Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 260: 113558, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37321287
2.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 24(12): e573-e583, 2023 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37346003

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether change in functional status from pre-hospitalization baseline to hospital discharge is associated with long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) among children surviving septic shock. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of Life After Pediatric Sepsis Evaluation (LAPSE), a prospective cohort study of children with community-acquired septic shock, enrolled from January 2014 to June 2017. SETTING: Twelve U.S. academic PICUs. PATIENTS: Children, 1 month to 18 years, who survived to hospital discharge and had follow-up data for HRQL at 3 and/or 12 months. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Functional Status Scale (FSS) was assessed around enrollment to ascertain baseline status (pre-hospitalization) and at 28 days or hospital discharge. Two measures of HRQL were utilized: children with significant development delay were measured with the Functional Status II-R (FSII-R); typically, developing children were measured with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). Each group was analyzed separately with multivariable regression modeling to determine the association between change in FSS from baseline to day 28 and HRQL at 3 and 12 months from PICU admission. Of the original 389 LAPSE participants, 224 (58%) are included. Among children with developmental delay ( n = 88), worsened FSS was associated with lower FSII-R at 3 months from PICU admission (-2.02; 95% CI, -3.34 to -0.0.71; p = 0.003), but not 12 months. Among developmentally typical children ( n = 136), worsened FSS was associated with lower PedsQL at both 3 and 12 months. Developmentally typical children with a neurologic insult during the PICU stay had the largest decrement in PedsQL at 12 months (-14.04 mo; 95% CI, -22.15 to -5.94 mo; p < 0.001). However, worsened FSS remained associated with poor HRQL-PedsQL at 3 and 12 months, after controlling for neurologic events (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Change in FSS during hospitalization for septic shock is associated with long-term reductions in HRQL and could serve as a useful tool for identifying children at risk for this sequela.


Assuntos
Sepse , Choque Séptico , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Choque Séptico/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Prospectivos , Estado Funcional , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Alta do Paciente , Sobreviventes , Hospitais
3.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(8): 562-568, 2023 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36688499

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Many academic pediatric emergency departments (PEDs) have successfully implemented pediatric septic shock care pathways. However, many general emergency departments (GEDs), who see the majority of pediatric ED visits, have not. This study aims to compare the workflow, resources, communication, and decision making across these 2 settings to inform the future implementation of a standardized care pathway for children with septic shock in the GED. METHODS: We used the critical incident technique to conduct semistructured interviews with 24 ED physicians, nurses, and technicians at one PED and 2 GEDs regarding pediatric septic shock care. We performed a thematic analysis using the Framework Method to develop our coding schema through inductive and deductive analyses. We continued an iterative process of revising the schema until we reached consensus agreement and thematic saturation. RESULTS: We identified the following 6 themes: (1) functioning like a "well-oiled machine" may be key to high performance; (2) experiencing the sequence of care for children with sepsis as invariant and predictable may be essential to high-quality performance; (3) resilience and flexibility are characteristic of high levels of performance; (4) believing that "the buck stops here" may contribute to more accountability; (5) continuous system learning is essential; and (6) computerized clinical decision support may not be optimized to drive decision-making at the point of care. Commentary from GED and PED participants differed across the 6 themes, providing insight into the approach for standardized care pathway implementation in GEDs. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric septic shock workflow, decision making, and system performance differ between the PED and GEDs. Implementation of a standardized care pathway in GEDs will require a tailored approach. Specific recommendations include (1) improving shared situation awareness; (2) simulation for knowledge, skill, and team-based training; and (3) promoting a culture of continuous learning.


Assuntos
Sepse , Choque Séptico , Criança , Humanos , Choque Séptico/terapia , Procedimentos Clínicos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
4.
Hosp Pediatr ; 12(12): 1048-1059, 2022 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36345706

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The pediatric sepsis literature lacks studies examining the inpatient setting, yet sepsis remains a leading cause of death in children's hospitals. More information is needed about sepsis arising in patients already hospitalized to improve morbidity and mortality outcomes. This study describes the clinical characteristics, process measures, and outcomes of inpatient sepsis cases compared with emergency department (ED) sepsis cases within the Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes data registry from 46 hospitals that care for children. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included Improving Pediatric Sepsis Outcomes sepsis cases from January 2017 to December 2019 with onset in inpatient or ED. We used descriptive statistics to compare inpatient and ED sepsis metrics and describe inpatient sepsis outcomes. RESULTS: The cohort included 26 855 cases; 8.4% were inpatient and 91.6% were ED. Inpatient cases had higher sepsis-attributable mortality (2.0% vs 1.4%, P = .025), longer length of stay after sepsis recognition (9 vs 5 days, P <.001), more intensive care admissions (57.6% vs 54.1%, P = .002), and greater average vasopressor use (18.0% vs 13.6%, P <.001) compared with ED. In the inpatient cohort, >40% of cases had a time from arrival to recognition within 12 hours. In 21% of cases, this time was >96 hours. Improved adherence to sepsis treatment bundles over time was associated with improved 30-day sepsis-attributable mortality for inpatients with sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient sepsis cases had longer lengths of stay, more need for intensive care, and higher vasopressor use. Sepsis-attributable mortality was significantly higher in inpatient cases compared with ED cases and improved with improved sepsis bundle adherence.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Sepse , Criança , Humanos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitais Pediátricos , Tempo de Internação
5.
Paediatr Drugs ; 24(3): 193-205, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35307800

RESUMO

Sepsis is a life-threatening response to infection that contributes significantly to neonatal and pediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide. The key tenets of care include early recognition of potential sepsis, rapid intervention with appropriate fluids to restore adequate tissue perfusion, and empiric antibiotics to cover likely pathogens. Vasoactive/inotropic agents are recommended if tissue perfusion and hemodynamics are inadequate following initial fluid resuscitation. Several adjunctive therapies have been suggested with theoretical benefit, though definitive recommendations are not yet supported by research reports. This review focuses on the recommendations for medication and fluid management of pediatric sepsis and septic shock, highlighting issues related to antibiotic choices and antimicrobial stewardship, selection of intravenous fluids for resuscitation, and selection and use of vasoactive/inotropic medications. Controversy remains regarding resuscitation fluid volume and type, antibiotic choices depending upon infectious risks in the patient's community, and adjunctive therapies such as vitamin C, corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and methylene blue. We include best practice recommendations based on international guidelines, a review of primary literature, and a discussion of ongoing clinical trials and the nuances of therapeutic choices.


Assuntos
Sepse , Choque Séptico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Hidratação , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Ressuscitação , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico
6.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(12): 1385-1394, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34849928

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the implementation of clinical pathways, known as pediatric rapid response algorithms, within an existing rapid response system was associated with an improvement in clinical outcomes of hospitalized children. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients admitted to the PICU as unplanned transfers from the general medical and surgical floors at a single, freestanding children's hospital between July 1, 2017, and January 31, 2020. We examined the impact of the algorithms on the rate of critical deterioration events. We used multivariable Poisson regression and an interrupted time series analysis to measure 2 possible types of change: an immediate implementation effect and an outcome trajectory over time. RESULTS: We identified 892 patients (median age: 4 [interquartile range: 1-12] years): 615 in the preimplementation group, and 277 in the postimplementation group. Algorithm implementation was not associated with an immediate change in the rate of critical deterioration events but was associated with a downward rate trajectory over time and a postimplementation trajectory that was significantly less than the preimplementation trajectory (trajectory difference of -0.28 events per 1000 non-ICU patient days per month; 95% confidence interval -0.40 to -0.16; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Algorithm implementation was associated with a decrease in the rate of critical deterioration events. Because of the study's observational nature, this association may have been driven by unmeasured confounding factors and the chosen implementation point. Nevertheless, the results are a promising start for future research into how clinical pathways within a rapid response system can improve care of hospitalized patients.


Assuntos
Criança Hospitalizada , Hospitais Pediátricos , Algoritmos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Hosp Pract (1995) ; 49(sup1): 413-421, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34404310

RESUMO

Pediatric sepsis is a common problem worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Best practice recommendations have been published by both the American College of Critical Care Medicine and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign to guide the recognition and treatment of pediatric sepsis. However, implementation of these recommendations can be challenging due to the complexity of the care required and intensity of resources needed to successfully implement programs. This paper outlines the experience with implementation of a pediatric sepsis quality improvement program at Primary Children's Hospital, a free-standing, quaternary care children's hospital in Salt Lake City. The hospital has implemented sepsis projects across multiple care settings. Challenges, lessons learned, and suggestions for implementation are described.PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYSepsis is a life-threatening condition that results from an inappropriate response to an infection by the body's immune system. All children are potentially susceptible to sepsis, with nearly 8,000 children dying from the disease in the US each year. Sepsis is a complicated disease, and several international groups have published guidelines to help hospital teams treat children with sepsis appropriately. However, because recognizing and treating sepsis in children is challenging and takes a coordinated effort from many different types of healthcare team members, following the international sepsis guidelines effectively can be difficult and resource intensive. This paper describes how one children's hospital (Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah) approached the challenge of implementing pediatric sepsis guidelines, some lessons learned from their experience, and suggestions for others interested in implementing sepsis guidelines for children.


Assuntos
Sepse , Choque Séptico , Criança , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sepse/terapia , Choque Séptico/terapia
9.
ASAIO J ; 66(10): 1152-1160, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33136603

RESUMO

Risk factors for mortality in children with refractory pediatric septic shock who are supported with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) are largely unknown. Therefore, we performed univariable and multivariable analyses to determine risk factors for mortality among children (<19 years) who underwent an ECLS run between January 2012 and September 2014 at eight tertiary pediatric hospitals, and who had septic shock based on 2005 International Consensus Criteria. Of the 514 children treated with ECLS during the study period, 70 were identified with septic shock. The mortality rate was similar between those with (54.3%) and without septic shock (43.7%). Among those with septic shock, significant risk factors for mortality included cardiac failure or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) as indication for ECLS cannulation compared with respiratory failure (P = 0.003), having a new neurologic event following cannulation (P = 0.032), acquiring a new infection following cannulation (P = 0.005), inability to normalize pH in the 48 hours following ECLS cannulation (P = 0.010), and requiring higher daily volume of platelet transfusions (P = 0.005). These findings can be used to help guide clinical decision making for children with septic shock that is refractory to medical management.


Assuntos
Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidade , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Choque Séptico/terapia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
10.
Hosp Pediatr ; 10(4): 311-317, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32122986

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: National guidelines advocate for the administration of antibiotics within 1 hour to children with septic shock, although there is variance in the pediatric evidence-based literature supporting this benchmark. Our objective for this study was to describe the association of target time to antibiotic administration (TTAA) with outcomes of children treated for suspected septic shock in a pediatric emergency department. Septic shock is suspected when signs of perfusion and/or hypotension are present. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included PICU admission, hospital and PICU length of stay, and organ dysfunction resolution by hospital day 2. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children <18 years of age admitted from the pediatric emergency department and treated for suspected septic shock between February 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015. Associations between TTAA and outcomes were evaluated by using multivariable linear and logistic regression models obtained from stepwise selection. RESULTS: Of 1377 patients, 47% were boys with a median age of 4.0 (interquartile range 1.4-11.6) years, 1.5% (20) died, 90% were compliant with TTAA goals, 40% required PICU admission, 38% had ≥2 unique complex chronic conditions, 71% received antibiotics in ≤2 hours, and 30% had a culture-positive bacterial etiology. There were no significant associations between TTAA and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found no association with TTAA and any clinical outcomes, adding to the growing body of literature questioning the timing benchmark of antibiotic administration. Although the importance of antibiotics is not in question, elucidating the target TTAA may improve resource use and decrease inappropriate or unnecessary antibiotic exposure.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico , Tempo para o Tratamento , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Benchmarking , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
J Pediatr Intensive Care ; 8(3): 122-129, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31404226

RESUMO

Severe sepsis (SS) in pediatric oncology patients is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. We investigated the incidence of and risk factors for morbidity and mortality among children diagnosed with cancer from 2008 to 2012, and admitted with SS during the 3 years following cancer diagnosis. A total of 1,002 children with cancer were included, 8% of whom required pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission with SS. Death and/or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome occurred in 34 out of 99 PICU encounters (34%). Lactate level and history of stem-cell transplantation were significantly associated with the development of death and/or organ dysfunction ( p < 0.05).

12.
J Pediatr ; 195: 213-219.e3, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29426688

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the variation in care and cost of spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to identify opportunities for improving healthcare value. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from the Pediatric Health Information Systems database, including children 11-18 years of age with AIS who underwent spinal fusion surgery between 2004 and 2015. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the relationships between hospital cost, patient outcomes, and resource use. RESULTS: There were 16 992 cases of AIS surgery identified. There was marked variation across hospitals in rates of intensive care unit admission (0.5%-99.2%), blood transfusions (0%-100%), surgical complications (1.8%-32.3%), and total hospital costs ($31 278-$90 379). Hospital cost was 32% higher at hospitals that most frequently admitted patients to the intensive care unit (P = .009), and 8% higher for each additional 25 operative cases per hospital (P = .003). Hospital duration of stay was shorter for patients admitted to hospitals with highest intensive care unit admission rates and higher surgical volumes. There was no association between cost and duration of stay, 30-day readmission, or surgical complications. The largest contribution to hospital charges was supplies (55%). Review of a single hospital's detailed cost accounting system also found supplies to be the greatest single contributor to cost, the majority of which were for spinal implants, accounting for 39% of total hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest contribution to AIS surgery cost was supplies, the majority of which is likely attributed to spinal implant costs. Opportunities for improving healthcare value should focus on controlling costs of spinal instrumentation, and improving quality of care with standardized treatment protocols.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escoliose/economia , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
16.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 6(1): 80-86, 2017 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26837956

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Septic shock remains an important cause of death and disability in children. Optimal care requires early recognition and treatment. METHODS: We evaluated a retrospective cohort of children (age <19) treated in our emergency department (ED) for septic shock during 2008-2012 to investigate the association between timing of antibiotic therapy and outcomes. The exposures were (1) receipt of empiric antibiotics in ≤1 hour and (2) receipt of appropriate antibiotics in ≤1 hour. The primary outcome was development of new or progressive multiple system organ dysfunction syndrome (NP-MODS). The secondary outcome was mortality. RESULTS: Among 321 patients admitted to intensive care, 48% (n = 153) received empiric antibiotics in ≤1 hour. These patients were more ill at presentation with significantly greater median pediatric index of mortality 2 (PIM2) scores and were more likely to receive recommended resuscitation in the ED (61% vs 14%); however, rates of NP-MODS (9% vs 12%) and hospital mortality (7% vs 4%) were similar to those treated later. Early, appropriate antibiotics were administered to 33% (n = 67) of patients with identified or suspected bacterial infection. These patients had significantly greater PIM2 scores but similar rates of NP-MODS (15% vs 15%) and hospital mortality (10% vs 6%) to those treated later. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill children with septic shock treated in a children's hospital ED who received antibiotics in ≤1 hour were significantly more severely ill than those treated later, but they did not have increased risk of NP-MODS or death.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Infecções Bacterianas/mortalidade , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Intervenção Médica Precoce , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Análise de Sobrevida
17.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 17(10): e451-e458, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27500722

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends rapid recognition and treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. Few reports have evaluated the impact of these recommendations in pediatrics. We sought to determine if outcomes in patients who received initial care compliant with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign time goals differed from those treated more slowly. DESIGN: Single center retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Emergency department and PICU at an academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: Three hundred twenty-one patients treated for septic shock in the emergency department and admitted directly to the PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The exposure was receipt of emergency department care compliant with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations (delivery of IV fluids, IV antibiotics, and vasoactive infusions within 1 hr of shock recognition). The primary outcome was development of new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Secondary outcomes included mortality, need for mechanical ventilation or vasoactive medications, and hospital and PICU length of stay. Of the 321 children studied, 117 received Surviving Sepsis Campaign compliant care in the emergency department and 204 did not. New or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome developed in nine of the patients (7.7%) who received Surviving Sepsis Campaign compliant care and 25 (12.3%) who did not (p = 0.26). There were 17 deaths; overall mortality rate was 5%. There were no significant differences between groups in any of the secondary outcomes. Although only 36% of patients met the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline recommendation of bundled care within 1 hour of shock recognition, 75% of patients received the recommended interventions in less than 3 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for pediatric septic shock in compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommendations was not associated with better outcomes compared with children whose initial therapies in the emergency department were administered more slowly. However, all patients were treated rapidly and we report low morbidity and mortality. This underscores the importance of rapid recognition and treatment of septic shock.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Choque Séptico/terapia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Terapia Combinada , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitais Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/etiologia , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/mortalidade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Choque Séptico/complicações , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico , Choque Séptico/mortalidade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
Pediatrics ; 131(6): e1723-30, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23690525

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is increasing unmet need for solid organ donation. Alternative donor sources, such as donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD), are needed. The objective of this study was to examine the impact of DCDD on trends in pediatric organ donation and transplantation. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network for US organ recipients and donors from 2001 to 2010 stratified according to age, organ, and deceased donor type (DCDD or donation after neurologic determination of death). Additional data included transplant wait-list removals due to death. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2010, pediatric organ transplant recipients increased from 1170 to 1475. Organs from DCDD donors were transplanted into children infrequently but increased from 1 to 31. Pediatric donation after neurologic determination of death decreased by 13% whereas DCDD increased by 174% (50 to 137). Recipients of pediatric grafts decreased from 3042 to 2751. Adults receiving grafts from pediatric donors decreased from 2243 to 1780; children receiving pediatric grafts increased from 799 to 971. Transplant recipients receiving pediatric DCDD grafts were few but increased annually from 50 to 128 adults and 0 to 9 children. Pediatric candidates dying waiting for an organ decreased from 262 to 110. CONCLUSIONS: From 2001 to 2010, children received more solid organ transplants and fewer children died waiting. Organ recovery from pediatric and adult DCDD donors increased. The number of pediatric recipients of DCDD grafts remains small. Adults primarily receive the direct benefit from pediatric DCDD but other changes in organ allocation have directly benefited children.


Assuntos
Transplante de Órgãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Morte Encefálica , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Morte , Humanos , Lactente , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...