Efficacy and safety of combined Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multicenter cohort study.

Purpose: To conduct a real-world evaluation of the efficacy and safety of combined Chinese and Western medicine in treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods: A multicenter, prospective cohort study design was employed, enrolling 450 KOA patients (Kellgren-Lawrence score of 3 or less). The patients were divided into a Western medicine treatment group (WM group) and a combined Western and traditional Chinese medicine treatment group (WM-CM group). A 6-week treatment plan was administered, and follow-up visits occurred at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after initiating treatment. The primary outcome indicator was the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score after 6 weeks of treatment. Secondary outcome indicators included WOMAC subscales for pain, stiffness, and joint function, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), and clinical effectiveness. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was used as a safety evaluation indicator. Results: A total of 419 patients were included in the final analysis: 98 in the WM group and 321 in the WM-CM group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable, except for the incidence of stiffness symptoms and stiffness scores. After 6 weeks of treatment, the WM-CM group exhibited superior results to the WM group in improving the total WOMAC score (24.71 ± 1.38 vs. 16.36 ± 0.62, p < 0.001). The WM-CM group also outperformed the WM group in WOMAC pain and joint function scores, VAS score, PCS score, MCS score, and clinical effectiveness (p < 0.05), which was consistent with the findings of the main evaluation index. Subgroup analysis indicated that the combined Chinese and Western medicine treatment showed more pronounced benefits in patients under 65 years of age and in those with a Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification of 0-I. Throughout the study, no adverse effects were observed in either group. Conclusion: The combination of Chinese and Western medicine demonstrated superiority over Western medicine alone in relieving knee pain symptoms, improving knee function, and enhancing the quality of life for KOA patients with a K-L score of 3 or less. Moreover, the treatment exhibited a good safety profile. Clinical Trial Registration: (https://www.chictr.org.cn/), identifier (ChiCTR1900027175).

Factors influencing clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal ranibizumab: comparison between responder and non-responder cases.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the leading cause of visual impairment in patients with diabetes mellitus. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the factors influencing the clinical outcomes in 73 patients (94 eyes) with DME treated with intravitreal ranibizumab therapy. Baseline demographic, systemic, and ocular data were assessed for the association with visual and anatomic outcomes after treatment. The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved from 0.92 ± 0.45 to 0.61 ± 0.43 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) (p < 0.001) after treatment. The mean central subfield macular thickness (CST) decreased from 425.2 ± 127.4 to 328.6 ± 99.4 µm (p < 0.001). The treatment response was significantly influenced by Age (p = 0.003) and baseline BCVA (p = 0.001). In addition, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (p = 0.013) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (p = 0.019) were the prognostic factors for the visual outcome in the responders and non-responders, respectively. Moreover, baseline CST was the strongest predictor of anatomic outcome in all subjects (p < 0.001). Intravitreal ranibizumab for DME resulted in significant improvement in clinical outcomes. Younger age and better baseline BCVA were associated with better visual outcome after the treatment. In addition, glycemic control in the treatment of patients with DME is crucial to achieve better visual outcomes, especially in the responders to ranibizumab treatment.

Antitumor activity of pluripotent cell-engineered vaccines and their potential to treat lung cancer in relation to different levels of irradiation.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are critical for tumor initiation/maintenance and recurrence or metastasis, so they may serve as a potential therapeutic target. However, CSC-established multitherapy resistance and immune tolerance render tumors resistant to current tumor-targeted strategies. To address this, renewable multiepitope-integrated spheroids based on placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells (pMSCs) were X-ray-modified, at four different irradiation levels, including 80, 160, 240, and 320 Gy, as pluripotent biologics, to inoculate hosts bearing Lewis lung carcinoma (LL2) and compared with X-ray-modified common LL2 cells as control. We show that the vaccines at the 160/240 Gy irradiation levels could rapidly trigger tumor cells into the apoptosis loop and evidently prolong the tumor-bearing host's survival cycle, in contrast to vaccines irradiated at other levels (P<0.05), with tumor-sustaining stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 pathway being selectively blockaded. Meanwhile, almost no or minimal toxicity was detected in the vaccinated hosts. Importantly, 160/240 Gy-irradiated vaccines could provoke significantly higher killing of CSCs and non-CSCs, which may provide an access to developing a novel biotherapy against lung carcinoma.