Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Shows High Rates of Return to Activity and Low Rates of Recurrent Valgus Instability: An Updated Systematic Review.

Purpose: To examine the clinical outcomes and return to sport rates after treatment of combined, complete (grade III) injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL). Methods: A literature search of the following databases was completed using key words related to combined ACL and (MCL) tears: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and SPORTDiscus. Level I-IV studies that examined patients with complete tears of the ACL and grade III tears of the MCL, diagnosed by either magnetic resonance imaging or clinical examination of valgus instability, were included. Study inclusion was determined by 2 independent reviewers. Patient demographics, treatment choices, and patient outcomes, including clinical examination (i.e., range of motion, hamstring strength) and subjective assessments (i.e., International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm scores, Tegner activity scores) were collected. Results: Six possible treatment combinations were assessed. Good or excellent outcomes related to range of motion, knee stability, subjective assessments, and return to play were reported after ACL reconstruction regardless of MCL treatment. Those with combined ACL and MCL reconstruction returned to their previous level of activity at a high rate (range, 87.5%-90.6%) with low rates of recurrent valgus instability. Triangular MCL reconstruction with a posterior limb that serves to reconstruct the posterior-oblique ligament best-restored anteromedial rotatory stability of the knee when compared with anatomic MCL reconstruction (90.6% and 65.6%, respectively). Nonsurgical management of the ACL injury, regardless of MCL treatment, demonstrated low return to activity (29%) and frequent secondary knee injuries. Conclusions: High rates of return to sport with low risk of recurrent valgus instability have been demonstrated after MCL reconstruction, and triangular MCL reconstruction can more effectively restore anteromedial rotatory instability compared with MCL repair. Restoration of valgus stability can be common after reconstruction of the ACL with or without surgical management of the MCL, although patients with grade III tibial-sided or mid-substance injuries were less likely to regain valgus stability with nonoperative treatment than femoral-sided injuries. Level of Evidence: Level IV; systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Surgical Management of Failed Articular Cartilage Surgery in the Knee.

Failure rates of cartilage restoration surgery range from 14% to 43%. When failure of prior cartilage restoration surgery is suspected, a thorough clinical workup should be performed to assess the timing and duration of symptoms. Attention should be paid to patient risk factors such as age, body mass index, and smoking status. Concomitant pathology such as malalignment, ligament insufficiency, and meniscus status must be evaluated before revision surgery. As outlined in our treatment algorithm, the size/location of the lesion and the type of primary procedure will guide planning for revision procedures. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):262-272.].

Return to School After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Study of Adolescents and Young Adults.

Background: The ability to return to school after orthopaedic surgery is an important consideration for young patients, as there is substantial literature indicating that school attendance is correlated strongly with academic performance. Purpose: To evaluate the time to return to school, the barriers that students encounter when returning to school, and the academic effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in high school (HS) and college students. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Full-time HS and college/graduate school (C/GS) students who underwent ACLR during the 2017 to 2018 and 2018 to 2019 academic periods were included in the study. Patients were contacted 2 weeks postoperatively to complete a questionnaire that assessed their time to return to school and barriers that interfered with their ability to return, and they completed a second questionnaire at 6 weeks postoperatively that assessed academic performance and challenges faced upon returning to school. Results: Included were 36 (52.2%) full-time HS students and 33 (47.8%) full-time C/GS students. HS students reported a longer time to return to school compared with C/GS students (8.51 vs 5.89 days; P = .008). In addition, HS students missed more scheduled school days than C/GS students (5.39 vs 2.90 days; P < .001). The majority of HS (73.5%) and C/GS (65.5%) students cited pain as a barrier to return, and more than half of HS (70.6%) and C/GS (55.2%) students also cited restricted mobility as a barrier to return. HS students were more likely to miss an examination in the early postoperative period compared with their C/GS counterparts (65.7% vs 39.3%; P = .037). Many students in both cohorts received a grade less than expected in the early postoperative period; this was not significantly different between the 2 groups (HS, 50.0%; C/GS, 42.9%; P = .489). Conclusion: ACLR can have a negative effect on school attendance and academic performance among HS and C/GS students. Orthopaedic surgeons should counsel all students and their families adequately about the potential academic effect of orthopaedic surgery in order to maximize clinical results, academic performance, and satisfaction in their patients.

Economic Impact of Unused Surgical Instruments in an Orthopaedic Surgery Department at an Academic Medical Center: A Prospective Cross-sectional Study.

Orthopaedic surgical trays contain unused instruments, but we do not know which specific instruments go unused nor do we know the savings from eliminating them from a given tray. This was a single-site, observational study conducted at an academic medical center. The primary outcome was type of unused instruments and percentage of instruments used in two commonly used surgical trays. The secondary outcome was cost savings in United States dollars (USD) that could be attained by eliminating these instruments. In the first tray, five instruments (10.6%) were unused in any of 37 observed cases. In the second tray, nineteen instruments (19.6%) were unused in 37 observed cases. The total annual savings from replacement cost analysis and reprocessing cost analysis was $6,597.00 USD. Unused instruments are common in surgical trays. Eliminating unused instruments can result in immediate cost savings. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(3):131-135, 2021).

Strong Agreement Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Radiographs for Caton-Deschamps Index in Patients With Patellofemoral Instability.

PURPOSE: To compare the measurements of the Caton-Deschamps index on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and radiographs of patients undergoing operative management of patellar instability. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and/or tibial tubercle osteotomy between January 2015 and November 2019 were assessed. Caton-Deschamps indices were measured by 3 independent reviewers on both radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging. Intra- and interclass correlation coefficients and a Bland-Altman analysis were calculated to assess inter-rater reliability and measurement agreement between radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients (73 knees) were identified. The average Caton-Deschamps index was 1.23 ± 0.18 on radiograph and 1.26 ± 0.18 on magnetic resonance imaging. Strong inter-rater reliability was observed between reviewers for both radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging Caton-Deschamps indices (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.700 and 0.715, respectively). Pooled observer measurements revealed a moderate agreement between radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging for patella to tibia distance, weak agreement for patellar articular cartilage distance, and strong agreement for the Caton-Deschamps index (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.687, 0.485, and 0.749, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a mean difference in Caton-Deschamps index of -0.03 ± 0.15 (95% limits of agreement: -0.29 to 0.23) between radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging, meaning that Caton-Deschamps indices were on average 0.03 lower on radiographic than on magnetic resonance imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The Caton-Deschamps index has strong agreement between radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing patellar stabilization surgery. Either modality can be reliably used to preoperatively assess patellar height. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, diagnostic case series.

The Relationship Between Discoid Meniscus and Articular Cartilage Thickness: A Quantitative Observational Study With MRI.

BACKGROUND: Several cadaveric imaging studies have demonstrated that the articular cartilage thickness on the tibial plateau varies depending on coverage by native meniscal tissue. These differences are thought to partially contribute to the rates of cartilage degeneration and development of osteoarthritis after meniscectomy. Because there is greater tibial plateau coverage with meniscal tissue in the setting of a discoid meniscus, these findings may also have implications for the long-term health of the knee after saucerization of a torn discoid meniscus. PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between lateral compartment articular cartilage thickness and the presence or absence of a discoid meniscus. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Included in the study were 25 patients younger than 40 years of age who had undergone a 1.5-T or 3-T knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between 2010 and 2016 at a single institution and had an intact, lateral discoid meniscus. Only patients with an otherwise asymptomatic lateral compartment were included. The authors then identified 35 age-matched controls with a nondiscoid, intact lateral meniscus who underwent knee MRI at the same institution and during the same period. The articular cartilage thicknesses in 6 zones of the lateral femoral condyle (LFC) and lateral tibial plateau (LTP) were measured for each patient by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists, and the mean thicknesses were compared between the study and control groups. RESULTS: The average age at MRI was 22.63 years (range, 8.30-35.90 years) for the discoid group and 20.93 years (range, 8.43-34.99 years) for the nondiscoid group. The nondiscoid group had significantly greater mean articular cartilage thickness in all 6 zones of the LTP (P < .05 for all). When comparing the zones of the LFC, there was no significant difference in the mean thickness in any zone between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with discoid menisci had thinner baseline articular cartilage thickness in the LTP compared with those patients without discoid menisci.

Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Between Orthopaedic Surgeons for Reparability of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using MRI.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the standard of care for patients after an ACL tear, as poor historical outcomes were observed after primary ACL repair. Certain subgroups of patients, however, have been shown to have outcomes equivalent to reconstruction after undergoing ACL repair and therefore may benefit from the potential advantages offered by avoiding reconstruction. It is important to accurately and consistently identify and indicate these candidates for ACL repair. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation for the reparability of ACL tears and to identify imaging factors that may lead to surgeon uncertainty or disagreement in decision making. Our hypothesis was that the orthopaedic surgeons surveyed would not be able to reliably agree on the reparability of an ACL using MRI scans alone. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We administered 2 surveys to 6 fellowship-trained orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons. Each surgeon reviewed preoperative MRI scans for 20 patients and answered a series of questions, ultimately determining whether they would choose an ACL reconstruction or repair for the patient based on the imaging alone. The same survey was repeated 6 weeks later. Kappa values for inter- and intraobserver reliability of their decision making were then calculated. RESULTS: The average kappa for interobserver reliability in the 2 surveys was 0.22, and the average kappa for intraobserver reliability was 0.34. Interobserver reliability among the surgeons in this group was poor to moderate; intraobserver reliability was slightly better. The choice for ACL repair was significantly correlated with proximal tear locations (r = 0.854; P < .001), good-quality ACL tissue remnant (r = 0.929; P < .001), and how many surgeons believed that the tear only involved a single bundle (r = 0.590; P = .006). CONCLUSION: The surgeons surveyed in this study did not consistently agree on candidates for ACL repair using MRI alone.

Rethinking Patellar Tendinopathy and Partial Patellar Tendon Tears: A Novel Classification System.

BACKGROUND: Patellar tendinopathy is an overuse injury of the patellar tendon frequently affecting athletes involved in jumping sports. The tendinopathy may progress to partial patellar tendon tears (PPTTs). Current classifications of patellar tendinopathy are based on symptoms and do not provide satisfactory evidence-based treatment guidelines. PURPOSE: To define the relationship between PPTT characteristics and treatment guidelines, as well as to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based classification system for partial patellar tendon injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (prognosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: MRI characteristics and clinical treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed for 85 patients with patellar tendinopathy, as well as 86 physically active control participants who underwent MRI of the knee for other conditions. A total of 56 patients had a PPTT and underwent further evaluation for tear size and location. The relationship between tear characteristics and clinical outcome was defined with use of statistical comparisons and univariate and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 85 patients, 56 had partial-thickness patellar tendon tears. Of these tears, 91% involved the posterior and posteromedial regions of the proximal tendon. On axial MRI views, patients with a partial tear had a mean tendon thickness of 10 mm, as compared with 6.2 mm for those without (P < .001). Eleven patients underwent surgery for their partial-thickness tear. All of these patients had a tear >50% of tendon thickness (median thickness of tear, 10.3 mm) on axial views. Logistic regression showed that tendon thickness >8.8 mm correlated with the presence of a partial tear, while tendon thickness >11.45 mm and tear thickness >55.7% predicted surgical management. CONCLUSION: Partial-thickness tears are located posterior or posteromedially in the proximal patellar tendon. The most sensitive predictor for detecting the presence of a partial tear was patellar tendon thickness, in which thickness >8.8 mm was strongly correlated with a tear of the tendon. Tracking thickness changes on axial MRI may predict the effectiveness of nonoperative therapy: athletes with patellar tendon thickness >11.5 mm and/or >50% tear thickness on axial MRI were less likely to improve with nonoperative treatment. A novel proposed classification system for partial tears, the Popkin-Golman classification, can be used to guide treatment decisions for these patients.

Surgical Management of Patellofemoral Instability in the Skeletally Immature Patient.

Compared with skeletally mature patients, skeletally immature patients are at a higher risk of acute traumatic patellar dislocation. Surgical treatment is the standard of care for patients with recurrent instability and requires important and technically challenging physeal considerations. Physeal-sparing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is the treatment of choice for these patients, replacing older nonanatomic extensor mechanism realignment techniques. Implant-mediated guided growth is an important adjunct to correct genu valgum angular deformities that contribute to patellar instability. Patient-specific surgical techniques and proper surgical indications are crucial for successful outcomes.

Rehabilitation variability following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an increasingly utilized surgical option for recurrent patellar instability. Recent studies have highlighted the potential benefits of accelerated functional rehabilitation; however, no validated MPFL rehabilitation guidelines currently exist. OBJECTIVE: To assess the variability of MPFL reconstruction rehabilitation protocols published online by academic orthopaedic programs. METHODS: Online MPFL rehabilitation protocols from U.S. teaching orthopaedic programs were reviewed. A comprehensive scoring rubric was developed to assess each protocol for both the presence of various rehabilitation components and the timing of their introduction. RESULTS: Thirty-one protocols (20%) were identified from 155 U.S. academic orthopaedic programs. Thirty protocols (97%) recommended immediate postoperative knee bracing. Twenty protocols (65%) allowed for weight-bearing as tolerated using crutches immediately postoperatively, whereas seven protocols (23%) recommended partial weight-bearing and four protocols (13%) recommended toe-touch weight-bearing. For those protocols advising partial and toe-touch weight-bearing, advancement to full weight-bearing was achieved at averages of 4.7 (range, 3-8) weeks and 6.3 (range, 6-7) weeks, respectively. There was considerable variation in range of motion (ROM) goals; however, most protocols (97%) recommended achieving 90 degrees of knee flexion at an average of 1.4 (range, 0-6) weeks. Significant diversity was found in the inclusion and timing of strengthening, stretching, proprioception, and basic cardiovascular exercises. Twenty-five protocols (81%) recommended return to training after completing specific athletic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of U.S. teaching orthopaedic institutions publish MPFL reconstruction rehabilitation protocols online. Furthermore, there is a high degree of variability in both the composition and timing of rehabilitation modalities across these protocols.

Trends in Management and Complications of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Pediatric Patients: A Survey of the PRiSM Society.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have been recognized and treated with increasing frequency in children and adolescents. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in skeletally immature patients has unique considerations and there is a large practice variation in the management of these injuries. The purpose of this study was to survey the members of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Society regarding their experience with the management and complications of pediatric ACL injuries. METHODS: A 15-question survey was distributed to 71 orthopaedic members of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine study group. RESULTS: Regarding treatment of an 8-year-old child with a complete ACL tear, 53% of respondents recommended iliotibial band reconstruction, 33% recommended all-epiphyseal reconstruction, and only 3% would treat nonoperatively in a brace. In adolescent patients with 2 years of growth remaining, 47% of respondents recommended a physeal "respecting" technique, 31% recommended a physeal-sparing technique, and 19% would perform an adult-style ACLR. There were 29 new cases of growth arrest reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there have been major changes in the trends in pediatric ACLR over the past 15 years, and the most treatment variability is found among adolescent patients with about 2 years of growth remaining. The study also demonstrates that while the overall incidence of growth disturbance after ACLR remains low, new cases of growth disturbance continue to be identified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V-survey of expert opinion and experience.

Does the Type of Metal Instrumentation Affect the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of implant metal composition with the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following pediatric spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SSI is a well-described complication following pediatric spine surgery. Many risk factors have been identified in the literature, but controversy remains regarding metal composition as a risk factor. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation procedures between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2008, at three large children's hospitals for any etiology of scoliosis and had at least 1 year of postoperative follow-up. Procedures included posterior spinal fusion, growth-friendly instrumentation, and revision of spinal instrumentation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition of SSI was used. A chi-squared test was performed to determine the relationship between type of metal instrumentation and development of an SSI. RESULTS: The study included 874 patients who underwent 1,156 total procedures. Overall, 752 (65%) procedures used stainless steel instrumentation, 238 (21%) procedures used titanium instrumentation, and the remaining 166 (14%) procedures used cobalt chrome and titanium hybrid instrumentation. The overall risk of infection was 6.1% (70/1,156) per procedure, with 5.9% (44/752) for stainless steel, 6.7% (12/238) for titanium, and 6.0% (10/166) for cobalt chrome. The multiple regression analysis found no significant differences in the metal type used between patients with and without infection (p = .886) adjusting for etiology, instrumentation to pelvis, and type of procedures. When stratified based on etiology, the multiple regression analyses also found no significant difference in SSI between two metal type groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no difference in risk of infection with stainless steel, titanium, or cobalt chrome/titanium instrumentation and is adequately powered to detect a true difference in risk of SSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic.

Assessment of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Tilt on Radiographic Measurements in Lenke "C" Modifier Curves Undergoing Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine how the amount of residual lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt correlates with radiographic measurements. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: When performing a selective thoracic posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the LIV may be tilted into the lumbar curve or made horizontal. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of 33 consecutive patients with AIS, Lenke types 1 to 4, lumbar modifier C, and a minimum follow-up of 2 years, who underwent selective thoracic posterior spinal fusions. Measurements obtained from pre- and postoperative radiographs were correlated with postoperative LIV tilt. RESULTS: At final follow-up, less postoperative LIV tilt significantly correlated with less thoracic apical translation (p = .023) when controlling for the position of the LIV relative to the stable vertebra and preoperative thoracic and lumbar curve flexibility. LIV tilt was not significantly associated with thoracic Cobb angle, lumbar Cobb angle, lumbar apical translation, coronal balance, sagittal balance, or the amount of correction obtained compared to their preoperative measurements (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Decreased LIV tilt was significantly associated with decreased thoracic apical translation. LIV tilt did not significantly correlate with coronal balance or any other radiographic measurement. We caution that these findings may only be applicable in C modifier curves and when the correct LIV is chosen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.

Assessment of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Tilt on Radiographic Measurements in Lenke "C" Modifier Curves Undergoing Selective Thoracic Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to determine how the amount of residual lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt correlates with radiographic measurements. When performing a selective thoracic posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the LIV may be tilted into the lumbar curve or made horizontal. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study of 33 consecutive patients with AIS, Lenke types 1 to 4, lumbar modifier C, and a minimum follow-up of 2 years, who underwent selective thoracic posterior spinal fusions. Measurements obtained from pre- and postoperative radiographs were correlated with postoperative LIV tilt. RESULTS: At final follow-up, less postoperative LIV tilt significantly correlated with less thoracic apical translation (p =.023) when controlling for the position of the LIV relative to the stable vertebra and preoperative thoracic and lumbar curve flexibility. LIV tilt was not significantly associated with thoracic Cobb angle, lumbar Cobb angle, lumbar apical translation, coronal balance, sagittal balance, or the amount of correction obtained compared to their preoperative measurements (p >.05). CONCLUSION: Decreased LIV tilt was significantly associated with decreased thoracic apical translation. LIV tilt did not significantly correlate with coronal balance or any other radiographic measurement. We caution that these findings may only be applicable in C modifier curves and when the correct LIV is chosen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.

An Independent Evaluation of the Validity of a DNA-Based Prognostic Test for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: ScoliScore is a DNA-based prognostic test, designed and used to help to predict the risk of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The role of this test in clinical practice remains unclear as the published results of the ScoliScore have not been validated independently. The purpose of this study was to determine if the ScoliScore effectively predicted the risk of curve progression in patients with mild and moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in two urban academic medical centers. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who met inclusion criteria at two centers were administered the ScoliScore test. Two groups were created: a progression group (those who had a Cobb angle of >40° or those who had undergone surgical fusion) and a non-progression group (those who had skeletal maturity without curve progression to 40°). ScoliScore values and risk levels were compared between the two groups. The negative predictive value was calculated for low-risk scores and the positive predictive value was calculated for high-risk scores. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p = 0.706) in the mean ScoliScore (and standard deviation) between patients with curve progression (107 ± 55 points) and those without curve progression (102 ± 62 points). There was also no significant difference (p = 0.399) in curve progression between patients with high-risk scores (26.7%) and those with low-risk scores (12.9%). The positive predictive value of the test was 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.55), and the negative predictive value was 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.96). ScoliScores and rates of progression were not affected by brace-wear. CONCLUSIONS: ScoliScores did not differ between patients with and without curve progression, and the negative and positive predictive values were lower in our study than in the previously published validation study by the developers of the test. This may be due to differences in our test population, genetic variability, or failure of patients in the non-progression group to follow up.

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the modified Waldenström classification system for staging of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

BACKGROUND: The absence of a reliable classification system for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease has contributed to difficulty in establishing consistent management strategies and in interpreting outcome studies. The purpose of this study was to assess interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the modified Waldenström classification system among a large and diverse group of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Twenty surgeons independently completed the first two rounds of staging: two assessments of forty deidentified radiographs of patients with Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease in various stages. Ten of the twenty surgeons completed another two rounds of staging after the addition of a second pair of radiographs in sequence. Kappa values were calculated within and between each of the rounds. RESULTS: Interobserver kappa values for the classification for surveys 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0.81, 0.82, 0.76, and 0.80, respectively (with 0.61 to 0.80 considered substantial agreement and 0.81 to 1.0, nearly perfect agreement). Intraobserver agreement for the classification was an average of 0.88 (range, 0.77 to 0.96) between surveys 1 and 2 and an average of 0.87 (range, 0.81 to 0.94) between surveys 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: The modified Waldenström classification system for staging of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease demonstrated substantial to almost perfect agreement between and within observers across multiple rounds of study. In doing so, the results of this study provide a foundation for future validation studies, in which the classification stage will be associated with clinical outcomes.

Best Practices in Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Spine Deformity Surgery: Development of an Intraoperative Checklist to Optimize Response.

STUDY DESIGN: Consensus-based creation of a checklist and guideline. OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus-based checklist to guide surgeon responses to intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) changes in patients with a stable spine and to develop a consensus-based best practice guideline for IONM practice in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies show that checklists enhance surgical team responses to crisis situations and improve patient outcomes. Currently, no widely accepted guidelines exist for the response to IONM changes in spine deformity surgery. METHODS: After a literature review of risk factors and recommendations for responding to IONM changes, 4 surveys were administered to 21 experienced spine surgeons and 1 neurologist experienced in IONM. Areas of equipoise were identified and the nominal group process was used to determine items to be included in the checklist. The authors reevaluated and modified the checklist at 3 face-to-face meetings over 12 months, including a period of clinical validation using a modified Delphi process. The group was also surveyed on current IONM practices at their institutions. This information and existing IONM position statements were used to create the IONM best practice guideline. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for the creation of 5 checklist headings containing 26 items to consider in the response to IONM changes. Consensus was reached on 5 statements for inclusion in the best practice guideline; the final guideline promotes a team approach and makes recommendations aimed at decreasing variability in neuromonitoring practices. CONCLUSIONS: The final products represent the consensus of a group of expert spine surgeons. The checklist includes the most important and high-yield items to consider when responding to IONM changes in patients with a stable spine, whereas the IONM guideline represents the group consensus on items that should be considered best practice among IONM teams with the appropriate resources.

Does ScoliScore provide more information than traditional clinical estimates of curve progression?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study comparing ScoliScore and clinical risk estimates. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare risk stratification between ScoliScore and traditional clinical estimates to determine whether ScoliScore provides unique information. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ScoliScore is a genetic prognostic test designed to evaluate the risk of curve progression in skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with Cobb angles of 10° to 25°. Clinicians are currently trying to better understand the role this test may play in guiding clinical decision making because current standards of curve progression are largely based on radiographical markers, such as curve magnitude and bone age. METHODS: Ninety-one patients who received ScoliScore testing at our center and met study inclusion criteria were identified. Patients were given a "clinical risk" level using their Risser sign and Cobb angle. Assigned clinical risk levels were compared with the ScoliScore risk levels reported by the manufacturer's scoring algorithm. RESULTS: ScoliScore risk distribution in our population was 36% low risk, 55% intermediate risk, and 9% high risk. This compares with 2%, 51%, and 47%, respectively, for comparable clinical risk groupings. Only 25% of patients were in the same risk category for both systems. There were no significant correlations between ScoliScore and age, race, menarcheal status, Risser sign, or sex. There was a positive correlation between the Cobb angle and the ScoliScore (r = 0.581, P < 0.001). Cobb angle remained significant in the multivariate regression model (P < 0.001), and Cobb angle was found to account for 33.3% of ScoliScore's variance. CONCLUSION: Only Cobb angle showed significant correlation with ScoliScore among the socioclinical variables studied. The risk distribution of the 2 risk estimation systems examined differed markedly: ScoliScore predicted nearly 16 times more low-risk patients and more than 5 times fewer high-risk patients. This demonstrates that ScoliScore provides unique information to traditional predictors of curve progression, advancing our understanding of the role of ScoliScore in the clinical setting.