EGFR/CEP7 high polysomy is separate and distinct from EGFR amplification in glioblastoma as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

EGFR amplification in gliomas is commonly defined by an EGFR/CEP7 ratio of ≥2. In testing performed at a major reference laboratory, a small subset of patients had ≥5 copies of both EGFR and CEP7 yet were not amplified by the EGFR/CEP7 ratio and were designated high polysomy cases. To determine whether these tumors are more closely related to traditionally defined EGFR-amplified or nonamplified gliomas, a retrospective search identified 22 out of 1143 (1.9%) gliomas with an average of ≥5 copies/cell of EGFR and CEP7 with an EGFR/CEP7 ratio of <2 displaying high polysomy. Of these cases, 4 had insufficient clinicopathologic data to include in additional analysis, 15 were glioblastomas, 2 were IDH-mutant astrocytomas, and 1 was a high-grade glial neoplasm, NOS. Next-generation sequencing available on 3 cases demonstrated one with a TERT promoter mutation, TP53 mutations in all cases, and no EGFR mutations or amplifications, which most closely matched the nonamplified cases. The median overall survival times were 42.86, 66.07, and 41.14 weeks for amplified, highly polysomic, and nonamplified, respectively, and were not significantly different (p = 0.3410). High chromosome 7 polysomic gliomas are rare but our data suggest that they may be biologically similar to nonamplified gliomas.

Quantitative Imaging Analysis Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Validation for Clinical HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer.

CONTEXT.­: Quantitative imaging is a promising tool that is gaining wide use across several areas of pathology. Although there has been increasing adoption of morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis, the adoption of evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue has been limited because of complexity and lack of practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE.­: To perform human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) FISH validation in breast carcinoma in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) 2018 guideline. DESIGN.­: Clinical validation of HER2 FISH was performed using the US Food and Drug Administration-approved dual-probe HER2 IQFISH (Dako, Carpinteria, California) with digital scanning performed on a PathFusion (Applied Spectral Imaging, Carlsbad, California) system. Validation parameters evaluated included z-stacking, classifier, accuracy, precision, software, and hardware settings. Finally, we evaluated the performance of digital enumeration on clinical samples in a real-world setting. RESULTS.­: The accuracy samples showed a final concordance of 95.3% to 100% across HER2 groups 1 to 5. During clinical implementation for HER2 groups 2, 3, and 4, we achieved a final concordance of 76% (95 of 125). Of these cases, only 8% (10 of 125) had discordances with clinical impact that could be identified algorithmically and triaged for manual review. CONCLUSIONS.­: Digital FISH enumeration is a useful tool to improve the efficacy of HER2 FISH enumeration and capture genetic heterogeneity across HER2 signals. Excluding cases with high background or poor image quality and manual review of cases with ASCO/CAP group discordances can further improve the efficiency of digital HER2 FISH enumeration.

Digital imaging correlation of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma cases with HER2 genetic heterogeneity.

Genetic heterogeneity (GH) is a rare but important event in the evaluation of HER2 amplification status. We investigated whether HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) GH correlated with increased protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or morphologic features using image analyses. Retrospective search of HER2 FISH GH cases 2016-2020 was performed. Cases with both FISH and IHC slides available were considered eligible and were digitally imaged. Additional demographic, histological, and treatment information was compiled from pathology and medical records when available. Overall, 11 of 15 cases (73.3%) had HER2 FISH GH that matched to areas of HER2 overexpression or focally different morphology. Nine cases with areas of gene amplification overlapped with <10% of intense circumferential protein expression ("Mini 3+"), and 1 case with focal micropapillary features. Clinical information was available on 6 patients (40%), all were alive with no evidence of disease (mean follow-up 30.5 months; range, 12-65 months). One patient with GH and a lymph node metastasis showed nonamplified population in the nodal tumor. GH, when defined as discrete clusters of amplified cells following 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines, even when less than 10% of the tumor cells, frequently has morphologic correlates such as focal intense protein overexpression or micropapillary morphology. Clinical significance of these focal gene amplification and protein overexpression needs to be further investigated.

Histopathological Correlation of Chromosome 12 Polysomy by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization in Adipocytic Neoplasms.

Background: Identification of MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization is an important diagnostic tool for evaluation of adipocytic neoplasms. Rarely, neoplasms can show increased copies of MDM2 and CEP12 probes (polysomy) without amplification (MDM2/CEP12 ratio <2.0). While noted in the literature, this finding has not been the focus of any study to date. Methods: Consecutive cases were retrospectively screened for increased copies of MDM2 and CEP12 and were classified as: high polysomy (ratio<2.0, CEP12≥10.0), low polysomy (ratio<2.0, but >0.5, CEP12≥4.0 but <9.9), and CEP12 amplification (ratio≤0.5, CEP12 > 4.0). H&E slides were classified by a pathologist into diagnostic categories based on morphology without knowledge of MDM2 amplification result. Correlations between chromosome 12 polysomy and histological features in the same region of the tumor were investigated. Results: There were 19 (0.7%) high polysomy, 52 (2.0%) low polysomy and 3 (0.1%) CEP12 amplification cases identified in the 2541 cases screened. While low polysomy was seen across benign and malignant adipocytic tumors and other sarcomas, high level polysomy was primarily seen in liposarcomas, both atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma (ALT/WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS). No lipomas were high polysomy. Conclusion: Polysomy is an uncommon, but distinct, finding in adipocytic neoplasms found across the spectrum of benign to malignant with little insight into the pathophysiology or prognosis. While low polysomy is also observed in benign adipocytic neoplasms, high polysomy is almost always seen in malignant adipocytic neoplasms and is uncommon in benign adipocytic neoplasms.

Histologic and Molecular Characterization of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma With Discordant ROS1 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

INTRODUCTION: ROS1 immunohistochemical (IHC) positivity requires follow-up with confirmatory testing such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Identifying predictive characteristics of false positive ROS1 IHC cases could aid in optimizing testing algorithms, decrease testing costs and preserve tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective results were retrieved for 2054 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma submitted to our laboratory for molecular testing. Reflex ROS1 FISH was done on all ROS1 immunoreactive cases using ROS1 D4D6 antibody. Staining intensity and histo-score was recorded for all ROS1 immunoreactive cases. Results of any additional molecular testing (KRAS, BRAF, EGFR, ALK FISH, RET FISH, MET FISH) were also tabulated. RESULTS: ROS1 immunoreactivity was seen in 305/2054 (14.8%) cases. Immunoreactivity was weak in majority of the cases with only 4.6% cases having an histo-score >100 and 5.9% of cases had moderate staining intensity. FISH was negative in 99% (302/305) cases with any degree of IHC expression (discordant cases) while 3 cases were positive by FISH. Diffuse strong IHC staining in greater than 90% of the tumor was noted in 6 cases, 3 (0.98%) of which were confirmed to have ROS1 rearrangement by FISH. The discordant cases had significantly higher rates of EGFR mutations (P<0.0005) in comparison to ROS1 IHC negative cases, were seen more often in adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma (P<0.0005) with lepidic and acinar patterns, and more likely to occur in primary lung carcinomas (P<0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: False positive ROS1 immunoreactivity was very frequent, occurred more commonly in primary NSCLC cases with acinar and/or lepidic histologies and was more likely in EGFR mutated cases. Using higher positivity thresholds for ROS1 IHC and incorporating the histologic and molecular correlates into algorithmic strategies could result in increased specificity and clinical utility of ROS1 IHC assay.

Specific Immunoglobulin (Ig) G Reference Intervals for Common Food, Insect, and Mold Allergens.

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of serum IgG measurement in the diagnosis of allergy and food-induced hypersensitivity has been largely discredited. Recent studies, however, have shown that specific IgG can inhibit IgE mediated allergies, and may play a role in allergen specific desensitization. Accurate reference intervals for IgG specific allergens have not been widely established and are needed for better interpretation of serum antibody concentrations. In this study we established 64 IgG reference intervals for 48 common food allergens, 5 venoms, and 11 molds. DESIGN: Specific IgG concentrations were determined employing an automated fluorescent enzyme immunoassay on serum samples from 130 normal adults (65 males and 65 females), age range 18-69 y, mean 37.3 y. RESULTS: The lower reference interval limit for all allergens tested (n=64) was <2 mcg/mL. The median upper reference interval value for all 64 allergens was 12.9 mcg/mL, with Tuna (f40) having the lowest upper interval limit at 3.8 mcg/mL, and the mold Setomelanomma rostrate (m8) demonstrating the highest upper interval limit at 131 mcg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable variation observed among the upper reference interval limits emphasizes the need for the establishment of allergen specific ranges for IgG. These newly established ranges should be a useful aid for clinicians in the interpretation of laboratory serum IgG results.