Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Toxicol ; 95(1): 321-336, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910239

RESUMO

Current in vitro genotoxicity tests can produce misleading positive results, indicating an inability to effectively predict a compound's subsequent carcinogenic potential in vivo. Such oversensitivity can incur unnecessary in vivo tests to further investigate positive in vitro results, supporting the need to improve in vitro tests to better inform risk assessment. It is increasingly acknowledged that more informative in vitro tests using multiple endpoints may support the correct identification of carcinogenic potential. The present study, therefore, employed a holistic, multiple-endpoint approach using low doses of selected carcinogens and non-carcinogens (0.001-770 µM) to assess whether these chemicals caused perturbations in molecular and cellular endpoints relating to the Hallmarks of Cancer. Endpoints included micronucleus induction, alterations in gene expression, cell cycle dynamics, cell morphology and bioenergetics in the human lymphoblastoid cell line TK6. Carcinogens ochratoxin A and oestradiol produced greater Integrated Signature of Carcinogenicity scores for the combined endpoints than the "misleading" in vitro positive compounds, quercetin, 2,4-dichlorophenol and quinacrine dihydrochloride and toxic non-carcinogens, caffeine, cycloheximide and phenformin HCl. This study provides compelling evidence that carcinogens can successfully be distinguished from non-carcinogens using a holistic in vitro test system. Avoidance of misleading in vitro outcomes could lead to the reduction and replacement of animals in carcinogenicity testing.


Assuntos
Testes de Carcinogenicidade , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Determinação de Ponto Final , Projetos de Pesquisa , Pontos de Checagem do Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Linhagem Celular , Forma Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Metabolismo Energético/efeitos dos fármacos , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Micronúcleos com Defeito Cromossômico/induzido quimicamente , Testes para Micronúcleos , Fosforilação , Medição de Risco , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismo
2.
Mutagenesis ; 35(6): 445-452, 2020 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33219664

RESUMO

In vitro genotoxicity studies are a quick and high throughput approach to assess the genotoxic potential of chemicals; however, the reliability of these tests and their relevance to in vivo effects depends on the choice of representative cell line and optimisation of assay conditions. For chemicals like urethane that require specific metabolic activation to cause genotoxicity, it is important that in vitro tests are conducted using cell lines exhibiting the activity and induction of CYP450 enzymes, including CYP2E1 enzyme that is important in the metabolism of urethane, at a concentration representing actual or perceived chemical exposure. We compared 2D MCL-5 cells and HepG2 cells with 3D HepG2 hanging drop spheroids to determine the genotoxicity of urethane using the micronucleus assay. Our 2D studies with MCL-5 did not show any statistically significant genotoxicity [99% relative population doubling (RPD)] compared to controls for concentrations and time point tested in vitro. HepG2 cells grown as 2D indicated that exposure to urethane of up to 30 mM for 23 h did not cause any genotoxic effect (102% RPD) but, at higher concentrations, genotoxicity was produced with only 89-85% RPD. Furthermore, an exposure of 20-50 mM for 23 h using 3D hanging drop spheroid assays revealed a higher MN frequency, thus exhibiting in vitro genotoxicity of urethane in metabolically active cell models. In comparison with previous studies, this study indicated that urethane genotoxicity is dose, sensitivity of cell model (2D vs. 3D) and exposure dependent.


Assuntos
Testes de Mutagenicidade/métodos , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Uretana/toxicidade , Biomarcadores , Técnicas de Cultura de Células , Pontos de Checagem do Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Linhagem Celular , Respiração Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Dano ao DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Glicólise/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Micronúcleos com Defeito Cromossômico/induzido quimicamente , Testes para Micronúcleos/métodos , Mitocôndrias/efeitos dos fármacos , Mitocôndrias/metabolismo , Esferoides Celulares
3.
Arch Toxicol ; 92(2): 935-951, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29110037

RESUMO

Human exposure to carcinogens occurs via a plethora of environmental sources, with 70-90% of cancers caused by extrinsic factors. Aberrant phenotypes induced by such carcinogenic agents may provide universal biomarkers for cancer causation. Both current in vitro genotoxicity tests and the animal-testing paradigm in human cancer risk assessment fail to accurately represent and predict whether a chemical causes human carcinogenesis. The study aimed to establish whether the integrated analysis of multiple cellular endpoints related to the Hallmarks of Cancer could advance in vitro carcinogenicity assessment. Human lymphoblastoid cells (TK6, MCL-5) were treated for either 4 or 23 h with 8 known in vivo carcinogens, with doses up to 50% Relative Population Doubling (maximum 66.6 mM). The adverse effects of carcinogens on wide-ranging aspects of cellular health were quantified using several approaches; these included chromosome damage, cell signalling, cell morphology, cell-cycle dynamics and bioenergetic perturbations. Cell morphology and gene expression alterations proved particularly sensitive for environmental carcinogen identification. Composite scores for the carcinogens' adverse effects revealed that this approach could identify both DNA-reactive and non-DNA reactive carcinogens in vitro. The richer datasets generated proved that the holistic evaluation of integrated phenotypic alterations is valuable for effective in vitro risk assessment, while also supporting animal test replacement. Crucially, the study offers valuable insights into the mechanisms of human carcinogenesis resulting from exposure to chemicals that humans are likely to encounter in their environment. Such an understanding of cancer induction via environmental agents is essential for cancer prevention.


Assuntos
Testes de Carcinogenicidade/métodos , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Linfócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Linhagem Celular , Humanos , Testes para Micronúcleos , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismo
4.
Arch Toxicol ; 91(7): 2689-2698, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27942789

RESUMO

The use of manual microscopy for the scoring of chromosome damage in the in vitro micronucleus assay is often associated with user subjectivity. This level of subjectivity can be reduced by using automated platforms, which have added value of faster with high-throughput and multi-endpoint capabilities. However, there is a need to assess the reproducibility and sensitivity of these automated platforms compared with the gold standard of the manual scoring. The automated flow cytometry-based MicroFlow® and image analysis-based Metafer™ were used for dose response analyses in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells exposed to the model clastogen, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), aneugen, carbendazim, and the weak genotoxic carcinogen, ochratoxin A (OTA). Cells were treated for 4 or 30 h, with a 26- or 0-h recovery. Flow cytometry scoring parameters and the Metafer™ image classifier were investigated, to assess any potential differences in the micronucleus (MN) dose responses. Dose response data were assessed using the benchmark dose approach with chemical and scoring system set as covariate to assess reproducibility between endpoints. A clear increase in MN frequency was observed using the MicroFlow® approach on TK6 cells treated for 30 h with MMS, carbendazim and OTA. The MicroFlow®-based MN frequencies were comparable to those derived by using the Metafer™ and manual scoring platforms. However, there was a potential overscoring of MN with the MicroFlow® due to the cell lysis step and an underscoring with the Metafer™ system based on current image classifier settings. The findings clearly demonstrate that the MicroFlow® and Metafer™ MN scoring platforms are powerful tools for automated high-throughput MN scoring and dose response analysis.


Assuntos
Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Testes para Micronúcleos/instrumentação , Testes para Micronúcleos/métodos , Automação , Benzimidazóis/toxicidade , Carbamatos/toxicidade , Linhagem Celular , Núcleo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Núcleo Celular/genética , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/instrumentação , Ensaios de Triagem em Larga Escala/métodos , Humanos , Metanossulfonato de Metila/toxicidade , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Ocratoxinas/toxicidade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
5.
Environ Mol Mutagen ; 52(9): 690-8, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21910140

RESUMO

A collaborative international trial was conducted to evaluate the reproducibility and transferability of an in vivo mutation assay based on the enumeration of CD59-negative rat erythrocytes, a phenotype that is indicative of Pig-a gene mutation. Fourteen laboratories participated in this study, where anti-CD59-PE, SYTO 13 dye, and flow cytometry were used to determine the frequency of CD59-negative erythrocytes (RBC(CD59-)) and CD59-negative reticulocytes (RET(CD59-)). To provide samples with a range of mutant phenotype cell frequencies, male rats were exposed to N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) via oral gavage for three consecutive days (Days 1-3). Each laboratory studied 0, 20, and 40 mg ENU/kg/day (n = 5 per group). Three sites also evaluated 4 mg/kg/day. At a minimum, blood samples were collected three times: predosing and on Days 15 and 30. Blood samples were processed according to a standardized sample processing and data acquisition protocol, and three endpoints were measured: %reticulocytes, frequency of RET(CD59-) , and frequency of RBC(CD59-) . The methodology was found to be reproducible, as the analysis of technical replicates resulted in experimental coefficients of variation that approached theoretical values. Good transferability was evident from the similar kinetics and magnitude of the dose-related responses that were observed among different laboratories. Concordance correlation coefficients showed a high level of agreement between the reference site and the test sites (range: 0.87-0.99). Collectively, these data demonstrate that with adequate training of personnel, flow cytometric analysis is capable of reliably enumerating mutant phenotype erythrocytes, thereby providing a robust in vivo mutation assay that is readily transferable across laboratories.


Assuntos
Citometria de Fluxo , Laboratórios , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Testes de Mutagenicidade , Mutação , Animais , Antígenos CD59/genética , Calibragem , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Determinação de Ponto Final , Eritrócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Eritrócitos/metabolismo , Eritrócitos/ultraestrutura , Etilnitrosoureia/toxicidade , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Citometria de Fluxo/normas , Cooperação Internacional , Laboratórios/normas , Testes de Mutagenicidade/métodos , Testes de Mutagenicidade/normas , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos F344 , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Ratos Wistar , Padrões de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Reticulócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Reticulócitos/metabolismo , Reticulócitos/ultraestrutura , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...