[Procalcitonin as a tool for the assessment of successful therapy of severe sepsis : An analysis using clinical routine data]. / Procalcitonin als Instrument zur Erfolgsmessung der Therapie einer schweren Sepsis : Eine Untersuchung mit klinischen Routinedaten.

INTRODUCTION: Procalcitonin (PCT) is a well-evaluated biomarker for the detection of severe bacterial infections and monitoring effectiveness of antibiotic therapy. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of PCT in a clinical routine setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 358,763 clinical cases from 7 German hospitals in 2012 and 2013, 3854 cases had an ICD-10 code representing sepsis. A total of 1778 cases had pathologic PCT and one episode of infection. Of those, 671 showed a series of measures that was suitable to assess treatment success using PCT reduction. Propensity score matching was used to create two comparable groups with 211 patients in each group. RESULTS: The group with PCT reduction within 12 days showed a highly significant better proportion of survival (146/211 vs. 17/211; p < 0.0001). The odds ratio for death according to PCT reduction vs. nonreduction is 25.64 (p < 0.0001; 95 % CI: 14.49-45.45). PCT was normalized after an average of 6.2 days. DISCUSSION: The difference in survival implicates that PCT reduction is a suitable surrogate parameter to indicate successful antimicrobial therapy. Successful antibiotic therapy is a proven predictor for survival in sepsis. This study also showed concordant results in the group of patients with sepsis after abdominal surgery. Results from subgroup analyses confirm the initial findings. PCT reduction was used as surrogate for therapy success, as the antimicrobial therapy was not electronically available. CONCLUSION: PCT reduction is a strong predictor for survival. However, the data show that overall use of PCT to monitor sepsis therapy is not yet routinely established. Hospitals should establish algorithms for sepsis treatment that include PCT for the assessment of adequacy and the monitoring of success of the antimicrobial therapy.

[Economic burden of Clostridium difficile enterocolitis in German hospitals based on routine DRG data]. / Ökonomische Auswirkungen einer Clostridium-difficile-Enterokolitis in deutschen Krankenhäusern auf der Basis von DRG-Kostendaten.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) is not only a increasing medical but also economical problem. METHODS: Data from the DRG project group of the German society for digestive and metabolic diseases (DGVS) were analyzed for CDAD. Out of 430,875 cases from 37 German hospitals 2,767 cases were grouped by having CDAD either as primary (PD) or secondary diagnosis (SD; likely to be from a hospital source) in an initial or recurring hospital stay (RD). For comparison non-CDAD cases from the same hospitals from that year where matched using propensity score matching. As endpoints we defined LOS (length of stay), difference of LOS to national average LOS, total costs per case and difference between costs and revenue for all three groups. RESULTS: Patients from the PD group (n = 817) showed a mean LOS of 11.2 days compared to 8.5 days for the control group, 4,132 € mean cost per case (536 € more than control) and a mean loss of -1,064 € per case compared to -636 €. In the SD group (n = 1,840) patients stayed in the hospital for 28.8 days (control: 18.1 days), had costs of 19,381 € (control: 13,082 €) and a loss of -3,442 € compared to -849 € in the control group. Recurring cases (RD; n = 110) showed a LOS of 37.3 days (control: 21.3 days), had even higher costs (20.755 € vs. 13,101 €) and higher losses (-4,196 € vs. -1,109 €). CONCLUSION: By extrapolating these findings CDAD not only harms patients but generates a yearly cost burden of 464 million € for the German healthcare system including a loss of 197 million € for German hospitals. To the authors' opinion sufficient measures against CDAD should include pre hospital risk reduction programs, introduction of effective therapeutic and hygienic strategies in hospitals as well as improvements in documentation for these cases to support further developments of the German DRG system.

[Improvement of cost allocation in gastroenterology by introduction of a novel service catalogue covering the complete spectrum of endoscopic procedures]. / Verbesserung der Kostenkalkulation in der Gastroenterologie durch Einführung eines neuen Leistungskatalogs für alle endoskopischen Prozeduren.

BACKGROUND: The German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) is incomplete for endoscopic interventions and fails to differentiate between complex and simple procedures. This is caused by outdated methods of personnel-cost allocation. METHODS: To establish an up-to-date service catalogue 50 hospitals made their anonymized expense-budget data available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS). 2.499.900 patient-datasets (2011-2013) were used to classify operation-and-procedure codes (OPS) into procedure-tiers (e.g. colonoscopy with biopsy/colonoscopy with stent-insertion). An expert panel ranked these tiers according to complexity and assigned estimates of physician time. From June to November 2014 exact time tracking data for a total 38.288 individual procedures were collected in 119 hospitals to validate this service catalogue. RESULTS: In this three-step process a catalogue of 97 procedure-tiers was established that covers 99% of endoscopic interventions performed in German hospitals and assigned validated mean personnel-costs using gastroscopy as standard. Previously, diagnostic colonoscopy had a relative personnel-cost value of 1.13 (compared to gastroscopy 1.0) and rose to 2.16, whereas diagnostic ERCP increased from 1.7 to 3.62, more appropriately reflecting complexity. Complex procedures previously not catalogued were now included (e.g. gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: 16.74). DISCUSSION: This novel service catalogue for GI-endoscopy almost completely covers all endoscopic procedures performed in German hospitals and assigns relative personnel-cost values based on actual physician time logs. It is to be included in the national coding recommendation and should replace all prior inventories for cost distribution. The catalogue will contribute to a more objective cost allocation and hospital reimbursement - at least until time tracking for endoscopy becomes mandatory.

The use of a standardized PCT-algorithm reduces costs in intensive care in septic patients - a DRG-based simulation model.

INTRODUCTION: The management of bloodstream infections especially sepsis is a difficult task. An optimal antibiotic therapy (ABX) is paramount for success. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a well investigated biomarker that allows close monitoring of the infection and management of ABX. It has proven to be a cost-efficient diagnostic tool. In Diagnoses Related Groups (DRG) based reimbursement systems, hospitals get only a fixed amount of money for certain treatments. Thus it's very important to obtain an optimal balance of clinical treatment and resource consumption namely the length of stay in hospital and especially in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We investigated which economic effects an optimized PCT-based algorithm for antibiotic management could have. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected inpatient episode data from 16 hospitals. These data contain administrative and clinical information such as length of stay, days in the ICU or diagnoses and procedures. From various RCTs and reviews there are different algorithms for the use of PCT to manage ABX published. Moreover RCTs and meta-analyses have proven possible savings in days of ABX (ABD) and length of stay in ICU (ICUD). As the meta-analyses use studies on different patient populations (pneumonia, sepsis, other bacterial infections), we undertook a short meta-analyses of 6 relevant studies investigating in sepsis or ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP). From this analyses we obtained savings in ABD and ICUD by calculating the weighted mean differences. Then we designed a new PCT-based algorithm using results from two very recent reviews. The algorithm contains evidence from several studies. From the patient data we calculated cost estimates using German National standard costing information for the German G-DRG system. We developed a simulation model where the possible savings and the extra costs for (in average) 8 PCT tests due to our algorithm were brought into equation. RESULTS: We calculated ABD savings of 4 days and ICUD reductions of -1.8 days. Our algorithm contains recommendations for ABX onset (PCT ≥ 0.5 ng/ml), validation whether ABX is appropriate or not (Delta from day 2 to day 3 ≥ 30% indicates inappropriate ABX) and recommendations for discontinuing ABX (PCT ≤ 0.25 ng/ml). We received 278,264 episode datasets where we identified by computer-based selection 3,263 cases with sepsis. After excluding cases with length of stay (LOS) too short to achieve the intended savings, we ended with 1,312 cases with ICUD and 268 cases without ICUD. Average length of stay of ICU-patients was 27.7 ± 25.7 days and for Non-ICU patients 17.5 ± 14.6 days respectively. ICU patients had an average of 8.8 ± 8.7 ICUD. - After applying the simulation model on this population we calculated possible savings of Euro -1,163,000 for ICU-patients and Euro -36,512 for Non-ICU patients. DISCUSSION: Our findings concerning the savings from the reduction of ABD are consistent with other publications. Savings ICUD had never been economically evaluated so far. Our algorithm is able to possibly set a new standard in PCT-based ABX. However the findings are based on data modelling. The algorithm will be implemented in 5-10 hospitals in 2012 and effects in clinical reality measured 6 months after implementation. CONCLUSION: Managing sepsis with daily monitoring of PCT using our refined algorithm is suitable to save substantial costs in hospitals. Implementation in clinical routine settings will show how much of the calculated effect will be achieved in reality.

[Introduction of the new DRG-based reimbursement system in German hospitals--a difficult operation? Experiences and possible solutions from the viewpoint of trauma surgery]. / Die Einführung des neuen DRG-basierten Entgeltsystems in Deutschen Krankenhäusern--Eine schwierige Operation? Erfahrungen und Lösungsansätze aus der Sicht der Unfallchirurgie.

Until recently the costs of patients in German hospitals have mainly been calculated according to the length of hospital stay. However, in December 1999, a dramatic change was announced in the social laws in the "Gesundheitsreform 2000." Beginning in 2003 a prospective payment system based on the classification of the "Australian Refined DRGs (AR-DRG)" will be introduced. DRGs are already used in quite a lot of industrialized countries and basically are "per case" payment systems that group patients with homogeneous average costs based on the diagnoses and procedures performed in the hospital. When preparing for this new system, the clinician has a lot of additional tasks. Besides correctly documenting all clinical findings with the ICD-10 Diagnoses and the German OPS301 procedure codes, a knowledge of the economical impact of the clinical decision is absolutely crucial. The most important task is the optimizing of all clinical treatment processes (e.g. by the introduction of clinical pathways), because only hospitals that can do highly efficient treatment will be able to survive in the upcoming competitive situation. In the Krankenhaus München--Schwabing DRGs have been used as a benchmarking tool since 1997. Based on valuable experience, many direct measures to optimize efficiency have been taken. Especially in patients with multiple trauma, it became evident that the use of efficient and standardized treatment can bring economic gain without loss of quality.