Compromised quality of life in adult patients who have received a radiation dose towards the basal part of the brain. A case-control study in long-term survivors from cancer in the head and neck region.

BACKGROUND: Adult patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disorders have compromised quality of life (QoL). Whether this is due to their endocrine consequences (hypopituitarism), their underlying hypothalamic-pituitary disorder or both is still under debate. The aim of this trial was to measure quality of life (QoL) in long-term cancer survivors who have received a radiation dose to the basal part of the brain and the pituitary. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=101) treated for oropharyngeal or epipharyngeal cancer with radiotherapy followed free of cancer for a period of 4 to10 years were identified. Fifteen patients (median age 56 years) with no concomitant illness and no hypopituitarism after careful endocrine evaluation were included in a case-control study with matched healthy controls. Doses to the hypothalamic-pituitary region were calculated. QoL was assessed using the Symptom check list (SCL)-90, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), and Psychological Well Being (PGWB) questionnaires. Level of physical activity was assessed using the Baecke questionnaire. RESULTS: The median accumulated dose was 1.9 Gy (1.5-2.2 Gy) to the hypothalamus and 2.4 Gy (1.8-3.3 Gy) to the pituitary gland in patients with oropharyngeal cancer and 6.0-9.3 Gy and 33.5-46.1 Gy, respectively in patients with epipharyngeal cancer (n=2). The patients showed significantly more anxiety and depressiveness, and lower vitality, than their matched controls. CONCLUSION: In a group of long time survivors of head and neck cancer who hade received a low radiation dose to the hypothalamic-pituitary region and who had no endocrine consequences of disease or its treatment QoL was compromised as compared with well matched healthy controls.

Three-years of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in GH-deficient adults: effects on quality of life, patient-reported outcomes and healthcare consumption.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate the effects of 3 years of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in GH deficient (GHD) patients in Sweden. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: An open label study in 237 adults with GHD (116 men and 121 women), consecutively enrolled in KIMS (Pfizer's international metabolic database) in Sweden. MEASUREMENTS: QoL and healthcare consumption were determined using questionnaires [QoL-assessment of GHD in Adults (QoL-AGHDA), the psychological general well-being (PGWB) index and the patient life situation form (PLSF)]. RESULTS: The mean starting dose of GH was 0.13 mg/day and the mean maintenance dose was 0.37 mg/day. The mean insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) SD score increased from -1.92 at baseline to 0.38 after 3 years. There was a sustained increase in QoL as measured by the QoL-AGHDA and PGWB questionnaires. The number of doctor visits and the number of days in hospital were reduced after 3 years of GH replacement. The number of days of sickleave decreased during the first 2 years of treatment, but returned towards baseline values after 3 years. Leisure-time physical activity and satisfaction with physical activity increased. CONCLUSION: Three years of GH replacement therapy induced a sustained improvement in QoL. Healthcare consumption was reduced, although the reduction in the number of days of sickleave was not statistically significant after 3 years of treatment.

Growth hormone (GH) replacement in GH-deficient adults: a crossover trial comparing the effect on metabolic control, well-being and compliance of three injections per week versus daily injections.

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy regimens in adults using daily subcutaneous (sc) injections may not be optimal with respect to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three times weekly injections with daily sc GH injections in terms of serum IGF-I, IGFBPs, lipoprotein levels, serum bone markers, glucose metabolism, body composition, compliance and well-being. Twenty hypopituitary men, 46-76 years, on a course of stable conventional GH replacement therapy for more than 12 months, were included in a 16-week crossover trial. During the first 8 weeks GH was administered three times per week followed by 8 weeks with daily sc injections with the same weekly dose of GH. Fasting serum samples were collected at baseline and on two consecutive days at the end of each 8-week period. Serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations were lower both the first and second morning after the last injection during the period with three injections per week. The second morning after the last GH injection in this period the IGF-I/BP-3 ratio, plasma insulin and FFA were lower whereas IGFBP-1 was increased as compared with values obtained during the period with daily injections. Serum Lp(a) levels, body composition, fat distribution, well-being and compliance were not differently affected by the two treatment regimens. These results suggest that the same weekly dose of GH given as three injections per week reduces serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels without affecting Lp(a) levels. The day-to-day variation in glucose metabolism and FFA serum levels differs considerably between the two modes of GH administration.

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in GH-deficient women during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The present recommendation is to discontinue GH replacement therapy in hypopituitary women, as they become pregnant. We report our experience of managing GH deficiency with GH replacement therapy in pregnant hypopituitary women. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Eight hypopituitary women, median age 30.5 years (range 20-39 years), were followed prospectively during 12 distinct pregnancies. Six women were receiving replacement therapy for other pituitary hormone deficiencies and five pregnancies were achieved with ovulation induction therapy. GH replacement therapy was maintained at the same pregestational dose during the first trimester, with a gradual decrease of the dose during the second trimester and discontinuing the treatment at the beginning of the third trimester. Serum IGF-1 levels were measured in four selected pregnancies at three different points, one in each trimester of gestation. RESULTS: Seven pregnancies resulted in normal vaginal deliveries and five had programmed Caesarian sections. The median gestation age at time of delivery was 40 weeks (range 33-42 weeks). Newborns had a median birthweight SD score of -0.37 (range -1.93 to 1.21) and a median birthlength SD score of 0.07 (range -2.73 to 1.53). No congenital malformations were observed. Three women were able to breastfeed their babies. Before gestation, the median daily dose of GH was 0.5 mg (range 0.3-0.8 mg) and the median serum IGF-1 was 37.5 nmol/l (range 7.6-54.5 nmol/l). IGF-1 levels were fairly constant in the first and second trimesters of gestation, showing an increment during the last trimester, when GH treatment was discontinued. CONCLUSION: The GH replacement regimen presented for pregnant women with GH deficiency was safe. No major side-effects and no negative influences on maternal and fetal outcome were observed.

Low dose dehydroepiandrosterone affects behavior in hypopituitary androgen-deficient women: a placebo-controlled trial.

Thirty-eight women, aged 25-65 yr, with androgen deficiency due to hypopituitarism were treated with oral dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA; 30 mg/d if <45 yr of age and 20 mg if > or =45 yr of age) for 6 months in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind study, followed by a 6-month open treatment period. The administration of DHEA raised the serum levels of DHEAS to normal age-related reference ranges and increased androstenedione and T to subnormal levels. Androgen effects on skin and/or pubic and/or axillary hair were observed in 84% (32 of 38) of the women after all received 6 months of DHEA treatment. No such effects were observed after the placebo treatment. These effects after 6 months were correlated with the serum levels of DHEAS (r = 0.37; P = 0.03), androstenedione (r = 0.42; P = 0.01), and T (r = 0.37; P = 0.03). The percentages of partners who reported improved alertness, stamina, and initiative by their spouses were 70%, 64%, and 55%, respectively, in the DHEA group and 11%, 6%, and 11%, respectively, in the placebo group (P < 0.05). According to the partners, sexual relations tended to improve compared with placebo (P = 0.06). After 6 months of treatment, increased sexual interest or activity was reported by 50% of the women taking 30 mg DHEA, by none taking 20 mg DHEA, and by two women taking placebo (P = NS). Compared with levels after placebo administration, high density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-1 levels decreased after DHEA. Serum concentrations of IGF-I, serum markers of bone metabolism, and bone density did not change. In conclusion, oral administration of a low dose of DHEA to adult hypopituitary women induced androgen effects on skin and axillary and pubic hair as well as changes in behavior, with only minor effects on metabolism.