Readmissions after general surgery: a prospective multicenter audit.

BACKGROUND: Readmission rates after surgical procedures are viewed as a marker of quality of care and as a driver to improve outcomes in the United Kingdom, they are not remunerated. However, readmissions are not wholly avoidable. The aim of this study was to develop a regional overview of readmissions to determine the proportion that might be avoidable and to examine predictors of readmissions at a unit level. METHODS: We undertook a prospective multicenter audit of readmissions following National Health Service funded general surgical procedures in five National Health Service hospitals and three independent sector providers over a 2-wk period. Basic demographic and procedure data were captured. Readmissions to hospitals were identified through acute admissions lists. Reason for readmission was identified, and the readmission data assessed by a senior surgical doctor as to whether it was avoidable. RESULTS: We identified 752 operations in the study period with all followed up to 30 d. The overall rate of readmissions was 4.7%, with 40% of these judged as being potentially avoidable. Pain and wound problems accounted for the vast majority of avoidable readmissions. The number of unavoidable readmissions was correlated with the workload of each center (r = 0.63, P = 0.06) and as with the higher (British United Provident Association) complexity of surgery (r = 0.90, P = 0.01). Patient and demographic factors were not associated with readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective audit describes readmission rates after general surgery. Volume and complexity of work are associated with readmission rates. A large proportion of readmissions could be reduced by attention to analgesia and outpatient arrangements for wound management.

Has the Bachelor of Surgery Left Medical School?-A National Undergraduate Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Nearly all trainee doctors would undertake a surgical placement in their clinical training; however, there is anecdotal evidence of variability in undergraduate surgical teaching across the UK. We set out to describe the provision of undergraduate surgery and report graduating students' opinions of aspects of this. METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional questionnaire of medical students graduating in 2014 from UK medical schools. An online electronic questionnaire was used to capture demographics, career intentions, and individual's undergraduate experience of surgery. A separate questionnaire was sent to medical schools to assess time devoted to surgical placements and how surgical sciences were taught and assessed. RESULTS: From 483 responses covering 31 UK medical schools, there were 328 completed student questionnaires. A third of respondents felt that teaching of surgical sciences was inadequate. Medical schools reported time allocated to surgical specialties ranging from 4 to 21 weeks (median 13 weeks). Among all, 1 medical school offered a basic surgical skills course and 1 medical school specifically assessed surgical-related skills. Overall, 65% of medical students felt prepared for a surgical foundation placement and 88% felt prepared for a medical foundation placement. In total, 78% felt ready to participate in an acute medicine on-call and 48% felt ready for emergency surgery on-call. There was a positive association between time dedicated to undergraduate surgery and reported preparedness for a foundation surgical job. CONCLUSIONS: UK medical students reported uniformly low rates of satisfaction with surgical science teaching. Students studying at medical schools with more time in the curriculum dedicated to surgery reported higher levels of preparedness for surgical foundation jobs. There were differences in the rates of perceived preparedness for surgical posts and for emergency surgery. There is a clear need to review undergraduate surgical provision to ensure that students are equipped for safe practice in junior surgical foundation jobs.

Health Education England, Local Education and Training Boards (LETBs) and reform of healthcare education: implications for surgical training.

BACKGROUND: National Health Service (NHS) reforms have changed the structure of postgraduate healthcare education and training. With a Government mandate that promotes multi-professional education and training aligned with policy driven initiatives, this article highlights concerns over the impact that these changes may have on surgical training. DISCUSSION: The creation of Health Education England (HEE) and its local education and training boards (LETBs), which are dominated by NHS healthcare providers, should result in greater accountability of employers in workforce planning, enhanced local responsibility and increased transparency of funding allocation. However, these changes may also create a potential poacher-turned-gamekeeper role of employers, who now have responsibility for junior doctors' training. Analysis of LETB membership reveals a dearth of representation of surgeons, who comprise only 2% of board members, with the input of trainees also seemingly overlooked. A lack of engagement with the LETBs by the independent sector is a concern with increasing numbers of training opportunities potentially being lost as a result.The new system also needs to recognise the specific training needs required by the craft specialties given the demands of technical skill acquisition, in particular regarding the provision of simulation training facilities and trainer recognition. However, training budget cuts may result in a disproportionate reduction of funding for surgical training. Surgical training posts will also be endangered, opportunities for out-of-programme experience and research may also decline and further costs are likely to be passed onto the trainee. SUMMARY: Although there are several facets to the recent reforms of the healthcare education and training system that have potential to improve surgical training, concerns need to be addressed. Engagement from the independent sector and further clarification on how the LETBs will be aligned with commissioning services are also required. Surgical training is in danger of taking a back seat to Government mandated priorities. Representation of trainees and surgeons on LETB committees is essential to ensure a surgical viewpoint so that the training needs of the future consultant workforce meet the demands of a 21st century health service.

Neuropilins: expression and roles in the epithelium.

Initially found expressed in neuronal and then later in endothelial cells, it is well established that the transmembrane glycoproteins neuropilin-1 (NRP1) and neuropilin-2 (NRP2) play essential roles in axonal growth and guidance and in physiological and pathological angiogenesis. Neuropilin expression and function in epithelial cells has received little attention when compared with neuronal and endothelial cells. Overexpression of NRPs is shown to enhance growth, correlate with invasion and is associated with poor prognosis in various tumour types, especially those of epithelial origin. The contribution of NRP and its ligands to tumour growth and metastasis has spurred a strong interest in NRPs as novel chemotherapy drug targets. Given NRP's role as a multifunctional co-receptor with an ability to bind with disparate ligand families, this has sparked new areas of research implicating NRPs in diverse biological functions. Here, we review the growing body of research demonstrating NRP expression and role in the normal and neoplastic epithelium.

Adenocarcinoma of a colostomy following abdominoperineal resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: a case study.

Malignant neoplasms presenting on a stoma, as well as the development of colorectal adenocarcinoma after previous treatment for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anal canal, are rare. The unique case is presented of an 81-year-old woman with parastomal bleeding and ulceration found to have a primary colorectal adenocarcinoma arising de novo on a colostomy, formed after salvage abdominoperineal resection (APR) 3 years earlier for recurrent anal SCC. This is the first reported case of a colonic adenocarcinoma on a colostomy formed after an APR for anal SCC. Although stomal neoplasia is rare, the appearance of a friable bleeding lesion on the stoma should be investigated to exclude metastatic cancer or a second primary malignancy.