Treatment of Coxa Profunda With Open Surgical Hip Dislocation, Rim Resection, Cam Resection, and Labral Reconstruction.

Coxa profunda presents a unique challenge in surgical treatment approach given global acetabular overcoverage. Arthroscopic treatment can be fraught with difficulty obtaining hip distraction for safe arthroscopic instrumentation, and limited arthroscopic access may prevent sufficient osseous resection of the excess acetabular rim. Although hip arthroscopy use has increased markedly over the past decades for all types of hip pathology, coxa profunda may represent one unique indication for surgical hip dislocation. This technique describes open surgical hip dislocation, rim resection, femoral osteoplasty, and labral reconstruction using anterior tibialis allograft for coxa profunda with combined-type femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral ossification.

Radiographic outcomes of femur fractures following SIGN Fin nailing in low- and middle-income countries.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effectiveness of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Fin nail for achieving satisfactory postoperative radiographic alignment following femoral shaft fractures. METHODS: Femoral shaft fractures stabilized with the SIGN Fin nail were identified using the SIGN Online Surgical Database. A random number generator was used to identify 500 femur fractures fixed within 6 weeks of injury for which postoperative radiographs were available. Fractures were classified using OTA/AO and Winquist-Hansen classification systems. Deviation from anatomic alignment was measured on anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs using an on-screen protractor tool. Other clinical variables recorded in the SIGN Online Surgical Database were also analyzed. Simple logistic regression was used to assess for associations between subject and surgical characteristics and misalignment status. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The overall rate of malalignment >5° was 9.4%. Factors associated with increased incidence of malalignment include older age, increased time to surgery, distal diaphyseal location, closed (vs open) reduction, degree of comminution, and fracture classification. Intra-rater ICC was 0.70 (0.52, 0.82) in the coronal plane and 0.55 (0.32, 0.72) in the sagittal plane. Inter-rater ICC was 0.37 (0.08, 0.60) and 0.32 (0.05, 0.54), respectively. CONCLUSION: The SIGN Fin nail is an effective implant for fixation of femoral shaft fractures in resource-limited regions, achieving rates of satisfactory postoperative alignment comparable to that of the standard SIGN nail as well as femoral shaft fractures treated in North American Trauma Centers. Further research is required to investigate rotational alignment and long-term clinical outcomes for the SIGN Fin nail. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Factors Considered in Ranking Orthopaedic Trauma Fellowship Applicants: A Survey of Program Directors.

INTRODUCTION: More than 90% of orthopaedic surgery graduates pursue fellowship training after residency. Previous investigations have examined factors considered important by orthopaedic sports medicine and hand surgery fellowship program directors (PDs). This study sought to identify which factors orthopaedic trauma fellowship PDs deem most important when evaluating applicants. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to all 59 orthopaedic trauma fellowship PDs. PDs were given a list of 12 factors, which they ranked in order of importance. A weighted score for each factor was calculated. PDs could also write-in additional factors they considered important when ranking applicants. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 83% (49/59 PDs). Forty-five percent of responding PDs listed the interview as the most important factor when ranking applicants. Other factors considered most important included letters of recommendation, personal connections to the applicant and/or letter writers, and the applicant's background in trauma. Results of the weighted score calculation again identified the interview as the most important factor when ranking applicants, followed by letters of recommendation, personal connections to the applicant/letter writers, the applicant's residency program, strength of the applicant's background in trauma, and research experience. DISCUSSION: Orthopaedic trauma fellowship PDs consider the interview, letters of recommendation, and personal connections to the applicant/letter writers to be the most important factors when ranking fellowship applicants.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following retrograde SIGN fin nailing for femoral shaft fractures.

PURPOSE: The Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) intramedullary nail was designed for use in resource limited settings which often lack fluoroscopy, specialized fracture tables, and power reaming. A newer design iteration, the SIGN Fin nail, was developed to further simplify retrograde femoral nailing by making proximal interlocking screw placement unnecessary. Instead, the leading end of the Fin nail achieves stability through an interference fit within the proximal femoral canal. While the performance of the traditional SIGN nail has been reported previously, no large series has examined long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of femoral shaft fractures treated with the SIGN Fin nail. METHODS: The SIGN online surgical database was used to identify all adult femoral shaft fractures treated with the SIGN Fin nail since its introduction. All patients with minimum 6 month clinical and radiographic follow-up were included in the analysis. Available demographic, injury, and surgical characteristics were recorded. Fracture alignment was evaluated on final follow-up radiographs using a previously validated on-screen protractor tool. Coronal and sagittal plane alignment measurements were recorded as deviation from anatomic alignment (DFAA), with units in degrees. Fracture healing was assessed on final follow-up radiographs, with union defined as any bridging callus and/or cortical remodeling across one cortex on orthogonal views. Clinical outcomes available in the database included knee range of motion (ROM) greater than 90° and weight-bearing status at final follow-up. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were then compared between patients with united and nonunited fractures. RESULTS: The database query identified 249 femoral shaft fractures stabilized with the Fin nail in 242 patients who had minimum 6 month clinical and radiographic follow-up. Final follow-up radiographs were performed at an average of 48 weeks postoperatively. Average coronal and sagittal plane alignment measured on final follow-up radiographs were 2.18° and 2.58°, respectively. The rate of malalignment (DFAA > 10° in either plane) at final follow-up was 6%. Two hundred twenty-nine fractures (92%) were united at final follow-up. Overall, 209 (84%) of patients achieved full weight bearing and 214 (86%) achieved knee ROM >90° at final follow-up. Compared to patients with united fractures, those with nonunion were less likely to achieve full weight bearing (20% vs 90%, P < .001) and knee ROM >90° (30% vs 91%, P < .001). There was no significant difference in mean DFAA between united and nonunited fractures in the coronal (2.1° vs 3.8°, P = .298) or sagittal (2.5° vs 3.5°, P = .528) planes. CONCLUSION: The SIGN Fin nail achieves satisfactory radiographic alignment and clinical outcomes at minimum 6 month follow-up. The overall union rate is comparable to that achieved with the standard SIGN nail. Ease of implantation makes the Fin nail an attractive option in resource-limited settings.

Satisfactory postoperative alignment following retrograde SIGN Fin nailing for femoral shaft fractures: A case-control study.

PURPOSE: In developing countries, long bone fractures following trauma are a significant contributor to morbidity, and operating room resources are often limited in these settings. The Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) Fin nail may reduce the challenges of retrograde intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures without fluoroscopy. In contrast to the traditional SIGN nail placed in a retrograde fashion, the Fin nail does not require proximal interlocking screws. Instead, the nail achieves stability through an interference fit within the proximal femoral canal. The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative alignment in femoral shaft fractures treated with either a retrograde SIGN Fin nail or a standard retrograde SIGN nail. METHOD: Using the SIGN online surgical database, we identified all femoral shaft fractures treated with a retrograde SIGN Fin nail at 2 African hospitals. Two examiners independently classified fracture patterns using the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification system. Using an on-screen protractor tool, postoperative coronal and sagittal plane alignment were measured and recorded as deviation from anatomic alignment (DFAA), with units in degrees. Available patient demographics and surgical details were also recorded. Fin nail cases were matched in a 1:1 ratio to retrograde standard SIGN nail cases based on AO/OTA fracture type. RESULTS: Twenty-eight retrograde Fin nail cases were identified, and 28 matched retrograde SIGN nail cases were selected. The Fin nail and retrograde SIGN nail groups were well matched in terms of demographics, AO/OTA fracture type, and surgical characteristics. There was no significant difference in postoperative coronal or sagittal plane alignment between the groups. There were no cases in either group of average postoperative malalignment >5° in any plane. CONCLUSION: The SIGN Fin nail appears to achieve satisfactory radiographic alignment without the need for proximal interlocking screws, making it an attractive implant for retrograde femoral shaft fracture fixation in resource-limited settings. Further research is required to validate these findings and determine long-term Fin nail clinical outcomes.