RESUMO
Microtia and anotia are congenital auricular anomalies that negatively impact the psychosocial development of those affected. Because auricular cartilage is a type of elastic cartilage that lacks regenerative capacity, any notable defect in its structure requires a surgical approach to reconstructing the auricle. While there are several reconstructive options available between alloplastic and prosthetic implants, autologous rib cartilage grafts remain the most commonly used treatment modality. Still, this widely used technique is accompanied by significant patient discomfort in a young child and carries additional risks secondary to the traumatic process of rib cartilage extraction, such as pneumothorax and chest wall deformities, and the final esthetic results may not be ideal. To circumvent these limitations, tissue engineering approaches have been used to create a realistic-looking ear that mirrors the complex anatomy of the normal ear. This article reviews the biochemical and biomechanical properties of human auricular cartilage as they relate to design criteria. In addition, a variety of cell sources, biocompatible scaffolds, scaffold-free techniques, and mechanical and biological stimuli are discussed. This review aims to identify knowledge gaps in the literature related to auricular cartilage characteristics and make recommendations to drive the field of auricular tissue engineering.
RESUMO
RealSelf is an online community that hosts an expansive number of online reviews for cosmetic and reconstructive plastic surgery procedures. The purpose of this study is to analyze patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction procedures from RealSelf to determine factors contributing to a positive or negative patient experience. Methods: The breast reconstruction category from RealSelf.com was analyzed using a web crawler-based application built from Python and Selenium. Reviews were collected from May 2009 to November 2021. Information including RealSelf's inherent "worth it" ranking system, review text, the number of submitted photographs, and the number of readers who found the review helpful was captured. The content of the review was then independently reviewed by the authors and was categorized with key factors that determined positive or negative reviews. Results: A total of 3451 breast reconstruction reviews were collected. After the authors analyzed each review, 3225 (94.33%) were identified as positive reviews. The most common factors associated with positive reviews were physician demeanor (n = 2600, 31.7%), aesthetic outcome (n = 1955, 23.8%), or staff (n = 1543, 18.8%), while negative reviews were associated with unfavorable aesthetic outcome (n = 94, 28.9%), physician demeanor (n = 82, 25.2%), or postoperative complications (n = 75, 23.1%). Conclusions: Although there are surveys that analyze patient satisfaction for breast reconstruction, there has not been a study that analyzed a large online review database. Predominating factors in both positive and negative reviews were physician demeanor and aesthetic outcome.
RESUMO
Importance: In a patient-centered field such as plastic surgery, patient-reported satisfaction can measure the success and value of surgery, since it is not uncommon for patient and surgeon assessments to differ. Currently, there is no standard for evaluating patient-reported satisfaction postauricular reconstruction. Objective: To systematically review the literature regarding patient-reported satisfaction postauricular reconstruction in microtia patients. Evidence Review: The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed. Studies documenting patient-reported satisfaction postauricular reconstruction in microtia patients were included. All techniques for ear reconstruction have been included in this review. Findings: Nineteen studies utilizing autologous reconstruction technique, comprising 3694 patients, met inclusion criteria. No standardized patient satisfaction assessment was used throughout the studies, indicating criteria variability to measure outcomes. Auricular substructure analysis highlighted lower patient satisfaction with the tragus and antitragus compared with the upper units. In addition, satisfaction depended on patient perception, not on a low surgical complication rate. Conclusions: There is a clear need to incorporate a standardized validated surgery-specific questionnaire related to patient satisfaction in the auricular reconstruction protocol.
