A prospective observational study of oseltamivir safety and tolerability in infants and young children ≤24 months.

PURPOSE: Infants and young children are at elevated risk of influenza-associated complications, but information on the safety of antiviral therapies is limited in this age group. METHODS: In this prospective open-label observational safety study, children aged ≤24 months with a clinical diagnosis of influenza in routine practice received either no antiviral treatment ('unexposed' group) or oseltamivir treatment or prophylaxis ('exposed' group), according to the physician's judgment. Patients were followed up for 30 days after the baseline visit. RESULTS: Adverse events (AEs) were analysed in 1065 patients; they were reported in 390/711 (54.9%) in the unexposed group, 167/340 (49.1%) patients in the exposed group, and 6/14 prophylaxis patients. Cough and rhinitis were the most common events, reported more often in unexposed children (22.9 and 20.3% respectively) than in exposed children (13.2 and 10.0%; p < 0.001); pyrexia, diarrhoea and vomiting were less common, occurring at similar rates in exposed and unexposed patients. Nasal congestion (3.5%), bronchitis (5.6%) and upper respiratory tract infection (1.5%) were reported more frequently in exposed patients than in unexposed patients (0.7, 2.7 and 0.1% respectively; p < 0.05). In the exposed group, 11.2% of patients (n = 38) experienced 41 AEs considered at least possibly related to oseltamivir, none being assessed as serious. Overall, there were 79 serious AEs in 59 patients. Eleven discontinued treatment because of an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Oseltamivir has a good tolerability profile in infants and children aged ≤24 months. These findings contributed to the recent FDA approval of oseltamivir for treating infants aged 2-51 weeks.

The safety of oseltamivir in pregnancy: an updated review of post-marketing data.

PURPOSE: Influenza infection places pregnant women at greater risk of morbidity and hospitalization. The use of oseltamivir to treat influenza increased markedly in all population groups during the A/H1N1pdm09 pandemic, including pregnant women. Given this increase in exposure, a reassessment of the safety of oseltamivir in pregnancy was conducted. METHODS: The Roche Global Safety Database was searched for all exposures to oseltamivir during pregnancy in the 13 years up to 30 April 2012. RESULTS: Of the 2926 maternal exposures to oseltamivir retrieved from the Safety Database, pregnancy outcomes were known for 2128 women. Most exposures (>90%) were reported during or after the pandemic. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in exposed women was: spontaneous abortions, 2.9% (61/2128); therapeutic abortions, 1.8% (39/2128); and pre-term deliveries, 4.2% (84 of 2000 live births), values which are lower than background rates in the general population (women with or without influenza). Fetal outcomes were known in 1875 of the 2926 exposures. For the 81 reported birth defect cases, 11 occurred during the sensitive period for the respective defects. A review of these and other case reports of birth defects did not suggest that they resulted from oseltamivir exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The data reviewed in this article reinforce the findings of a previous review, suggesting that oseltamivir is unlikely to cause adverse pregnancy or fetal outcomes.

Oseltamivir in seasonal, pandemic, and avian influenza: a comprehensive review of 10-years clinical experience.

Oseltamivir (Tamiflu®; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland) is an orally administered antiviral for the treatment and prevention of influenza A and B infections that is registered in more than 100 countries worldwide. More than 83 million patients have been exposed to the product since its introduction. Oseltamivir is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for use in the clinical management of pandemic and seasonal influenza of varying severity, and as the primary antiviral agent for treatment of avian H5N1 influenza infection in humans. This article is a nonsystematic review of the experience gained from the first 10 years of using oseltamivir for influenza infections since its launch in early 2000, emphasizing recent advances in our understanding of the product and its clinical utility in five main areas. The article reviews the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir and its active metabolite, oseltamivir carboxylate, including information on special populations such as children and elderly adults, and the co-administration of oseltamivir with other agents. This is followed by a summary of data on the effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment and prophylaxis in patients with all types of influenza, including pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and avian H5N1 influenza. The implications of changes in susceptibility of circulating influenza viruses to oseltamivir and other antiviral agents are also described, as is the emergence of antiviral resistance during and after the 2009 pandemic. The fourth main section deals with the safety profile of oseltamivir in standard and special patient populations, and reviews spontaneously reported adverse event data from the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods and the topical issue of neuropsychiatric adverse events. Finally, the article considers the pharmacoeconomics of oseltamivir in comparison with vaccination and usual care regimens, and as a component of pandemic influenza mitigation strategies.

Osteonecrosis of the jaw and bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis.

A potential side effect associated with bisphosphonates, a class of drugs used in the treatment of osteoporosis, Paget's disease and metastatic bone disease, is osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). The incidence of ONJ in the general population is unknown; this rare condition also may occur in patients not receiving bisphosphonates. Case reports have discussed ONJ development in patients with multiple myeloma or metastatic breast cancer receiving bisphosphonates as palliation for bone metastases. These patients are also receiving chemotherapeutic agents that might impair the immune system and affect angiogenesis. The incidence or prevalence of ONJ in patients taking bisphosphonates for osteoporosis seems to be very rare. No causative relationship has been unequivocally demonstrated between ONJ and bisphosphonate therapy. A majority of ONJ occurs after tooth extraction. Furthermore, the underlying risk of developing ONJ may be increased in osteoporotic patients by comorbid diseases. Treatment for ONJ is generally conservative.