number ACTRN12606000191594.

Post-cancer fatigue is not associated with immune activation or altered cytokine production.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged fatigue after cancer treatment is common. The pathophysiology of such post-cancer fatigue (PCF) is unknown, although cross-sectional studies suggest increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production. This study investigated the association between cytokine levels and fatigue from the time of treatment to 12 months later. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A representative nested case-control series was derived from a prospective cohort of women treated for early-stage breast cancer, including 13 PCF cases and 15 matched control subjects who recovered uneventfully. Serum levels and in vitro production of the cytokines interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-2, interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-ß were measured by multiplex immunoassay in longitudinally collected samples. In addition, serum levels of neopterin and the anti-inflammatory regulators, IL-1 receptor antagonist, sIL-6R, and sTNF-rII, were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Flow cytometric analysis of activated leukocyte subsets was performed. RESULTS: No significant differences in any of these parameters were found between cases and control subjects. Cytokine levels and symptoms showed no clear correlation pattern. CONCLUSION: The findings in this well-characterised subject group argue against the notion that PCF is mediated by peripheral inflammation.

Third consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) include a rapidly expanding repertoire of medical, surgical and supportive care measures. DESIGN: To provide timely and evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of patients with MBC, an international expert panel reviewed and discussed the evidence available from clinical trials regarding diagnostic, therapeutic and supportive measures with emphasis on their impact on the quality of life and overall survival of patients with MBC. RESULTS: Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic workup, endocrine therapy, chemotherapy, use of targeted therapies and bisphosphonates, surgical treatment and supportive care measures in the management of patients with MBC were formulated. CONCLUSIONS: The present consensus manuscript updates evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of MBC depending on disease-associated and biological variables.

Taxanes for adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in pre- and post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. Taxanes are highly active chemotherapy agents in metastatic breast cancer. Their role in early breast cancer was examined in this review. OBJECTIVES: To review the randomised evidence comparing taxane containing chemotherapy regimens with non-taxane containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of pre- or post-menopausal women with early breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register was searched on 9th January 2007 using the codes for 'early breast cancer' and keywords for taxanes. Details of the search strategy used to create the register are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. The reference lists of other related literature reviews and articles were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing taxane containing regimens with non-taxane containing regimens in women with operable breast cancer. Women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected from published trials and abstracts. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality and the data extracted independently by two review authors. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); disease-free survival (DFS) was a secondary outcome measure. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted when reported. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 20 studies, 12 of these (7 full publications, 5 abstracts) had sufficient data published for inclusion (11 for OS and 11 for DFS) in the review. The weighted average median follow up was 60.4 months. All studies fulfilled quality criteria either adequately or well. Amongst 18,304 women with 2483 deaths, the HR for OS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.88, P < 0.00001) favouring taxane containing regimens. Amongst 19,943 women with 4800 events, the HR for DFS was 0.81 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.86, P < 0.00001) favouring taxane containing regimens. There was no statistical heterogeneity for either OS or DFS. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of studies supports the use of taxane containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimens with improvement of overall survival and disease-free survival for women with operable early breast cancer. The review did not identify a subgroup of patients where taxane containing treatment may have been more or less effective. Dosage and scheduling of the taxane drug is not clearly defined and we await results of the next generation of studies to determine the optimal use of taxanes in early breast cancer.

Imatinib disposition and ABCB1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein) genotype.

The aim of this study was to explore the impact of individual variation in drug elimination on imatinib disposition. Twenty-two patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor or chronic myeloid leukemia initially received imatinib 600 mg daily with dosage subsequently toxicity adjusted. Pharmacokinetic parameters on day 1 and at steady-state were compared with elimination phenotype and single-nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP3A5 and ABCB1. A fivefold variation in estimated imatinib clearance (CL/F) was present on day 1 and mean CL/F had fallen by 26% at steady state. This reduction in imatinib CL/F was associated with ABCB1 genotype, being least apparent in thymidine homozygotes at the 1236T>C, 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T loci. Toxicity-related dose reduction also tended to be less common in these individuals. ABCB1 genotype was associated with steady-state CL/F due to an apparent genotype-specific influence of imatinib on elimination. Further evaluation of ABCB1 genotype and imatinib dosage is warranted.

Second consensus on medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

The present consensus manuscript defines evidence-based recommendations for state-of-the-art treatment of metastatic breast cancer depending on disease-associated and biologic variables.

Addition of drug/s to a chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The addition of a chemotherapy drug or drugs to an established regimen is one method used to increase the dose and intensity of treatment for metastatic breast cancer. OBJECTIVES: To identify and review the randomised trial evidence in the first line management of women with metastatic breast cancer that evaluates the addition of one or more chemotherapy drugs to an established regimen. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the specialised register maintained by the Editorial Base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group on 3rd August 2004 (updated search on 2nd August 2005) using the codes for "advanced breast cancer" and "chemotherapy". Details of the search strategy applied by the Group to create the register, and the procedure used to code references, are described in the Group's module on the Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials that evaluated a first line regimen of at least two chemotherapy drugs, and compared it to that same regimen plus the addition of one or more chemotherapy drugs in women with metastatic breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We collected data from published trials and assessed studies for eligibility and quality. Two reviewers extracted data independently. We derived hazard ratios (HR) from time-to-event outcomes where possible, and a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. We analysed response rates as dichotomous variables and extracted toxicity data where available. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 17 trials reporting on 22 treatment comparisons (2674 patients randomised). Fifteen trials (20 treatment comparisons) reported results for tumour response and 11 trials (14 treatment comparisons) published time-to-event data for overall survival. There were 1532 deaths in 2116 women randomised to trials of the addition of a drug to the regimen and control (the regimen alone). There was no detectable difference in overall survival between these patients, with an overall HR of 0.96 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.07, P = 0.47) and no statistically significant heterogeneity. We found no difference in time to progression between these regimens, with an overall HR of 0.93 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.07, P = 0.31) and no statistically significant heterogeneity. Addition of a drug to the regimen was favourably associated with overall tumour response rates (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.44, P = 0.04) although we observed statistically significant heterogeneity for this outcome across the trials. Where measured, acute toxicities such as alopecia, nausea and vomiting and leukopenia were more common with the addition of a drug. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The addition of one or more drugs to the regimen shows a statistically significant advantage for tumour response in women with metastatic breast cancer but the results suggest no difference in survival time or time to progression. The positive effect on tumour response observed with addition of a drug to the regimen was also associated with increased toxicity.

A risk index for early node-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the application of the St Gallen 2001 classification with a risk index developed at the New South Wales Breast Cancer Institute (BCI Index) for women with node-negative breast cancer treated without adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS: The BCI risk categories were constructed by identifying combinations of prognostic indicators that produced homogeneous low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups using the same variables as in the St Gallen classification. RESULTS: The BCI low-risk category consisted of women aged 35 years or more with a grade 1 oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumour 20 mm or less in diameter, or with a grade 2 ER-positive tumour of 15 mm or less. This category constituted 40.1 per cent of patients, with a 10-year distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) rate of 97.2 per cent. The BCI intermediate-risk category included women aged 35 years or more with a grade 2 ER-positive tumour of diameter 16-20 mm, or a grade 1 or 2 ER-negative tumour measuring 15 mm or less, and comprised 12.1 per cent of the women, with a 10-year DRFS rate of 88 per cent. The high-risk category comprised 47.7 per cent of women, with a 10-year DRFS rate of 68.4 per cent. CONCLUSION: If confirmed in other data sets, the BCI Index may be used to identify women at low risk of distant relapse (2.8 per cent at 10 years) who are unlikely to benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy, and women at intermediate risk of distant relapse (12 per cent at 10 years) in whom the benefit of adjuvant systemic therapy is small.

Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: what makes AC and CMF worthwhile now?

BACKGROUND: Studies of women who had adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer 10-20 years ago showed that many judged small benefits sufficient to make it worthwhile. Indications, regimens and supportive care have changed. We sought the preferences of contemporary women who received similar chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-seven consecutive consenting women who completed adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer 3-34 months previously were interviewed. Preferences were elicited with a structured, scripted interview using the trade-off method. Women were presented with four hypothetical scenarios based on known life expectancies (5 and 15 years) and survival rates (65% and 85% at 5 years) without adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Improvements of an additional year in life expectancy or 3% in survival rates were judged sufficient to make adjuvant chemotherapy worthwhile by 68-84% of women. Half the women judged 1 day or 0.1% sufficient to make adjuvant chemotherapy worthwhile. Recollections of better well-being during adjuvant chemotherapy, having dependants and having a friend or relative who died from cancer were independently associated with judging smaller benefits sufficient to make adjuvant chemotherapy worthwhile (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Preferences were highly variable, but the benefits judged sufficient to make adjuvant chemotherapy worthwhile were even smaller than those found in previous studies. Preferences were influenced by factors other than direct benefits and harms of chemotherapy.

A systematic review of taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

We compared the results of randomised trials comparing taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing a taxane in women with metastatic breast cancer. The specialised register of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched in March 2004. Eligibility was assessed and data extracted from eligible studies by two reviewers. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for time-to-event outcomes, and a fixed-effect model was used for meta-analysis. Tumour response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Of 21 eligible trials, 16 had published some results and 12 data on overall survival. An estimated 2621 deaths among 3643 women suggest a significant difference in overall survival in favour of taxane-containing regimens (HR 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.00, P=0.05). The treatment effect on survival was similar if only trials of first-line chemotherapy were included, although not statistically significant. There appeared to be an advantage for taxanes in time to progression (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, P=0.02) and overall response (odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.52, P<0.001). There was significant heterogeneity across the trials (P<0.001), partly because of the varying efficacy of the comparator regimens. Taxane-containing regimens improved overall survival in women with metastatic breast cancer. Taxane-containing regimens are more effective than some, but not all, nontaxane-containing regimens.

Taxane containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that taxanes are among the most active chemotherapy agents in the management of metastatic breast cancer. OBJECTIVES: To identify and review the randomised evidence comparing taxane containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing a taxane in the management of women with metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The specialised register maintained by the Editorial Base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 2nd May 2003 using the codes for "advanced breast cancer", "chemotherapy". Details of the search strategy applied by the Group to create the register, and the procedure used to code references, are described in the Group's module on the Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing taxanes in women with metastatic breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected from published trials. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data were extracted, by two independent reviewers. Hazard ratios were derived for time-to-event outcomes where possible, and a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted where present. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty one eligible trials were identified of which 12 have published time-to-event data and 16 have reported response data. The quality of randomisation was generally not described. An estimated 2621 deaths in 3643 randomised women demonstrate a statistically significant difference in favour of taxane-containing regimens with a HR for overall survival of 0.93 (95% CI=0.86-1.00, p=0.05) and no statistically significant heterogeneity. If the analysis is restricted to trials of firstline chemotherapy the HR changes to 0.92 and is no longer statistically significant (95% CI 0.84-1.02, p=0.11). There was also a significant difference in favour of taxanes in relation to time to progression (overall HR 0.92, 95%CI 0.85-0.99, p=0.02) and overall response in assessable women (overall OR 1.34, 95%CI 1.18-1.52, p<0.00001) however there was strong statistical evidence of heterogeneity (P<0.00001), probably reflecting the varying efficacy of the comparator regimens used in the trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: When all trials are considered, taxane-containing regimens appear to improve overall survival, time to progression and overall response in women with metastatic breast cancer. The degree of heterogeneity encountered indicates that taxane-containing regimens are more effective than some, but not all non-taxane-containing regimens.

Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is commonly thought that combining chemotherapy agents for treating women with metastatic breast cancer will result in regimens that are more active, offer superior tumour response rates with more time before progression and improve overall survival. However, it is not known whether giving patients more intensive chemotherapy regimens (judged according to some measure eg dose, dose intensity, response rate, or toxicity) results in better health outcomes. One way to investigate the effect of more versus less-intensive chemotherapy is to compare regimens containing a single drug (and hence possibly less active treatment) with regimens containing a greater number of drugs (and hence possibly more active but more toxic), even when adjustments are made to dosages or schedules to account for toxicity. OBJECTIVES: To compare use of single chemotherapy agents with regimens containing a combination of agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Specialised Register maintained by the Editorial Base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 2nd May 2003 using the codes for "advanced breast cancer", "chemotherapy". Details of the search strategy applied by the group to create the register, and the procedure used to code references, are described in the group's module on The Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing single agent chemotherapy with combination therapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected from published trials. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Hazard ratios were derived for time-to-event outcomes where possible, and a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted where present. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty seven eligible trials were identified of which 28 had published time-to-event data. The quality of randomisation was generally not described. Data, based on an estimated 4220 deaths in 5707 women, show a modest advantage for combination chemotherapy regimens compared with single agents with a hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival of 0.88 (95% CI=0.83-0.94, P<0.0001) and no evident heterogeneity. Results are similar if the analysis is limited to trials in women receiving first-line chemotherapy. Combination regimens are favourably associated with time to progression (overall HR of 0.78 (95% CI=0.73-0.83, P<0.00001) and tumour response rates (OR 1.28, CI=1.15-1.42, P<0.00001) although significant heterogeneity was observed (P=0.002 and P<0.00001 respectively). This probably reflects the varying efficacy of the comparator regimens used in the trials. Women receiving combination regimens experienced a higher toxicity level for leukopenia, hair loss and nausea and vomiting compared with those receiving a single agent, which was statistically significant. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared with single-chemotherapy agents, combination regimens show a statistically significant advantage for tumor response and time to progression in women with metastatic breast cancer, a modest improvement in overall survival and significantly worse toxicities.

Antitumour antibiotic containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Antitumour antibiotics are used in the management of metastatic breast cancer. Some of these agents have demonstrated higher tumour response rates than non-antitumour antibiotic regimens, however a survival benefit has not been established in this setting. OBJECTIVES: To identify and review the randomised evidence comparing anti-tumour antibiotic containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing an anti-tumour antibiotic in the management of women with metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The specialised register maintained by the Editorial Base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 2nd May, 2003 using the codes for "advanced breast cancer" and "chemotherapy". Details of the search strategy and coding applied by the Group to create the register are described in the Group's module on The Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing anti-tumour antibiotic containing regimens with regimens not containing anti-tumour antibiotics in women with metastatic breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected from published trials. Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Hazard ratios (HRs) were derived from time-to-event outcomes where possible, and a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Quality of life and toxicity data were extracted where present. A primary analysis was conducted for all trials and by class of antitumour antibiotic. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-three trials reporting on 45 treatment comparisons were identified. All trials published results for tumour response and 26 trials published time-to-event data for overall survival. The observed 4084 deaths in 5284 randomised women did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in survival between regimens that contained antitumour antibiotics and those that did not (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.03, P = 0.35) and no significant heterogeneity. Antitumour antibiotic regimens were favourably associated with time-to-progression (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91) and tumour response rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.48) although statistically significant heterogeneity was observed for these outcomes. These associations were consistent when the analysis was restricted to the 29 trials that reported on anthracyclines. Patients receiving anthracycline-containing regimens were also more likely to experience toxic events compared to patients receiving non-antitumour antibiotic regimens. No statistically significant difference was observed in any outcome between mitoxantrone-containing and non-antitumour antibiotic-containing regimens. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared to regimens without antitumour antibiotics, regimens that contained these agents showed a statistically significant advantage for tumour response and time to progression in women with metastatic breast cancer but were not associated with an improvement in overall survival. The favourable effect on tumour response and time to progression observed in anthracycline-containing regimens was also associated with greater toxicity.

Platinum containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported high tumour response rates for platinum-containing regimens in the treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. OBJECTIVES: To identify and review the evidence from randomised trials comparing platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing platinum in the management of women with metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The specialised register maintained by the editorial base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 2nd May 2003 using the codes for "advanced breast cancer", "chemotherapy". Details of the search strategy applied to create the register, and the procedure used to code references, are described in the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group module on The Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing platinum in women with metastatic breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data (from published trials) were extracted by two independent reviewers. Hazard ratios were derived for time-to-event outcomes, where possible, and a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and quality of life data (not available) were extracted where present. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen eligible trials were identified, of which 12 had published time-to-event data. The quality of randomisation was generally not described.Data, based on an estimated 987 deaths in 1377 women, was unable to show a statistically significant difference in favour of platinum-containing regimens. The hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.15, p=0.96), with minor heterogeneity. Results were similar when the analysis was limited to trials in women receiving first line chemotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference in favour of platinum-containing regimens for time to progression (overall HR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.19, p=0.31) although there was marked evidence of heterogeneity (p< 0.0001). There was a statistically significant difference in overall response in favour of platinum-containing regimens (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.76, p=0.0001). However, there was strong statistical evidence of heterogeneity (p < 0.00010) probably reflecting the varying efficacy of the comparator regimens used in the trials. Heterogeneity may also reflect the differences, and difficulties, in assessing response. Women receiving platinum-containing regimens experienced statistically significant greater toxicity levels for leukopenia, hair loss, nausea and vomiting and anaemia compared with those receiving non-platinum regimens. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: In view of the significant excess toxicity, lack of progression or survival benefit and the availability of less toxic active agents it is difficult to justify the use of platinum-containing regimens, particularly as first line treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice. Ongoing trials are examining the possibility of synergy between platins and trastuzamab, a monoclonal antibody treatment. No randomised trials containing oxalplatin were identified for the present review.

Systematic review of taxane-containing versus non-taxane-containing regimens for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

The use of taxanes in early breast cancer is increasing. However, there are few mature studies of taxanes in this setting, and their role is uncertain. Our systematic review of randomised trials of adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic therapy identified ten reported trials comparing a taxane-containing group with a non-taxane-containing control group in women with early breast cancer. Four of five neoadjuvant trials showed higher rates of complete response with taxanes, although differences were not significant. All five adjuvant trials showed improvements in disease-free survival with taxanes, and these improvements were significant in three trials and independent of oestrogen-receptor status. Two trials showed a significant improvement in overall survival. These results support the use of adjuvant taxanes in women with early breast cancer and involved lymph nodes. Longer follow-up of these trials and results from continuing trials are needed to clarify the best use of taxanes in early breast cancer.

Platinum containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported high tumour response rates for platinum-containing regimens in the treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer. OBJECTIVES: To identify and review the evidence from randomised trials comparing platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing platinum in the management of women with metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: The specialised register maintained by the editorial base of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group was searched on 2nd May 2003 using the codes for "advanced breast cancer", "chemotherapy". Details of the search strategy applied to create the register, and the procedure used to code references, are described in the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group module on The Cochrane Library. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens with regimens not containing platinum in women with metastatic breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were assessed for eligibility and quality, and data (from published trials) were extracted by two independent reviewers. Hazard ratios were derived for time-to-event outcomes, where possible, and a fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis. Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and quality of life data (not available) were extracted where present. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen eligible trials were identified, of which 12 had published time-to-event data. The quality of randomisation was generally not described.Data, based on an estimated 987 deaths in 1377 women, was unable to show a statistically significant difference in favour of platinum-containing regimens. The hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was 1.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 1.15, p=0.96), with minor heterogeneity. Results were similar when the analysis was limited to trials in women receiving first line chemotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference in favour of platinum-containing regimens for time to progression (overall HR of 1.06 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.19, p=0.31) although there was marked evidence of heterogeneity (p< 0.0001). There was a statistically significant difference in overall response in favour of platinum-containing regimens (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.76, p=0.0001). However, there was strong statistical evidence of heterogeneity (p < 0.00010) probably reflecting the varying efficacy of the comparator regimens used in the trials. Heterogeneity may also reflect the differences, and difficulties, in assessing response. Women receiving platinum-containing regimens experienced statistically significant greater toxicity levels for leukopenia, hair loss, nausea and vomiting and anaemia compared with those receiving non-platinum regimens. REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: In view of the significant excess toxicity, lack of progression or survival benefit and the availability of less toxic active agents it is difficult to justify the use of platinum-containing regimens, particularly as first line treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer in routine clinical practice. Ongoing trials are examining the possibility of synergy between platins and trastuzamab, a monoclonal antibody treatment. No randomised trials containing oxalplatin were identified for the present review.