Unraveling the optimal balance of problem-related affective experiences and need satisfaction in cognitive-behavioral therapy: A response surface analysis.

Objective: Although therapists are encouraged to balance emotionally involving work on the patient's problems with need satisfaction in therapy sessions, effects of this balance have rarely been studied empirically. Hence, we examined congruence effects between problem-related affective and need-satisfying experiences in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Method: 165 distressed family caregivers rated problem-related affective experiences, need-satisfying experiences comprising self-esteem, positive interpersonal, and control experiences, as well as coping experiences after 12 CBT sessions. We examined within-person congruence effects of problem-related affective and need-satisfying experiences on subsequent coping in multilevel response surface analysis. Further, we included between-person problem-related affective and need-satisfying experiences and pretreatment depression and anxiety as moderators of within-person effects. Results: A slight predominance of self-esteem over problem-related affective experiences as well as exact correspondence between problem-related affective and both interpersonal and control experiences was most predictive of coping. Between-person moderators supported a cross-level balance heuristic of problem-related affective and self-esteem experiences. Finally, a stronger emphasis on self-esteem and interpersonal over problem-related affective experiences proved more beneficial for patients with high anxiety and low depression. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of balancing problem-related affective and need-satisfying experiences in CBT and provide insights into how balancing may be tailored to specific patients.

How do care-related beliefs contribute to depression and anxiety in family caregivers of people with dementia? Testing a cognitive vulnerability-stress model.

OBJECTIVES: Care-related beliefs are considered risk factors for decreased mental health in family caregivers of people with dementia. However, their exact role in the caregiver stress process remains unclear. Hence, we tested a cognitive vulnerability-stress model of depression and anxiety in family caregivers of people with dementia. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted using baseline data from a caregiver intervention trial (N = 322). Within Bayesian moderated mediation analysis, we examined mediation of effects of objective demands (severity of dementia, challenging behavior, caregiving intensity, caregiving duration) on depression and anxiety via subjective caregiver burden and moderation by care-related beliefs in four domains (dysfunctional caregiving standards, dysfunctional attitudes towards dementia, functional self-care-related beliefs, functional acceptance-related beliefs). RESULTS: The relation between objective demands and subjective burden was amplified by dysfunctional caregiving standards and dysfunctional attitudes towards dementia and mitigated by functional self-care-related beliefs. Further, functional acceptance-related beliefs attenuated the effect of subjective caregiver burden on depression. CONCLUSION: The study provides preliminary evidence for a cognitive vulnerability-stress model of depression and anxiety in family caregivers of people with dementia. The results indicate that the four-domain model of care-related beliefs is a valuable framework for future research and may serve as a heuristic model for cognitive-behavioral therapy in this population.

Between- and within-person effects of affective experiences on coping in CBT: Direct effects and interplay with therapeutic alliance and resource activation.

OBJECTIVE: The role of affective experiences (AE) in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has rarely been investigated. We examined between- and within-person effects of AE on coping in CBT for family caregivers and interactions with therapeutic alliance and resource activation. METHODS: 67 family caregivers rated AE, therapeutic alliance, resource activation, and coping after each of 12 sessions of telephone-based CBT. We examined direct session-to-session effects of AE on coping in structural equation modeling and interactions of AE with therapeutic alliance and resource activation in multilevel models. RESULTS: AE did not directly predict coping. Instead, within-person effects of AE interacted with simultaneous within-person emotional bond. Given strong emotional bond, AE positively predicted coping, whereas given weak emotional bond, AE negatively predicted coping. Further, cross-level interactions of between-person AE and within-person agreement on collaboration and resource activation indicated that these positively predicted coping only in dyads with high between-person AE. CONCLUSION: AE may enhance coping when complemented with strong emotional bond. Further, within-person effects of agreement on collaboration and resource activation seem to rely on a certain degree of between-person AE. Results are discussed in relation to current findings on emotional processing in CBT.

Effects of general change mechanisms on outcome in telephone-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for distressed family caregivers.

BACKGROUND: The study investigated the influence of general change mechanisms (GCMs) on outcome in telephone-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for family caregivers. METHODS: In a stepped-care intervention approach, highly distressed family caregivers received telephone-based CBT after completing a care counseling intervention. Sixty-six therapist-caregiver dyads rated emotional bond, agreement on collaboration, problem actuation, resource activation, clarification of meaning, and mastery after each of 12 therapy sessions. Outcomes were caregiver burden (SCQ-AV) and depression (CES-D) after therapy. Associations of GCMs with outcome were examined in multilevel regression models. RESULTS: Caregiver burden was significantly predicted by caregiver-rated emotional bond (ß = -0.18) as well as therapist-rated resource activation (ß = -0.26), problem actuation (ß = -0.22), clarification of meaning (ß = -0.18), and mastery (ß = -0.18). None of the GCMs predicted depression from any perspective. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that GCMs are relevant for reducing caregiver burden in CBT for family caregivers and should be fostered in treatment manuals, in particular therapist-rated GCMs. Since therapist and caregiver perspectives differed in predicting caregiver burden, future research should investigate perspective congruence and its effect on therapy outcome.

Face-to-face versus telephone-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for family caregivers of people with dementia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to directly compare the effects and acceptability of telephone-based (TEL-CBT) with face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy (F2F-CBT) for family caregivers of people with dementia (PwD). METHOD: Caregivers for whom F2F participation was possible were allocated to F2F-CBT (n = 49). The other participants were randomized to TEL-CBT (n = 139) or CG (n = 134). CBT consisted of 12 sessions over 6 months. RESULTS: TEL-CBT yielded significantly better physical health (d = 0.27) and coping with daily hassles (d = 0.38) at posttest compared to F2F-CBT. Therapist competence, acceptability, and outcomes at follow-up did not differ between TEL-CBT and F2F-CBT. CONCLUSIONS: TEL-CBT is a valuable alternative to F2F-CBT for family caregivers of PwD as TEL-CBT has the advantage of higher accessibility while it does not significantly differ from F2F-CBT in effectiveness and caregivers' evaluation of the setting, their experience with the therapist, and their satisfaction.

Pragmatic Effectiveness of Face-to-Face Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Family Caregivers of People with Dementia.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to investigate the pragmatic effectiveness of face-to-face cognitive-behavioral therapy (F2F-CBT) for family caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) implemented in a routine care setting relative to usual care in a quasi-experimental study. METHODS: Participants indicating that attendance of F2F-CBT was possible were assigned to F2F-CBT (n = 49). F2F-CBT consisted of 12 sessions over 6 months. Effects were evaluated at posttest and 6-month follow-up on a variety of outcomes relative to usual care (CG; n = 134). RESULTS: At posttest, F2F-CBT yielded significantly fewer symptoms of depression (d = 0.37), better emotional well-being (d = 0.64), and better coping with the care situation (d = 0.52) than CG. At 6-month follow-up, the effect on emotional well-being was retained (d = 0.44) and social relationships were rated significantly better in F2F-CBT than CG (d = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: F2F-CBT proved to be effective in supporting family caregivers of PwD. However, only relatively few caregivers were able to regularly attend face-to-face sessions. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: CBT seems particularly suitable for supporting family caregivers of PwD in coping with the complex psychological burden. Delivery via telephone or internet could be a necessary alternative to F2F-CBT for reducing barriers to participation.