Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Trauma Case Rep ; 37: 100575, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34917741

RESUMO

We present the rare case of an open femoral condyle fracture (Gustilla IIIA) combined with a vertical patella fracture due to sharp injury after a traffic collision in a 17-year-old female. During subsequent operation, a locking compression plate was used for definitive fixation of the distal femur and the patella was reduced and fixated with two screws. Four months after surgery, the patient had practically full range of motion again and no secondary complications occurred. On control X-ray, there was consolidation of the fracture.

2.
J Crit Care ; 55: 140-144, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31715532

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Unclear recommendations in transfusion guidelines may possibly lead to inconsistency in treatment of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. This study aimed to uncover variation in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion decisions in the ICU worldwide. METHODS: Members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) were requested to complete an online questionnaire which included four different hypothetical clinical scenarios. The scenarios represented patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), abdominal sepsis, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-surgical complications. Hemoglobin level was 7∙3 g/dL in all scenarios. The questionnaire explored the physicians' transfusion decision in each clinical scenario and identified patient characteristics that were most influential in the transfusion decision. RESULTS: In total 211 members participated in the study, of whom 142 (67%) completed the entire survey. Most variation was observed in the clinical scenario of sepsis, in which 49% decided to transfuse and 51% decided not to. In the clinical scenarios of AMI, TBI and post-surgical complications this was respectively; 75/25%, 35/65% and 66/34%. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care physicians differed in outcome of RBC transfusion decisions and weighed patient characteristics differently. These findings indicate that variation in transfusion practice amongst critical care physicians exists.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/normas , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Sepse/terapia , Adulto , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Hemoglobinas/análise , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Médicos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Vox Sang ; 113(4): 378-385, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29473174

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most guidelines recommend a restrictive transfusion trigger of 7 g/dl. It is unclear whether this resulted in more uniform transfusion practices. The primary objective was to uncover the extent of variation in transfusion decisions within four scenarios of critically ill patients among critical care physicians in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey comprising four different hypothetical clinical scenarios was sent to all members of the Dutch Society of Intensive Care. The scenarios represented patients with acute myocardial infarction (Hb 8·5 g/dl), abdominal sepsis (Hb 7·1 g/dl), traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Hb 7·9 g/dl) and post-surgical complications (Hb 7·3 g/dl). The questions explored the decision whether or not to transfuse and a ranking of clinical characteristics playing the most important role in the transfusion decision. RESULTS: A total of 224 members (22%) participated in the study of whom 188 (84%) completed all questions. The percentages of respondents that decided to transfuse ranged from 25·9% in the scenario with TBI to 81·6% in the scenario with post-surgical complications. Most controversy was seen in the scenario with sepsis for which 43·2% decided to transfuse, whereas 56·8% decided not to. Haemoglobin level, diagnosis and haemodynamics were most important for the transfusion decision in all scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians decided differently on red-blood-cell transfusion given the clinical scenarios and weighed clinical characteristics differently in their transfusion decisions. These findings suggest there still is substantial variation in critical care transfusion practice.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Cuidados Críticos/psicologia , Tomada de Decisões , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/psicologia , Adulto , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...