Clinician- and Patient-Identified Solutions to Reduce the Fragmentation of Post-ICU Care in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Critical care survivors experience multiple care transitions, with no formal follow-up care pathway. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the potential solutions to improve the communication between treating teams and integration of care following an ICU admission, from the perspective of patients, their caregivers, intensivists, and general practitioners (GPs) from diverse socioeconomic areas? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included a qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with intensivists, GPs, and patients and caregivers. Framework analysis was used to analyze data and to identify solutions to improve the integration of care following hospital discharge. Patients were previously mechanically ventilated for > 24 h in the ICU and had access to a video-enabled device. Clinicians were recruited from hospital networks and a state-wide GP network. RESULTS: Forty-six interviews with clinicians, patients, and caregivers were completed (15 intensivists, eight GPs, 15 patients, and eight caregivers). Three higher level feedback loops were identified that comprised 10 themes. Feedback loop 1 was an ICU and primary care collaboration. It included the following: (1) developing collaborative relationships between the ICU and primary care; (2) providing interprofessional education and resources to support primary care; and (3) improving role clarity for patient follow-up care. Feedback loop 2 was developing mechanisms for improved communication across the care continuum. It included: (4) timely, concise information-sharing with primary care on post-ICU recovery; (5) survivorship-focused information-sharing across the continuum of care; (6) empowering patients and caregivers in self-management; and (7) creation of a care coordinator role for survivors. Feedback loop 3 was learning from post-ICU outcomes to improve future care. It included: (8) developing comprehensive post-ICU care pathways; (9) enhancing support for patients following a hospital stay; and (10) integration of post-ICU outcomes within the ICU to improve clinician morale and understanding. INTERPRETATION: Practical solutions to enhance the quality of survivorship for critical care survivors and their caregivers were identified. These themes are mapped to a novel conceptual model that includes key feedback loops for health system improvements and foci for future interventional trials to improve ICU survivorship outcomes.

Low prevalence of communication between intensive care unit medical staff and general practitioners: A single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) have a central role in delivering care to the Australian community, which includes coordinating management of chronic diseases and treatment of patients after admission to intensive care units (ICUs). Consultations between ICUs and GPs may become increasingly relevant as patients of advancing age and chronic disease burden are admitted to ICUs. However, how frequently and for what reason such consultations occur remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and themes of consultations between ICU medical staff and GPs. METHODS: Ten years of electronic medical records in the ICU of a regional Australian hospital were searched for patient admissions documenting the terms "gp", "general p∗", or "primary care∗" anywhere throughout the record. The proportion of ICU admissions in which a consultation between ICU staff members and GPs was documented was recorded along with the reason/s for the consultation and designation (resident, registrar, consultant) of those who communicated with the GP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures included the proportion of ICU admissions with a documented consultation between ICU staff and GPs, theme of the consultation, and designation (resident, registrar, consultant) of those who communicated with the GP. RESULTS: Of 13 402 admissions to the ICU, 137 (1.02%) had a documented consultation between ICU medical staff and GPs. Most consultations (n = 116, 85%) were initiated by junior ICU medical staff members seeking clinical information from the GPs. Few consultations were to discuss goals of care (n = 10, 7.3%) or care following ICU discharge (n = 15, 11%). CONCLUSIONS: Consultations between ICU medical staff and GPs were infrequent. Further research is required on how best to integrate the health care provided by ICUs and GPs.

A qualitative descriptive study of a novel nurse-led skin cancer screening model in rural Australia.

BACKGROUND: People residing in rural areas have higher rates of skin cancer and face barriers to accessing care. Models of skin cancer care addressing the specific needs of rural communities and overcoming specific challenges are required, but literature is scarce. This study aimed to describe the elements of a nurse-led skin cancer model in rural Victoria using qualitative methodology and programme logic to inform implementation and ongoing sustainability. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders involved in the skin cancer model, namely health service executive management, clinical staff, and administration staff. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were thematically analysed independently by two researchers before themes were compared and refined. A programme logic model was developed to organise themes into contextual elements, inputs, activities and anticipated outcomes; it was also used as a visual tool to aid discussions with key stakeholders. Member checking of the logic model occurred to verify interpretation. This programme logic model will be refined throughout the implementation phase, and again after three years of service delivery. RESULTS: Eight stakeholders participated in interviews. Thematic analysis identified three major themes: the influence of the local rural context, the elements of the model, and "making it happen'. These major themes and accompanying sub-themes were mapped to the programme logic model by contextual elements (rural locale, health service access barriers, burden of disease), key inputs (promotion, human resources including appropriate nurse training and leadership) and 'making it happen' (governance including referral pathways, flexible and sustained funding, and partnerships). The anticipated outcomes identified include skin cancer care delivered locally, timely access, career development for nurses, and decreased skin cancer burden. CONCLUSION: An initiative that is place-based and community driven in response to consumer demand addresses key system barriers to earlier detection of skin cancers. It is anticipated to result in flow-on reductions in skin cancer disease burden. Programme logic was useful to both describe the initiative and as a visual tool for discussions, with the potential to inform wider health service efforts to address system barriers and bottlenecks.