RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to investigate the effect of pre-operative intravenous methylprednisolone on post-operative pain control and joint mobility in Chinese patients undergoing single primary total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled single-centre trial. Sixty subjects were randomized into intervention and control group. The peri-operative anaesthetic and analgesic regimes were standardized. The intervention group received 125 mg methylprednisolone intravenously on the induction of anaesthesia. Subjects were assessed at 24, 30 and 48 h after surgery and upon discharge for pain scores and range of movement from the operated knee. Change in C-reactive protein level was calculated. Patient's satisfaction was recorded. Adverse reactions were documented. Subjects were followed up at 6 weeks, 4 months and 1 year. RESULTS: Rest pain and pain on movement were significantly reduced in the methylprednisolone group at 24 and 30 h after surgery (ANOVA p = 0.030, p = 0.003, p = 0.032, p = 0.010). The methylprednisolone group demonstrated a greater range of movement from the operated knee up to 30 h after surgery (ANOVA p = 0.031). Post-operative C-reactive protein level was significantly less in the methylprednisolone group (p < 0.001). Methylprednisolone group had a higher patient's satisfaction than the control group (p < 0.01). No adverse effects were noted at the 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative intravenous methylprednisolone improves post-operative pain and joint mobility after total knee arthroplasty up to 30 h after operation. It results in a higher patients' satisfaction. It can act as an effective adjunct in the multimodal analgesic regime. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03082092.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Intravenosa , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , China , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Período Pré-Operatório , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Trigger point injections are commonly practised pain interventional techniques. However, there is still lack of objective diagnostic criteria for trigger points. The mechanisms of action of trigger point injection remain obscure and its efficacy remains heterogeneous. The advent of ultrasound technology in the noninvasive real-time imaging of soft tissues sheds new light on visualization of trigger points, explaining the effect of trigger point injection by blockade of peripheral nerves, and minimizing the complications of blind injection.
RESUMO
IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: Local injections of steroids have been widely practiced to provide regional analgesia for the treatment of a wide variety of musculoskeletal pain syndromes. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of steroid injections is not substantial. Also, there have been reports of catastrophic complications associated with their use. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The evidence currently available in the literature (Database: Ovid MEDLINE 1950 to 2010) is reviewed. The areas covered include the analgesic mechanisms of steroids, indications for steroid injections and their effectiveness, as well as the risks and precautions for steroid injections. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: This is an up-to-date review on the clinical application of steroid injections for regional analgesia, which will give the reader an insight on how to maximize the benefits of steroids while minimizing their side effects and complications. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Although steroid injections are generally considered effective and safe in the treatment of painful condition of limbs, their use in the treatment of chronic back pain is still controversial and serious complications have been reported. More studies on outcome and safety are warranted.