Epidemiology of pediatric spinal trauma with neurological deficits in Catalonia: a 36-year experience.

PURPOSE: Existing literature on pediatric traumatic spinal cord injury (PTSCI) demonstrates large variations in characteristics, incidence, time-periods and etiology, worldwide. Epidemiological studies addressing injuries to the total spine, conducted in Southern European regions are remarkably scarce; therefore we aimed to investigate long-term trends analyzing etiology, fracture location and type, single or multiple fractures, associated lesions and neurological status in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study. We analyzed post-acute patients after PTSCI, aged 0-17, admitted with neurological deficits between 1986 and 2022 to a specialized hospital in Catalonia. Neurological deficits were assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS). RESULTS: Two hundred and forty nine children were included, 174 (69.9%) boys and 75 (30.1%) girls; mean age was 13.9 years (range, 2 months to 17 years). Two hundred and four children (82%) had ≥ 1 spinal fractures, 66 (26.5%) dislocations and 8 (3.2%) SCIWORA. Fractures were multilevel contiguous in 108 (43.4%) cases. Fracture types comprised 81 vertebral compactions (32.5%), 22 burst fractures (8.8%), 7 odontoid (2.8%) and 4 tear-drops (1.6%). There were ≥ 1 associated lesions in 112 cases (45%): in limbs in 23 cases (9.2%), thorax or abdomen in 59 (23.7%) and skull or face in 81 (32.5%). In 44 cases (39% of the 112) there were multiple lesions. Locations comprised cervical spine in 105 cases (42%), thoracic spine in 124 (49%), lumbar spine in 18 (7%), and sacrum in 2 (0.8%). Road traffic accidents (RTAs) were the main etiology (62.2%) over the whole period. However, from 2016 onwards, RTAs dropped below the rate of falls and sports injuries. The most common sites for injury in those aged 9 years or older were in the cervical (41.1%) and thoracic (50.7%) regions. Those aged 8 or under were far more likely to sustain a complete SCI (80.0%) or an accompanying traumatic brain injury (45.0%) likely due to higher numbers of pedestrian versus car RTAs. A significant peak in the occurrence of cases during 2006-2010 (20.1%) was identified with an absolute drop immediately after, during 2011-2015 (8.8%). A marked shift in trend is observed between 2016-2022 regarding age of injuries (an increase in 9 years or older), etiology (increase in falls and sports versus RTA), AIS grade (increase in incomplete lesions AIS B-D versus AIS A), severity (increase in tetraplegia versus paraplegia) and location (increase in cervical versus lumbar and thoracic injuries). CONCLUSIONS: A shift in trend is observed in the past 7 years regarding age of injuries (increase in those older than 9), etiology (increase in falls and sports versus RTA), AIS grade (increase in incomplete lesions AIS B-D versus AIS A), severity (increase in tetraplegia versus paraplegia) and location (increase in cervical). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Pressure ulcers acquired during inpatient rehabilitation after spinal cord injury, characterization and predictors: A 15-years' experience.

BACKGROUND: Most studies focus on the risk factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers (PUs) during acute phase or community care for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to i) compare clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients after SCI with PUs acquired during rehabilitation vs inpatients without PUs and ii) evaluate an existing PU risk assessment tool iii) identify first PU predictors. METHODS: Individuals (n = 1,135) admitted between 2008 and 2022 to a rehabilitation institution within 60 days after SCI were included. Admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) and mEntal state, Mobility, Incontinence, Nutrition, Activity (EMINA) were assessed. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were fitted. RESULTS: Overall incidence of PUs was 8.9%. Of these, 40.6% occurred in the first 30 days, 47.5% were sacral, 66.3% were Stage II. Patients with PUs were older, mostly with traumatic injuries (67.3%), AIS A (54.5%), lower FIM motor (mFIM) score and mechanical ventilation. We identified specific mFIM items to increase EMINA specificity. Adjusted Cox model yielded sex (male), age at injury, AIS grade, mFIM and diabetes as PUs predictors (C-Index = 0.749). CONCLUSION: Inpatients can benefit from combined assessments (EMINA + mFIM) and clinical features scarcely addressed in previous studies to prevent PUs.

Effectiveness and efficiency of telerehabilitation on functionality after spinal cord injury: A matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation in spinal cord injury (teleSCI) is a growing field that can improve access to care and health outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The clinical effectiveness of teleSCI is not known. OBJECTIVES: To compare independence in activities of daily living and mobility capacity in patients following teleSCI and matched controls undergoing traditional rehabilitation. DESIGN: Matched case-control study. SETTING: TeleSCI occurring in home setting (cases) versus traditional rehabilitation on inpatient unit (controls). PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two consecutive patients with SCI followed with teleSCI were compared to 42 historical rehabilitation inpatients (controls) matched for age, time since injury to rehabilitation admission, level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), complete or incomplete injury, and etiology (traumatic/nontraumatic). The teleSCI group (n = 42) was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls (n = 613). INTERVENTIONS: The teleSCI group followed home-based telerehabilitation (3.5 h/day, 5 days/week, 67 days average duration) and historical controls followed in-person rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI). We formally compared gains, efficiency and effectiveness. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury and the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) were used. RESULTS: The teleSCI group (57.1% nontraumatic, 71.4% paraplegia, 73.8% incomplete, 52.4% AIS grade D) showed no significant differences compared with historical controls in AIS grades, neurological levels, duration, gains, efficiency and effectiveness in FIM, SCIM, or WISCI, although the teleSCI cohort had significantly higher admission FIM scores compared with the complete cohort of historical controls. CONCLUSIONS: TeleSCI may provide similar improvements in mobility and functional outcomes as traditional rehabilitation in medically stable patients (predominantly with paraplegia and motor incomplete SCI) when provided with appropriate support and equipment.

Tele-rehabilitation on independence in activities of daily living after stroke: A Matched Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) in post-acute patients with stroke following tele-rehabilitation and matched in-person controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Matched case-control study. A total of 35 consecutive patients with stroke who followed tele-rehabilitation were compared to 35 historical in-person patients (controls) matched for age, functional independence at admission and time since injury to rehabilitation admission (<60 days). The tele-rehabilitation group was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls (n=990). Independence in ADLs was assessed using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and the Barthel Index (BI). We formally compared FIM and BI gains calculated as discharge score - admission scores, efficiency measured as gains / length of stay and effectiveness defined as (discharge score-admission score)/ (maximum score-admission score). We analyzed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FIM and BI. RESULTS: The groups showed no significant differences in type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), location, severity, age at injury, length of stay, body mass index, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, aphasia, neglect, affected side of the body, dominance or educational level. The groups showed no significant differences in gains, efficiency nor effectiveness either using FIM or Barthel Index. We identified significant differences in two specific BI items (feeding and transfer) in favor of the in-person group. No differences were observed in the proportion of patients who achieved MCID. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were seen between total ADL scores for tele-rehabilitation and in-person rehabilitation. Future research studies should analyze a combined rehabilitation approach that utilizes both models.

Inpatient Rehabilitation Falls: Comparing Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Versus Patients With Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Cognitively impaired neurological rehabilitation inpatients are at an increased risk for falls; yet, little is known regarding fall risk of different groups, such as stroke versus traumatic brain injury. OBJECTIVES: To determine if rehabilitation patients' fall characteristics differ for patients with stroke versus patients with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluates inpatients with stroke or traumatic brain injury admitted to a rehabilitation center in Barcelona, Spain, between 2005 and 2021. We assessed independence in daily activities with the Functional Independence Measure. We compared fallen versus nonfallen patients' features and examined the association between time to first fall and risk using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 1,269 fall events were experienced by 898 different patients with traumatic brain injury ( n = 313; 34.9%) and stroke ( n = 585; 65.1%). A higher proportion of falls for patients with stroke occurred while performing rehabilitation activities (20.2%-9.8%), whereas falls were significantly higher for patients with traumatic brain injury during the night shift. Fall timing revealed completely different behaviors (stroke vs. traumatic brain injury), for example, an absolute peak at 6 a.m. due to young male traumatic patients. Nonfallen patients ( n = 1,363; 78.2%) were younger, with higher independence in daily activities scores, and having a larger time since injury to admission; all three were significant fall predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with traumatic brain injury and stroke showed different fall behaviors. Knowledge of fall patterns and characteristics in the inpatient rehabilitation setting can help design management protocols to mitigate their risk.

Multicentric investigation on the safety, feasibility and usability of the ABLE lower-limb robotic exoskeleton for individuals with spinal cord injury: a framework towards the standardisation of clinical evaluations.

BACKGROUND: Robotic lower-limb exoskeletons have the potential to provide additional clinical benefits for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, high variability between protocols does not allow the comparison of study results on safety and feasibility between different exoskeletons. We therefore incorporated key aspects from previous studies into our study protocol and accordingly conducted a multicentre study investigating the safety, feasibility and usability of the ABLE Exoskeleton in clinical settings. METHODS: In this prospective pretest-posttest quasi-experimental study across two SCI centres in Germany and Spain, in- and outpatients with SCI were recruited into a 12-session training and assessment protocol, utilising the ABLE Exoskeleton. A follow-up visit after 4 weeks was included to assess after-training outcomes. Safety outcomes (device-related adverse events (AEs), number of drop-outs), feasibility and usability measures (level of assistance, donning/doffing-time) were recorded at every session together with changes in gait parameters and function. Patient-reported outcome measures including the rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and the psychosocial impact of the device were performed. Satisfaction with the device was evaluated in both participants and therapists. RESULTS: All 24 participants (45 ± 12 years), with mainly subacute SCI (< 1 year after injury) from C5 to L3, (ASIA Impairment Scale A to D) completed the follow-up. In 242 training sessions, 8 device-related AEs (pain and skin lesions) were reported. Total time for don and doff was 6:50 ± 2:50 min. Improvements in level of assistance and gait parameters (time, steps, distance and speed, p < 0.05) were observed in all participants. Walking function and RPE improved in participants able to complete walking tests with (n = 9) and without (n = 6) the device at study start (p < 0.05). A positive psychosocial impact of the exoskeleton was reported and the satisfaction with the device was good, with best ratings in safety (participants), weight (therapists), durability and dimensions (both). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results prove the feasibility of safe gait training with the ABLE Exoskeleton in hospital settings for persons with SCI, with improved clinical outcomes after training. Our study protocol allowed for consistent comparison of the results with other exoskeleton trials and can serve as a future framework towards the standardisation of early clinical evaluations. Trial Registration https://trialsearch.who.int/ , DRKS00023503, retrospectively registered on November 18, 2020.

Falls During Inpatient Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury: Characterization, Clock-Hour Visualization, and Time to Event Predictors.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) determine fall characteristics (eg, cause, location, witnesses) of inpatients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and whether they were different for ambulatory persons vs wheelchair users; (2) visualize the total number of daily falls per clock-hour for different inpatients' features (eg, cause of injury, age); (3) compare clinical and demographic characteristics of inpatients who experienced a first fall event vs inpatients who did not experience such event; and (4) identify first fall event predictors. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Institution for inpatient neurologic rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with SCI (N=1294) admitted to a rehabilitation facility between 2005 and 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional independence measure (FIM), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) at admission. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS: A total of 502 fall events were experienced by 369 ambulatory inpatients (19.8%) and wheelchair users (80.2%) in 63.9% of cases being alone, with cause, situation, and location significantly different in both groups. Clock-hour visualizations revealed an absolute peak at 12 AM (complete or incomplete injuries, with paraplegia or tetraplegia) but a relative peak at 9 AM mainly including incomplete patients with paraplegia. Of the (n=1294) included patients, 16.8% experienced at least 1 fall. Fallen patients reported higher levels of HADS depression, lower total SCIM, and longer time since injury to admission, with no differences in age, sex, educational level, FIM (quasi-significant), and AIS grade. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards identified time since injury to admission and AIS grade D as significant predictors of first fall event. CONCLUSIONS: Falls identification, characterization, and clock-hour visualization can support decisions for mitigation strategies specifically addressed to inpatients with SCI. Fall predictors were identified as a first step for future research.

Clinical Prediction Rule Validation for Ambulation Outcome After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in a Spanish Population.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the ability to walk after traumatic spinal cord injury is of utmost importance in the clinical setting. Nevertheless, only a small fraction of predictive models are evaluated on their performance by other authors using external data. The Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule for long-term walking ability was developed and validated using neurological assessments performed within 15 days postinjury. However, in reality, this assessment is most often performed between 11 and 55 days. When considering a longer time from injury to neurological assessments, the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule has only been externally validated for patients after non-traumatic spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to validate the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule with neurological assessment performed within 3-90 days after traumatic spinal cord injury, using (a) the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule logistic regression coefficients (Equation 1); (b) the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule weighted coefficients (Equation 2); and (c) the reestimated (using a Spanish population) weighted coefficients (Equation 3). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective (STROBE-compliant) study involving 298 adults with traumatic spinal cord injury admitted to a hospital between 2010 and 2019 in Spain. The Spinal Cord Independence Measure item-12 was used for walking assessment. RESULTS: Using Equation 1, the model yielded 86.2% overall classification accuracy, 94.5% sensitivity, and 83.4% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.939, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.915-0.965; p < .001).Using Equation 2 yielded 86.2% overall classification accuracy, 93.2% sensitivity, and 83.9% specificity (AUC = 0.9392, 95% CI: 0.914-0.964; p < .001).Using Equation 3 yielded 86.9% overall classification accuracy, 68.9% sensitivity, and 92.8% specificity (AUC = 0.939, 95% CI: 0.914-0.964; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the Dutch Clinical Prediction Rule in a Spanish traumatic spinal cord injury population with assessments performed up to 90 days postinjury with similar performance, using the original coefficients and including a reestimation of the coefficients.

The impact of COVID-19 on community integration, quality of life, depression and anxiety in people with chronic spinal cord injury.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Compare community integration, quality of life, anxiety and depression of people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) living in the community before the outbreak of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 disease (COVID-19) and during it. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: In-person follow-up visits (before COVID-19 outbreak) to a rehabilitation hospital in Spain and on-line during COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Community dwelling adults (≥ 18 years) with chronic SCI. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) were compared using the Wilcoxon ranked test or paired t-test when appropriate. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy five people with SCI assessed on-line between June 2020 and November 2020 were compared to their own assessments before COVID-19. Participants reported significantly decreased Social Integration during COVID-19 compared to pre-pandemic scores (P = 0.037), with a small effect size (d = -0.15). Depression (measured using HADS) was significantly higher than before COVID-19 (P < 0.001) with a moderate effect size (d = -0.29). No significant differences were found in any of the 4 WHOQOL-BREF dimensions (Physical, Psychological, Social and Environmental).Nevertheless, when all participants were stratified in two groups according to their age at on-line assessment, the younger group (19-54 years, N = 85) scored lower during COVID-19 than before, in WHOQOL-BREF Physical (P = 0.004), (d = -0.30) and Psychological dimensions (P = 0.007) (d = -0.29). The older group (55-88 years, N = 0) reported no significant differences in any dimension. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 impacted HADS' depression and CIQ's social integration. Participants younger than 55 years were impacted in WHOQOL-BREF's physical and psychological dimensions, meanwhile participants older than 55, were not.