Effects of acute olanzapine exposure on central insulin-mediated regulation of whole body fuel selection and feeding.

The use of antipsychotics is associated with severe disruptions in whole body glucose and lipid metabolism which may in part occur through the central nervous system and impaired insulin action at the brain. Here we investigated whether olanzapine treatment might also affect the ability of central insulin treatment to regulate food intake and fuel preference in the light and dark cycle. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with olanzapine (or vehicle solution; 3 mg/kg, subcutaneous) and a simultaneous acute intracerebral ventricular (ICV) infusion of insulin (or vehicle; 3 µL at 10mU; ICV) at the beginning of the 12-h light and dark cycles. Olanzapine treatment reduced RER in the dark and light phases (most consistently in the 4-hours post-treatment), while ICV insulin reduced average RER predominantly in the dark phase, but also at the end of the light cycle. The RER lowering effect of ICV-insulin during the light cycle was absent in the group co-administered olanzapine. The reduction in RER during the dark phase was mirrored by decreased food intake with ICV insulin, but not olanzapine treated rats. The reduction in food intake by ICV-insulin was abolished in rats co-administered olanzapine suggesting rapid induction of central insulin resistance. A combination of ICV-insulin and olanzapine similarly reduced RER in the dark phase, independent of changes in food intake. Olanzapine treatment, alone or in combination with ICV-insulin, significantly reduced VCO2 at regular intervals in the dark phase (specifically 3 h post-treatment), while VO2 was not significantly altered by either treatment. Finally, heat production was increased by olanzapine treatment in the light phase, though this effect was not consistent. The findings confirm that acute olanzapine treatment directly reduces RER and suggest that treatment with this drug may also override central insulin-mediated reductions in food intake at the hypothalamus (while still independently favoring fatty acid oxidation). Acute central insulin similarly reduces RER, but in contrast to olanzapine, this may represent a physiologically appropriate response to reduction in food intake.

In male rats, the ability of central insulin to suppress glucose production is impaired by olanzapine, whereas glucose uptake is left intact.

BACKGROUND: Insulin receptors are widely expressed in the brain and may represent a crossroad between metabolic and cognitive disorders. Although antipsychotics, such as olanzapine, are the cornerstone treatment for schizophrenia, they are associated with high rates of type 2 diabetes and lack efficacy for illness-related cognitive deficits. Historically, this risk of diabetes was attributed to the weight gain propensity of antipsychotics, but recent work suggests antipsychotics can have weight-independent diabetogenic effects involving unknown brain-mediated mechanisms. Here, we examined whether antipsychotics disrupt central insulin action, hypothesizing that olanzapine would impair the well-established ability of central insulin to supress hepatic glucose production. METHODS: Pancreatic euglycemic clamps were used to measure glucose kinetics alongside a central infusion of insulin or vehicle into the third ventricle. Male rats were pretreated with olanzapine or vehicle per our established model of acute olanzapine-induced peripheral insulin resistance. Groups included (central-peripheral) vehicle-vehicle (n = 11), insulin-vehicle (n = 10), insulin-olanzapine (n = 10) and vehicle-olanzapine (n = 8). RESULTS: There were no differences in peripheral glucose or insulin levels. Unexpectedly, we showed that central insulin increased glucose uptake, and this effect was not perturbed by olanzapine. We replicated suppression of glucose production by insulin (clamp relative to basal: 77.9% ± 13.1%, all p < 0.05), an effect abolished by olanzapine (insulin-olanzapine: 7.7% ± 14%). LIMITATIONS: This study used only male rats and an acute dose of olanzapine. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study suggesting olanzapine may impair central insulin sensing, elucidating a potential mechanism of antipsychotic-induced diabetes and opening avenues of investigation related to domains of schizophrenia psychopathology.

Lipoic acid and haloperidol-induced vacuous chewing movements: Implications for prophylactic antioxidant use in tardive dyskinesia.

Tardive dyskinesia (TD), a potentially irreversible antipsychotic (AP)-related movement disorder, is a risk with all currently available antipsychotics. AP-induced vacuous chewing movements (VCMs) in rats, a preclinical model of TD, can be attenuated by antioxidant-based treatments although there is a shortage of well-designed studies. Lipoic acid (LA) represents a candidate antioxidant for the treatment of oxidative stress-related nervous system disorders; accordingly, its effects on AP-induced VCMs and striatal oxidative stress were examined. Rats treated with haloperidol decanoate (HAL; 21mg/kg every 3weeks, IM) for 12weeks were concurrently treated with LA (10 or 20mg/kg, PO). VCMs were assessed weekly by a blinded rater, and locomotor activity was evaluated as were striatal lipid peroxidation markers and serum HAL levels. VCMs were decreased by the lower dose (nonsignificant), whereas a significant increase was recorded with the higher dose of LA. HAL decreased locomotor activity and this was unaffected by LA. Striatal malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in HAL-treated rats were reduced by both LA doses, while 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) levels were predictive of final VCM scores (averaged across weeks 10-12). Study limitations include differences between antipsychotics in terms of oxidative stress, LA dosing, choice of biomarkers for lipid peroxidation, and generalizability to TD in humans. Collectively, current preclinical evidence does not support a "protective" role for antioxidants in preventing TD or its progression, although clinical evidence offers limited evidence supporting such an approach.

Atypical antipsychotics and effects on feeding: from mice to men.

RATIONALE: So-called atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) are associated with varying levels of weight gain and associated metabolic disturbances, which in patients with serious mental illness (SMI) have been linked to non-compliance and poor functional outcomes. Mechanisms underlying AAP-induced metabolic abnormalities are only partially understood. Antipsychotic-induced weight gain may occur as a result of increases in food intake and/or changes in feeding. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we examine the available human and preclinical literature addressing AAP-related changes in feeding behavior, to determine whether changes in appetite and perturbations in regulation of food intake could be contributing factors to antipsychotic-induced weight gain. RESULTS: In general, human studies point to disruption by AAPs of feeding behaviors and food consumption. In rodents, increases in cumulative food intake are mainly observed in females; however, changes in feeding microstructure or motivational aspects of food intake appear to occur independent of sex. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this review indicate that the varying levels of AAP-related weight gain reflect changes in both appetite and feeding behaviors, which differ by type of AAP. However, inconsistencies exist among the studies (both human and rodent) that may reflect considerable differences in study design and methodology. Future studies examining underlying mechanisms of antipsychotic-induced weight gain are recommended in order to develop strategies addressing the serious metabolic side effect of AAPs.

Metformin attenuates olanzapine-induced hepatic, but not peripheral insulin resistance.

Antipsychotics (APs) are linked to diabetes, even without weight gain. Whether anti-diabetic drugs are efficacious in reversing the direct effects of APs on glucose pathways is largely undetermined. We tested two metformin (Met) doses to prevent impairments seen following a dose of olanzapine (Ola) (3 mg/kg); glucokinetics were measured using the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HIEC). Met (150 mg/kg; n=13, or 400 mg/kg; n=11) or vehicle (Veh) (n=11) was administered through gavage preceding an overnight fast, followed by a second dose prior to the HIEC. Eleven additional animals were gavaged with Veh and received a Veh injection during the HIEC (Veh/Veh); all others received Ola. Basal glucose was similar across treatment groups. The Met 400 group had significantly greater glucose appearance (Ra) in the basal period (i.e., before Ola, or hyperinsulinemia) vs other groups. During hyperinsulinemia, glucose infusion rate (GINF) to maintain euglycemia (reflective of whole-body insulin sensitivity) was higher in Veh/Veh vs other groups. Met 150/Ola animals demonstrated increased GINF relative to Veh/Ola during early time points of the HIEC. Glucose utilization during hyperinsulinemia, relative to basal conditions, was significantly higher in Veh/Veh vs other groups. The change in hepatic glucose production (HGP) from basal to hyperinsulinemia demonstrated significantly greater decreases in Veh/Veh and Met 150/Ola groups vs Veh/Ola. Given the increase in basal Ra with Met 400, we measured serum lactate (substrate for HGP), finding increased levels in Met 400 vs Veh and Met 150. In conclusion, Met attenuates hepatic insulin resistance observed with acute Ola administration, but fails to improve peripheral insulin resistance. Use of supra-therapeutic doses of Met may mask metabolic benefits by increasing lactate.

Acutely administered antipsychotic drugs are highly selective for dopamine D2 over D3 receptors.

We showed previously, using [(3)H]-(+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine ([(3)H]-(+)-PHNO) autoradiography, that several antipsychotic drugs do not occupy dopamine D3 receptors at clinically-relevant doses in rat. This is an unexpected finding considering the near-equivalent in vitro affinity of these drugs for D2 and D3 receptors. The purpose of the current study was to address two possible methodological limitations of our previous report, namely that (1) [(3)H]-(+)-PHNO may have been administered at non-tracer dose, potentially causing underestimate of D3 receptor occupancy, and (2) antipsychotic drugs were administered chronically, potentially causing increased D3 receptor expression not accounted for in the vehicle-treated control group. We found that decreasing [(3)H]-(+)-PHNO dose from 5.6nmol/kg (our previous dose) to 0.6nmol/kg caused a >60% increase in [(3)H]-(+)-PHNO binding to D3 receptors in cerebellar lobes 9 and 10, indicating that our previous study was indeed conducted under non-tracer dose conditions. However, neither reducing [(3)H]-(+)-PHNO dose further to 0.3nmol/kg (a tracer dose), nor administering antipsychotics acutely affected antipsychotic receptor occupancy. At clinically-relevant levels of D2 occupancy (57-82% inhibition of striatal binding), neither olanzapine nor haloperidol occupied D3 receptors, while clozapine occupied D3 receptors at levels similar to our previous report (33%). Risperidone moderately occupied D3 receptors (40%), but at a dose occupying >90% of D2 receptors and therefore of questionable clinical relevance. These findings demonstrate that the lack of antipsychotic occupancy of D3 receptors is not attributable to limitations of our previous study. These results suggest that D3 receptor blockade is not necessary for the therapeutic effects of the antipsychotic drugs examined.