RESUMO
PURPOSE: Open reduction and internal fixation with a tension band construct is the standard treatment for displaced transverse intra-articular olecranon fractures. The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of tension band fixation of olecranon fractures in children, specifically assessing the need for revision fixation and hardware removal. METHODS: Patients less than 18 years of age diagnosed with a displaced transverse intra-articular olecranon fracture and treated with tension band fixation between 2008 and 2017 were retrospectively enrolled. Operative treatment was with tension band wire (TBW) or tension band suture (TBS) constructs. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients, 36 male and ten female with a mean age of 12.3 years (6 to 17), were included. Surgical fixation was with TBW in 17 patients and TBS in 29 patients. Revision fixation due to failure and fracture displacement was required in 6% of the TBW group and 14% of the TBS group (p = 0.19). The patients who required revision fixation in the TBS group were older (14.7 years versus 11.6 years, p = 0.05) and heavier (70.5 kg versus 48.5 kg, p = 0.05) than those in the same group who did not require revision fixation. CONCLUSION: Paediatric olecranon fractures treated with TBW or TBS fixation unite in the majority of patients with similar need for hardware removal due to prominence and/or pain between fixation techniques. In a select group of older patients weighing greater than 50 kg, TBS constructs demonstrate increased failure rates, requiring revision fixation, and should be avoided in this population group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Superiority of non-operative versus operative treatment of clavicle shaft fractures remains unclear. We aimed to assess shoulder function in adolescents following shortened clavicle fracture and compare operative versus non-operative treatment. METHODS: Patients aged 12 to 18 years at the time of fracture and minimum 1.5 years post injury were identified for this institutional review board (IRB)-approved study. For this retrospective cohort study, patients were frequency-matched for age, gender, shortening of the clavicle fracture and activity level. The dominant arm was controlled in the statistical model. Initial radiographs were used to measure clavicle shortening. At follow-up, isokinetic testing of both shoulders was performed in flexion, external rotation and the plane of scapular motion. Maximum number of isotonic repetitions and average isometric torque were recorded, as were ASES and DASH scores. Data were analysed comparing non-operative and operative groups and involved and uninvolved shoulders. RESULTS: Twenty patients were recruited (18 male, 2 female), with ten in each group. Median clavicle shortening was 17.5 mm (11.4 to 23.6). There was no statistical difference in average ASES (100 vs 99; p = 0.84) or DASH (0.0 vs 1.7; p = 0.08) between non-operative and operative groups, respectively. Results of isokinetic testing comparison between non-operative and operative groups showed no statistical difference for any individual association, controlling for the dominant arm. Among the non-operative group, the involved arm had decreased functional measures compared with the uninvolved arm on all measures, when controlling for dominant arm, and there was increased variability of the functional estimate. CONCLUSIONS: The increased variability in functional measures for the non-operative group suggests some patients may have dysfunction.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In gymnastics, the wrist is exposed to many different stresses including increased extension, especially during back handsprings. Currently a wrist extension angle during impact that places the wrist in danger has not been established. The purpose of this study was to: (1) determine the mean impact wrist angle during a standing back handspring in female preadolescent and adolescent gymnasts and (2) determine which factors predict impact wrist angles. METHODS: Fifty female gymnasts from six facilities, ages 8-15 were included in this study. Each gymnast completed a questionnaire about gymnastics participation and history of wrist pain. Active range of motion of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, and ankle was measured. Each gymnast was asked to perform a standard back handspring, which was videotaped. The wrist and shoulder flexion angles, at maximum impact, were recorded and measured using motion analysis software. Two-sample t-test was used to assess the relationship between impact wrist angle and wrist pain. Multiple linear regression was used to determine the association between related variables and impact wrist angle. RESULTS: The mean back handspring impact wrist angle was 95°. Fifteen subjects (30%) reported wrist pain. Years of participation (p=0.02) and impact shoulder angle (p=0.04) were predictive of impact wrist angles. CONCLUSION: Shoulder angles and years of participation correlate with impact wrist angles during the performance of a standing back handspring. Future studies are necessary to determine if addressing these factors can affect the impact wrist angles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
