Telehealth for Assessing and Managing Tardive Dyskinesia: Expert Insights from a Cross-Disciplinary Virtual Treatment Panel.

Introduction: Publications on the integration of telehealth in the care of patients with movement disorders are increasing, but little has been presented regarding its use in tardive dyskinesia (TD), a drug-induced movement disorder associated with prolonged exposure to dopamine receptor blocking agents. This study was conducted to address that knowledge gap, based on insights from a panel of TD experts. Methods: In 2020, six neurologists, three psychiatrists, and three psychiatric nurse practitioners participated in individual semistructured interviews about in-person and virtual TD assessment and management in their practices. Two virtual roundtables were then conducted to consolidate findings from these interviews. Results: The panel agreed that despite the challenges of virtual TD assessment (e.g., technology issues, difficulty observing entire body, inability to conduct thorough neurological examinations), telehealth can offer benefits (e.g., fewer missed appointments, reduced time/cost, easier access to family/caregiver feedback). The panel also agreed that telehealth should be combined with periodic in-person visits, and they recommended an in-person TD assessment within 6 months before the first virtual visit and at least one in-person assessment every 6 months thereafter. Additional best practices for TD telehealth included implementing video, involving family/caregivers, and providing preappointment instructions to help patients prepare their technology and environment. Conclusions: Telehealth is not a substitute for in-person visits but can be a helpful complement to in-person clinical care. Clinicians can optimize virtual visits in patients at risk of TD by using targeted questions to identify TD and evaluate its impact and by providing education about approved TD treatments.

Assessment of Long-Term Effects of Sports-Related Concussions: Biological Mechanisms and Exosomal Biomarkers.

Concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in athletes can cause persistent symptoms, known as post-concussion syndrome (PCS), and repeated injuries may increase the long-term risk for an athlete to develop neurodegenerative diseases such as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). The Center for Disease Control estimates that up to 3.8 million sport-related mTBI are reported each year in the United States. Despite the magnitude of the phenomenon, there is a current lack of comprehensive prognostic indicators and research has shown that available monitoring tools are moderately sensitive to short-term concussion effects but less sensitive to long-term consequences. The overall aim of this review is to discuss novel, quantitative, and objective measurements that can predict long-term outcomes following repeated sports-related mTBIs. The specific objectives were (1) to provide an overview of the current clinical and biomechanical tools available to health practitioners to ensure recovery after mTBIs, (2) to synthesize potential biological mechanisms in animal models underlying the long-term adverse consequences of mTBIs, (3) to discuss the possible link between repeated mTBI and neurodegenerative diseases, and (4) to discuss the current knowledge about fluid biomarkers for mTBIs with a focus on novel exosomal biomarkers. The conclusions from this review are that current post-concussion clinical tests are not sufficiently sensitive to injury and do not accurately quantify post-concussion alterations associated with repeated mTBIs. In the current review, it is proposed that current practices should be amended to include a repeated symptom inventory, a cognitive assessment of executive function and impulse control, an instrumented assessment of balance, vestibulo-ocular assessments, and an improved panel of blood or exosome biomarkers.

Dental students' experiences with and attitudes toward people with mental retardation.

BACKGROUND: People with mental retardation have limited access to oral health care. Dental school administrators reported minimal training in U.S. dental schools for these patients. As a result, students and practitioners may not be prepared to provide needed services. METHODS: The authors surveyed 295 third- and fourth-year students at five dental schools about their didactic and clinical preparation for, attitudes toward and comfort levels with treating people with mental retardation, as well as whether their experiences affect their willingness to treat people with mental retardation. The authors analyzed data using previously developed statistical software. RESULTS: A little more than 68 percent of respondents reported receiving five hours or less of instruction devoted to how to care for people with mental retardation, and 50.8 percent reported having no clinical training in this area. Nearly 60 percent reported that they had little to no confidence in providing care, while 74.6 percent reported they had little to no preparation in providing care. Students who had experience working with people with mental retardation attributed greater capabilities to such people than did students who had no such experience. CONCLUSIONS: Many U.S. dental students are prepared inadequately to provide services for people with mental retardation. Spending time with these patients provides a more positive understanding of the capabilities of these people. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Increasing numbers of people with mental retardation no longer live in institutions, and they are dependent on dentists in private practice for care. Increased dental school training and continuing education programs are needed to meet this need.