Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ; 29: 100340, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36425907

RESUMO

Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex directly from clinical specimens is critical for patient care. Mycobacterial culture requires days to weeks for results and therefore many laboratories employ rapid molecular methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. There are two FDA-cleared molecular assays for the detection of M. tuberculosis complex in the United States and both are cleared for testing of respiratory specimens only. The detection of M. tuberculosis complex in extrapulmonary specimens is often done using laboratory-developed PCR methods. In this work, the verification and subsequent validation of test performance over a decade is detailed for a laboratory-developed PCR assay (MTBRP) that detects M. tuberculosis complex from respiratory and non-respiratory specimens. The assay also provides information about potential isoniazid resistance. The performance of the MTBRP PCR assay was compared to the Cepheid Xpert MTB/RIF assay in acid-fast smear positive and smear negative specimens and mycobacterial culture for acid-fast smear positive specimens. The MTBRP assay demonstrated 99% correlation with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay using 499 respiratory specimens. The performance of the MTBRP PCR assay compared with mycobacterial culture for 867 AFB smear positive respiratory and non-respiratory specimens demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.1%. This work provides longitudinal evidence using real-world clinical laboratory conditions and specimens to demonstrate that laboratory-developed PCR assays such as the MTBRP can provide a rapid and sensitive method for detection of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis from a wide-variety of smear positive specimen sources.

2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(4): 1446-8, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22238445

RESUMO

The Yeast Traffic Light PNA FISH kit (YTL) correctly identified Candida spp. in 207/216 (96%) positive blood cultures. Discordant results were seen with known cross-reacting species and cultures containing Candida lambica and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. The YTL provides rapid, reliable identification of the five common Candida species found in blood cultures.


Assuntos
Candida/genética , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Corantes Fluorescentes/química , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Ácidos Nucleicos Peptídicos/química , Candidemia/microbiologia , Reações Falso-Positivas , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente/métodos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente/normas , Padrões de Referência , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(4): 1614-6, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21270234

RESUMO

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry was compared to phenotypic testing for yeast identification. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry yielded 96.3% and 84.5% accurate species level identifications (spectral scores, ≥ 1.8) for 138 common and 103 archived strains of yeast. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry is accurate, rapid (5.1 min of hands-on time/identification), and cost-effective ($0.50/sample) for yeast identification in the clinical laboratory.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Micologia/métodos , Micoses/diagnóstico , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/métodos , Leveduras/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Micologia/economia , Micoses/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Leveduras/química , Leveduras/classificação
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 48(5): 1749-52, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20335412

RESUMO

The SLOMYCO Sensititre panel and the custom JustOne strip (both from TREK Diagnostic Systems, Cleveland, OH) were evaluated for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates against clarithromycin. Seventy-one archived and prospectively collected isolates were tested using both the SLOMYCO panel and the JustOne strip, and the results were compared to those obtained using the BACTEC 460 (BD, Sparks, MD) radiometric method and a broth microdilution reference method. Results obtained by the SLOMYCO panel and the JustOne strip agreed with the BACTEC 460 method for 64/71 isolates (90%). Similarly, concordance with the broth microdilution method was 40/43 isolates (93%) for both test systems. The effect of the source medium on inoculum preparation was evaluated, and there were no differences noted in MICs, regardless of whether the inoculum was prepared from isolates grown in Middlebrook 7H9 medium, on Middlebrook 7H10 agar, or in VersaTREK broth culture bottles (Trek Diagnostics). Clarithromycin susceptibility testing of MAC using the SLOMYCO panel and the JustOne strip methods is easy to set up and simple to read and is readily incorporate into the clinical laboratory. These systems offer advantages over the BACTEC 460 system including the lack of a need for radioactive substrates, sharps, or costly instrumentation.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/farmacologia , Claritromicina/farmacologia , Complexo Mycobacterium avium/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Complexo Mycobacterium avium/isolamento & purificação , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/microbiologia
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(4): 1447-53, 2003 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12682128

RESUMO

An evaluation of the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification system by nucleic acid sequencing and the Mayo Clinic experience with its integration into a routine clinical laboratory setting are described. Evaluation of the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification system was accomplished with 59 American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains and 328 clinical isolates of mycobacteria identified by conventional and 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing by using the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification system. Nucleic acid sequencing identified 58 of 59 (98.3%) ATCC strains to the species level or to the correct group or complex level. The identification results for 219 of 243 clinical isolates (90.1%) with a distance score of <1% were concordant with the identifications made by phenotypic methods. The remaining 85 isolates had distance scores of >1%; 35 (41.1%) were identified to the appropriate species level or group or complex level; 13 (15.3%) were identified to the species level. All 85 isolates were determined to be mycobacterial species, either novel species or species that exhibited significant genotypic divergence from an organism in the database with the closest match. Integration of nucleic acid sequencing into the routine mycobacteriology laboratory and use of the MicroSeq 500 microbial identification system and Mayo Clinic databases containing additional genotypes of common species and added species significantly reduced the number of organisms that could not be identified by phenotypic methods. The turnaround time was shortened to 24 h, and results were reported much earlier. A limited number of species could not be differentiated from one another by 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing; however, the method provides for the identification of unusual species and more accurate identifications and offers the promise of being the most accurate method available.


Assuntos
DNA Ribossômico/análise , Mycobacterium/classificação , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Laboratórios , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Mycobacterium/genética , Infecções por Mycobacterium/microbiologia , Fenótipo , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Análise de Sequência de DNA
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA