Survival Outcomes of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Combined With Radiation Versus Chemotherapy Alone After Pancreatectomy for Distal Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Institution Experience.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated survival outcomes in patients with distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (D-PDAC) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) and adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent DP for D-PDAC from 2000 to 2015 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital was performed. Demographics, baseline risk factors, and type of adjuvant treatment were assessed for associations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Comparisons were made with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients underwent DP for D-PDAC. Of these, 105 patients were followed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Forty-five patients received chemotherapy only and 60 patients received chemoradiation. The median OS with chemoradiation was 33.6 months and 27.9 months (P = 0.54) with chemotherapy only. The median DFS was 15.3 months with chemoradiation and 19.8 months with chemotherapy only (P = 0.89). Elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9, stage II to III disease, splenic vein involvement, and vascular invasion were significant risk factors in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, there were no significant differences in OS or DFS with chemoradiation compared with chemotherapy alone after DP in patients with D-PDAC.

Gastric cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: Experience from a high-volume center and review of existing literature.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged survival of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy can be associated with late complications due to altered gastrointestinal anatomy. The incidence of gastric cancer is increasingly reported. We set out to examine our experience with gastric cancer as a late complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy with a focus on incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. METHODS: We queried our prospectively collected institutional database for patients that developed gastric cancer after pancreaticoduodenectomy and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS: Our database revealed 6 patients who developed gastric cancer following pancreaticoduodenectomy, presenting with a mean age of 62.2 years and an even sex distribution. All of those patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant indications with an average time to development of metachronous gastric cancer of 8.3 years. Four patients complained of gastrointestinal discomfort prior to diagnosis of secondary malignancy. All of these cancers were poorly differentiated and were discovered at an advanced T stage (≥ 3). Only half developed at the gastrointestinal anastomosis. Four underwent surgery with a curative intent, and 2 patients are currently alive (mean postgastrectomy survival = 25.5 months). In accordance with previous literature, biliopancreatic reflux from pancreaticoduodenectomy reconstruction, underlying genetic susceptibility, and adjuvant therapy may play a causative role in later development of gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: Long-term survivors after pancreaticoduodenectomy who develop nonspecific gastrointestinal complaints should be evaluated carefully for complications including gastric malignancy. This may serve as an opportunity to intervene on tumors that typically present at an advanced stage and with aggressive histology.

Higher Tumor Burden Neutralizes Negative Margin Status in Hepatectomy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine if the prognostic significance of margin status in hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) varies for different levels of tumor burden because hepatectomy indications for CRLM have been recently expanded to include patients with a higher tumor burden in whom achieving an R0 resection is difficult. METHODS: Clinicopathological variables in an exploration cohort of 290 patients receiving hepatectomy in Japan for CRLM were investigated. R0 resection was defined as a margin width > 0 mm. Tumor burden was assessed using the recently introduced Tumor Burden Score (TBS), which was calculated as TBS2 = (maximum tumor diameter in cm)2 + (number of lesions)2. The principal findings were validated using a cohort from the United States. RESULTS: R1 resection rates significantly increased as TBS increased: 4/86 (4.7%) in patients with TBS < 3, 29/171 (17.0%) in patients with TBS ≥ 3 and < 9, and 9/33 (27.3%) in patients with TBS ≥ 9 (p < 0.001). R0 resection was significantly superior to R1 resection in patients with TBS ≥ 5; however, this was not the case for TBS ≥ 6, as confirmed by both univariate and multivariate analyses. Furthermore, prehepatectomy chemotherapy was associated with significantly improved survival for patients with TBS ≥ 8. Analysis of the validation cohort yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: R0 resection appeared to have a positive impact on prognosis among patients with low tumor burden; however, this was not the case for patients with high tumor burden. As such, systemic treatment, in addition to surgery, may be central to achieving satisfactory outcomes in the latter patient population.