A novel Movement Amplification environment reveals effects of controlling lateral centre of mass motion on gait stability and metabolic cost.

During human walking, the centre of mass (COM) laterally oscillates, regularly transitioning its position above the two alternating support limbs. To maintain upright forward-directed walking, lateral COM excursion should remain within the base of support, on average. As necessary, humans can modify COM motion through various methods, including foot placement. How the nervous system controls these oscillations and the costs associated with control are not fully understood. To examine how lateral COM motions are controlled, healthy participants walked in a 'Movement Amplification' force field that increased lateral COM momentum in a manner dependent on the participant's own motion (forces were applied to the pelvis proportional to and in the same direction as lateral COM velocity). We hypothesized that metabolic cost to control lateral COM motion would increase with the gain of the field. In the Movement Amplification field, participants were significantly less stable than during baseline walking. Stability significantly decreased as the field gain increased. Participants also modified gait patterns, including increasing step width, which increased the metabolic cost of transport as the field gain increased. These results support previous research suggesting that humans modulate foot placement to control lateral COM motion, incurring a metabolic cost.

Cardiopulmonary Responses During Clinical and Laboratory Gait Assessments in People With Chronic Stroke.

Background: The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a common clinical assessment used to evaluate locomotor function in patients after stroke. Previous work suggests the 6MWT can estimate peak metabolic capacity (VO2peak) without cardiorespiratory assessments during graded exercise tests (GXTs), which may assist with exercise prescription. However, selected research also indicated increased heart rates (HRs) during 6MWTs beyond levels considered safe without GXTs. Objective: The goal of this study was to examine cardiorespiratory responses during 6MWTs and GXTs in individuals with chronic stroke and their associations with demographic or clinical characteristics. Design: The study used a cross-sectional observational design. Methods: Cardiorespiratory responses were assessed during 6MWTs at self-selected velocity (SSV) and fastest velocity (FV), and during GXTs. Secondary assessments included the lower extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Functional Gait Assessment, gait speeds, and daily stepping activity. Correlation and regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between locomotor performance, cardiorespiratory responses, and clinical and demographic characteristics. Results: Average HRs during 6MWT-FV were 72% to 76% of the age-predicted maximum (HRmax), with 20% of participants exceeding 85% predicted HRmax. When normalized to HRs during GXTs, HRs during 6MWT-FV were 86% to 88% of observed HRmax. Primary predictors of increased HRs during 6MWTs were resting HR, body mass index, and daily stepping. Distance during 6MWT-FV was a significant predictor of VO2peak in combination with other variables. Electrocardiographic abnormalities were observed in >80% of participants at rest and 31% demonstrated distinct abnormalities during GXTs, which were not related to 6MWT or GXT performance. Limitations: In addition to sample size, a primary limitation involved the ability to accurately predict or measure HRmax in patients with motor dysfunction after stroke. Conclusions: Cardiac responses were higher than anticipated during 6MWTs and often exceeded recommended HR thresholds. Clinicians should closely monitor cardiorespiratory responses during 6MWTs.

Access to exercise and its relation to cardiovascular health and gene expression in laboratory animals.

The interaction between genes and environment can influence cardiovascular disease (CVD). This 16 month study investigated if genes associated with cardiovascular (CV) regulation were expressed differently in animals having: 1) no access to physical activity or exercise (SED), 2) access to hour-long, twice weekly activity (PA), and 3) access every-other-day to a running wheel (EX). Out of 31,000 genes, a CV subset comprising 44 genes was investigated. Ten genes from this subset were expressed differently in EX compared with SED, and 34 genes were expressed differently in PA compared with SED (p<0.05). Total cholesterol (70+/-8 vs. 101+/-9 mg dl(-1)), triglycerides (104+/-8 vs. 127+/-4 mg dl(-1)), resting systolic blood pressure (130+/-3 vs. 141+/-3 mmHg), mean arterial pressure (110+/-2 vs. 120+/-2 mmHg) and heart rate (380+/-6 vs. 405+/-9 beats min(-1)) were lower in EX compared with SED (p<0.05), but intracellular adhesion molecule levels did not differ among groups. Mean gene expressions for Gja1, Fdft1, Edn1, Cd36, and Hmgb2 differed in animals according to access to physical activity. These genes play roles in heart rate, cholesterol biosynthesis, blood pressure, cell adhesion, and transcription and neurogenesis regulation, respectively. In conclusion, a total of 44 CV genes were expressed differently in SED compared to PA and EX; and SED showed more physiological evidence of CVD.

Exercise improves biomarkers of health and stress in animals fed ad libitum.

Voluntary and forced exercise decrease morbidity and mortality in laboratory animals. Caloric restriction has similar effects on health and unique benefits on life span. Nonetheless, in most experiments, animals do not have access to physical activity and are fed ad libitum (AL). We hypothesized that with regular access to either unlimited running wheel exercise (EX) or limited physical activity (PA), key biomarkers of health would be enhanced enough to counter some consequences of a sedentary AL lifestyle. This 16-month study compared body weight, tumor number and size, tissue lesions, oxidative stress, and reactive stress in (1) sedentary animals with no access to physical activity (SED); (2) animals with access to hour-long, twice weekly activity in a large box (PA); and (3) animals with access every other day to a running wheel (EX). At the end of the study, EX body weight was 8-9% lower than PA and SED. In addition, EX had no kidney lesions versus 50% in PA and SED, and had smaller tumor size (10+/-2 vs. 14+/-4 and 30+/-4 mm). Exhaustive exercise lowered glutathione/oxidized glutathione ratio in EX and PA, but in SED, the ratio was depressed even in resting animals. In all treatments, prolactin (PRL) levels were lower in resting animals than in acutely exercised animals. In conclusion, EX had the most favorable health biomarkers while SED had the least. PA did not confer gross health benefits different than the SED group, but was biochemically more similar to EX animals.