Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Respir Med ; 106(8): 1124-33, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22621820

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) are at higher risk of developing Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) than patients in the general population. However, no studies have been performed in general practice assessing longitudinal incidence rates for CAP in COPD patients or risk factors for pneumonia onset. METHODS: A cohort of COPD patients aged ≥ 45 years, was identified in the General Research Practice Database (GPRD) between 1996 and 2005, and annual and 10-year incidence rates of CAP evaluated. A nested case-control analysis was performed, comparing descriptors in COPD patients with and without CAP using conditional logistic regression generating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The COPD cohort consisted of 40,414 adults. During the observation period, 3149 patients (8%) experienced CAP, producing an incidence rate of 22.4 (95% CI 21.7-23.2) per 1000 person years. 92% of patients with pneumonia diagnosis had suffered only one episode. Multivariate modelling of pneumonia descriptors in COPD indicate that age over 65 years was significantly associated with increased risk of CAP. Other independent risk factors associated with CAP were co-morbidities including congestive heart failure (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6), and dementia (OR 2.6, 95%CI 1.9-3.). Prior severe COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.3-3.2) and severe COPD requiring home oxygen or nebulised therapy (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.6) were also significantly associated with risk of CAP. CONCLUSION: COPD patients presenting in general practice with specific co-morbidities, severe COPD, and age >65 years are at increased risk of CAP.


Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas/complicações , Pneumonia/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/complicações , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , País de Gales/epidemiologia
2.
BMC Public Health ; 11: 896, 2011 Nov 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22122757

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) has increased within the UK and, in response, targets for TB control have been set and interventions recommended. The question was whether these had been implemented and, if so, had they been effective in reducing TB cases. METHODS: Epidemiological data were obtained from enhanced surveillance and clinics. Primary care trusts or TB clinics with an average of > 100 TB cases per year were identified and provided reflections on the reasons for any change in their local incidence, which was compared to an audit against the national TB plan. RESULTS: Access to data for planning varied (0-22 months). Sputum smear status was usually well recorded within the clinics. All cities had TB networks, a key worker for each case, free treatment and arrangements to treat HIV co-infection. Achievement of targets in the national plan correlated well with change in workload figures for the commissioning organizations (Spearman's rank correlation R = 0.8, P < 0.01) but not with clinic numbers. Four cities had not achieved the target of one nurse per 40 notifications (Birmingham, Bradford, Manchester and Sheffield). Compared to other cities, their loss to follow-up during treatment was usually > 6% (χ2 = 4.2, P < 0.05), there was less TB detected by screening and less outreach. Manchester was most poorly resourced and showed the highest rate of increase of TB. Direct referral from radiology, sputum from primary care and outreach workers were cited as important in TB control. CONCLUSION: TB control programmes depend on adequate numbers of specialist TB nurses for early detection and case-holding.Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/9/127.


Assuntos
Cidades/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Tuberculose Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Corpo Clínico/provisão & distribuição , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Tuberculose Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Prim Care Respir J ; 19(1): 21-7, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20157684

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The identification and management of adults presenting with pneumonia is a major challenge for primary care health professionals. This paper summarises the key recommendations of the British Thoracic Society (BTS) Guidelines for the management of Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) in adults. METHOD: Systematic electronic database searches were conducted in order to identify potentially relevant studies that might inform guideline recommendations. Generic study appraisal checklists and an evidence grading from A+ to D were used to indicate the strength of the evidence upon which recommendations were made. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides definitions, key messages, and recommendations for handling the uncertainty surrounding the clinical diagnosis, assessing severity, management, and follow-up of patients with CAP in the community setting. Diagnosis and decision on hospital referral in primary care is based on clinical judgement and the CRB-65 score. Unlike some other respiratory infections (e.g. acute bronchitis) an antibiotic is always indicated when a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia is made. Timing of initial review will be determined by disease severity. When there is a delay in symptom or radiographic resolution beyond six weeks, the main concern is whether the CAP was a complication of an underlying condition such as lung cancer.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Médicos de Família , Pneumonia Bacteriana/prevenção & controle , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sociedades Médicas , Reino Unido
4.
N Engl J Med ; 352(9): 865-74, 2005 Mar 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15745977

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intrapleural fibrinolytic agents are used in the drainage of infected pleural-fluid collections. This use is based on small trials that did not have the statistical power to evaluate accurately important clinical outcomes, including safety. We conducted a trial to clarify the therapeutic role of intrapleural streptokinase. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, 454 patients with pleural infection (defined by the presence of purulent pleural fluid or pleural fluid with a pH below 7.2 with signs of infection or by proven bacterial invasion of the pleural space) were randomly assigned to receive either intrapleural streptokinase (250,000 IU twice daily for three days) or placebo. Patients received antibiotics and underwent chest-tube drainage, surgery, and other treatment as part of routine care. The number of patients in the two groups who had died or needed surgical drainage at three months was compared (the primary end point); secondary end points were the rates of death and of surgery (analyzed separately), the radiographic outcome, and the length of the hospital stay. RESULTS: The groups were well matched at baseline. Among the 427 patients who received streptokinase or placebo, there was no significant difference between the groups in the proportion of patients who died or needed surgery (with streptokinase: 64 of 206 patients [31 percent]; with placebo: 60 of 221 [27 percent]; relative risk, 1.14 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.54; P=0.43), a result that excluded a clinically significant benefit of streptokinase. There was no benefit to streptokinase in terms of mortality, rate of surgery, radiographic outcomes, or length of the hospital stay. Serious adverse events (chest pain, fever, or allergy) were more common with streptokinase (7 percent, vs. 3 percent with placebo; relative risk, 2.49 [95 percent confidence interval, 0.98 to 6.36]; P=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: The intrapleural administration of streptokinase does not improve mortality, the rate of surgery, or the length of the hospital stay among patients with pleural infection.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Pleurais/tratamento farmacológico , Estreptoquinase/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções Bacterianas/mortalidade , Infecções Bacterianas/cirurgia , Terapia Combinada , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Drenagem , Empiema Pleural/tratamento farmacológico , Empiema Pleural/mortalidade , Empiema Pleural/cirurgia , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Instilação de Medicamentos , Tempo de Internação , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Pleurais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Pleurais/mortalidade , Doenças Pleurais/cirurgia , Pneumonia/complicações , Radiografia , Estreptoquinase/efeitos adversos , Reino Unido
5.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 10(1): 59-64, 2004 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15166851

RESUMO

Community-acquired pneumonia remains a common and serious condition worldwide. Severe community-acquired pneumonia requiring ICU admission is a distinct entity with different pathogens, outcomes, and management. The mortality rate in severe community-acquired pneumonia can be more than 50%. Over the past decade, some international guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia have been developed in an attempt to optimize patient care. These guidelines have developed prediction tools to direct clinicians in the management of community-acquired pneumonia, including when to admit a patient to the ICU and selecting appropriate investigations and antimicrobial therapy. The individual recommendations of these guidelines and the guidelines as a whole require further studies.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pneumonia Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Chlamydophila pneumoniae , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Prevalência , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...