RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Central venous access devices (CVADs) are commonly used for the treatment of paediatric cancer patients. Catheter locking is a routine intervention that prevents CVAD-associated adverse events, such as infection, occlusion and thrombosis. While laboratory and clinical data are promising, tetra-EDTA (T-EDTA) has yet to be rigorously evaluated or introduced in cancer care as a catheter lock. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a two-arm, superiority type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial conducted at seven hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. Randomisation will be in a 3:2 ratio between the saline (heparinised saline and normal saline) and T-EDTA groups, with randomly varied blocks of size 10 or 20 and stratification by (1) healthcare facility; (2) CVAD type and (3) duration of dwell since insertion. Within the saline group, there will be a random allocation between normal and heparin saline. Participants can be re-recruited and randomised on insertion of a new CVAD. Primary outcome for effectiveness will be a composite of CVAD-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI), CVAD-associated thrombosis or CVAD occlusion during CVAD dwell or at removal. Secondary outcomes will include CABSI, CVAD-associated-thrombosis, CVAD failure, incidental asymptomatic CVAD-associated-thrombosis, other adverse events, health-related quality of life, healthcare costs and mortality. To achieve 90% power (alpha=0.05) for the primary outcome, data from 720 recruitments are required. A mixed-methods approach will be employed to explore implementation contexts from the perspective of clinicians and healthcare purchasers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been provided by Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (HREC/22/QCHQ/81744) and the University of Queensland HREC (2022/HE000196) with subsequent governance approval at all sites. Informed consent is required from the substitute decision-maker or legal guardian prior to participation. In addition, consent may also be obtained from mature minors, depending on the legislative requirements of the study site. The primary trial and substudies will be written by the investigators and published in peer-reviewed journals. The findings will also be disseminated through local health and clinical trial networks by investigators and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622000499785.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Neoplasias , Humanos , Criança , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Ácido Edético/uso terapêutico , Austrália , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Trombose/etiologia , Nova Zelândia , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Heparina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Older and younger adults are offered similar analgesic options after hemorrhoid surgery (HS), but the differences in pain between the two populations are unknown. This study aims to compare postoperative pain outcomes after HS in older and younger individuals. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of patients who underwent HS between 2018 and 2023. Patients were excluded if additional anorectal procedures were performed at the time of HS. Data related to pain-related outcomes were compiled: (1) need for narcotic prescription refills; (2) documentation of a pain-related phone call within 30 d; (3) urgent postoperative office visit before regular scheduled follow-up; and (4) pain-related postoperative emergency department visits. Associations between age and pain-related outcomes were tested using Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, and covariate adjusted logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: There were a total of 249 patients, 60 older adults, and 189 younger adults. Compared to younger patients, older adults demonstrated a reduced frequency of pain-related phone calls (10.3 versus 32.1%, P < 0.01) and opioid refills (0 versus 14.4%, P < 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, older age remained inversely associated with pain-related postoperative phone calls (odds ratio = 0.25, 95% confidence interval = [0.1-0.6], P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults had better pain outcomes after HS in comparison to younger patients. These findings suggest that the postoperative analgesic needs of older patients after HS are lower than those of younger patients. Decisions regarding opioid prescription in older adults recovering from HS should be tailored to avoid narcotic-related complications.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between deficiency of vitamin A or D at diagnosis of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and subsequent infectious complications during induction therapy. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study of children with newly diagnosed ALL from 2007 to 2017 at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. We measured vitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, retinol binding protein as a surrogate for vitamin A, and immunoglobulin isotypes in serum obtained at ALL diagnosis, and we assessed the association between vitamin deficiencies or levels and infection-related complications during the 6-week induction phase using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Among 378 evaluable participants, vitamin A and D deficiencies were common (43% and 17%, respectively). Vitamin D deficiency was associated with higher risks of febrile neutropenia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.7; P = .0072), clinically documented infection (aHR, 1.73; P = .025), and likely bacterial infection (aHR, 1.86; P = .008). Conversely, vitamin A deficiency was associated solely with a lower risk of sepsis (aHR, 0.19; P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, vitamin D deficiency was associated with an increased risk of common infection-related complications during induction therapy for ALL. Additional studies are warranted to evaluate whether vitamin D supplementation could mitigate this effect.
RESUMO
This prognostic study analyzes the accuracy of the Phoenix Sepsis Score for the classification of attributable mortality risk in children with cancer presenting to the intensive care.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Sepse , Humanos , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Sepse/mortalidade , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Lactente , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Mini abstract The financial benefits of instituting the American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification Program far exceed the costs, with the added benefits of enhanced patient satisfaction and improved staff morale.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification is a cornerstone of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society COVID-19 treatment guidance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to define the clinical characteristics and comorbidities associated with critical COVID-19 in children and adolescents. METHODS: Two independent reviewers screened the literature (Medline and EMBASE) for studies published through August 31, 2023, that reported outcome data on patients aged ≤21 years with COVID-19. Critical disease was defined as an invasive mechanical ventilation requirement, intensive care unit admission, or death. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and heterogeneity was explored through subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Among 10,178 articles, 136 studies met the inclusion criteria for review. Data from 70 studies, which collectively examined 172,165 children and adolescents with COVID-19, were pooled for meta-analysis. In previously healthy children, the absolute risk of critical disease from COVID-19 was 4% (95% CI, 1%-10%). Compared with no comorbidities, the pooled OR for critical disease was 3.95 (95% CI, 2.78-5.63) for the presence of one comorbidity and 9.51 (95% CI, 5.62-16.06) for ≥2 comorbidities. Key risk factors included cardiovascular and neurological disorders, chronic pulmonary conditions (excluding asthma), diabetes, obesity, and immunocompromise, all with statistically significant ORsâ >â 2.00. CONCLUSIONS: While the absolute risk for critical COVID-19 in children and adolescents without underlying health conditions is relatively low, the presence of one or more comorbidities was associated with markedly increased risk. These findings support the importance of risk stratification in tailoring pediatric COVID-19 management.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Comorbidade , Estado Terminal , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A subset of patients in ACS-NCDB with stage-1 colon cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), in contrast to national guidelines. This study aimed to define this population and evaluate associations between AC and survival. METHODS: Patients with T1-2N0 colon cancer from 2004 to 2016 were separated into AC and non-AC groups. Adverse pathological features (APF) included T2, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, positive margin, and inadequate lymph nodes (<12). Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 1745 of 139,857 patients (1.2 %) received AC. Receiving AC was associated with male sex (p = 0.02), uninsured (p < 0.01), low income (p = 0.02), or having ≥2 APFs (p < 0.001). In the total cohort, AC was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.14 [1.04-1.24] P < 0.01). On subset analysis, AC was associated with improved OS for patients with ≥2 APFs (log-rank P=<0.001), and decreased mortality when adjusted for covariates (HR 0.81 [0.69-0.95] P=<0.01). The most significant predictor of mortality was old age (HR 3.78 [3.67, 3.89] p ≤ 0.01), followed by higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR 1.73 [1.69, 1.76] (p ≤ 0.01), and higher APF score (HR 1.46 [1.42, 15.2] p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: AC was associated with decreased survival in the total cohort of stage 1 colon cancer patients, but was associated with improved survival for patients with multiple APFs.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Seguimentos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Importance: Children undergoing treatment for leukemia are at increased risk of severe sepsis, a dysregulated immune response to infection leading to acute organ dysfunction. As cancer survivors, they face a high burden of long-term adverse effects. The association between sepsis during anticancer therapy and long-term organ dysfunction in adult survivors of childhood cancer has not been examined. Objective: To determine whether severe sepsis during therapy for leukemia in childhood is associated with subsequent chronic health conditions in adult survivors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included 644 adult survivors of childhood leukemia who were diagnosed between January 1, 1985, and July 19, 2010, and participated in the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Participants were excluded if they received hematopoietic cell transplant or had relapsed leukemia. Data collection ended June 30, 2017. Data were analyzed from July 1, 2020, to January 5, 2024. Exposures: Severe sepsis episodes, defined according to consensus criteria as septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or multiorgan dysfunction associated with infection occurring during anticancer therapy, were abstracted by medical record review for all participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-defined chronic health condition outcomes were independently abstracted. Associations between sepsis and cumulative incidence of chronic health conditions (eg, cardiovascular, pulmonary, kidney, neurological, and neurocognitive outcomes) were compared by adjusted hazard ratios from Cox proportional hazards logistic regression. Inverse propensity score weighting was used to adjust for potential confounders, including age, year of diagnosis, and leukemia type. Results: The study sample consisted of 644 adult survivors of pediatric leukemia (329 women [51.1%] and 315 men [48.9%]; including 56 with a history of acute myeloid leukemia and 585 with a history of acute lymphoblastic leukemia) who were most recently evaluated at a median age of 24.7 (IQR, 21.2-28.3) years at a median time after leukemia diagnosis of 17.3 (IQR, 13.7-21.9) years. Severe sepsis during treatment of acute childhood leukemia occurred in 46 participants (7.1%). Participants who experienced severe sepsis during treatment were more likely to develop moderate to severe neurocognitive impairment (29 of 46 [63.0%] vs 310 of 598 [51.8%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.61-2.16]; P < .001) significantly affecting attention, executive function, memory and visuospatial domains. Sepsis was not associated with long-term risk of cardiovascular, pulmonary, kidney, or neurological chronic health conditions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of long-term outcomes in survivors of pediatric leukemia, severe sepsis during anticancer therapy for leukemia was associated with a selectively increased risk for development of serious neurocognitive sequelae. Efforts to reduce the effects of anticancer therapy on long-term function and quality of life in survivors might include prevention of severe sepsis during therapy and early detection or amelioration of neurocognitive deficits in survivors of sepsis.
Assuntos
Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Leucemia , Sepse , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Adulto Jovem , Estudos de Coortes , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos , Qualidade de Vida , Progressão da Doença , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/etiologia , SobreviventesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Since November 2019, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has created challenges for preventing and managing COVID-19 in children and adolescents. Most research to develop new therapeutic interventions or to repurpose existing ones has been undertaken in adults, and although most cases of infection in pediatric populations are mild, there have been many cases of critical and fatal infection. Understanding the risk factors for severe illness and the evidence for safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of therapies for COVID-19 in children is necessary to optimize therapy. METHODS: A panel of experts in pediatric infectious diseases, pediatric infectious diseases pharmacology, and pediatric intensive care medicine from 21 geographically diverse North American institutions was re-convened. Through a series of teleconferences and web-based surveys and a systematic review with meta-analysis of data for risk factors, a guidance statement comprising a series of recommendations for risk stratification, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19 was developed and refined based on expert consensus. RESULTS: There are identifiable clinical characteristics that enable risk stratification for patients at risk for severe COVID-19. These risk factors can be used to guide the treatment of hospitalized and non-hospitalized children and adolescents with COVID-19 and to guide preventative therapy where options remain available.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Fatores de Risco , Consenso , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Antivirais/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Importance: COVID-19 in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or lymphoma (ALL/LLy) has not been described in detail and may affect chemotherapy administration and long-term outcomes. Objective: To describe the clinical presentation of COVID-19 and chemotherapy modifications in pediatric patients with ALL/LLy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective case series of patients at St Jude Children's Research Hospital and its affiliate sites with newly diagnosed ALL/LLy who were treated on the Total XVII protocol (NCT03117751) between March 30, 2020, and June 20, 2022. Participants included patients aged 1 to 18 years who were receiving protocol chemotherapy. Acute symptoms and chemotherapy modifications were evaluated for 60 days after the COVID-19 diagnosis, and viral clearance, adverse events, and second SARS-CoV-2 infections were followed up during the 27-month study period. Exposures: SARS-CoV-2; all patients were screened at least weekly and at symptom onset and/or after known exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Main Outcomes and Measures: Description of the spectrum of COVID-19 illness and chemotherapy modifications. Results: Of 308 pediatric patients, 110 (36%) developed COVID-19 at a median age of 8.2 (IQR, 5.3-14.5) years. Sixty-eight patients (62%) were male. Most patients were in the continuation/maintenance phase of chemotherapy (101 [92%]). Severe disease was rare (7 [6%]) but was associated with older age, higher white blood cell counts at ALL/LLy diagnosis, lower absolute lymphocyte counts at COVID-19 diagnosis, abnormal chest imaging findings, and SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Rare but serious thrombotic events included pulmonary embolism and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (n = 1 for each). No multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children or death was seen. SARS-CoV-2 reinfection occurred in 11 patients (10%) and was associated with older age and with receiving standard or high-risk vs low-risk ALL/LLy therapy. Chemotherapy interruptions occurred in 96 patients (87%) and were longer for patients with severe disease, SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, and/or a COVID-19 diagnosis during the pre-Omicron variant period vs the post-Omicron period (after December 27, 2021). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series of COVID-19 in pediatric patients with ALL/LLy, severe COVID-19 was rare, but chemotherapy administration was affected in most patients. Long-term studies are needed to establish the outcomes of COVID-19 in this population.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Linfoma , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Humanos , Masculino , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Feminino , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Teste para COVID-19 , Reinfecção , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/complicações , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/epidemiologia , Linfoma/complicações , Linfoma/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background: Risk stratification is a cornerstone of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society COVID-19 treatment guidance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to define the clinical characteristics and comorbidities associated with critical COVID-19 in children and adolescents. Methods: Two independent reviewers screened the literature (Medline and EMBASE) for studies published through August 2023 that reported outcome data on patients aged ≤21 years with COVID-19. Critical disease was defined as an invasive mechanical ventilation requirement, intensive care unit admission, or death. Random effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and heterogeneity was explored through subgroup analyses. Results: Among 10,178 articles, 136 studies met the inclusion criteria for review. Data from 70 studies, which collectively examined 172,165 children and adolescents with COVID-19, were pooled for meta-analysis. In previously healthy children, the absolute risk of critical disease from COVID-19 was 4% (95% CI, 1%-10%). Compared with no comorbidities, the pooled OR for critical disease was 3.95 (95% CI, 2.78-5.63) for presence of one comorbidity and 9.51 (95% CI, 5.62-16.06) for ≥2 comorbidities. Key risk factors included cardiovascular and neurological disorders, chronic pulmonary conditions (excluding asthma), diabetes, obesity, and immunocompromise, all with statistically significant ORs >2.00. Conclusions: While the absolute risk for critical COVID-19 in children and adolescents without underlying health conditions is relatively low, the presence of one or more comorbidities was associated with markedly increased risk. These findings support the importance of risk stratification in tailoring pediatric COVID-19 management.
RESUMO
CONTEXT: Central venous access device (CVAD) locks are routine interventions used to prevent and treat complications, such as infection, thrombosis, and catheter occlusion. OBJECTIVE: To compare and rank lock-solutions for prevention or treatment of complications in pediatrics. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Five databases and 2 clinical trial registries were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Published and unpublished randomized controlled trials that enrolled pediatric patients with a CVAD and compared the effectiveness of lock-solutions. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction was conducted by 2 reviewers. Odds ratio (OR) for prevention or treatment of CVAD-associated bloodstream infection (BSI), thrombosis, occlusion, CVAD-failure, and mortality were calculated, with point estimates ranking lock-solutions. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included. Chelating agents and antibiotic locks given as prevention were associated with lower odds (OR: 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.67; moderate-quality; OR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05-0.79, high-quality, respectively) of CVAD-associated BSI compared with heparinized saline (reference). Preventative thrombolytic agents had lower odds (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.93; low-quality) of CVAD occlusion, whereas ethanol had higher odds (OR: 2.84, 95% CI: 1.31-6.16; high-quality) compared with heparinized saline (reference). No lock solution had effects on thrombosis prevention or treatment, CVAD-failure, CVAD-associated BSI treatment failure, or mortality. LIMITATIONS: There was substantial uncertainty around the point estimates because of the limited number of studies for outcomes and study heterogeneity. More high-quality studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of lock solutions. CONCLUSIONS: Chelating agents and antibiotic locks may be effective for CVAD-associated BSI prevention in pediatrics. Thrombolytic agents can be an option for CVAD occlusion prevention, whereas ethanol may not be recommended.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateteres Venosos Centrais , Sepse , Trombose , Criança , Humanos , Antibacterianos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Quelantes , Etanol , Fibrinolíticos , Metanálise em Rede , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controleRESUMO
PURPOSE: The optimal management of fever without severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] ≥500/µL) in pediatric patients with cancer is undefined. The previously proposed Esbenshade Vanderbilt (EsVan) models accurately predict bacterial bloodstream infections (BSIs) in this population and provide risk stratification to aid management, but have lacked prospective external validation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Episodes of fever with a central venous catheter and ANC ≥500/µL occurring in pediatric patients with cancer were prospectively collected from 18 academic medical centers. Variables included in the EsVan models and 7-day clinical outcomes were collected. Five versions of the EsVan models were applied to the data with calculation of C-statistics for both overall BSI rate and high-risk organism BSI (gram-negative and Staphylococcus aureus BSI), as well as model calibration. RESULTS: In 2,565 evaluable episodes, the BSI rate was 4.7% (N = 120). Complications for the whole cohort were rare, with 1.1% (N = 27) needing intensive care unit (ICU) care by 7 days, and the all-cause mortality rate was 0.2% (N = 5), with only one potential infection-related death. C-statistics ranged from 0.775 to 0.789 for predicting overall BSI, with improved accuracy in predicting high-risk organism BSI (C-statistic 0.800-0.819). Initial empiric antibiotics were withheld in 14.9% of episodes, with no deaths or ICU admissions attributable to not receiving empiric antibiotics. CONCLUSION: The EsVan models, especially EsVan2b, perform very well prospectively across multiple academic medical centers and accurately stratify risk of BSI in episodes of non-neutropenic fever in pediatric patients with cancer. Implementation of routine screening with risk-stratified management for non-neutropenic fever in pediatric patients with cancer could safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic use.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções Bacterianas , Infecções , Neoplasias , Sepse , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Prospectivos , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Febre/diagnóstico , Febre/etiologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Sepse/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Cefiderocol is a novel cephalosporin antibiotic with activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria and limited pediatric experience. This case series describes 3 immunocompromised children receiving blood transfusion who developed benign red or purple urine with administration of cefiderocol. Interaction with iron from blood products is a possible mechanism. It is important to recognize this phenomenon and distinguish it from hematuria to avoid unnecessary diagnostic testing.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of existing sepsis scores for prediction of adverse outcomes in children with cancer admitted to the ICU with suspected sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review using data available at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after ICU admission to calculate the Pediatric Risk of Mortality 3 (PRISM-3), Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA), Paediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 (PELOD-2), and Quick Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to evaluate performance for prediction of attributable mortality. Sensitivity analyses included recalculation of scores using worst preceding values for each variable, excluding hematologic parameters, and prediction of alternative outcomes. SETTING: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, a pediatric comprehensive cancer center in the USA. PATIENTS: Pediatric patients (<25 years of age) receiving conventional therapy for cancer admitted to the ICU with suspected sepsis between 2013 and 2019. RESULTS: Of 207 included episodes of suspected sepsis, attributable mortality was 16 (7.7%) and all evaluated sepsis scores performed poorly (maximal AUROC of 0.73 for qSOFA at 1 and 24 h). Sensitivity analyses did not identify an alternative approach that significantly improved prediction. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available sepsis scores perform poorly for prediction of attributable mortality in children with cancer who present to ICU with suspected sepsis. More research is needed to identify reliable predictors of adverse outcomes in this population.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Sepse , Humanos , Criança , Estudos Retrospectivos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/etiologia , Sepse/epidemiologia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Fatores de Risco , Curva ROC , Neoplasias/complicações , PrognósticoRESUMO
SARS-CoV-2 has caused millions of infections worldwide since its emergence in 2019. Understanding how infection and vaccination induce mucosal immune responses and how they fluctuate over time is important, especially since they are key in preventing infection and reducing disease severity. We established a novel methodology for assessing SARS-CoV-2 cytokine and antibody responses at the nasal epithelium by using nasopharyngeal swabs collected longitudinally before and after either SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. We then compared responses between mucosal and systemic compartments. We demonstrate that cytokine and antibody profiles differ between compartments. Nasal cytokines show a wound healing phenotype while plasma cytokines are consistent with pro-inflammatory pathways. We found that nasal IgA and IgG have different kinetics after infection, with IgA peaking first. Although vaccination results in low nasal IgA, IgG induction persists for up to 180 days post-vaccination. This research highlights the importance of studying mucosal responses in addition to systemic responses to respiratory infections. The methods described herein can be used to further mucosal vaccine development by giving us a better understanding of immunity at the nasal epithelium providing a simpler, alternative clinical practice to studying mucosal responses to infection.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Imunidade nas Mucosas , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Mucosa Nasal/metabolismo , Vacinação , Imunoglobulina A , Citocinas/metabolismo , Imunoglobulina G , Anticorpos AntiviraisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of fluoroquinolones to prevent infections in neutropenic patients with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a controversial issue, with international guidelines providing conflicting recommendations. Although potential benefits are clear, concerns revolve around efficacy, potential harms, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) implications. DISCUSSION: Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduces neutropenic fever (NF) bloodstream infections and other serious bacterial infections, based on evidence from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in adults and children. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis may also reduce infection-related morbidity and healthcare costs; however, evidence is conflicting. Adverse effects of fluoroquinolones are well recognized in the general population; however, studies in the cancer cohort where it is used for a defined period of neutropenia have not reflected this. The largest concern for routine use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis remains AMR, as many, but not all, observational studies have found that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis might increase the risk of AMR, and some studies have suggested negative impacts on patient outcomes as a result. CONCLUSIONS: The debate surrounding fluoroquinolone prophylaxis calls for individualized risk assessment based on patient characteristics and local AMR patterns, and prophylaxis should be restricted to patients at the highest risk of serious infection during the highest risk periods to ensure that the risk-benefit analysis is in favor of individual and community benefit. More research is needed to address important unanswered questions about fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with cancer or receiving HSCT.