Comparing the Efficacy of Endovascular Simulation Training in different Training Formats: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: High-fidelity endovascular simulators have demonstrated significant potential in enhancing interventionalists' performance metrics, including procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume usage. However, it is less clear whether trainee performance, when assessed using both multidimensional global and procedure-specific rating scales, improves in a manner consistent with these metric parameters. This study aimed to determine whether the structure of the training - conducted in block sessions or weekly intervals - impacts the effectiveness of the training. METHODS: 20 students were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center trial. They were randomly divided into block and weekly training groups, each undergoing 6 hours of supervised endovascular training on a Mentice simulator over a span of 3 weeks. At the outset and conclusion of their training, students performed a predefined peripheral endovascular intervention, which was assessed by an experienced interventionalist. Furthermore, participants were prompted to complete a survey at both the beginning and the end of the study. RESULTS: Both groups exhibited significant improvements in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume usage, global rating scale scores, and performance-specific rating scale scores. However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. The simulator training notably boosted the trainee's self-confidence. CONCLUSION: Simulator training not only enhances metric performance parameters, but also improves performance as assessed by both global rating scale and procedure-specific rating scale. Whether the training is conducted in block sessions or weekly intervals did not affect its efficacy. As such, the training format can be tailored to best fit the specific circumstances and setting.

Beyond the Slopes and Highways: Endovascular Repair of Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injuries after Skiing versus Motor Vehicle Accidents.

Background: Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is a potentially fatal condition, typically resulting from high-velocity trauma. To date, little is known about this type of injury among skiers, who form the largest patient cohort with aortic injuries in the alpine region of Tyrol, Austria. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study at the University Hospital of Innsbruck analyzed patients who underwent endovascular treatment for blunt traumatic aortic injury from 2005 to 2023. Patient data were extracted from electronic and digitalized medical history records. Subsequent analyses compared the baseline characteristics and clinical results of the skiing accident (SA) group to the motor vehicle accident (MVA) group. Results: A total of 48 BTAI patients receiving TEVAR were included, 25 (52%) from SAs versus 23 (48%) from MVAs, who were predominantly male (92% vs. 78.3%). Despite similar preoperative risk profiles and ASA Scores (1.44 vs. 1.74) and no marked differences in BTAI injury grades or the affected aortic zones, significant disparities emerged: the SA group experienced shorter median ICU stays (3 vs. 11 days, p = 0.0007), fewer concomitant injuries (5 vs. 7, p = 0.005), and lower Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) (29 vs. 33, p = 0.003) than their MVA counterparts. The presence of rib fractures alongside other thoracic injuries, such as lung injury, pneumothorax, or hemothorax, was strongly correlated with BTAI in patients following skiing accidents (OR = 128.5). Conclusions: The injury severities and locations of BTAI in SA patients were comparable to those in MVA patients, indicating similar mechanisms of thoracic trauma. However, the SA patients experienced fewer concurrent pelvic and extremity fractures, had less post-procedural morbidity, and required shorter ICU stays. The presence of rib fractures combined with other thoracic injuries strongly suggests BTAI. These indicators should lead to prompt imaging and appropriate therapy.

Alternative vein bypass in octogenarians with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians are regarded as one of the frailest patient groups among the chronic limb-threatening ischaemia population with high perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. As a result, alternative vein bypass surgery in the absence of sufficient great saphenous vein is often not considered as a potential treatment option. The aim of this study was to compare the results of octogenarians undergoing alternative vein bypass surgery due to chronic limb-threatening ischaemia to younger patients. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective analysis of patients undergoing bypass surgery for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia with alternative autologous vein grafts between 1997 and 2018 was performed. Patients aged over 80 years were compared with those under 80 years. Graft patency rates were assessed and a risk factor analysis for limb loss was performed. RESULTS: In total, 592 patients underwent bypass surgery during the study interval. Twenty-one per cent (n = 126) of patients were 80 years or older. At 4 years, primary, primary-assisted and secondary patency as well as limb salvage rates were not significantly different between the two groups (46% versus 50%, 60% versus 66%, 69% versus 72%, 72% versus 77%, for octogenarians versus non-octogenarians respectively). Major amputations were performed in 27 (21%) octogenarians and 91 (20%) non-octogenarians (P = 0.190). No higher 30-day and long-term mortality rates nor morbidity rates were detected in the octogenarian group with a median follow-up time of 27 (interquartile range 12-56) months. Minor amputation, the reason for alternative vein grafts, as well as the profunda femoris artery as proximal origin of the bypass were risk factors for limb loss in the postoperative course. CONCLUSION: Alternative vein bypass surgery in octogenarians with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia is safe and effective in terms of patency rates, limb salvage and survival compared with younger patients in the absence of sufficient great saphenous vein. Age alone should not be a deterrent from performing bypass surgery.

Long-Term Outcome of Bypass Surgery versus Endovascular Revascularization in Long Femoropopliteal Lesions.

Long-term follow-up data comparing surgical and endovascular revascularization of femoropopliteal lesions is rarely reported. This study presents 4-year results of revascularization for long femoropopliteal lesions (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Types C and D) with vein bypass (VBP), polytetrafluorethylene bypass (PTFE), and endovascular intervention with a nitinol stent (NS). Data from a randomized-controlled trial on VBP and NS was compared with a retrospective patient cohort using PTFE with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency, as well as changes in Rutherford categories and limb salvage rates, are reported. Between 2016 and 2020, 332 femoropopliteal lesions underwent revascularization. The lesion lengths and basic patient characteristics were similar between the groups. 49% of the patients presented with chronic limb threatening ischemia at the time of revascularization. During the four-year follow-up, primary patency was comparable for all three groups. Primary assisted and secondary patency were significantly higher after VBP, while PTFE and NS had similar results. Clinical improvement was also significantly superior after VBP. After four years of follow-up, patency rates as well as the clinical outcome clearly favor VBP. If no vein is available, NS is as effective as PTFE bypass with regard to patency and clinical outcome.

Total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing leads to worse results in patients with patellafemoral osteoarthritis Iwano Stages 3-4: a study based on arthroplasty registry data.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the preoperative degree of degeneration of the patellofemoral joint really affects the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery without patella resurfacing and thus to establish a parameter that might serve as a guiding factor to decide whether or not to perform retropatellar resurfacing. It was hypothesized that patients with preoperative mild patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Iwano Stages 0-2) would significantly differ from patients with preoperative severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Iwano Stages 3-4) in terms of patient-reported outcome (Hypothesis 1) and revision rates/survival (Hypothesis 2) after TKA without patella resurfacing. METHODS: Application of a retrospective-comparative design on the basis of Arthroplasty Registry data that included patients with primary TKA without patella resurfacing. Patients were allocated to the following groups based on preoperative radiographic stage of patellofemoral joint degeneration: (a) mild patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Iwano Stage ≤ 2) and (b) severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis (Iwano Stages 3-4). The Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was assessed preoperative and 1 year postoperative (0: best, 100 worst). In addition, implant survival was calculated from the Arthroplasty Registry data. RESULTS: In 1209 primary TKA without patella resurfacing, postoperative WOMAC total and WOMAC subscores did not differ significantly between groups, but potentially suffered from type 2 error. Three-year survival was 97.4% and 92.5% in patients with preoperative mild and severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis, respectively (p = 0.002). Five-year survival was 95.8% vs. 91.4% (p = 0.033) and 10-year survival was 93.3% vs. 88.6% (p = 0.033), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From the study findings, it is concluded that patients with preoperative severe patellofemoral osteoarthritis have significantly higher risks for reoperation than do those with preoperative mild patellofemoral osteoarthritis-when treated with TKA without patella resurfacing. Hence, it is recommended that patella resurfacing be applied in patients with severe Iwano Stage 3 or 4 patellofemoral osteoarthritis during TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective comparative.