Intramuscular injection of insulin lispro or soluble human insulin: pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics in Type 2 diabetes.

AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of insulin lispro and soluble human insulin following intramuscular (i.m.) injection in patients with Type 2 diabetes with secondary failure of sulphonylureas. METHODS: Single 15-U i.m. doses of insulin lispro or soluble human insulin were administered to 16 patients in a two-way, randomized, crossover design. Glucodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined over 6 h after insulin injection using clamp techniques. RESULTS: Insulin C(max) was significantly higher (971 +/- 217 vs. 659 +/- 141 pmol/l, P < 0.001) and T(max) was significantly shorter (46.9 +/- 27 vs. 94.7 +/- 50.1 min, P = 0.002) with insulin lispro. Glucose infusion rate (GIR) curves showed clear separation 20 min after injection and were significantly greater for insulin lispro during the 40-60, 60-80 and 80-100-minute time intervals. Total glucose infused was only approximately 5% larger with insulin lispro during the 6-h follow-up, due to lower insulinaemia at later time points. The glucose R(max) and TR(max) were not statistically different between insulin treatments. CONCLUSION: This study shows that i.m. injection of insulin lispro is followed by its more rapid absorption, which results in stronger metabolic effect in the first 2 h when compared with soluble human insulin under the same test conditions. Diabet. Med. 18, 562-566 (2001)

Graphical human insulin time-activity profiles using standardized definitions.

The purpose of this study was to (1) develop consistent definitions to report time-activity profiles of insulin formulations, (2) determine human insulin time-activity profiles based on all available pharmacokinetic studies of biosynthetic human insulin rDNA(E. coli) (Humulin), and (3) create graphs that accurately and usefully represent human insulin time-activity profiles (TAPs). Standard definitions of onset, peak, duration, and time of 50% maximal activity were developed for human insulin. Results from all pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies available on human insulin from searches of both published literature and unpublished work were analyzed by these standard methods. Data obtained using these definitions were used to construct diagrams of the time-activity relationships for each formulation. Sixty-three insulin tests utilizing a variety of methodologies and data analysis techniques were located. Time-activity curves generated by application of standardized definitions varied depending on methodology, and on whether glucose, insulin and/or glucose infusion rates were used as the measure of insulin activity. A method of standard analysis is required for evaluating insulin pharmacokinetic studies due to the wide variation in design of these studies. Graphic representation of ranges obtained by standard analysis of onset, peak, duration, and 50% maximal activity increase the information transmitted when compared to currently used tables of time-activity data. The time of 50% maximal activity during increasing and decreasing phases may be a better marker of clinically significant activity than the classically defined parameters of onset and duration.

Population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA) in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium in cancer patients enrolled in four different open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized phase II studies. METHODS: Pemetrexed disodium was administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion (600 mg/m2) every 21 days. A total of four blood samples were to be collected each cycle per patient (n= 103 patients) during cycles 1 and 3. Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effect modeling using NONMEM to estimate pemetrexed disodium pharmacokinetic parameters (mean, and between- and within-patient variability) as well as relationships between the pharmacokinetic parameters and various patient-specific factors (demographic and physiologic data). RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed disodium were best characterized by a two-compartment model with initial distribution and terminal elimination half-lives of 0.63 h and 2.73 h, respectively. The typical value of systemic clearance (CL) in liters per hour included a relationship to creatinine clearance (CrCL) with a slope of 0.0292. Typical values of central volume (V(c)), distributional CL (Q), and peripheral volume (V(p)) were 11.3 1, 3.21 l/h, and 5.20 l, respectively. Between-patient variability was 19.6%, 15.6%, and 21.7% for CL, V(c), and V(p), respectively. A combined additive/proportional error model was used to describe residual variability, with a coefficient of variation of 23.7% for the proportional component and a standard deviation of 0.0410 microg/ml for the additive component. Significant patient-specific factors on CL were calculated CrCL, body weight, and to a lesser extent alanine transaminase and folate deficiency. Gender and body weight were significant factors on V(c) while both body surface area and albumin were significant factors on V(p). In conclusion, population pharmacokinetic modeling revealed relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and various patient specific factors.

Improved postprandial glycemic control with Humalog Mix75/25 after a standard test meal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: This double-blind study was designed to compare the postprandial glucodynamic profile of Humalog Mix75/25, a new premixed insulin analogue containing 75% neutral protamine lispro and 25% insulin lispro with that of human insulin 70/30 (70% neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin and 30% regular human insulin) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. BACKGROUND: Insulin lispro Mix75/25 (Mix75/25) is the first available insulin formulation in which both the rapid-acting and basal components are insulin analogues. METHODS: This randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover study monitored patients' postprandial glucodynamic response to Mix75/25 and human insulin 70/30 (70/30) after a standard test meal. Eighty-four patients with type 2 diabetes participated in this study and were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment sequence groups. Patients received an identical test meal on 4 occasions, completing 2 test meals for each treatment. Equal doses of Mix75/25 or 70/30 were administered 5 minutes before each of the 2 test meals, with doses individualized for each patient. Blood samples were collected for 4 hours after the meal for measurement of plasma glucose. From these plasma glucose measurements, fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose (2pp), 2-hour postprandial glucose excursion (2pp(ex)), maximum glucose excursion (Gex(max)), the area under the glucose concentration versus time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUC4), and the area under the glucose excursion versus time curve from 0 to 4 hours (AUCex4) were calculated. RESULTS: Because of significant differences in the baseline fasting plasma glucose levels between Mix75/25 and 70/30 (Mix75/25: 8.9+/-2.2 mmol/L [160.2+/-39.6 mg/dL]; 70/30: 8.6+/-1.9 mmol/L [154+/-34 mg/dL), analyses of the excursion parameters provide a truer comparison of the glucodynamic response between insulin formulations. Mix75/25 resulted in significantly lower values for 2pp(ex) (3.35+/-2.28 vs 4.13+/-2.26 mmol/L), Gex(max) (4.51+/-1.88 vs 5.19+/-1.98 mmol/L), and AUCex4 (8.01+/-7.02 vs 10.6+/-6.47 mmol x h/L) compared with 70/30. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, premeal injection of Mix75/25 resulted in better postprandial glycemic control than did premeal injection of 70/30 in the 4 hours after a standard meal. Mix75/25 is a valuable option for managing postprandial blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who require insulin.

Humalog Mix25 offers better mealtime glycemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

To compare the postprandial glucodynamics of Humalog Mix25, (Humalog Mix75/25 in the US; Mix25), to human insulin 30/70 (Humulin 70/30 in the US; 30/70) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Ninety-three patients with type 1 diabetes and 84 patients with type 2 diabetes were evaluated in two separate but identical protocols using a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover design. Patients consumed test meals 5 minutes after equal doses of Mix25 or 30/70. Plasma glucose was measured at baseline and 15 minute intervals for 4 hours after the meal. Two-hour postprandial glucose (2pp), 2-hour glucose excursion (2pp(ex) ), glucose versus time area under the curve 0 to 4 hours (AUC(0-4) ) and glucose excursion area under the curve 0 to 2 and 0 to 4 hours (AUCex(0-2), AUCex(0-4) ) were calculated. For the combined patient population, Mix25 resulted in significantly lower 2pp (12.45 +/- 3.59 vs. 13.47 +/- 3.62 mmol/L; p <0.001), AUC(0-4) (44.45 +/- 12.20 vs. 47.25 +/- 11.97 mmol x h/L; p <0.001), and glucose excursion parameters: 2pp(ex) (3.20 +/- 2.72 vs. 4.40 +/- 2.81 mmol/L; p <0.001), AUCex(0-2) (5.45 +/- 3.15 vs 6.60 +/- 3.13 mmol x h/L; p <0.001), and AUCex(0-4) (7.57 +/- 8.37 vs. 11.02 +/- 8.47 mmol x h/L; p <0.001) compared to 30/70. Further analysis of the treatment by type of diabetes indicated that Mix25 provided nearly identical glucose excursion responses in type 1 and type 2 diabetes up to 2 hours after the test meal, in contrast to 30/70. Pre-meal injection of Mix25 resulted in lower postprandial blood glucose levels compared to 30/70. The postprandial blood glucose response following Mix25 was similar in patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic comparisons of recombinant and animal-source glucagon after IV, IM, and SC injection in healthy volunteers.

The structure of the hormone glucagon is identical among humans and several species of other mammals. Equivalence of recombinant glucagon (rG) to animal-source glucagon (aG) was assessed in this two-part, open-label, randomized study. Part I was a four-way crossover intravenous dose-ranging study of rG (pH 2.8) involving 12 subjects. Part II was a six-way crossover study of 29 subjects comparing rG (diluent pH 2.0 and 2.8) with aG administered subcutaneously (sc) and intramuscularly (im). Maximum glucagon plasma concentrations (C(max)) and area under the glucagon concentration curve (AUC) were calculated. Additionally, maximum blood glucose concentrations (BG(max)), maximum absolute BG excursion (MAE), and area under the glucose concentration curve from time of dosing to return to baseline (AUC(rtb)) were calculated. The primary focus was equivalence of the formulation intended for marketing (rG pH 2.0) to aG. Administration of rG pH 2.0 through the im route demonstrated equivalence to aG for all pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic comparisons. Subcutaneous administration of rG pH 2.0 demonstrated standard bioequivalence for AUC (5.87 versus 6.63 ng x h/mL; NS) and near equivalence for C(max) (7.94 versus 9.12 ng/mL; p < 0.05). rG pH 2.0 showed glucodynamic equivalence to aG (BG(max), 136 versus 133 mg/dL; MAE, 50.0 versus 47.4 mg/dL, respectively) and statistically greater AUC(rtb) values (151 versus 126 mg x h/dL, p < 0. 05). rG and aG were equally safe and well tolerated. In conclusion, rG provides equivalent safety and efficacy to aG.

A phase I evaluation of multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231514), administered every 21 days, utilizing the modified continual reassessment method for dose escalation.

PURPOSE: To determine toxicities, maximally tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic profile, and potential antitumor activity of MTA, a novel antifolate compound which inhibits the enzymes thymidylate synthase (TS), glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT), and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were given MTA intravenously over 10 min every 21 days. Dose escalation was based on the modified continual reassessment method (MCRM), with one patient treated at each minimally toxic dose level. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (27 males, 10 females, median age 59 years, median performance status 90%) were treated with 132 courses at nine dose levels, ranging from 50 to 700 mg/m(2). The MTD of MTA was 600 mg/m(2), with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and cumulative fatigue as the dose-limiting toxicities. Hematologic toxicity correlated with renal function and mild reversible renal dysfunction was observed in multiple patients. Other nonhematologic toxicities observed included mild to moderate fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, mucositis, rash, and reversible hepatic transaminase elevations. Three patients expired due to drug-related complications. Pharmacokinetic analysis during the first course of treatment at the 600 mg/m(2) dose level demonstrated a mean harmonic half-life, maximum plasma concentration (Cpmax), clearance (CL), area under the curve (AUC), and apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) of 3.08 h, 137 microg/ml, 40.0 ml/min per m(2), 266 microg. h/ml, and 7.0 l/m(2), respectively. An average of 78% of the compound was excreted unchanged in the urine. Partial responses were achieved in two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and in two patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Minor responses were obtained in six patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD and dose for phase II clinical trials of MTA when administered intravenously over 10 min every 21 days was 600 mg/m(2). MTA is a promising new anticancer agent.

Sensitive RIA for the specific determination of insulin lispro.

Insulin lispro is an insulin analog in which the primary sequence has been altered by the inversion of amino acids B28 and B29. To date, it has not been possible to specifically measure insulin lispro in the presence of endogenous insulin because of the high degree of homology between these peptides. However, the specific determination of insulin lispro offers advantages over quantifying total concentrations of immunoreactive insulin. We therefore immunized guinea pigs and screened for antibodies with increased affinity and selectivity for insulin lispro. We prepared a monospecific antiserum by a novel immunoadsorption strategy using despentapeptide insulin. The antiserum was used to develop a competitive RIA for insulin lispro. The RIA has a low limit of quantification (17.2 pmol/L); has no interference from insulin, proinsulin, or C-peptide; and has interassay CVs of 2.6-13.4%. The new RIA is useful for measuring serum concentrations of insulin lispro.

The action profile of lispro is not blunted by mixing in the syringe with NPH insulin.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of mixing the insulin analog lispro (Humalog) with NPH (Humulin I) before injection on lispro's fast, short action profile. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 12 healthy volunteers received subcutaneous abdominal injections of 0.1 U/kg regular insulin and 0.2 U/kg NPH insulin as follows: lispro and NPH injected separately (treatment group A), lispro and NPH mixed in the syringe up to 2 min before single injection (treatment group B), and human regular insulin and NPH mixed and injected as in group B (treatment group C), on separate occasions, in random order. Plasma glucose was maintained for 12 h by intravenous 20% glucose. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were compared by analysis of variance for repeated measures. RESULTS: Peak plasma insulin levels (2.6 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.6 ng/ml, P = 0.075), total glucose infused (121.5 +/- 32.8 vs. 135.0 +/- 49.0 vs. 117.3 +/- 39.9 mg.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.53), and maximum glucose infusion rate (GIRmax) (8.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 8.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 7.1 +/- 2.4 mg.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.65) were not significantly different between treatments. The times until peak insulin concentrations were similar in treatment groups A and B, but significantly shorter than in treatment group C (0.9 +/- 0.3 and 1.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.4 h, respectively, P = 0.042). The times until GIRmax were also not different (113.9 +/- 41 and 122.0 +/- 45 vs. 209.0 +/- 51.3 min, respectively, P = 0.002). The glucose infusion rate (GIR) then fell to 50% GIRmax more quickly in treatment groups A and B than in treatment group C (239.9 +/- 40.5 vs. 292.4 +/- 133.3 vs. 399.5 +/- 78.3, respectively, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The action profile of lispro is not attenuated by mixing lispro with NPH in the syringe immediately before injection. The advantages are available to those individuals who need to combine types of insulin before injection to achieve optimal diabetes control.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of LY231514, the multitargeted antifolate.

LY231514 is a novel antifolate that principally inhibits thymidylate synthase, but with additional folate-dependent enzyme targets. A Phase I study of single-agent LY231514 administered as a daily i.v. infusion over 10 minutes for 5 days, repeated every 3 weeks, was conducted to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of the drug using this schedule. Thirty-eight patients with advanced malignancies that were refractory or not amenable to standard therapy were treated with a total of 116 courses of LY231514, escalating treatment doses through 10 dose levels, from 0.2-5.2 mg/m2/day. No objective clinical responses were observed, although minor antitumor activity not fulfilling the response criteria was seen in three patients. A maximum tolerated dose of 4.0 mg/m2/day was determined, with neutropenia as the predominant dose-limiting toxicity. Reversible disturbances of liver biochemistry, fulfilling the protocol definitions of dose-limiting toxicity, were also observed. Other toxicities included diarrhea, mucositis, skin rash, and fatigue. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed at all treatment levels. Analysis showed a linear relation between administered dose and both maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration/time curve. The drug was cleared with a day 1 total body clearance of 108.9 +/- 38.8 ml/min/m2, with plasma concentrations declining with a mean harmonic terminal half-life of 1.4 +/- 0.98 h. When given by this schedule, LY231514 is tolerable, and Phase II studies are in progress.

Injection site effects on the pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of insulin lispro and regular insulin.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of a new insulin analog, insulin lispro, and regular human insulin were compared and contrasted after subcutaneous administrations in femoral, deltoid, and abdominal injection sites. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Single 0.2 U/kg doses of insulin lispro and regular insulin were administered to 12 healthy subjects in a six-way randomized crossover fashion. Each dose was given after an overnight fast in one of three injection sites: abdominal, deltoid, or femoral. Study drugs were given during a manual euglycemic glucose clamp. Blood samples were collected over the 12-h clamp for measurement of insulin-reactive components, with pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic measurements derived from these serum insulin and clamp measurements. RESULTS: Glucodynamic comparisons between insulin lispro and regular insulin showed a greater maximum infusion rate (Rmax) at an earlier time (TRmax), regardless of injection site. The total glucose infused (Gtot) showed nearly identical values between sites for insulin lispro. Regular insulin showed greater Gtot values from deltoid and femoral injections. When comparisons were made between drugs, regular insulin produced significantly greater Gtot, primarily driven by the increased Gtot from deltoid and femoral injections. Greater maximum serum insulin concentrations (Cmax) were experienced with insulin lispro at earlier times (tmax), regardless of the injection site (P < 0.001). Abdominal administrations produced the greatest Cmax values at the earliest tmax for both regular insulin and insulin lispro. Deltoid and femoral injections had lower Cmax values for both compounds. Shifts also occurred with tmax, although these shifts were much greater with regular insulin than with insulin lispro. Equivalent area under the curve (AUC) values were found when compared between compounds. CONCLUSIONS: Slower absorption from deltoid and femoral administrations resulted in an increased duration of action for both regular insulin and insulin lispro when compared to abdominal administration. However, notable increases in the onset of action were only apparent with regular insulin. The consistency with insulin lispro response from abdominal and extremity injection sites allows more potential sites for subcutaneous injection with an assured rapid response.

Initial phase I evaluation of the novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor, LY231514, using the modified continual reassessment method for dose escalation.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, maximal-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic profile, and potential antitumor activity of LY231514, a novel thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were administered LY231514 intravenously over 10 minutes, weekly for 4 weeks, every 42 days. Dose escalation was based on the modified continual reassessment method (MCRM), with one patient treated at each minimally toxic dose level. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in all patients. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were administered 58 courses of LY231514 at doses that ranged from 10 to 40 mg/m2/wk. Reversible neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Inability to maintain the weekly treatment schedule due to neutropenia limited dose escalation on this schedule. Nonhematologic toxicities observed included mild fatigue, anorexia, and nausea. At the 40-mg/m2/wk dose level, the mean harmonic half-life, maximum plasma concentration, clearance, and apparent volume of distribution at steady-state were 2.02 hours, 11.20 micrograms/mL, 52.3 mL/min/m2, and 6.64 L/m2, respectively. No major antitumor responses were observed; however, minor responses were achieved in two patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: The dose-limiting toxicity, MTD, and recommended phase II dose of LY231514 when administered weekly for 4 weeks every 42 days are neutropenia, 40 mg/m2, and 30 mg/m2, respectively.

[Lys(B28), Pro(B29)]-human insulin: effect of injection time on postprandial glycemia.

BACKGROUND: [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)]-human insulin (lispro) is an insulin analogue with a reduced capacity for self-association and faster absorption from subcutaneous injection sites. We hypothesized that administration of lispro closer to a meal would result in better glucose control than that achieved with regular insulin. METHODS: This trial used a randomized crossover design that consisted of a period of metabolic stabilization lasting 9 days followed by an evaluation period lasting 5 days. The patients received weight-maintenance diets, and insulin doses were adjusted as needed. Calorie intake, insulin dose, and activities were kept constant once the evaluation period began. During the evaluation period, we varied the time between insulin injection and mealtime and assessed glucose control. RESULTS: During the evaluation period, the lowest mean glucose concentrations were 117.9 mg/dl for lispro and 119.8 mg/dl (p = 0.817) for regular insulin. To obtain these, we gave lispro, on average, 22.5 minutes before meals and regular insulin 63.8 minutes before meals (p = 0.006). A similar pattern was evident throughout the glucose control parameters. The exception was mean amplitude of glucose excursion, which was lower after lispro (59 versus 75 mg/dl; p = 0.007) compared with regular insulin. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved equal or slightly better glucose control, as reflected by mean amplitude of glucose excursion, with insulin lispro given much closer to meal time than that achieved with regular insulin. As a result of these findings, we propose that a rapidly absorbed analogue of insulin is capable of achieving better control of postprandial glucose at a more convenient injection time.

Comparative pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of two human insulin mixtures. 70/30 and 50/50 insulin mixtures.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast the pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of two insulin mixtures, one of 50% NPH human insulin and 50% Regular human insulin (50/50) and one of 70% NPH human insulin and 30% Regular human insulin (70/30), in healthy male volunteers after subcutaneous administrations of 0.3 U/kg. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We administered single doses of 50/50 and 70/30 insulins to 18 volunteers in a randomized crossover fashion. All subjects received 0.3 U/kg of each mixture separated by at least 7 days. Each dose was given after an overnight fast and during a glucose clamp to maintain a euglycemic state. We measured serum insulin and C-peptide concentrations through frequent blood sampling after each treatment. Pharmacokinetic measurements were calculated from insulin data corrected for C-peptide, including maximum insulin concentration (Cmax), time to maximum insulin concentration (tmax), terminal rate constant (beta), area under the curve from 0 to infinity (AUCinfinity0), and mean residence time (MRT). Pharmacodynamic measurements were summarized from C-peptide concentrations (minimum C-peptide concentration [Cmin], time to minimum C-peptide concentration [tmin], area between the C-peptide baseline and the C-peptide suppression curve [AOCc], absolute maximal difference from baseline [Sdiff] and glucose clamp measurements. The glucose clamp measurements included maximum infusion rates (Rmax) and time to Rmax (TRmax) from glucose infusion rate (GIR) documentation, as well as cumulative glucose infused during the first 4 h ((0)4Gtot) and total glucose infused (Gtot) during the study. RESULTS: For the pharmacokinetic assessment, statistically greater values of insulin Cmax and beta were found for the 50/50 mixture, whereas the 70/30 mixture had a greater MRT. Statistical differences were also detected in glucodynamics, with greater values of Rmax and (0)4Gtot found with the 50/50 mixture. Notably, differences were not detected for insulin AUCinfinity0 and Gtot values. CONCLUSIONS: Higher insulin concentrations and a greater initial response were present with the 50/50 mixture, but the two mixtures had equivalent bioavailability and cumulative effects. These results support use of the 50/50 mixture in situations where greater initial glucose control is required.

[Lys(B28), Pro(B29)]-human insulin. A rapidly absorbed analogue of human insulin.

[Lys(B28, Pro(B29)]-human insulin (LYSPRO) is an insulin analogue in which the natural amino acid sequence of the B-chain at positions 28 and 29 is inverted. These changes result in an insulin molecule with a greatly reduced capacity for self-association in solution. These clinical studies were designed to compare LYSPRO with human Regular insulin after subcutaneous injection in humans. We wanted to evaluate the effect of adding zinc to LYSPRO on its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In addition, we compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LYSPRO and human Regular insulin after subcutaneous injection to those of human Regular insulin given intravenously. Thus, we compared four treatments: solutions of zinc-free LYSPRO given subcutaneously (A), zinc-containing LYSPRO given subcutaneously (B), human Regular insulin given subcutaneously (C), and human Regular insulin given intravenously (D). We gave a 10-U dose of each treatment to 10 healthy (nondiabetic) men during glucose clamps. Serum insulin concentrations peaked more than two times higher (maximum serum insulin level [Cmax], 698 vs. 308 pM, A vs. C) and in less than half the time (time to Cmax [Tmax], 42 vs. 101 min, A vs. C) after subcutaneous injection of zinc-free LYSPRO. At the same time, the glucose infusion rate peaked in about half the time (time to maximum glucose infusion rate [TRmax], 99 vs. 179 min, A vs. C) and was slightly but not significantly higher (maximum glucose infusion rate [Rmax], 3.1 vs. 2.2 mmol/min, A vs. C) than that of human Regular insulin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Establishment of time-action profiles for regular and NPH insulin using pharmacodynamic modeling.

OBJECTIVE: To provide distinct definitions and quantify the establishment of onset, peak, and duration of action for insulins. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We administered single subcutaneous doses of 10 U regular insulin to 10 volunteer subjects and 25 U NPH insulin to 6 healthy male volunteer subjects on separate occasions. Each dose was given after an overnight fast during a glucose clamp to maintain an euglycemic state. We measured serum insulin concentrations and glucose infusion rates (GIR) from frequent blood sampling after each treatment. Serum insulin concentrations were related to GIR values at each collection time and a counter-clockwise hysteresis resulted. An effect compartment model was used to simultaneously describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of each insulin and to resolve the hysteresis. RESULTS: From the resulting relationship, GIR could then be predicted, with onset and duration of action reflecting the time when effect compartment concentrations initially exceeded then declined below a 10% maximum possible effect (Emax) level. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals were constructed allowing a predictive range of values. For regular insulin, a mean onset of 0.75 h, peak of 2 h, and duration of 6 h was estimated. Mean values were also produced with NPH, with an onset of 3 h, peak of 6-7 h, and a duration of 13 h estimated. CONCLUSIONS: This method estimates the onset, peak, and duration of insulin action. Although these estimates were from single doses, we believe they can provide good estimations of insulin activity.

Comparative bioavailability of a sustained-release ion-exchange hydralazine product with a potassium (cation) challenge.

A sustained-release formulation of hydralazine was manufactured by binding hydralazine to an ion-exchange resin and coating the drug-resin complex with a semipermeable membrane. Because the sustained-release characteristics are due in part to displacement of drug from the drug-resin complex by gastrointestinal ions, the stability of the sustained-release formulation could be compromised if challenged by a high concentration of ions. In this study, 12 healthy male volunteers participated in a two-way crossover trial that was designed to test the bioavailability and release of drug from the sustained-release formulation both with and without concomitant ingestion of a solution of KCl. Blood samples were collected over a 14-h period after administration of either treatment. Analysis of whole blood for hydralazine and comparison of the values of the area under the curve of the concentration of hydralazine versus time, the maximum concentration of hydralazine, and the time to reach the maximum concentration between the two experimental groups showed that KCl had no influence on the bioavailability or release characteristics of hydralazine from the sustained-release formulation.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics and antibacterial activity of daptomycin, a new lipopeptide antibiotic, in healthy volunteers.

Three separate single-dose studies were performed to define the disposition and pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in healthy volunteers. Daptomycin was administered as a single 14C-labeled dose (1.0 mg/kg of body weight) and as single doses between 0.5 and 6.0 mg/kg. All doses were intravenous. Antibacterial activity was determined from doses of 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, and 6.0 mg/kg against two strains of Staphylococcus aureus (one methicillin resistant) and one Enterococcus strain. After administration of 14C-labeled daptomycin, recovery of 14C in urine and feces accounted for 83% of the administered dose, with the greatest fraction (78%) appearing in the urine. Specific analysis for daptomycin in both urine and plasma indicated that metabolic products were present in urine, but total 14C in plasma consisted of daptomycin only. Doses between 0.5 and 6 mg/kg were linear, with a limited total body clearance (0.13 to 0.21 ml/min/kg) and a small volume of distribution (0.10 to 0.15 liter/kg). The small volume of distribution may be a factor of the high plasma protein binding (90 to 95%). Renal clearance made up 34 to 54% of total body clearance. Daptomycin demonstrated in vivo antibacterial activity against all three test strains, with the greatest activity observed against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. The predicted MIC for all three strains was approximately 13 micrograms/ml, corresponding to total (bound plus unbound) drug. On the basis of the drug's pharmacokinetics and antibacterial activity, doses of 4 to 6 mg/kg/day, possibly in divided doses, are predicted to be effective.